Nuclear demolition. I get laughed at but this shit is real. Here is a 4 hour documentary of a Russian technician being interviewed for his book.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I

Long watch, but packed with things we all need to know.

saw this ages ago, never found it again. Thought i might have dreamt it.

Just about to settle in an listen to it. Any further decent discussion about this online?

God this is difficult to listen to. Production- awful, interviewer- dreadful, interviewee- incomprehensible.

Hundreds of smoke alarms were probably ground up and partially aerosoled, along with their load of nuclear material. X-ray machines and other medical devices, as well.

That would take a lot of fucking smoke alarms. Were there medical devices in the WTC?

Not sure. Makes sense that there would be a clinic/dentist. Just grinding up the buildings would release radon gas and radioactive material in the aggregate, as well.

We need to know exactly the type of radiation and how much. Along with the normal levels on that area and how much normal deviation there is. None of these theory sites have this data from what I have seen.

Water samples of WTC6 basement revealed Tritium levels 55 times higher than background levels. Tritrated water is often a tell tale sign of nuclear fusion. There were also higher levels of Barium and Strontium, also suspicious.

Those are not types of radiation. But byproducts.

Edit: Tritium is used in power generation, on the nuke reactors. They are more often found in Canada than the US.

Yes, byproducts of nuclear fusion. Nuclear bombs can cause similar, and H3 (Tritium) is essential to their design.

I'm doubting you at all, I have no reason to, but do you have a source for those numbers? I legitimately just want a copy of them

Department of Energy report of Tritium at WTC

US Geological Survey report of Sept 11 attacks:

At least some heavy metals and metalloids (such as aluminum, chromium, antimony, molybdenum, and barium) are readily leached from the dusts into rain or wash water. Indoor dust samples showed greater proportions of leachable metals than outdoor dust samples. These metals may also be potentially bioavailable if the dusts are accidentally inhaled or ingested. Chemical leach tests of the material coating steel girders in the WTC debris indicate that the coatings can contain soluble chromium.

Thanks you mate, I'm trying to compile articles with stats and proof.

Mini nukes set off on 9/11. All the science is there, just few people look into it since we know the official story is bullshit anyways.

Not so mini...75 kiloton buried below as Khalizov says.

"Not found!" Didn't take long.

I thought this too at first but OP's link just had a : at the end for me. Delete it and link works. Good article

No clue why you're being downvoted; you're right

I have never heard of this. I am a 'truther', but this is news to me.

It was actually the first 9/11 truth theory, all the way back from 2001.

My guess would be that turning big amount of matter into dust could spike radiation by itself, releasing natural isotopes from the mass of materials. Even in this article: "Engineers estimate 1/3 of the builing vaporised". Though tritium is not isotope I would expect.

I am convinced it was thermite cutting the support aided by regular bombs to trigger the collapse. Nukes don't explain the white hot molten steel running out of the building before the collapse. But the thermite does explain the hot molten puddles left over.

If there were nukes how did all the witnesses--walking all over the hot pile for days--survive the radiation?

And all his graphs "correlating" certain elements... there are way too many ways to interpret those. I don't see them proving anything.

And about the debris spraying upward. If the building is in near free fall, the stuff below still has to get out of the way. It's going to spray in all directions, including upward.