There is nothing wrong with being suspicious of the media, governments, and certain companies. That does not make you a "nut."

Stop saying "nut" ya jackass.

YOU SAID IT AGAIN

Dude, every time you say it you are lending credence to the idea, do you understand now why people are telling you to not even say the phrase?

Some people provably have some form of mental illness.

A person having a differing opinion, however, does not constitute evidence that they have any form of mental illness, so long as that opinion is based on sound logic and reason.

Do not allow the system to shape your mind to their will because of the fear of social stigma from others who have also been indoctrinated into the systems way of thinking.

Be alert, aware, informed, think critically, and keep your head up.

No need to apologize man it's good.

You know that is pretty clear that you got deleted from askreddit because you asked a leading and loaded question... which is not what that sub is about. As for the blood, her wrist/ hand is bloody and she touched her face... clearly those are actually hand prints.

You realize this happened almost two years ago, right? A lot of people did spend a lot of time and effort talking about this, about how the Boston Bombing and Sandy Hook and the Aurora shooting and others were obvious bullshit. About how all the evidence is right there in your face, out in the open. They were met with censorship and attacks in every form of media, and with organized limited hangout disinformation ops like DallasGoldBug and countless others. Some were even physically threatened by the dipshit, criminal thugs posing as law enforcement in this country. Average people don't have the time and resources to risk their safety by continuing to harp on every little piece of evidence, years after the fact, in order to attempt to educate the dumb masses of what should be obvious: that nearly every terror attack in the past fifteen years has been a false flag hoax.

The pictures of Craft International guys with backpacks coupled with the "Naked Man," coverage was enough for me.

But like other commenters have stated, these minutiae were discussed ad nauseum during The Event and the aftermath (remember the r/findthe bombers subreddit?), and those of us who questioned it took the negative response and kinda just let it go.

It's no wonder the people of this country are OK with a military-police-state with a corrupt media who combine to both physically and mentally terrorize them when you realize that Stockholm Syndrome can actually happen en masse.

why isn't anyone talking about this?

There is a small group of people who literally control the reality in which 90% of people in this country believe they live in. Every major news org is controlled and if all the news orgs say "The sky is green" then that's what the masses believe. The news says that if you ask the question you just did, you should be shamed and mocked and ridiculed. So that's what will happen if you bring it up in a "normal" setting.

The same kind of questions exist for JFK, the 1993 wtc bombing, the okc bombing, Twa 800, Dumb bases, FEMA, 911, Boston, Sandy Hook, ebola, MH370 and MH17. Are all of these conspiracies? Maybe, maybe not. Are all of these events shrouded in a massive web of lies and weakly glued together by a manufactured narrative? Better believe it.

So, I'm just curious -- why isn't anyone talking about this?

Lots of people are. I'd suggest youtube for a start. But beware there is a lot of junk out there to wade through. Take everything with a grain of salt.

And really, if people were really talking about it, wouldn't this particular thing already be covered on Reddit many times over? It's just shocking to me.

It has been. A search should in this sub should give you lots of results. Boston doesn't generally get a lot of love around here though. And if you think the anomolies with Boston are crazy check out Sandy Hook. I can't make heads or tails of that one.

Spot on.

Check out the No Agenda Show for a critical eye of the news. Its on iTunes, YouTube and www.curry.com

You know that is pretty clear that you got deleted from askreddit because you asked a leading and loaded question... which is not what that sub is about.

As for the blood, her wrist/ hand is bloody and she touched her face... clearly those are actually hand prints.

I'm not the OP.

oops, phones are hard to facebook on, hit reply to the wrong post.

You can clearly see there is no blood on her face, hands, or legs

You can't clearly see that, shot is very blurry, can't see the side of her face that has appears to be bloody in wheel chair picture. The blood on her hand can be the blood from the wound on her head. You can't tell the sequence of events based on how the images are given.

Or the blood on her face is from her hand and she touched her face which is more likely. Agreed though, in the initial photos you cannot really see the side of the face that does later have blood on it. Its seems to me more likely that the wound is on the hand she got it on her face... regardless not exactly evidence for conspiracy.

I also like OPs fake outrage at being pulled off of askreddit for asking a loaded and leading question...

Its blood from the hand wound on the face. I work with trauma victims and blood gets everywhere and stays there.

There are plenty of pictures of them applying fake blood and fake dust (supposed to be from explosion but it comes out of a bag)

No disrespect meant as its good to question.

I'm from Boston. Was at finish line that day. It happend. Could someone in the crowds have gamed the system by pretending to be hurt? Sure. But I have seen other threads about the bombing where people theorize that all the victims were actors. I can unequivocally say they were not. ; )

VIP stand or the peanut gallery ?

Because as I left the scene that day on boylston I saw disattached limbs. They were not props.

You shouldn't focus on the little details. As someone who was skeptical of the officially reported event as they occurred, there were countless times where the official story contradicted first hand reports.

The authorities were really sloppy when create the official story of the Boston Bombings. A couple days after the event, CNN broadcasts that they the bomber had been taken into custody. Within a few hours, they abandoned that story without any explanation or retraction.

A few days later, the FBI has a press conference where they show video of two guys walking one after the other, and ask the public for help identifying them. Shortly after, it emerged that the FBI had been in recent communication with the accused bombers. They were lying when made the official announcement that they wanted the public's help identifying the people seen on video.

After the manhunt, it they found no weapon near the surviving bomber, so the story about a 2 way firefight was a lie. Other details from the original story were cut from the official story and forgotten within about a week. Such forgotten details from the original reports were that they robed of a 7-11 and were throwing bombs out the window of their getaway taxi.

I could go on, but it's pointless.

There are a countless little discrepancies in the official stories of the Boston Bombing, 9/11, and other important happenings where there is an official truth repeated by people in the media and politics. It's much more sane and reasonable to just accept that the official story is not the honest truth.

The official story falls apart if you examine it critically. If you are skeptical of such reports from the start, you can actually see the official story being fabricated in the immediate aftermath.

when the boston marathon happened on this subreddit there were tons of pictures that we saw doctored. literally hundreds.

there were also explanations on the smoke bombs used, the fake blood, the fake explosions, the fake police badges, etc. etc. dig through the search history of the subreddit from the time it happened to about a week-two weeks later and there WAS unlimited INSANE information about what really occurred. very detailed, such a hoax what they say happened there.

[deleted]

You've found the solid evidence necessary for you to KNOW the Boston Bombing (firecracker) was a sham. Congratulations on your perceptiveness. When you open your eyes on Sanky Hook and 9/11, very likely similar conclusions will be made. The masses can see this evidence, yet their fear controlls them. Truth is everything.

YOU SAID IT AGAIN