Who do you consider to be in control of or have ownership over the Private Federal Reserve System in the United States or more broadly the private central banking system that controls most of the world's currencies?

But the Fed began in 1913

Shh! EVIL NAZIS are the real problem in the world today! NWO = "The Fourth Reich"... this is what Alex Jones says, so it must be true. I mean, who else could possibly be responsible? None of this goes back before the 1920's -- that would be ludicrous! ;)

[edit link]

Yeah Nazi's ofcourse. Certainly not Jews.

The United States began in 1776. George W. Bush's presidency began in January 2001. Many nations are quite old, while their current government is quite young. My interpretation of what was said (and I am possibly wrong here), is that the current situation began post-WW2.

I think you bring up a very good point though. If someone was to blindly repeat that the Fed began post-WW2, then their argument could easily be dismissed by noting the Fed began in 1913. By knowing what you stated, they could clarify their point that the current incarnation of the Fed comes from a post-WW2 alliance.

I am hoping my post is seen as building on what you wrote, not attacking it.

the op didn't ask when the fed began. just sayin'

But he said it was owned by post WWII/Nazi interests, which I think is true, but I think that WWII and the Nazi's came into existence because of the printing press at the Fed, not the other way around.

From Wikipedia, "The Nazi Party was founded as the pan-German nationalist and antisemitic German Workers' Party on 5 January 1919. "

It's plausible it was started earlier than that if you want to get a bit, tinfoilhatty...

The fourth Reich.

Have you ever heard of the red house report? It kind of describes the business/banking side of that while operation paperclip details the intelligence and scientific side.

The nazis didn't lose, they just moved

Go on

But the fact that we in the West worked with the post-war Nazi cult and how they are involved today is not so widely known!

I am aware of Operation Paperclip, but was there more things that the West did with Nazis post war? Thanks!

Don't forget the Nazi scientists we scooped up either.

Any connection to 'red shield' aka Rothschild?

so have you seen catherine austin fitts piece? and if so, your thoughts? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0mimIp8mr8

wonderful!!

Nice answer

How far ahead do you think the US's space technology is versus what they show us?

Do you believe Gary Mckinnon was telling the truth when he "hacked" NASA and saw a list of off-planet officers?

because they have been reverse-engineering alien technology for sixty years!

Not to say that can't be true, but what makes you so sure? Do you have any proof?

The truth is out there, no really it is there are plenty of people that have come forward, here is one story of David Adair to get you started.

What alien technologies? And what are their motivations for keeping the alien tech a secret?

Yes it's all certainly plausible, but you say it with such confidence. Is there any real evidence that they actually possess these technologies?

A space craft capable of traveling light centuries or millennium to our planet only to crash into it? Yeah...

Awesome, thanks :)

Why do you think aliens came here in the first place?

There was this guy who piloted to the comet elnin years ago and had an ama on it in theabovetipsecret forums. Supposedly the real budget is for the secret military and they've seen other planets with lights from other civilizations with the speed it can travel.

Are there any conspiracy topics that you feel get far more play in the community than they deserve? Possibly being there to distract or lead the community down the wrong path?

Benjamin Fulford is a charlatan

Considering the moderator axolotl_peyotl hosted a fake AMA with AE911Truth — I would love some legitimate verification that the user "darkjournalist" is not another fake guest. If this brings downvotes then so be it.

Edit: I have been banned by SovereignMan and flytape for "using all caps" when all I did was quote someone's post, which happened to be in all caps. Lol their vendetta is pathetic.

Yo you should edit this into your post description! Glad you provided legitimate verification.

https://mobile.twitter.com/darkjournalist/status/588734781430595584

Sorry if I came across as rude - I don't trust the mods here after their previous AMA performances.

Don't get too involved replying to 3rdEyeNavigator, he's a pro-government troll.

Who asked an OK question for once.

Don't be fooled.

I'm not ;)

Go check out his youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/darkjournalist

What are your thoughts on Philip Schneider’s story about getting in the firefight with aliens in an underground base in Dulce, New Mexico? Also, can you recommend a good podcast that talks about such topics?

Richard Sauder has also done some sterling research into D.U.M.B.S and the technology behind them.

What is the biggest twist you've discovered in your research. A belief you held going into the investigation but changed drastically with more evidence.

Awesome response! I certainly felt that way looking back. That realization forces the individual to question all 'authority' sources, truly making the media gatekeepers.

Which conspiracy theories do you think are completely false or made up?

Do you think the Zapruder film was altered to create the "driver shot JFK" red herring?

What do you think of the testimony of Judyth Vary Baker?

Any way to explain the lack of Boeing 757 wreckage at both the Pentagon and Shanksville?

Thanks for the reply!

I'm even more interested in my first question in this thread, although it certainly got buried.

You can find it here.

Thanks for hanging around! And I'll certainly check out her stuff when I get some free time this weekend.

What are your thoughts on the Tsarnaev ruling?

Thank you for the response. I will look more in to PDS' work.

Well, he's welcome to believe that, but real journalists provide evidence to back themselves up.

You mentioned in one of your fb posts that you have some possibly new information for the AMA. Can you give us some more insight into the nature of this new info at all?

The October 2010 NYC sightings you experienced really seem to have made a mark on you. Looking forward to your new shows and your info on CERN, sounds spooky.

Wow, that's amazing. My neighbor when I was growing up told me he had a relative that worked for Nintendo and that you could find Link hidden in the original Super Mario game.

What aspect of 9/11 do you find to be most compelling in making the case that 9/11 was an inside job?

Didn't we go to war in Iraq and Afghanistan because of 9/11? That seems like a robust response, considering we're still there.

I would have gone with controlled demolitions.

Especially WTC1 and WTC2.

WTC7 is too obvious of a controlled demolition.

We need to start talking about 110 story buidings that fall through themselves at nearly free fall speed.

What was it that made you decide to start doing your work and dedicating yourself to currently showcasing alternative and conspiracy news -was there a defining moment or event?

Could you expand on that aircraft and your thoughts about it?

Since this happened in 2010, do you have any video?

Any pictures of such an event? Or merely hearsay?

Oh, the balloons. Gotcha. Didn't know they were alien balloons.

Guess what? I predict there will be ufos flying over my kid's birthday party this September. Ooohhh, aliens!

Told in what context?

On the record where? Before the fact or after the fact? Because I can go on the record for predicting last night's lottery numbers, but it doesn't win me the jackpot...

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ufo-nyc-kids-no-mysterious-floating-orbs-escaped-balloons-teacher-engagement-party-article-1.186981

What do you think about the theory that the greys and other such "aliens" are the same creatures that are known as "demons" in many religions (ie, deceitful, malevolent creatures that seem supernatural to us humans and try to mislead humanity with lies and other forms of deception)?

Jacques Vallee championed the same theory in Passport to Magonia.

What are your thoughts on who might be behind JFK assassination?

Any thoughts on the "Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" documentary?

that was a curveball that bent my mind a bit at first, too...but when you have a CIA guy stating on camera they did do body switches--it adds a little traction...The documentary's final breakdown of the JFK assassination is pretty out-of-the-box as well...

also interesting to me are the 2 trucks parked at the corner which may have been used as Communication and Control Centers which Jim Fetzer pointed out. (not too big on Fetzer--he goes too far quite often, but his JFK "Getting Him to the Ambush" slideshow is pretty good)

I also recently noticed that LBJ said there was a conspiracy to Walter Cronkite (which many of us have seen)--and then again to a reporter for the Atlantic.

OSWALD! How in the hell at the height of the coldwar could a marine defect, live in Russia, marry a soviet, come back to the states without being stopped? Magic Bullet my ass!... Disgusted in the United States of Apathy.

I'm going to x-post this to /r/jfkresearcher.

10/10

It's apparent Oswald was an asset, and more likely a patsy. The Gemstone File had put forth an interesting, and entirely plausible hypothesis eluding to such. One of the more interesting aspects of the file was pointing to John Roselli as the second (or third) shooter. I find this portion of the theory increasingly plausible, considering he was involved with the mafia and had been recruited by the CIA to take part in a plot to assassinate Castro, and that he had later admitted to others in taking part in the JFK assassination, and considering the circumstances of his death just prior to continuing his testimony before Congress to that effect.

Daniel- this is great stuff! What questions should we really be asking ourselves in all of this? (thanks!)

Do you exercise heightened protocols on your communications/computing equipment to ensure security and avoid surveillance/spying by third parties? Without giving anything away, any tips on that issue?

What's your opinion on William Cooper?

If you're going to exchange critical data, that is extremely sensitive and/or dangerous in the wrong hands, consider using Tor over a VPN, and be sure to encrypt anything and everything worth encrypting, ideally using a combination of algorithms (i.e. AES-Serpent-Twofish).

tails operating system is a good start...

What is your opinion on DMT and the alien intelligences that are encountered on it. do you think that they are the same intelligence that the canadian defence minister and yourself speak of or do you think they are something else. i have experienced them personally multiple times and i cannot fathom them being an illusion, they have so much heart and character and genuine concern for me. it is baffling and beautiful and i'm curious of your views on the phenomenon

Skyrocketing DJ to incredible levels of fame (infamy?) IMHO

Easiest way for them to make contact. They have some cool 'organic' tech. Had an experience w/ a female entity using an instrument with a lot of tendrils on my chest and throat. A whole weight lifted from me when she was done. I think we also exist on a higher level simultaneously. Meatspace seems to just be the default plane of existence.

I think we also exist on a higher level simultaneously.

You can find plenty of very bright sciency types who postulate that our reality could be a simulation or a hologram of sorts. As above, so below. It amazes me that the further science goes the closer it seems to get to religion/spirituality.

I think it's probably the most likely scenario :)

How do you see our world in 10-20 years? Do you think all hope is lost?

"Runaway Centralization" cue applause =)

Are you tracking any major disasters for 2016?

Agreed re: Fukishima. Kerry Kassidy from Project Camelot interviews people who seem to suggest a major United States EMP event (Simon Parkes) or Niburu-related dust storm (Kameran Fally), have any of your sources pointed to anything like that?

Finally, can you speak at all to what's happening with Vaccine legislation, and why all of a sudden the push to mass-vaccinate?

Sources: Parkes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=1496&v=b4WQty5e7Cc Fally: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dm65i1eQpCY

Do you see 2016 as a tipping point for this activity? Or still TBD ha.

What do you think the motive was behind the anthrax attacks that targeted Senators Patrick Leahy and Tom Daschle and who was responsible for making them happen?

Any thoughts on the upcoming 20 year anniversary of the OKC bombing attacks in 1995?

Do you ever receive assistance from more ethereal sources?

You say that the government has been hiding alien contact for 60 years and that the elite are retro-engineering their technology and exploring space. What is their end game and why isn't the public being told?

What would the end game be though? I feel like after 60 years of working with this technology they could have us all doing their bidding with ease. Then again...we pretty much are as it stands today, but you know what I mean.

EDIT: Actually listening to your interview with Farell and I get it now.

As far as what they are building out there, they've had 60 years...what should we think?

Captain Randy Cramer has some very definite information with regard to what he feels they are building/have built.

Any evidence to back any of this up? Cuz journalists should probably present evidence for stuff. It's kinda their job.

Mods, can you guys just ban this idiot? He keeps copy pasting the same shitpost comment (among others) all through this AMA.

I haven't cut and pasted anything.

And why should I be banned for asking someone to provide proof of extraordinary claims? Is this not an AMA? Are my questions not valid?

Questions may be valid but your intentions (and as evidenced with a troll username as 'a shill') are questionable.

Did you watch his video? That's be a start. Bye.

You mean the multiple propaganda pieces he's calling journalism? If you'd bothered to read the first question I asked him, as well as the follow ups I posted after being blown off, then you'd know that I am familiar with this charlatan's "work."

What are your views on the Apollo missions, the (alleged) moon landings, and the connection to the breakaway civilization and the secret space program?

Any evidence for any of this?

Financing a breakaway civilization: A series of scandals involving allegedly counterfeit "bearer bonds" make up the biggest and most under-reported financial story of the 21st century.

Also the following, both by Joseph Farrell:

Covert Wars and Breakaway Civilizations: The Secret Space Program, Celestial Psyops and Hidden Conflicts

Covert Wars and the Clash of Civilizations: UFOS, Oligarchs and Space Secrecy

Your first link is dead.

The other two... Farrell? Seriously? The guy who describes his work as "cutting-edge speculation"? The guy who uses outdated research to prop up crazy speculations, and uses his own, already-debunked work to cite as a reference to further expound the baselessness of this crazy "logic"?

Sorry, that's not evidence any more than the Bible is evidence for God.

What is the best film documentary about the "breakaway civilization" and the secret space program? Or the best way to learn about it.

Is there a connection between Bell Helicopter and the Nazi "Bell" spaceship?

I'm curious about what kind of capabilities do they have? Flying aircraft carriers like in the avengers?

I never saw anything that would trigger my spidey sense while in their facilities.

Hello darkjournalist, you do great work. My question is, what do you think of the state of alternative media as it stands today? Do you see it blossoming amid the obvious propaganda in the main stream? Or do you think the cointelpro is doing a good job to discredit truth speaking? What has your personal experience been?

I completely agree. The truth needs a new name. The conspiracy theory label is like labelling thinking people to heretics of the approved story.

I've found 'conspiracy realist' or 'conspiracy researcher' to be preferable, or simply no label at all.

Some background as to how and why the term exists, in its current form, within the popular lexicon:

CIA Popularized "Conspiracy Theory" Term to Silence Dissent

Abby Martin talks to Lance deHaven-Smith, Florida State University professor and author of 'Conspiracy Theory in America', about some of the US' most controversial events and how labeling truth-seekers as 'conspiracy theorists' damages democracy.

"The use of “conspiracy theory” to deter citizens from investigating historic events is paradoxical, to be sure. It suggests that those who commit criminal conspiracies can only be relatively powerless people who happen to live on the most strategically important lands, and conspiracies among rich, powerful people are impossible or absurd.

Basically, our entire legal system is based on the idea of conspiracy. Despite this fact we have been conditioned by the government and the media to blindly accept the official reports and to treat any questioning of those reports as “conspiracy theorizing.” That is, you are a conspiracy theorist if you don’t believe the government’s conspiracy theory.

This cultural phenomenon goes back to 1967. At that time, in response to questions about the Warren Commission Report (which President Ford helped create), the CIA issued a memorandum calling for mainstream media sources to begin countering “conspiracy theorists.” In the 45 years before the CIA memo came out, the phrase “conspiracy theory” appeared in the Washington Post and New York Times only 50 times, or about once per year. In the 45 years after the CIA memo, the phrase appeared 2,630 times, or about once per week.

Before the CIA memo came out, the Washington Post and New York Times had never used the phrase “conspiracy theorist.” After the CIA memo came out, these two newspapers have used that phrase 1,118 times. Of course, in these uses the phrase is always delivered in a context in which “conspiracy theorists” were made to seem less intelligent and less rationale than people who uncritically accept official explanations for major events.

President George W. Bush and his colleagues often used the phrase conspiracy theory in attempts to deter questioning about their activities. When questioned by reporters about an emerging scandal in September 2000, Bush said the idea that his presidential campaign was flashing subliminal messages in advertisements was absurd, and he added that “conspiracy theories abound in America’s politics.” When in 1994, Bush’s former company Harken Energy was linked to the fraudulent Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) through several investors, Bush’s spokeswoman, Karen Hughes, shut down the inquiry by telling the Associated Press — “We have no response to silly conspiracy theories.”

Because Bush’s campaign had, in fact, been flashing subliminal messages in its advertisements, and Harken Energy was actually linked to BCCI, people began to wonder what Bush and his colleagues meant when they made diversionary comments about conspiracy theories. More importantly, that track record raised questions about Bush’s statement after the 9/11 attacks, in which he said in a televised speech — “Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th.”

There is no question that criminal government-sponsored conspiracies exist. History is replete with them and they usually involve the government claiming that the country was under attack from “terrorists.” This was true of Hitler’s Reichstag fire and it was true of the attacks that occurred in 20th century Western Europe under the guise of Operation Gladio. An example more relevant to 9/11 was the conspiracy behind Operation Northwoods, a plan drafted and approved in 1962 by the highest levels within the U.S. military.

Author James Bamford wrote of Operation Northwoods that it called “for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. [This would provide] the public and international backing they needed to launch their war.” The signed documents are available to everyone today and because of this we know that high level U.S. government representatives do conspire, on occasion, to commit crimes against the American people for the purpose of starting wars.

State Crimes Against Democracy: Relation To Conspiracy Theory:

The origins and rhetorical function of the term "conspiracy theory" constitute an important subject matter for SCAD theory and research. At least since the 1970s, the conspiracy-theory label has been applied pejoratively to a wide range of suspicions and allegations of official wrongdoing that have not been substantiated by public officials themselves. The label suppresses mass suspicions that inevitably arise when shocking political crimes benefit top leaders or play into their agendas, especially when those same officials are in control of agencies responsible for preventing the events in question or for investigating them after they have occurred.

Communication scientists Ginna Husting and Martin Orr, both professors at Boise State University, have studied the use of the conspiracy-theory label as a putdown and have explained how the label works to silence suspicion. The conspiracy-theory label challenges the very rationality of persons who voice suspicions and thus shifts the subject of discussion from the suspicions to the speakers’ competency or lack thereof.

DeHaven-Smith has shown that the conspiracy-theory label was popularized as a pejorative term by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in a propaganda program initiated in 1967. The program was directed at criticisms of the Warren Commission’s conclusion that President Kennedy had been assassinated by a lone gunman. The propaganda campaign called on media corporations and journalists to criticize “conspiracy theorists” and raise questions about their motives and judgments. The CIA told its contacts that “parts of the conspiracy talk appear to be deliberately generated by Communist propagandists.”

SCAD scholars hypothesize that the CIA’s role in inserting the conspiracy-theory label into the American lexicon of political speech is only one of many instances when U.S. intelligence operatives have manipulated domestic opinion by structuring the terms of discourse. For example, deHaven-Smith has argued that the nomenclature surrounding the Global War on Terror—terms like “axis of evil,” “ground zero,” and “homeland security” that are associated with World War II - and the meme “9/11” used to denote the terror attacks in the United States on September 11, 2001 - emerged too quickly and were too sophisticated to have been developed without the expertise of public relations specialists.

By their very nature, SCADs are events that present a profound challenge to citizens’ most closely guarded beliefs about government and democracy. Laurie Manwell has written extensively on the many attitudes, biases, and faulty beliefs which can prevent people from processing information that challenges these pre-existing assumptions about government, reasoned dissent, and public discourse in a democratic society. In contrast to other academics’ suggestions on how to deal with conspiracy-related speech (e.g., Sunstein and Vermeule’s 2009 suggestions for taxing, fining, or banning conspiracy-related speech or for government-orchestrated cognitive infiltration of private and public beliefs) Manwell’s recommendations all involved more open discourse, greater public education and media literacy, and increased political knowledge, participation and tolerance. She argues that, for a functioning democracy to, at the bare minimum, survive, let alone thrive, “the right to dissent with the majority opinion, and the necessity to have this dissenting discourse within the public sphere, must be protected” (Manwell, 2010, p. 849).

CIA Instructions to Media Assets, re: Assassination of President Kennedy (CIA Document #1035-960, marked "PSYCH" for presumably Psychological Warfare Operations, in the division "CS", the Clandestine Services, sometimes known as the "dirty tricks" department)

b. To employ propaganda assets to and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose. The unclassified attachments to this guidance should provide useful background material for passing to assets. Our ploy should point out, as applicable, that the critics are (I) wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in, (II) politically interested, (III) financially interested, (IV) hasty and inaccurate in their research, or (V) infatuated with their own theories. In the course of discussions of the whole phenomenon of criticism, a useful strategy may be to single out Epstein's theory for attack, using the attached Fletcher article and Spectator piece for background. (Although Mark Lane's book is much less convincing that Epstein's and comes off badly where confronted by knowledgeable critics, it is also much more difficult to answer as a whole, as one becomes lost in a morass of unrelated details.)

Further reading: “Conspiracy Theory”: Foundations of a Weaponized Term - Subtle and Deceptive Tactics to Discredit Truth in Media and Research by Prof. James F. Tracy

I wish we would work together to rebrand the term "conspiracy theorist" to kind of reset and give us a better chance in public discourse: http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/32kpm2/rebranding_the_term_conspiracy_theorist/

Lately using "conspiracy analysis" to describe how I keep me ear to the ground.

Y'arr

What is your theory on the origins of the Great Pyramids in Giza? The technology required for such a feat is incredible. I doubt they were built by slaves pulling stones with rope.

Was it an off-world intelligence, or an advanced terrestrial culture that has since been destroyed?

There are some extremely convincing theories out there that the great pyramid is actually an ancient thorium nuclear reactor that was used by extraterrestrials, with the other pyramids in the area being attempts by humans of the time to recreate the technology. There was so much scientific basis for these claims that it is almost undeniable.

Firstly, thanks for doing this.

I would like to hear your thoughts on supressed technology. Do you think free energy has been discovered? Are you familiar with Nassim Haramein's work?

I saw a guy on Joe Rogan's podcast talk about how free energy was suppressed and he said that they required (only) 20 million for all the proper lab equipment. 20 million is literally nothing, which is why I think it's bullshit.

Do you remember what number podcast this is? Thanks

What are your thoughts on the purpose behind the push for mass vaccinations going on right now?

If these scientists can be bought (thus compromising their ethics), how can we know that you can't be bought?

This AMA has just been fantastic - thanks so much!!!

Do you believe that the construction of underground bases/cities could be used to shield the elite in the event of an EMP Strike?

The musician (once again known as) Prince references the existence of underground cities in his very hard to find 1998 single "The War"

Underground right now as we speak, there is a metropolis
Awaiting, waiting... 4 U, me
Clean air, food 2 eat

Will U go, will U go?
Will U go underground 2 this metropolis, this metropolis paradise?
...One condition: microchip in your neck

He makes a lot of allusions in that song to "dark" ideas.

http://prince.org/msg/7/347464

I believe that my dog is a super intelligent being from Mars. Doesn't make it true.

When do you think disclosure about extraterrestrials is going to happen?

Any chance you could be more specific? Your answer is quite vague. What unofficial institutions would disclose?

What unofficial institutions would disclose?

In what ways do you see that unfolding on a massive scale?

The visitors, that is. Currently happening in the skies (as far as I'm convinced) but, how and where on the ground?

Personally I find most if not all of his answers to be vague and hardly more than anyone could glean from the Internet with just a little effort.

I'm interested in something novel, or a more thorough reply to any particular topic.

It's an AMA, if he gave a detailed response or a link to every question it would take forever, do some of your own research using his information.

I have done my own research. Some of his links are good admittedly.

Maybe his program is more informative.

My parents knew a man who claimed to have been a White House guard during the Kennedy/Johnson years. He told them that he knew that Lyndon Johnson was behind the killing of JFK and that Oswald was framed. He also said that Oswald's mother was secretly flown to the White House in a helicopter, and that she met with LBJ behind closed doors. None of the guards were allowed in the room with them.

Do you believe that his claims are likely to be true?

part of a coalescence of interests...

I'm assuming you've read the excellent book LBJ and the Conspiracy to Kill Kennedy: A Coalescence of Interests by Joseph Farrell?

I really enjoyed your interview with Joseph too.

What about his claims that Oswald was framed, and his mother was flown to the White House? And what possible reasons do you think there could have been for flying her there and LBJ having a secret meeting with her? Do you think it's possible that she was hired to help frame her son or something of that nature?

Yes, clearly involved. Wait, where's your evidence on that?

Do you think "Mr. Global" knows about free energy technology and is actively trying to keep this information secret?

Who do you consider to be in control of our election system and national presidential debates in the U.S.? Do you support hand-counted paper ballots publicly counted in every polling place, an election day holiday, automatic voter registration, and a national popular vote with no electoral college? Any other solutions to our corrupt and heavily influenced election process?

so you aren't registered to vote? are you saying city councils and referendums are useless? that is totally not true and sadly misleading and is the reason i cannot take people like you seriously.

Anyone that writes code or manages databases can tell you that electronic vote counting can be manipulated and no one would be the wiser.

Have you read the Mark Gorton PDFs? If so, what do you think?

Thanks. I hadn't heard of this. Here is some background, as well as one of the documents:

http://gawker.com/the-astounding-conspiracy-theories-of-wall-street-geniu-1561427624

I read his JFK one. Looked like a solid research paper but nothing that would surprise anyone who's followed the case.

Is there anything you've been (credibly) told that made you think "This is just too hot to handle"?

Hi this is Sarah from Business Game Changers... I wanted to ask you more about the economy. Catherine Austin Fitts has stated that the inequality in the economy has been caused by the black budget and the loss of trillions. Do you think the black budget has this effect and is it causing the fragile condition that we are experiencing?

Dan, not a question, but just wanted to say thanks.

You have really fascinating material, a great interview style, and I look forward to seeing much more.

Again, Thanks

Any advice for someone who wants to expand their audience and develop an alternative/media network?

The idea would be to build upon a core group of people I trust to analyze MSM news (propaganda) in semi-real time to try and debunk the way they are currently shaking Western reality.

I have toiled with a news website, but think that the best way to get information out there is through a downloadable podcast thing that you can listen to passively at your wage slave job while having an expanded resource website for those that want to learn more.

Any advice would be amazingly beneficial, as I think I have a large enough team to out together in the next few months that would be interested in doing some stuff in their free time, and really enjoy the donations/Value For Value model that has made No Agenda and more recently Jen Briney's Congressional Dish gain traction and become not self sustaining, but still provide an incentive to contribute high quality work.

And full disclosure - it would be specifically geared towards increasing the transparency if government action in DC (since their not doing it anyway) in an end-game goal to produce a latfe group of motivated and a political active electorate if the Millenial Generation do challenge and hold accountable the most vulnerable (and I would argue most powerful since they control the funding) of the US House of representatives during an upcoming election cycle which should see a huge turnout (since it's not a midterm election).

Any advice would be immensely helpful. Feel free to PM me if you think you can help point me n the direction I need to go.

Thank you for your time and all the work you've done.

I will. Got the kiddo all day today while the wife is at work so I'll PM you the idea when she naps.

Thanks for the input and all the time put in over the last day or so.

It is more appreciated than you know.

Not to smear this topic with my garbage but I started doing broadcasts with Mixlr and with a little funding it can be set up to do 24/7 broadcast and do skype calls etc etc.

My platform is techno/ufo conspiracy but believe me it is in baby form--I have two broadcasts on my showreel, however the experiment phase is over and the lumbering beast is up and running. Hit me up let's get real real.

I'm intrigued.

Well great, here's the start-up version:

http://mixlr.com/redlightslatenights/showreel

There you can listen so far to my first two broadcasts. I plan on broadcasting tonight at 10pm MDT, (Monday April 27th) 12am EDT, so you can listen in. If you like it, let's take it a step further somehow. I'm open to things, my platform puts forth good music with some UFO news and the occasional stuff related to advertising my production company. I am twiddling with skype (have never used) and when that is running i will be able to do live calls via the program =)

I'll check it out when the kiddo goes to bes tonight before the wife gets home (I usually get a free hour every few days to get weird).

I'll be in touch.

Have you ever heard of this ? This supposedly funded a great deal of black ops in the post WWII world

Peggy & sterling seagrave are amazing & thorough researchers. It's a very deep rabbit hole.

Yeh it's very interesting. Very murky with some big names, some still living

Btw, your Oswald doco was great. I will share it.

You're welcome. It's a great piece of work.

http://www.amazon.com/Gold-Warriors-Americas-Recovery-Yamashitas/dp/1844675319

Non-mobile: this

^{That's why I'm here, I don't judge you. PM /u/xl0 if I'm causing any trouble. WUT?}

Just want you to know, i subscribed to your youtube channel, i love your interviewing technique, it's obvious by the questions you ask you are very well read and well prepared for each interview, i love Joseph P Farrel & Richard Dolan, I'm a big believer in the Breakaway Civilization. You should get your content on iTunes in the podcast section. I have no questions, well actually, what made you want to start podcasting when there are so many doing it, what future plans do you have. Once again i love your stuff.

Please pick any you would like to answer:

How did you get started down the road of Dark Journalism?

What is your most interesting conspiracy/event in history?

Do you think matter created consciousness or consciousness created matter?

Have you had any UFO experiences first hand or what is your strangest “dark” experience?

In your interview with Linda Moulton Howe, she mentioned that our world’s atomic bomb testing could affect the other multiverses. Can you give us your take on this and what you think about the topic of multiverses.

While trying to strike a balance in the criteria,

• Most easily provable
• Most wide spread, greatest ramifications for largest number of people
• Easiest to put a stop to
  
• Something anyone could get involved with, and contribute to making better

Pick an issue.

What are your thoughts on the theory that Israel and the USA fund and support ISIS/ISIL so that this group can gain as much ground as possible before it attacks Israel? Then Israel would have the excuse it needs to go into other Levant countries so that it can extend it's territory to the Euphrates river.

Since you think the beheadings are real, do you have any opinion on why the videos appear to be 'sanitized' and don't actually show the act? Videos before and after that they released have been more brutal.

What are you most excited about in your current lines of investigation?

Oh damn, you just got a new subscriber from this one. I can't wait to hear about this.

Do you believe humans have been through the Van Allen belt (i.e. to the moon)?

You mention in an earlier answer "the sightings of very unusual craft over NYC in October of 2010" and "someone told you they would be there". Is there additional information available on this event?

Do you have any theories that have any concrete proof? If yes, could you share those with us?

Military figures, astronauts, politicians on UFO activity

This is the tip of the iceberg.

thanks for this it's going on the box for keeps now

Would you happen to know the name of any ongoing black projects / special access programs related to or commonly misidentified with UFOs / UAP?

Examples: Brilliant Buzzard, Blue Eyes, Copper Canyon, Black Star, Senior Citizen, Black Manta, TR-3B, LRS-B, Telos, CAV, Solar Warden, etc.

You're taking one thing (the financial bailout) and conflating it with something completely unrelated -- and completely failing to answer the question that was asked.

Daniel - did you cultivate your own interview style? or.. was there someone who mentored you? It strikes me that your skill set sharpened up significantly from about 12-14 months ago, was that a significant time?

What do you think is the motivation of tyrants, totalitarian schemers, and NWO types? Why do they go through all of the trouble and stress of trying to control and change countries and the world for the worse? Why don't they just take enough ill-gotten gains to retire filthy rich and lead a life of ease, then leave everyone alone? Do they believe, in some twisted way, that what they are doing is humanitarian?

What are your thoughts on God? Are we being protected?

Who are we protected by?

It is my opinion that any UFO sightings/encounters that involve coherent humanoid entities or ships/flying saucers cannot be of extraterrestrial origin. This is because of the hypothesis of the technological singularity. Any civilization sufficiently advanced to visit earth from afar has without a doubt created artificial intelligence, has near infinite insight and the means to construct anything, be anything, and manipulate reality to the extent that it is possible for an intelligence existing within this universe could ever be capable.

Therefore, it seems highly incongruous that members of said species would firstly adopt a disadvantageous form (greys/little green men/etc.) then fly, in person, around population centers on earth.

Even we as humans in 2015 have almost transcended that need, with the advent of drones and other autonomous craft.

Clearly, if the crashed craft was indeed alien, packed with very interesting new technologies, it indicates at least that TPTB do not have access to strong AI technology, or else they would already have an army of robotic Einsteins who could rapidly reverse-engineer and capitalize on said technology.

But, what would be the point, anyhow? Said army would no doubt be able to elucidate all remaining scientific and technological hurdles, obviating the need for the head-start of finding an alien craft.

I guess this is more a comment than a question, but the whole ET theory doesn't make logical sense in my opinion for the reasons I stated.

If there are ETs, and I would say, rather that if ET intelligence is here, then it's everywhere and is more of a conglomerate 'presence'. I think we're more likely to find evidence of this presence at the microscopic level, in anomalies in our genes and cellular machinery, in anomalous electromagnetic energy configurations and signals, etc.

Its nature would not be easily understandable by us, and probably wouldn't be fully elucidated until we are able to transcend our present intellectual and perceptual limitations.

ETs most likely exist, but any that have made their way all the way to Gaia won't be meeting the president and shaking his hand, they or it would most likely perceive humanity as a totality, as something to be instantly and comprehensively infiltrated (which, no doubt, it has been).

Cool AMA btw, and thanks. I'd never heard of you before but your interviews on your website are very informative and interesting!

are reptillian aliens real?

How do you publish/monitise your work to a large/general audience without being identified? And have there been any legal problems to what you've been doing?

Thanks for the response. I thought because you were discussing and publicising controversial subjects, you would take measures to defend your identity from others.

Do you believe that Rand Paul has a better or worse chance at getting the GOP nomination than his father, Ron Paul? What do you think of his strategy, compared to that of his dad?

what changes are we likely to observe in the short-to-mid term future (regarding what information you've come across)?

Do you think Snowden is a cia limited hangout?

...contradictory statement there

Snowden is a psyop

What do you think is the driving force behind climate change - humans, solar cycle, magnetosphere, Nibiru... or is it just number manipulation for the carbon tax?

You mention conservatives and libertarians, do you not think the two party system is just a ruse to play good cop bad cop and allow whatever they decided in the first place to occur?

This. I know it's a political football, but blaming climate change on pollution really exposes you. In order for you really believe this, this means that you are believing (mostly) government scientists, the same government scientists who you are claiming are lying and covering up a secret space program. How can you be sure of the fact they are lying about the secret space program, but then on the flip side be so willing to believe the same people when they say pollution is causing climate change?

I too believe that the changes we are seeing in the climate are man made changes, but certainly NOT being caused by pollution. Instead I think we are in the midst of a weather war with China and Russia to melt the artic snow caps in order to pillage the resources underneath. This is being done by a combination of things, including geo- engineering, and other secret technologies which are 1,000x more destructive to the earth then carbon emissions are.

I've lost a lot of respect for you actually when I read you believe pollution is causing climate change, while subtly attacking your political opponents.

Do you follow dutchsinse on youtube? What is your take on the increasing geologic activity (earthquakes, awakening volcanoes, etc) seemingly across the globe?

Does this pole shift have anything to do with CERN!?

What sparked your interest in UFOs? Have you had any sightings yourself?

Thanks for the link darkjournalist. I must say I'm thoroughly enjoying your AMA session, it's proving to be very insightful.

Great webpage! Very talented indeed.......

Keep supplying us with the TRUTH

Are you aware of the whistleblower who has come out recently by the name of GoodETxSG? His information is astounding, and I am inclined to think he is being sincere. What do you think?

And thank you! - I find the work you do truly inspiring, and a great asset to alternative media and our understanding of the world.

Are you all willing to speak truth to Zionism ?

Is there any of the modern Sci-fi films that made you think "Ah, they've got the real idea in the story line"?

ah, but no 'Forbidden Planet' references haha

I can see the episode title now:

DJ_Mission feat. Dark Journalist as they wend their way through the labyrinthine disclosures presented in 1990 Total Recall

I've got some significant materials there I think =)

Thoughts on Townsend Brown's research, and the weirdness associated with his reputation via the Philadelphia Experiment?

I personally suspect that all the weird rumors about the PE were created to make Brown seem like a crackpot, so that people would not investigate his technology, which has immense potential when modified with newer (2012) metamaterials. I'll elaborate on that last part if anyone is interested.

What do you think of Benjamin Fulford?

And thanks. Best AMA in reddit ever.

Perhaps he's been compromised/replaced?

It'd have to be real convincing tho, otherwise we'd have to explain why his army of martial artists never rose up.

What is the one thing most people should know but don't

This makes me think a lot about the media and how they use fear to drive public opinion.

DJ you deserved more love on this, but I suppose when you get down to it, real world trends and internet trends are totally different. To me, you deserve the real world trend sort of sensation. I am and always will be a fan of your great work.

Oh hey, I just realized that I go by DJ_Mission on reddit, I am a big fan on youtube go by the name Broox Authement =) I am reading an article right now about how "power-mods" or moderators banned this guy from many many subreddits for posting material that they personally disliked. I am pissed because I got banned from r/UFO and one time for posting a link to a different social media site (they called it 'spam' which back in my day was done by a bot repeatedly) but then my posting privileges were reinstated. . . now I am unable to post again! I found out because I was gonna link your DJ interview w/ LMH.

These fascist pigfuckers. =) Not asking you to join in on the bashing, but yeah, there's something going on within the reddit ranks presently.

I see you are still at it 4.5 hours after you started. I made sure to be here at the onset to get in a question or two. I shall ask another.

We are getting fucked up bad by a group or groups of people that have an agenda. Whether it is manipulating our money or hiding knowledge of ET contact, or wars of aggression that line the pockets of corporations, there is evidence to realize there is something there along those lines.

Do you suspect an entity or group that is responsible?

Approximately how much money do you make directly and indirectly related to your journalism, and where does this revenue come from?

When do ou think the american public will demand the truth ? I remember reading about big brother 25 years ago, ie. project Eschelon, The aurora project,kennedy assasination both John and Robert. The list goes on forever ..UFO's were know in modern times from WWI till today.Our leaders can't even lie to us with any believability anymore. Ttey really think we are Sheeple, stupid sheep. What will it taketoreturn to truth and open communication with the people that elected them, not the special groups of influencial people that are funding these pet further thier own financial gain?

Are you familiar with Captain Randy Cramer, sir? He is a Marine that says he's been part of a secret space program and has spent 17 years on Mars protecting a human colony there from, among other things, two intelligent species native to that planet.

Yes. Difficult to just "take his word for it". Certainly. One thing that helped me go from "this is just some guy talking" to "this might actually be valid and true information" is what he specifically said here.

He said if he is a civilian saying what he is saying and he is lying, then there is no consequence for it. His saying that he is a military officer in the United States armed forces and saying what he's saying, however, means that if he is lying, then he is committing a felony prosecutable by law and could be fined a few tens of thousands of dollars and thrown in prison for a few years.

I looked this up, and he is actually telling the truth. He would be committing a felony if he were lying about how he has been comporting himself in all these videos. The fact (as he himself says) that he has not been approached by any military superior and told to cease and desist is, it seems to me, pretty telling indeed with regard to all the information he has come out with.

That bit right there kind of clinches all the other information that he has disclosed because it gives everything he's come out saying more weight than would otherwise be the case if he were just, again, "some guy off the street saying stuff".

What do you consider to be the most cutting edge / revolutionary / disruptive / "dark" topic at this very moment ?

9/11 (WTC1 & WTC2)

1. thermite

2. energy beam

3. mini nukes

4. none of the above

5. at least one of the above.

Wow you really do believe the super weapon theory? Paul Hellyer did mention the 500 page book that lady wrote about it, saying that it was chock full of evidence. . . There must be at least something to it, which turns my stomach another full notch from the already gutwrenching disgusting truths that the whole thing was vile sorcery much akin to Tower of Babel lore. . . yuck

vaccines: gods gift to humanity (and stray dogs) --OR-- the devil's trap door to vaccine-resistant "super viruses" ?

When it comes to UFOs and our government, there seems to be a great deal of secrecy. Information is kept from the public and even seemingly from those in the military and in high ranking government positions. Do you think we are dealing with a kind of shadow government that controls all knowledge pertaining to UFOs? If so, how long has this shadow government been active? Could there be a connection to reports of Men in Black?

In your opinion, what would you say is the biggest misconception in the Alternative News arena?

That reminds me, what do you think of Benjamin Fulford and his increasingly outlandish claims?

Why are reptilian essences incarnating into human bodies and what does it mean? Are they aware of what they are, or is it a surprise to them as well?

There are all sorts of "essences" incarnating into human bodies. Some are aware because they are made aware. Most are not. As for why, well it depends on where they came from. I'm going to need to be vague for my own protection but I will say that there is usually an "invitation" involved, and a genetic tether needed to incarnate into a particular bloodline.

What is it about the "reptile" essence is the one and only essence that my friend can see? Mind if I message you? I respect anonymity.

Go on ahead. :)

Well, without knowing anything else about your friend, the first thing that pops into mind is "takes one to know one". Lol. If not that, then your friend was probably on the other end of a war type situation in the past with that type. No need for private message, those who know anything about this stuff know me already. Everyone else will just think I'm crazy, and that has its own type of protection. I feel the need to be vague for other reasons.

So what is the invitation all about?

What's your plan to stop companies like Northrop Grumman?

Did Obama really visit America's base station on Mars ?

Thanks, though you concede there are aliens living on Earth ? Jump rooms exist ?

[deleted]

You did, thank you, and sorry for the double post!

Are you fully credentialed and have a press pass? If so I might have some information for you.

Even independent journalists should get credentialed, because AP will just ignore your stories.

I can't if you aren't credentialed, I'm sorry. :(

You have been nice about it. I'll tell you what.... I'll send you a couple pictures of something interesting.

I just PM'd you

Why not share these photographs with the rest of the community?

Trying to protect my identity.

I just wanted to say thanks for your work and you're doing a great job with the show, and kudos for being involved with the online community via reddit.

Some day people will look back on guys like you and see you as heroes of the species and intellectual heroes for just trying to access the (nearly) inaccessible and trying to make people of aware of what was really going on in the world - while so much effort from "the other side" is going towards keeping people unaware/entertained/distracted/busy with busy work and nonsense and anything to keep people "sleeping". The work of collecting the knowledge of all the other people you have on, like Hon. Paul Hellyer and making it part of the collective social memory is a huge, huge deal and utterly important for someone to do, so thank you.

Good job, thanks, keep up the good work, your show is one of (if not the) greatest in my opinion in this whole field, for one thing because you don't do anything gimmicky, you're just in the 'dark journalism' field and you do a great job of it all.

I agree completely and thank you for contributing to that.

in the presence of someone like that you realize what our society currently lacks. A combination of ethics, strength intellectual prowess, and spiritual awareness.

Bravo!

How can i help?

I seek the truth, i want it, i need it. Its like an obsession, and man is it taking its toll on me! Do you have any tips for a person in my situation?

Hi again

Just wondering what your thoughts are on Rupert Murdoch? Do you think he has links to the intelligence community?

What would you say about a network of "dark journalists" creating a new alternative newsmedia in concert with each other, as opposed to its existing competitive form?

You want the name to get out there? I'll be your Huckleberry.

Have you ever looked into any of the claims of Rodney Class?

In your mind, why do you think a majority of people don't believe in real proven conspiracies that will in time open the mind to other ideas?

1. Do you acknowledge that Michael Hastings was murdered?

2. By whom?

3. For what reason(s)?

4. What percentage of your articles do you intentionally fill with disinformation & red herrings -- like Alex Jones, Noam Chomsky, Veterans Today, etc. -- just to make sure you don't end up like Michael Hastings ?

Do you believe that Edward Snowden is a "limited hangout" ?

What is your definition of "limited hangout" ?

Thank you for your time.

Did it ever come to be possible that he was a test shill, like a plant operative put there to see how many shits the people would give? (turns out not too many shits at all, shown by Last Week Tonight)

Good stuff! Subscribed and looking forward to catching up on the back episodes.

I admire and respect you and everyone else who is asking these very important questions. That being said my question is this: what do you suggest as crucial must read books? Not beginner material. I'd love to hear any suggestions from you or anyone else, ty much.

Okay, so I have to ask.

James Corbett has a theory about a fake alien invasion, false flag type thing. The technology to create these mass hallucinations exists.

Although this doesn't refute the existence of real aliens, it is plausible as a mechanism to ratchet down the freedoms while we do battle with an "alien menace", while the usual characters benefit.

What do you think of this? I for one don't doubt the existence of aliens, but this theory does hold water, and James is an excellent researcher. Do you plan to collaborate in the future?

Absolutely. Your insights are on the mark. I love your work and will continue to watch when I'm not on my bandwidth-constrained satellite connection :(

Seriously of all the content this sub sees about 2% of it is UFO related so why then is the only stickied post a 75% UFO fan page?

edit: case and point: In the interview with Catherine Austin Fitts as she's speaking about pedophilia extortion tactics used by opposing politicians/media DarkJournalist drops in with [paraphasing] "Arizona 1997 politician who said he saw the Arizona [UFO] lights got extorted". [approx 50:00min]. This is completely and utterly outside the scope of the Black Budget conversation about equity markets and debt.

tl;dr: DarkJournalist don't use this sub to validate your ufo conspiracies or at least as a show of good faith do away with the stickie.

What a useless AMA

how big is your dick?

Well I see you spent a lot of time answering questions here.

On behalf of the few people you ignored, I'd just like to say, fuck you too.

How would you differentiate between what you do and what, say, a televangelist does, other than cater to a different subset of foolish, crazy, and/or gullible people in order to make a buck?

That doesn't answer my question. So now, at the very least, I know you didn't answer my question. So enlighten me.

A televangelist preaches, dark journalist doesn't do that at all, he interviews researchers and listens to their ideas and theories. It isn't his job to convince you or anyone else of anything.

Isn't it his job to convince people? He presents everything he discusses as fact, despite the fact that there's no actual, solid, unfalsifiable evidence to support either his claims or his guests' claims whatsoever. Why should I put my faith in what this man's serving any moreso than, say, Benny Hinn?

By doing nothing other than "listening to their ideas and theories" and not questioning them in a meaningful and honest manner, he's presenting a one-sided agenda based on faith. And when was the last time he "interviewed" someone who disagreed with his views, or the views of his guests? And I say "interviewed" there with quotes, because, in real investigative journalism, an interview is supposed to be more than a circle-jerk of agreement between the subject and the interviewer. You're supposed to be getting to the truth, not blindly accepting everything you're presented on faith. Why doesn't he ever ask for proof? Hard evidence? Play devil's advocate (in anything other than a pedantic role)? Ask dissenting questions?

And why won't he take the time on this "ask me anything" to answer my dissenting question?

So yeah, my question was intentionally abrasive (perhaps of the type an actual investigative journalist would ask). Perhaps too much so, I'll confess. But it's still a valid question, in my opinion.

What's the difference between this Dark Journalist and a Televangelist? Both are making fantastic, unfalsifiable, unsubstantiated claims that I am supposed to accept on nothing more than blind faith. Both use their programs as an echo-chamber for their pre-existing agenda. And both use their program to solicit money from their believers. So I ask again, what's the difference?

He presents everything he discusses as fact.

Where does he do that?

Watch any one of his videos. Listen to how he presents everything. Take this one here:

Around :34 seconds in:

"...she's covered the most controversial issues from cattle mutilation to contact with extra-terrestrial life and the government cover-up of advanced UFO technology..."

Presenting these things like they're factual happenings. Even putting the words on the screen because... I can't hear him say them? Honestly, almost seems like he's pushing propaganda with that sort of schtick.

13:54, same video

"...well, that is fascinating, the degree to which the perception has changed, and I think we can all agree that there's an agenda that's moving forward there..."

We being she and he? Or is he telling me what to think? Because it sounds like he's telling me what to think. Honestly, the whole "I think we can all agree" thing is a big red-flag that says "propaganda" to me. But I digress.

Let's look at another video, from here:

"...we're going to dive into the subterranean covert world of the deep state..."

I am not aware that a subterranean covert world of a deep state exists. But he's assuming it does. And he seems to be assuming that I know that it does, despite the fact that he's presented no evidence of its existence. Which would be... presenting something he discusses as fact. Precisely what I was talking about. And again, those little captions next to his head.

Even the language he uses to discuss his subjects' work is dripping with praise, before they're even on the show:

"...Now Professor Scott's new book...is a powerful crowning-achievement in his lifelong work..."

Powerful crowning achievement? That's not objective journalism. That's telling me what and how to think.

...

Have you ever watched Babylon 5? Watch the episode "The Illusion of Truth" if you can find it. The way that the ISN propaganda is presented in that episode is exactly what this "Dark Journalist" is doing. So what's his agenda?

"...she's covered the most controversial issues from cattle mutilation to contact with extra-terrestrial life and the government cover-up of advanced UFO technology..."

But Linda Howe did cover these issues and it is a fact. She won an Emmy for her efforts with a strange harvest so how has DJ made this part up or lied about it?

She won a regional Emmy award for sound effects and editing, nothing to do with the content or factuality of anything she talks about. Though him saying that she's an "Emmy Award winning..." without the actual facts about the Emmy award sounds better, right? Gives her more credibility? Kinda like something that someone producing propaganda would say?

So where did DJ lie and say everything he presents is fact?

I never said either of those things. You have, however, ignored pretty much everything I have actually said, so I'm not going to bother with this conversation anymore.

Isn't it his job to convince people? He presents everything he discusses as fact

Your words dude. I don't care either way but everyone deserves a voices don't they? Looking at this thread DJ has been nothing other than polite. He hasn't pushed any agenda or idea, he's simply answered other peoples questions to the best of his ability.

I don't get any impression that he is trying to convince anyone of anything. You seem to make out that he is dishonest but you could say the same for anyone doing an AMA on any subreddit couldn't you?

An opinion is always worth listening to but it does not make anything fact.

Go polish your storm trooper cod piece elsewhere buddy.

You mention conservatives and libertarians, do you not think the two party system is just a ruse to play good cop bad cop and allow whatever they decided in the first place to occur?

ah, but no 'Forbidden Planet' references haha

Go on

Awesome, thanks :)

Why do you think aliens came here in the first place?

That reminds me, what do you think of Benjamin Fulford and his increasingly outlandish claims?

because they have been reverse-engineering alien technology for sixty years!

Not to say that can't be true, but what makes you so sure? Do you have any proof?

This. I know it's a political football, but blaming climate change on pollution really exposes you. In order for you really believe this, this means that you are believing (mostly) government scientists, the same government scientists who you are claiming are lying and covering up a secret space program. How can you be sure of the fact they are lying about the secret space program, but then on the flip side be so willing to believe the same people when they say pollution is causing climate change?

I too believe that the changes we are seeing in the climate are man made changes, but certainly NOT being caused by pollution. Instead I think we are in the midst of a weather war with China and Russia to melt the artic snow caps in order to pillage the resources underneath. This is being done by a combination of things, including geo- engineering, and other secret technologies which are 1,000x more destructive to the earth then carbon emissions are.

I've lost a lot of respect for you actually when I read you believe pollution is causing climate change, while subtly attacking your political opponents.

Anyone that writes code or manages databases can tell you that electronic vote counting can be manipulated and no one would be the wiser.

What alien technologies? And what are their motivations for keeping the alien tech a secret?

I think it's probably the most likely scenario :)

Shh! EVIL NAZIS are the real problem in the world today! NWO = "The Fourth Reich"... this is what Alex Jones says, so it must be true. I mean, who else could possibly be responsible? None of this goes back before the 1920's -- that would be ludicrous! ;)

[edit link]

The United States began in 1776. George W. Bush's presidency began in January 2001. Many nations are quite old, while their current government is quite young. My interpretation of what was said (and I am possibly wrong here), is that the current situation began post-WW2.

I think you bring up a very good point though. If someone was to blindly repeat that the Fed began post-WW2, then their argument could easily be dismissed by noting the Fed began in 1913. By knowing what you stated, they could clarify their point that the current incarnation of the Fed comes from a post-WW2 alliance.

I am hoping my post is seen as building on what you wrote, not attacking it.

the op didn't ask when the fed began. just sayin'

From Wikipedia, "The Nazi Party was founded as the pan-German nationalist and antisemitic German Workers' Party on 5 January 1919. "

It's plausible it was started earlier than that if you want to get a bit, tinfoilhatty...

Yeah Nazi's ofcourse. Certainly not Jews.

I can see the episode title now:

DJ_Mission feat. Dark Journalist as they wend their way through the labyrinthine disclosures presented in 1990 Total Recall

I've got some significant materials there I think =)