Donald Trump is an intentional, planned distraction to keep scrutiny off of the GOP and make even the most radical Republican presidential candidate appear completely rational.
No, Perot getting out some charts and talking about voodoo economics is really no comparison to the insane birther ramblings of Donald Trump. Or the insane racist ramblings of Donald Trump. Or the insane global warming denialism of Donald Trump. Or the insane "trickle down works" rhetoric of Donald Trump.
Well...it's not working anyway, so whatever. If that really is the stratagem, then it's half baked
Not surprising considering the party appeals to relatively half baked voters.
It wouldn't even surprise me if he was in it for the Dems, to make all Republicans look bad. Trump is gonna force the other GOP hopefuls to take stances on divisive issues that he doesn't care about taking. This will alienate the nominee to the point of no return for the general election.
Seems to me the plan so far is to ignore Bernie, but make everyone else look 10 times worse than Hillary. So when that crazy person gets the Republican nomination, the Dem and independent voters will say "oh well let's not chance it with Bernie we don't want to risk getting ________."
I am interested in seeing what will happen with Bernie most of all.
My comment was along the lines of "look at me..hear my fked up comments" and make the rest of the crooks running for office look like saints including Hillary.
Dur, try:
Splinter the (imbecile) conservative vote, and ensure a Hilliary victory.
Tptb want that bitch in there it would seem. I guess they buy coke off her husband or something.
Paul and Obama did not run primary against one another. Clinton and Obama did. You're no less wrong than you were initially. You might even somehow be more wrong.
No, Perot getting out some charts and talking about voodoo economics is really no comparison to the insane birther ramblings of Donald Trump. Or the insane racist ramblings of Donald Trump. Or the insane global warming denialism of Donald Trump. Or the insane "trickle down works" rhetoric of Donald Trump.
19 comments
4 exwasstalking 2015-07-07
Good cop, bad cop.
4 King-Hell 2015-07-07
That kinda makes sense. He is the original red herring.
3 Tister1985 2015-07-07
Same bs Ross Perot pulled years ago
2 Twonix 2015-07-07
Yeah but that one got away from them and arguably was the reason they lost.
1 Zooicide85 2015-07-07
No, Perot getting out some charts and talking about voodoo economics is really no comparison to the insane birther ramblings of Donald Trump. Or the insane racist ramblings of Donald Trump. Or the insane global warming denialism of Donald Trump. Or the insane "trickle down works" rhetoric of Donald Trump.
You get the idea.
2 Rontagosh 2015-07-07
Well...it's not working anyway, so whatever. If that really is the stratagem, then it's half baked Not surprising considering the party appeals to relatively half baked voters.
2 Ajegwu 2015-07-07
He's just an attention whore. He'd never take the job, he'd lose way too much money. Even more than he's losing now.
2 peterson2004 2015-07-07
And Bernie Sanders is the glimmer of hope to string along younger voters. Vote = consent.
2 jt32470 2015-07-07
and bernie sanders is this election's ron paul.
1 looknclick 2015-07-07
"appear completely rational"?
well, it doesn't work.
what works much better: Hitlery Clington
1 nolesforever 2015-07-07
It wouldn't even surprise me if he was in it for the Dems, to make all Republicans look bad. Trump is gonna force the other GOP hopefuls to take stances on divisive issues that he doesn't care about taking. This will alienate the nominee to the point of no return for the general election.
Seems to me the plan so far is to ignore Bernie, but make everyone else look 10 times worse than Hillary. So when that crazy person gets the Republican nomination, the Dem and independent voters will say "oh well let's not chance it with Bernie we don't want to risk getting ________."
I am interested in seeing what will happen with Bernie most of all.
1 Tister1985 2015-07-07
My comment was along the lines of "look at me..hear my fked up comments" and make the rest of the crooks running for office look like saints including Hillary.
But good points thou and well taken.
0 zeropoint357 2015-07-07
Dur, try: Splinter the (imbecile) conservative vote, and ensure a Hilliary victory. Tptb want that bitch in there it would seem. I guess they buy coke off her husband or something.
2 SixVISix 2015-07-07
How precisely do you splinter a vote before a primary?
0 zeropoint357 2015-07-07
Ask all the Paul supporters I know that voted for Obama.
1 SixVISix 2015-07-07
Paul and Obama did not run primary against one another. Clinton and Obama did. You're no less wrong than you were initially. You might even somehow be more wrong.
0 zeropoint357 2015-07-07
Derp. By stating the completely obvious, are you being deliberately obtuse, or are you genuinely stupid?
0 paid_zionist_shi111 2015-07-07
Jeb bush is a shoe in along with Marco Rubio. The true nwo ticket.
3 zeropoint357 2015-07-07
Bush again? I woulda never believed it, but shit, why the fuck not? Either him or Kang I guess.
2 Twonix 2015-07-07
Yeah but that one got away from them and arguably was the reason they lost.
1 Zooicide85 2015-07-07
No, Perot getting out some charts and talking about voodoo economics is really no comparison to the insane birther ramblings of Donald Trump. Or the insane racist ramblings of Donald Trump. Or the insane global warming denialism of Donald Trump. Or the insane "trickle down works" rhetoric of Donald Trump.
You get the idea.