[deleted]

You missed last weeks posts about the UK's Jimmy Savile?

When you have to specifically reference a single week old thread - that's the point that they are trying to make.

Just when the waves of paranoia and stupidity seemed too much for me to stay subscribed in /r/conspiracy an actual interesting post appears.

Edit: after reading the article in question I fail to see the connection between the murders and the article. I think the article is a form of publicity for the law firm that wrote it, look at the language in the article: capitalists comrades, Banksters, racketeering, etc. I do not think this type of language is necessary if the case were real, but it is necessary if this is a PR stunt (because you need to get people heated up). The murders were very tragic, but I think the mother walked in on the nanny slitting her own throat so we know she did it.

I do not think this type of language is necessary if the case were real, but it is necessary if this is a PR stunt (because you need to get people heated up).

Well, it's a real lawsuit, but I don't think they believe they could actually win it. What they can do, however, is charge each of the plaintiffs thousands of dollars in legal fees. The more publicity, the more plaintiffs they get.

The law firm (Spire Law) used to be called Mitchell J. Stein & Associates, but Mitchell J. Stein is no longer eligble to practice law in California. The California Attorney General and State Bar shut him and 3 other attorneys down: “The number of lawyers who have tried to take advantage of distressed homeowners in these tough economic times is nothing short of shocking.”

Here's a blog post from April from someone who thought their earlier lawsuit (in state court) was great until she contacted them: “It seems they want $10,000 to $18,000 from anyone who wants to join the suit.”

If you can provide a link to the complaint you will be my hero. (I've tried, no luck on any free service.)

For the suit filed in NY state court: http://www.msfraud.org/law/lounge/Abeel-v-Bank-of-America-etal-trillions_4-12.pdf

If you skip the 350 pages of plaintiffs and defendants, you finally get to some claims.

You are an officer and a gentleman, thank you very much.

I do not think this type of language is necessary if the case were real, but it is necessary if this is a PR stunt (because you need to get people heated up)

This was the first thing I thought when I saw this a couple of hours ago, nice to know someone else's spidey senses were tingling.

its been worse than GLP lately

I used to lurk there all the time (mostly for laughs, as the majority of the people there are imbeciles), and now I've been IP banned for 5 months. Haven't even left a single comment there.

Same thing here! I never posted but was IP banned; upon appeal, the ban stood but they helpfully suggested I could circumvent the whole thing by paying to become a Premium level asshole or some such enticement

I've never been to the site, so I just checked it out.
Already IP banned.

Any sources on the mother walking in on the nanny?

Yeah, I don't think that's a real article.

Definitely a refreshing post.

Got called a dirty zionist jew last week for asking for more information on a posted video.

Surprise the CNBC link doesn't link the story anymore...could you find another link for it please?

Actually, the wall street journal still has it here.

It is copyrighted so I don't want to paste the whole text in. Here are a few interesting parts:

NEW YORK, Oct. 25, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Spire Law Group, LLP's national home owners' lawsuit, pending in the venue where the "Banksters" control their $43 trillion racketeering scheme (New York) - known as the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History and identifying $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money by the "Banksters" and their U.S. racketeering partners and joint venturers - now pinpoints the identities of the key racketeering partners of the "Banksters" located in the highest offices of government and acting for their own self-interests.

and

The complaint - which has now been fully served on thousands of the "Banksters and their Co-Conspirators" - makes it irrefutable that the epicenter of this laundering and racketeering enterprise has been and continues to be Wall Street and continues to involve the very "Banksters" located there who have repeatedly asked in the past to be "bailed out" and to be "bailed out" in the future.

It's your duty to violate copyright law at every opportunity.

Right on. I think this will make a lot more people wake up.

Raise the Jolly Roger. Here be kenny-rogers, and he be a Pirate. ARRRGGGHHHH.

Edit: I do agree with you actually. Human nature is itself, mimicry.

Absolutely all progress works on the basis of copying with interference: biology, natural language, computer languages, computer software, all mechanical devices, all teachings, mother to daughter, everything. The corporate-state is the corporate-state because it works against change. Fuck the state, favour dynamics. Some one get me a soapbox.

Here, have mine. :)

That's how I look at it.

Any law suite that refers to the defendant as "banksters" will be laughed out of court...

...the bar for filing legal paperwork really isn't that high at the end of the day. Hell, a well executed press release costs more.

So long as a link is provided it falls under fair use.

[deleted]

Brilliant, thank you! Keep up the good work!

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/major-banks-governmental-officials-and-their-comrade-capitalists-targets-of-spire-law-group-llps-racketeering-and-money-laundering-lawsuit-seeking-return-of-43-trillion-to-the-united-states-treasury-2012-10-25

I dunno, does CNBC usually have articles with this kind of language? Mainstream outlets like CNBC don't typically refer to "banksters".

It wasn't written by a journalist but published as a press release. CNBC didn't have anything to do with the writing, but I would assume they do not just publish every PR they receive. There are editors who choose which releases should go live on the site. And this one in particular has gotten a lot of attention in the past couple of days...

Press releases are press releases. There are a lot of bullshit 'articles' circulated all over Reddit that look to be from generally well regarded sources (Reuters, NBC, NYT. etc) that are nothing more than press releases put up on the internet through a source in an attempt to make them look legit.

At the bottom of the article, "SOURCE Spire Law Group, LLP." I don't think CNBC wrote this. It's from the Spire Law Group. CNBC just published it.

I find it hard to believe a law firm would put out a press release that badly written. It makes me think someone else wrote the release and paid PR Newswire to release it, wanting to help publicize was Spire is doing.

Spire Law Group has been operating for over 200 years. Thought that was pretty cool.

The Firm is comprised of lawyers nationally with more than 250-years of experience in a span of matters

That could mean that they have 25 lawyers with 10 years of experience apiece. Also, they are shitty writers and their website screams Alex Jones / Personal Injury Lawyers.

Better Call Saul!

Saul Goodman= It's all Good man

The Spire Law Group's website is pretty damn sketchy. No list of their offices or the attorneys who work with them. The site is really poorly designed for a "national" law firm and they claim to be able to handle pretty much every type of legal matter, from divorce to trademark law to M&A. Would love some legit large scale lawsuits against the big banks, but this firm seems like BS to me. They would never be able to roll with the big firms the banks hire.

its on pr newswire and they automatically submit all pr statements to academic databases, why didnt they automatically add them?

Here's a screenshot of the article which is now removed.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/CNBCvanishedarticleSpire.jpg

cached mirror: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=http%3a%2f%2fwww.cnbc.com%2fid%2f49555671%2f&d=27022789364354710&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=507a8a4e,11426219

Exactly my thinking. Time will tell.

The law suit may be true but the verbage is not how these reporters normally speak. Granted the mans children are dead and this should not be taken lightly but if marketwatch is reporting it also and no one there is dying shouldn't we be a but dismissive about the link to the CNBC Exec? lets use common sense here

I agree with you. It's horrible what happened to his kids. Hopefully it's just coincidence. I just find it strange that CNBC took the link down.

I wanna know the time frame, of course if he was the first that is pretty damning but if this was secondary to PRNnewswire then the conspiracy position is suspect

This seems to be a copy: http://pastebin.com/4xXydk36

And if it is it's bullshit. It just names Obama, Holder, etc, and none of the bankers and republicans involved.

Oct. 25, 2012, 2:09 p.m. EDT

Major Banks, Governmental Officials and Their Comrade Capitalists Targets of Spire Law Group, LLP's Racketeering and Money Laundering Lawsuit Seeking Return of $43 Trillion to the United States Treasury

NEW YORK, Oct. 25, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Spire Law Group, LLP's national home owners' lawsuit, pending in the venue where the "Banksters" control their $43 trillion racketeering scheme (New York) - known as the largest money laundering and racketeering lawsuit in United States History and identifying $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money by the "Banksters" and their U.S. racketeering partners and joint venturers - now pinpoints the identities of the key racketeering partners of the "Banksters" located in the highest offices of government and acting for their own self-interests.

In connection with the federal lawsuit now impending in the United States District Court in Brooklyn, New York (Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML) - involving, among other things, a request that the District Court enjoin all mortgage foreclosures by the Banksters nationwide, unless and until the entire $43 trillion is repaid to a court-appointed receiver - Plaintiffs now establish the location of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) of laundered money in a racketeering enterprise participated in by the following individuals (without limitation): Attorney General Holder acting in his individual capacity, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, the brother in law of Defendant California Attorney General Kamala Harris (both acting in their individual capacities), Jon Corzine (former New Jersey Governor), Robert Rubin (former Treasury Secretary and Bankster), Timothy Geitner, Treasury Secretary (acting in his individual capacity), Vikram Pandit (recently resigned and disgraced Chairman of the Board of Citigroup), Valerie Jarrett (a Senior White House Advisor), Anita Dunn (a former "communications director" for the Obama Administration), Robert Bauer (husband of Anita Dunn and Chief Legal Counsel for the Obama Re-election Campaign), as well as the "Banksters" themselves, and their affiliates and conduits. The lawsuit alleges serial violations of the United States Patriot Act, the Policy of Embargo Against Iran and Countries Hostile to the Foreign Policy of the United States, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (commonly known as the RICO statute) and other State and Federal laws.

In the District Court lawsuit, Spire Law Group, LLP -- on behalf of home owner across the Country and New York taxpayers, as well as under other taxpayer recompense laws -- has expanded its mass tort action into federal court in Brooklyn, New York, seeking to halt all foreclosures nationwide pending the return of the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000.00) by the "Banksters" and their co-conspirators, seeking an audit of the Fed and audits of all the "bailout programs" by an independent receiver such as Neil Barofsky, former Inspector General of the TARP program who has stated that none of the TARP money and other "bailout money" advanced from the Treasury has ever been repaid despite protestations to the contrary by the Defendants as well as similar protestations by President Obama and the Obama Administration both publicly on national television and more privately to the United States Congress. Because the Obama Administration has failed to pursue any of the "Banksters" criminally, and indeed is actively borrowing monies for Mr. Obama's campaign from these same "Banksters" to finance its political aspirations, the national group of plaintiff home owners has been forced to now expand its lawsuit to include racketeering, money laundering and intentional violations of the Iranian Nations Sanctions and Embargo Act by the national banks included among the "Bankster" Defendants.

The complaint - which has now been fully served on thousands of the "Banksters and their Co-Conspirators" - makes it irrefutable that the epicenter of this laundering and racketeering enterprise has been and continues to be Wall Street and continues to involve the very "Banksters" located there who have repeatedly asked in the past to be "bailed out" and to be "bailed out" in the future.

The Havens for the money laundering schemes - and certain of the names and places of these entities - are located in such venues as Switzerland, the Isle of Man, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Cypress and entities controlled by governments adverse to the interests of the United States Sanctions and Embargo Act against Iran, and are also identified in both the United Nations and the U.S. Senate's recent reports on international money laundering. Many of these entities have already been personally served with summons and process of the complaint during the last six months. It is now beyond dispute that, while the Obama Administration was publicly encouraging loan modifications for home owners by "Banksters", it was privately ratifying the formation of these shell companies in violation of the United States Patriot Act, and State and Federal law. The case further alleges that through these obscure foreign companies, Bank of America, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo Bank, Citibank, Citigroup, One West Bank, and numerous other federally chartered banks stole trillions of dollars of home owners' and taxpayers' money during the last decade and then laundered it through offshore companies.

This District Court Complaint - maintained by Spire Law Group, LLP -- is the only lawsuit in the world listing as Defendants the Banksters, let alone serving all of such Banksters with legal process and therefore forcing them to finally answer the charges in court. Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, nor the Office of the Attorney General, nor any State Attorney General has sued the Banksters and thereby legally chased them worldwide to recover-back the $43 trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) and other lawful damages, injunctive relief and other legal remedies.

James N. Fiedler, Managing Partner of Spire Law Group, LLP, stated: "It is hard for me to believe as a 47-year lawyer that our nation's guardians have been unwilling to stop this theft. Spire Law Group, LLP stands for the elimination of corruption and implementation of lawful strategies, and that is what we're doing here. Spire Law Group, LLP's charter is to not allow such corruption to go unanswered."

Comments were requested from the Attorney Generals' offices in NY, CA, NV, NH , OH, MA and the White House, but no comment was provided.

About Spire Law Group

Spire Law Group, LLP is a national law firm whose motto is "the public should be protected -- at all costs -- from corruption in whatever form it presents itself." The Firm is comprised of lawyers nationally with more than 250-years of experience in a span of matters ranging from representing large corporations and wealthy individuals, to also representing the masses. The Firm is at the front lines litigating against government officials, banks, defunct loan pools, and now the very offshore entities where the corruption was enabled and perpetrated.

Contact: James N. Fiedler877-438-8766 http://spire-law.com

So the Bush administration wasn't involved. No Republican was involved.

So it's just some kind of republican hoax.

Not that I don't believe that the wealthy have stolen from us. But this article...bs

You can call bullshit, but the article existed.

http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=http%3a%2f%2fwww.cnbc.com%2fid%2f49555671%2f&d=27022789364354710&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=507a8a4e,11426219

It might be not credible at all, but do coincidences like this really happen on this Earth?

Yeah, it existed. But probably only as a way to attack the Obama administration. Not as a real article.

Lol it existed, but not anymore. Links dead :(

I thought so too, until I found this sentence:

as well as the "Banksters" themselves, and their affiliates and conduits.

Always unnamed.

Well, they could face retribution in the form of violence if they are named. Innocent until proven poor.

Names Holder, Geithner, and JP Morgan Chase

The only actual human beings named are democrats despite this being done during the Bush administration.

Yes, story is gone. Can anyone find the story elsewhere?

http://i.imgur.com/dWofr.jpg

It's not in the google cache either. I don't know what the cnbc story had but I found the the PRNewswire story here and here.

Back up everyone. The lawsuit is real and the double murder is real, but this "connection" between them is probably spurious. Since nobody can find any evidence of the CNBC report, perhaps we have to conclude that this story was never actually printed by CNBC?

The "link" to the double murder has therefore been made up by the OP to draw more attention to this lawsuit. The intention may be commendable, but the method is somewhat distasteful.

Keep intentionally looking the other way, maybe nothing is going on...ಠ_ಠ

The "link" to the double murder has therefore been made up by the OP to draw more attention to this lawsuit. The intention may be commendable, but the method is somewhat distasteful.

you know it was made up how? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

At this points its just one persons word against another.

Very true

If someone can provide a link, a screenshot, a cache of the supposed CNBC story, or a reference by another news source citing CNBC as a source of the story, then I will gladly upgrade my OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT of the link between the double murder and the lawsuit from "spurious" to "tenuous".

http://i.imgur.com/AslHQ.png

Seems legit!

Connection between the double murder and the lawsuit now upgraded to "tenuous".

Has the Wall Street Journal web editor's children been murdered as well?

Making the words OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT all capitals does not mean your assessment was objective.

This does not sound very objective

The "link" to the double murder has therefore been made up by the OP to draw more attention to this lawsuit. The intention may be commendable, but the method is somewhat distasteful.

You are correct that this was my subjective interpretation of the MOTIVES of the OP, but this is secondary and pursuant to the fact the absence of evidence of the story CAN be objectively assessed.

There is no objective evidence that CNBC ran this story is there?

http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=http%3a%2f%2fwww.cnbc.com%2fid%2f49555671%2f&d=27022789364354710&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=507a8a4e,11426219

This link was posted below an hour ago. You suck at thread comprehension.

Well said

By this logic, anybody that has had a negative story posted on CNBC's web site is a suspect.

It looks like someone may have. Is this Photoshopped?

Most people here seem to think it's genuine, and I am not arguing the case anymore.

However, I do think that anyone suggesting the mere existence of this webpage caused a double child murder of an executive in the company that published it, needs their bullshit-o-meter recalibrated.

The CNBC "report" was just regurgitation of a press release. My guess is if the CNBC's kids got whacked for a reason, this press release was not it.

[deleted]

A truly idiotic comment, bearing in mind how easy it is to check my 5+ year reddit history. Muppet.

I agree, why would they (who?) kill his children? Seems like just a coincidence.

Damn. Well, that explains a lot.

Of course they would kill for 43 trillion, kill anyone, everyone. I can't understand why we don't kill them back.

How much is your family worth? How much are you worth?

Deep question.

I would guess you can get a proper hitman for:
One adult 50k. One child 100k.

Whats an starving african child far far away worth ? What would you pay to keep him alive ? 20 Bucks, 100, 1000 ?

I thought chidren would come at discount because they are smaller.

Yeah, but i think they are harder to hit ... and ethical issues ;-)

that seems a little low, what with all the inflation.

10k was enough to hire an adult hit in this case: (http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Two-charged-in-Pierce-County-murder-for-hire-plot-166048756.html)

9k in silver bars for this one: (http://www.kcbd.com/story/19033838/two-suspects-arrested-in-connection-with-covenant-doctors-death)

I did find another example on-line that was 35k, but I just think that person didn't know the market.

If you kill me I swear I'll kill you back!

But what good does killing his family do? If this was a conspiracy the actors would have to know this wouldn't quiet a story involving a $43 Trillion lawsuit. It would actually increase attention to it. Moreover, I really fell a lawsuit of this magnitude is something of a strike suit because the amount is almost too preposterous.

What good does it do? How about letting all the other News Executives know if they pull the same shit, their families are going to get suicided. You dont ever directly hurt the people who 'hurt' you. You hurt the things they love.

First off, this $43 Trillion dollar number is made up. It's greater than the entire worlds GDP. You can't launder that. Second, even if this somehow happened killing the family of a web site manager would be the last person you would want to take out.

Why? Wouldn't it 'send a message' to other news website managers?

But sending a message doesn't change the fact that they're being sued and its public record. Plus by killing his family they would have known his work life would be highlighted including the story. This is a ridiculous suit and if the federal government and all of Wall st. had really managed to steal more money than the entire world is worth don't you think they'd have a better execution than this? Also, who the fuck cares, just buy off a judge and/or jury.

It doesnt need to change the fact they are being sued. What they dont need is public scrutiny. Keep this trial out of the eyes of the public, and maybe they could pay off a judge. But if the whole world is watching, paying off that judge is going to be a lot harder, and now any judgement by that judge is going to be scrutinized. Its about staying in the shadows.

"had really managed to steal more money than the entire world is worth don't you think they'd have a better execution than this?"

They had great execution. They had the wife say she saw her slit her own throat. All the news press is already blaming the nanny without hearing a single word from her. The only part where the hitman fucked up was leaving the nanny for dead. They broke her vertabrae, slit her wrist and throat and left her for dead. But she survived. I can only guess the next move is to tell the nanny to confess or her family is going to be wiped out.

I wouldn't be surprised if a little drug called scopolamine was involved here.

every now and then, a collection of seemingly unrelated events occur...

One must ask questions.

I saw this nanny murder on the news this morning and knew it seemed really out of place...

Especially considering the nanny hasn't been charged yet. Apparently she was set up.

Hmmm, I seem to remember hearing the nanny story like, 2 days ago.... there were reddit posts about 'all i wanted to do was read the news, nanny kills 2 kids, fuck me right' and so on.

Do you have any idea how hard it is to slit your own throat? That kind of crazy is there from birth and needs a boatload of lithium and leather straps. It doesn't just spring from mild depression.

I bet the nanny was stabbed while defending the kids, then left near them with a knife to make it look like she did it.

[deleted]

Yes it did. But it also reports;

"Music therapist Rima Starr, who lives on the same floor as the family, said she heard screams coming from their apartment at around 5:30 p.m.

"There was some kind of screaming about, `You slit her throat!' It was horrible," she said."

WTF???

We could use occam's razor, but if i want some one shut up, i know the simple way to deny testimony.

There was a debate in the house of lords (U.K) in Feb'2012 about 16 trill in USD moving unsanctioned through several British state owned banks they hinted that the US was behind the transfers, the investigation is still ongoing.

EDIT: Swapped out the video for a better quality one (The original)

I don't see the connection with the current story, but anyway, this is bunk.

Here's a transcript of David James' remarks.. If you can't tell just by the ridiculousness of it that it's a story made up by scammers, just google the name "Yohannes Riyadi". The Federal Reserve warned about it 4½ years before James' speech. This isn't the first time that Lord James has gone on about obvious fraud. He also made a speech in 2010 about another scheme. He is just the kind of senior citizen that Nigerian princes want to benefit with their inheritance.

http://www.ny.frb.org/banking/FRBNY_archived_fraud_alerts.html

Scam Involving Yohannes Riyadi and/or Wilfredo Saurin November 2007

The Federal Reserve is aware of a fraudulent scam involving individuals using the names Yohannes Riyadi and/or Wilfredo Saurin, or persons claiming to be representatives of these two men. In a typical version of this scam, Mr. Riyadi and/or his delegates falsely claim that they have on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York several U.S. Treasury Checks issued to Mr. Riyadi amounting to billions of dollars.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has been contacted by several brokers and financial institutions worldwide inquiring about the validity of this fraudulent account documentation, which is being offered as collateral for lines of credit or other types of asset based financing. The fraudulent scheme includes multiple documents which purport to have the signatures of various Federal Reserve officials, including Chairman Ben Bernanke.

In some instances, individuals involved in this fraudulent scheme claim to have met with Federal Reserve officials and claim to have verified that the alleged account is in order. We have also learned that the fraud may include the purchase of certain documents by the introducing brokers.

If you have information regarding this fraud please contact either Robert Amenta, Special Investigator at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or Erik Rosenblatt, Senior Special Agent at the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

No idea why you're getting downvoted; you're perfectly correct.

Last I heard the feds had arrested Riyadi in Cambodia or somewhere too. These are completely separate stories. Let's not tangle conspiracies together, guys.

http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=http%3a%2f%2fwww.cnbc.com%2fid%2f49555671%2f&d=27022789364354710&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=507a8a4e,11426219

Bing cached it (for now).

Here's a pastebin with the text.

http://pastebin.com/AyhiinKQ

Here's one with the HTML

http://pastebin.com/mp15xtCn

Sounds odd as hell. And by pulling the actual story, they're only attracting more curiosity.

Spread the curiosity. "If you have nothing to hide., you have nothing to fear" DHS.

[deleted]

[deleted]

He didn't use "/s" tag, so many redditors don't get it.

I kinda feel like, innocent people are dead. it's not that funny because honestly this probably won't be talked about much. there really should be a full investigation into this beyond "the nanny did it case closed".

As far as I can tell, the $43 trillion figure is supposed to represent the sum of all mortgages issued in the US. The lawsuit basically alleges that every outstanding mortgage is fraudulent. While I think this is ridiculous, the problems with robosigning and predatory lending are well documented, and the dollar value of the mortgages that could legitimately be challenged probably is in the trillions.

i believe the reason these mortgages are fraudulent is because they were made by "making up" the money in a bank account, and the account/money never really existed. there are a few laws that say you can not loan something you do not own personally. so all of the people who took out these loans, may be able to get their money back, if the bank can't prove that they held these funds prior to the loans.

Good! The banks suck up wealth by foreclosing on home owners. Lets give the wealth of the land back to its people in America. Not some Non-national central banking industry.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/british-oil-executive-murdered-brussels-street-035624517.html

How is this tied to this case? Thank you

Lol the nanny is not dead ? The article says she stabbed herself ? What ? If i saw two dead children and a woman, the children stabbed to death, the nanny stabbed to critical condition, i would assume someone ELSE stabbed all three...

Do you think that all people who get stabbed die?

?

Nope, but if i was a nanny which stabbed two children to death, i wouldn't try to suicide stab me and *fail. I would just cut both of my wrists and lay down.

What i wanted to say was, that it seems that the nanny was stabbed by the same non-nanny person who stabbed the children. And this person failed to kill her, which is pretty unprofessional for this amount of money we are talking about. theferore the "lol the nanny is not dead?" ;-)

But the media reports, before any investigation, that the nanny killed the children ... thats strange in my eyes.

The nanny slit her wrists and stabbed herself in the neck.

but if i was a nanny which stabbed two children to death,

Well, you aren't. How would you know what goes on the the mind of someone who just slaughtered two little girls?

I get your point, but if the nanny did it (which i doubt, because she got stabbed too) why would she stab herself ? Suicide ? Who stabs himselves for suicide ?

My point was, that its strange that the only stabbed survivor is automatically the killer.

But i still don't get your first comment:

Do you think that all people who get stabbed die?

why would she stab herself

How would I know? I don't know what murderers think.

But i still don't get your first comment:

I as referring to this:

Lol the nanny is not dead ?

[deleted]

Jfk didn't decide to put an end to the Federal Reserve....

he was trying to pass legislation that stopped them from printing the money, IE making the federal reserve obsolete.

I'm going to need a viable source for that please.

hold on let me search all of these documents written in america...

no seriously though. a viable source? define viable?

CNN? CNBC? ABC? NBC? WIKIPEDIA? what's viable to you bud?

you don't NEED a viable source. you are simply choosing not to believe. there are hundreds of sources on this, do a simple google.

You shouldn't get all bent out of shape and defensive just because someone asks you to back your shit up. It looks like you need to do a little more research on the topic. JFK already had his ducks lined up as far as legislation was concerned. You're thinking of Executive Order 11110. If you're going to be an ass to people online and accuse them of "choosing not to believe" then you'd better be sure you've done your homework. What do you think JFK's next move would have been to transfer power from the Federal Reserve to the Treasury Department?

because someone asks you to back your shit up

It's public record, surely he can open a tab and type shit into google..

The burden of evidence is on the one making the claim. And it's common courtesy to provide sources when asked.

Then he would find that kylefall is talking out of his ass, just as I explained in my previous response. Perhaps he already knew this and wanted to give kylefall a chance to explain himself.

Your post is like the exact opposite of a reaction you should have when someone asks for a source.

My point was that typical "viable sources" are actually the opposite of that. No matter what source I provide he can react the same way.

Do I need a specific source for the fact that he was assassinated too, just because someone doubts me? NO. ANYONE, and I mean ANYONE who is truly educated on the subject knows the truth. Anyone who is oblivious to it, who truly wants to find out will find out on their own. There is no such a thing as education other than self education, and this dude doesn't believe anyway so why the hell should I give him a source he's simply going to try and discredit? It's not a conspiracy it's a fact. I don't need to prove anything. THE SKY IS BLUE.

either way just so you can sleep at night i will do so below

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=59049&st=&st1=

that .edu link probably isn't legit ;) so i included a plethora of the sources listed on wikipedia. i could probably post a thousand fucking links, that's not the point.

Just like everything in life such as Osama , Hussein, 9/11, Israel, Monsanto, JFK or anything else. All the blatant facts and truth are plastered everywhere. I could source in and out all day every day and people would just discredit out of disbelief.

The issue is that most people aren't intelligent to process reality since they have been brainwashed not to since they were in diapers watching Disney cartoons they feel as adults they are unaffected by.

People discredit the CNBC murders yesterday as related. People do not want to accept that we are being slaughtered like cattle. Especially the intelligent people but it's the truth. You think JFK is different? You think the president of the USA makes the decisions? Like my god people. Why do you even frequent this subreddit.

^ "New Kennedy Silver Policy". Southeast Missourian. AP: p. 8. November 28, 1961. ^ "Silver Sale by Treasury Ended; President Seeks Support Repeal". New York Times: p. 1. November 29, 1961. ^ Economic Report of the President, p. XXIII. January 21, 1963. House document No. 28, 88th Congress, 1st Session. U.S. Govt. Printing Office. ^ Silver Legislation, April 3, 1963, House of Representatives Report No. 183, 88th Congress, 1st Session. ^ "Silver Act Repeal Plan Wins House Approval". New York Times. April 11, 1963. ^ "House Passes Silver Bill By 251-122". St. Petersburg Times. AP: p. 2A. April 11, 1963. ^ "Senate Votes End to Silver Backing". New York Times. May 24, 1963. ^ "Senate Okays Replacement of Silver Notes". Deseret News and Telegram. UPI: p. 2A. May 23, 1963. ^ "Kennedy Signs Silver Bill". Spokane Daily Chronicle. AP: p. 62. June 6, 1963. ^ "Bill to Release Silver Is Signed by President". New York Times. June 6, 1963. ^ Public Law 88-36, 77 Stat. 54, United States Statutes at Large, Vol. 77 (1963), p. 54, U.S. Govt. Printing Office. ^ a b Flaherty, Edward (September 4, 2000). "Myth #9: President Kennedy was assassinated because he tried to usurp the Federal Reserve's power. Executive Order 11110 proves it.". Debunking the Federal Reserve Conspiracy Theories (Political Research Associates). Retrieved December 7, 2009. ^ Text of Executive Order 11110 at The American Presidency Project ^ Text of Executive Order 12608 ^ Marrs, Jim (1989). Crossfire: The Plot that Killed Kennedy. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-88184-524-2. ^ Woodward, G. Thomas (1996). Money and the Federal Reserve System: Myth and Reality - CRS Report for Congress, No. 96-672 E. Congressional Research Service.; reprinted with footnotes in George B. Grey, ed. (2002). Federal Reserve System: background, analyses and bibliography. Nova Science. pp. 73–102. ISBN 978-1-59033-053-1.

I've done my research. The only thing supporting the conspiracy is books written by conspiracy theorists.

Google the EO JFK would signed about silver certificates, that's a good rabbit hole.

Rabbit hole? It looks like this conspiracy holds no weight. Mostly just blogs.

In fact it seems to not hold any merit at all. http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/weberman/jfk.htm

look up "executive order 11110"

I've read the order. It didn't do anything to stop the Federal Reserve...

Right, he was assassinated before he could do anything with it. He signed the order and less than 3 months later JFK was dead. AFAIK the order is still there, it hasnt been cancelled formally.

There was nothing do do with it because it was just an edit to a pre-existing executive order and all it did, if anything, was give more power to the Federal Reserve. This stuff is on Wikipedia it's not like it's hard to find.

How does it give more power to the Federal Reserve?

I read wikipedia too and it didnt say that. Nice try.

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/weberman/jfk.htm

The purpose of the order was to facilitate the reduction of certificates in circulation, not to increase them.

Uncited conjecture.

But the conspiracy theory book with no factual evidence is better?

You think "Executive order 11110" is a conspiracy theory?

Interesting.....

Have you read the order?!

I can copy and paste too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_11110#Conspiracy_theory

It's a debunked conspiracy theory.

Seriously, I love a good conspiracy but this subreddit seems to circlejerk to blatant lies.

Thats interesting that you didnt link to the order itself, and instead linked to someone talking about the order.

Is it so hard to copy/paste the actual order? Here you go, I'll do it for you since you seem to lack the ability.

SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 9, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j):

'(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821(b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of an outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption,' and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof.

SECTION 2. The amendments made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made. John F. Kennedy, THE WHITE HOUSE, June 4, 1963.

So, did you actually read the order yet?

You're both wrong.

Wow, the media is saying the nanny did it without any evidence, the police haven't charged her, she was found stabbed with a knife beside her and that somehow implicates her as the main suspect. Damn banksters you scary. Either that or those kids were hell incarnate.

http://www.kvue.com/news/176007461.html

The wife 'claims' to see her slit her own throat.

So let me get this straight. Nanny stabs kids to death in bathtub. Goes around the house and turns off all the lights. Waits patiently in the dark for the wife to come home. Wife comes home to dark apartment. Goes downstairs and comes back up, searches each room and just as she is walking into the bathroom the nanny slices her own throat and collapses. The 3rd young kid see's none of this.

Mind you, the nanny already has slit her wrist and somehow has a broken vertebrae.

Sounds to me, like maybe the wife came home with the killer still there, and he told her to say that or he'll be back for their other child.

I just read this for the first time today,

"Music therapist Rima Starr, who lives on the same floor as the family, said she heard screams coming from their apartment at around 5:30 p.m.

"There was some kind of screaming about, `You slit her throat!' It was horrible," she said."

You guys are aware that these automated feeds on the CNBC site are not, in fact, CNBC news items?

I would like to think CNBC is not 100% automated and there are moderators or editors who allow press releases to publish.

why in the hell is this not on the front page yet

I was waiting for /conspiracy to dig into this. My spidey sense has been tingling ever since I realized the father of the children was a news executive.

From news articles:

Music therapist Rima Starr, who lives on the same floor as the family, said she heard screams coming from their apartment at around 5:30 p.m.

"There was some kind of screaming about, `You slit her throat!' It was horrible," she said.

Why didn't you do that yourself?

"Oh yeah I knew there was something off, I'm brilliant, I was just waiting for your guys to bla bla bla"

Seriously? You sound like a teenager "Oh I could totally kick the ball that far. I'm just not gonna do it. Let Timmy kick the ball. But I could if I wanted to. Oh yeah totally!"

It's much easier to have a conversation with someone if they aren't being a condescending ass. Go fuck yourself.

The irony. And this you guys upvote? Alrighty then.

There is no irony here. I wasn't being condescending. I was being abrasive, moron. NOW I'm being condescending.

Stating that I was a 'condescending ass' and that it's hard to have a "conversation" with me and that I should go fuck myself, is definitely condescending.

Nevertheless, you're being condescending again, second time in a row while the whole point of your comment was for me not to be condescending. Way to go.

I see reading comrehension is something you never really spent quality time figuring out.

Third time being condescending now. And I'm having a conversation with you just fine. It seems you do too.

Next time just call me names or downvote me and stuff, but don't try to be an internet hero sounding all wise and good when you don't mean anything you're saying.

I think I've proven enough already. I'm done.

Mad.

you probably could have told him to not wait for /conspiracy to find out and go search for the info himself without berating him/her.

Nice try, troll.

This is some messed up shit. I don't blame heads of media corps because if they try to go against the grain this is what happens.

Where did the $43 trillion come from? That's approximately 60% of global GDP.

It's all mortgages in the US combined. That alone shows how ridiculous this claim is.

So how does the US citizenry borrow 43 trillion?

If this is true, then holy shit. Good job magister!

It never mentioned the children were those of a CNBC executive on the UK news. It just said...

"Police are hoping to speak to a nanny who is in critical condition after stabbing two children and then herself in New York".

Good post!

The US media, at least, was pretty clear that this was someone high up in CNBC.

Kevin Krim, to be exact.

The purported nanny story doesn't makes sense in some ways. She was supposedly under stress over financial problems. But under those circumstances, why would you ruin your source of income by killing the very reason for the job?

Of course the kids were killed as a warning not to Krim but to any other executive: don't embarrass the banks like this.

WTF?!!!

3 and a half hours later that same day (reported on today), the daughters of the executive of CNBC’s digital division (read: their website) are both killed by the family's nanny who was supposedly “a very nice woman”, “very religious”, and “has always been very, very stable”.

[2] http://www.kvue.com/news/176007461.html

This is PR on a lawsuit by Spire Law Group. It looks like it's intended to stop foreclosures on homes bought through subprime mortgages.

PROOF?? PROOOOOFFFF??????

Just kidding. But I can't wait to see how many idiots get all bent out of shape at you for merely bringing this up, and start screaming at you for evidence...ಠ_ಠ

Yeah, those idiots wanting more than random speculation. They're probably shilling, evidence is the rallying cry of shills.

More like, idiots demanding random Redditors to solve mysteries from their laptops over the internet, or else chastising them for even suggesting something other than what we were told.

really though. CNBC reports the story. it's now taken down. 3 people got stabbed. if you can't figure this one out they might as well get you next. so many naysayers apologists and critics in /r/conspiracy. USA has been doing this for years and it is never going to stop. everything they put on TV is a lie. there are so many sheep.

It has to be on TV to be real. Every skeptic knows that.

In case anyone is wondering I have a few screenshots here: http://imgur.com/a/RSJC9

Can someone please explain to me how the fuck this whole laundering of $43T would work exactly?

Most likely currency market (for ex) or a lot of off shore accounts

Can someone explain to me a simplified version of what happened, what this means, and the potential outcome? I don't really understand what has happened other than 42 trillion laundered.

a really really big washing machine.

i dont get it but i loled

If that maid starts saying "I was drinking my coffee and the next thing I know I was in the bathroom and then the mother came in" you'll know it's another Scopolamine dose with instruction. Just like Sir Han.

Either that or this maid is going to get killed while in custody somehow.

Oh or they might use NDAA power and just stuff her in to a gulag.

Sir Han?

He killed Greedo.

Search google for sirhan sirhan

"Sir Han"

Is that a thing now?

No, I fucked up the spelling it's sirhan sirhan

I fucking knew that nanny story was bullshit.

could someone ETLI5 and TL,DR this for me?

Tl;dr Its total bullshit, go back to you regularly scheduled masturbation.

Wow... wow... wow... people are so fucking low to involve family.

Please, can anyone verify the lawsuit is even real? All I can find on the internet about this are copies of this one article. No one else seems to have done their own report on this.

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/major-banks-governmental-officials-and-their-comrade-capitalists-targets-of-spire-law-group-llps-racketeering-and-money-laundering-lawsuit-seeking-return-of-43-trillion-to-the-united-states-treasury-175828861.html

http://news.yahoo.com/major-banks-governmental-officials-comrade-180900690.html

http://www.ign.com/boards/threads/major-banks-governmental-officials-and-their-comrade-capitalists-targets-of-spire-law-group-llps.452723011/

Woah, an actual conspiracy on /r/conspiracy? Unheard of!

For real though, good job OP. This is interesting.

real or fake... Yahoo! news picked it up. http://news.yahoo.com/major-banks-governmental-officials-comrade-180900690.html

Anyone with a few hundred bucks can post any press release they want to PRNewsWire.

It's a pay-to-play service that gets syndicated by mainstream sites because real companies use it too, but it's not a "real news" wire service.

In this case it's Spire Law Group, LLP paying, and for what reason I have no idea. It's terribly unprofessional writing and doesn't make me think "trustworthy law firm".

man that sucks

This is sad.

Here's a screen shot of the full story

That is fucking weird.

Holy shit!

I hope the links are made and people are held responsible.

Only in this way, will our fucked up Capitalist politics change.

Can the people of world unite to achieve this?

Or is it too late?

I knew there was collusion

great show

fuck my ass

It's also strange that the nanny is reported as in a "catatonic state" even though there seems to be no medical reason for it.

http://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20121026/upper-west-side/nanny-who-stabbed-kids-catatonic-state-sources-say

people should know this shit!! wtf is wrong with the world!

The unfortunate thing is that the 43 trillion dollars will have to be burned; the US can't suffer its redistribution; the likes of which would be insane.

I posted this in an earlier post about this:

According to this it is the same law firm that scammed thousands out of desperate home owners who were being foreclosed on by banks.

1. Defendants prey on desperate consumer homeowners facing foreclosure and the loss of their homes by selling participation in so-called "mass joinder" lawsuits against their mortgage lenders. Veterans of the loan modification industry, Defendants use deceptive advertising and telemarketing to recruit consumers to join these lawsuits, at a cost ofthousands of dollars each. Consumers are led to believe that joining these lawsuits will stay foreclosures, reduce their loan balances, entitle them to monetary benefits and potentially get them their homes free and clear of their mortgage.

2. Defendants often initiate the scheme by sending misleading mailers, including "Litigation Settlement Notification" mailers to homeowners notifying them that they are potential plaintiffs in a "national litigation settlement" with their lender. No settlements exist and in some cases no lawsuit has even been filed. Defendants' mailers nevertheless state that homeowners may receive their homes free and clear of a mortgage, stop foreclosures, and receive thousands of dollars in compensation for damages. The mailer states it is a "fmal notice" and that a phone in response is required, luring homeowners into contacting Defendants.

3. Once homeowners call the telephone numbers, Defendants engage them with additional false and misleading claims. ·Defendants' telemarketers, who are not attorneys, provide misleading advice to homeowners regarding legal procedures and the likely results and benefits of joining the mass joinder lawsuits. Defendants tell consumers that judges have already ruled that the banks were practicing predatory lending and that consumers have already received the promised results. Defendants make false and misleading claims the mass joinder lawyers have achieved substantial victories against the bank lenders, including obtaining homes free and clear, stopping foreclosures, and obtaining orders rescinding notices of default. Defendants claim that the attorneys handling the mass joinder lawsuits have tried thousands of cases, and only take on qualified clients likely to be helped by the lawsuit.

4. Homeowners are told that a settlement could happen at any moment and only those who have joined the lawsuit will receive the promised benefits. Defendants repeatedly make false or misleading statements to homeowners to get them to sign a retainer agreement and pay them thousands of dollars. Once homeowners sign a contract to join a "mass joinder" lawsuit and Defendants take their money, as much as $10,000, from their bank accounts, homeowners find they are unable to speak with an attorney with knowledge of the lawsuit. Basic questions such as whether the homeowner has been added to the lawsuit go unanswered. Some homeowners pay Defendants thousands of dollars only to lose their homes shortly thereafter to foreclosure.

5. Thousands of California homeowners have fallen for Defendants' scam, and Defendants have exported their mass joinder scheme nationwide. In this action, Plaintiff seeks an order permanently enjoining Defendants from engaging in their unlawful business practices, granting restitution for affected consumers, imposing civil penalties, and granting all other relief available under California law. By the filing of this lawsuit, Plaintiff does not seek to interfere with any consumer lawsuits or opine on the validity of any legal theories used to challenge alleged fraud by mortgage lenders or servicers. However, Defendants should not be allowed to violate California law by recruiting consumers into joining even potentially legitimate lawsuits by means of false and deceptive advertising.

Got info from here

This sounds more realistic than laundering 43 trillion.

edited for formatting.

Marina Krim, wife of Kevin Krim senior vice president and general manager of digital media at CNBC, had entrusted the care of her two small children to Yoselyn Ortega.. Ortega had worked for the Krim family for just 2 years before this violent "incident".. Although the New York City Police Department has not been able to interview Ortega because "she apparently slashed her own throat and slit her wrists", she "remains the main suspect" in the slaying of the Krim's 2 year old son and 6 year old daughter.. After investigations into Ortega's background, there were no criminal records and no history of psychiatric issues.. However, Paul Browne, spokesman for the NYPD explains that: "Apparently over the last month she "was not herself". Other reports about Ortega's mental state in the weeks prior to the murders reveal that she felt as though she "were losing her mind".. Ortega also had some financial difficulties which forced her out of her apartment with her son in the Bronx, and led to her moving in with her sister in Harlem. Yet despite these reports, Ortega never showed signs of personal problems with the Krim family.. Raymond Kelly, NYPD police commissioner, confirmed that Ortega was in a "medically induced coma" at the Weil Medical Center, which rendered her unable to speak with police.. Earlier, Scott Cohn, correspondent for CNBC, reports on a lawsuit filed by Eric Schneiderman, one of 10 New York State Attorney General citing JPMorgan Chase as profiteering from the mortgage-back securities which led to the stock market crash of 2008. Since Schneiderman filed the suit, eleven US prosecutors and 3 attorneys with the Civil Division of the Justice Department have assisted in the cases' development for the purposes of using the lawsuit for future reference against other Wall Street financial firms.. In January of this year, Krim was employed by JPMorgan Chase as a strategy consultant for only 3 months. This happened just prior to his employment with CNBC.. According to court documents regarding the lawsuit, the purpose for seeking legal remedy is: The deceptive coercive methods employed by mega-banks to facilitate injured parties' participation in loans and mortgages - The fraudulent and illegal use of MERS - Breach of plaintiff's statutory rights - Purposeful violation of consumer and homeowner protect statues - Processing money from unknown sources in contravention of the Patriot Act of 2001 - Foreclosing upon and accepting money for assets that do not exist.. The lawsuit states that there was a "a systemic fraud on thousands of investors" concerning the mortgage-backed securities first purvey by Bear Stearns, who was later acquired by JPMorgan Chase as part of the US governmental bailout of the banks after the 2008 crash. These securities were sold, according to the lawsuit, willfully and with intent by the seller to defraud and deceive investors. Because the securities were a combination of home mortgages, credit card debt and student loans which were bundled together and sold on the global markets after given a fake triple A rating.. Some of the mega-banks named in the lawsuit are: JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Wachovia, Citigroup, US Bancorp, Ally Financial, GM Acceptance Corporation, One West (owned by George Soros), HSBC, Deutsche Bank, PNC Bank, Bank of America.. Many foreign and overseas banks were named in the suit in conjunction with the mega-banks -- pointing to the fact that financial institutions like JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and others were using offshore banks to hide their monies acquired by the mortgage-backed securities scam. In essence, these financial institutions took monies from mortgage-holders, funneled it to offshore bank accounts and then after securitizing the loans, took the actual property from the individuals.. The complaint states that the Ponzi scheme concocted by the banksters was "the largest scheme in US history where domestic banking institutions -- on an international basis" conspired together with the common purpose of engaging in a "worldwide scheme to steal, rob and convert the personal property, money and proceeds of such assets of each Plaintiff herein" with the obvious purpose of a conspiratorial "decade-long systematic conversion...that damaged millions of borrowers across the US".. This lawsuit and the tragic death of two children appear connected. The truth of this lawsuit would bring down the greatest financial hoax of this century. The technocrats are willing to murder two innocent babies of a man who published the lawsuit on CNBC, because keeping the truth hidden is worth more to them than the lives of anyone possibly connected to the truth...

It wasn't just some words on a page but an outlashing by CNBC. This is a well thoughtout report and not simply a quick read off the teleprompter http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7JjODH5utBA

http://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinkrim i hope this isn't violation of forum policy. if it is i will take it down, but it pertains to the theory.

[deleted]

I'd like you to turn caps lock off, but I suppose I won't get that wish.

Does art dictate life?

MKUltra-ish. She stabbed herself afterwards and failed to die...

Anyone seen The Naked Gun? When OJ was turned into an assassin by the guy from Fantasy Island? "I must kill.. the Queen. I must kill.. the Queen."

All done with a remote mechanism.

anybody have a case number for the lawsuit?

NESARA

The news article linked at the bottom of the OP has this quote:

“There was some kind of screaming about, ‘You slit her throat!”’ said music therapist Rima Starr, who lives on the same floor and heard screams coming from the apartment at around 5:30 p.m.

I'll tell you what, that was the nanny yelling "You slit her throat" to whoever was doing the stabbing. This wasn't done by the nanny and the reason the nanny has wounds is because she was attacked as well. Now I guess she is being pinned with it.

Well I clicked on the link for the CNBC story. Apparently its not displaying now.

Just the fact two more kids are murdered in this shitty world just makes me want to puke. Why the kids?

This is unbelievable... If this connection and the fallout from it is true... OMG

Guys, it's a press release by the law firm, not an actual news article...

Holy shit. This is some serious shit right here.

Makes zero sense. A lawsuit is public information. More people would find out about it if they DID kill these kids like this. Murder always draws more attention to given circumstances.

this is fucking insane....but really, how was the bailout not an obvious reach-around? from the intel hub

Everyone please research this.

I didn't see anyone post a link to the actual lawsuit. It's pretty damning stuff.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/111307429/Spire-Law-Federal-Complaint-in-New-York

How can someone look up the case to see what's going on?

Knew it.

Sorry, but in the cache they misspelled "Money" so I call BS on this one.

thats a really stupid PR Newswire release of a ridiculous case; anyone can pay money and release that. There is no evidence these are related. So far this just trivializes a tragic event where 2 children were murdered.

any lawsuit that uses the word "bankster" is not real, folks....

This should be in /politics. this isn't a conspiracy. Whoever put it here is probably wanting to remove the credibility of the scandal.

This is a painfully stupid theory. If you stop talking about it, we'll all pretend you never said anything.

What if I told you that it was Jews?

moron, it was the reptilians.

Not nearly as stupid as spending your time commenting on a story you think is b.s. and your argument for this amounts to “nuh uh"

You're just upset that there aren't Jews mentioned anywhere in this theory.

It's your duty to violate copyright law at every opportunity.

http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=http%3a%2f%2fwww.cnbc.com%2fid%2f49555671%2f&d=27022789364354710&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=507a8a4e,11426219

This link was posted below an hour ago. You suck at thread comprehension.

It wasn't written by a journalist but published as a press release. CNBC didn't have anything to do with the writing, but I would assume they do not just publish every PR they receive. There are editors who choose which releases should go live on the site. And this one in particular has gotten a lot of attention in the past couple of days...

Exactly my thinking. Time will tell.

At the bottom of the article, "SOURCE Spire Law Group, LLP." I don't think CNBC wrote this. It's from the Spire Law Group. CNBC just published it.

Well said

Any law suite that refers to the defendant as "banksters" will be laughed out of court...

...the bar for filing legal paperwork really isn't that high at the end of the day. Hell, a well executed press release costs more.

Here's a screenshot of the article which is now removed.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/CNBCvanishedarticleSpire.jpg

cached mirror: http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=http%3a%2f%2fwww.cnbc.com%2fid%2f49555671%2f&d=27022789364354710&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=507a8a4e,11426219

I'd like you to turn caps lock off, but I suppose I won't get that wish.

Jfk didn't decide to put an end to the Federal Reserve....

You are an officer and a gentleman, thank you very much.

Rabbit hole? It looks like this conspiracy holds no weight. Mostly just blogs.

In fact it seems to not hold any merit at all. http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/weberman/jfk.htm

So long as a link is provided it falls under fair use.

because someone asks you to back your shit up

It's public record, surely he can open a tab and type shit into google..

What good does it do? How about letting all the other News Executives know if they pull the same shit, their families are going to get suicided. You dont ever directly hurt the people who 'hurt' you. You hurt the things they love.

Good! The banks suck up wealth by foreclosing on home owners. Lets give the wealth of the land back to its people in America. Not some Non-national central banking industry.