Rothchild Controlled Economist Declares VICTORY in Africa with a vaccine for meningitis. And by victory, they mean ignore paralysis and deaths after the vaccine, & spend $500,000,000 without providing access to clean drinking water which was cited by the Red Cross as the cause of the outbreaks

63  2015-11-13 by timo1200

Because apparently doing good is limited to injecting patented products and screw clean drinking water....

Why are vaccines being pushed so strongly in a country which lacks clean drinking water and basic sanitation services? UNICEF blames Chad’s recurrent outbreaks of disease, including meningitis, on this vital, common-sense need. Why have major organizations spent $571 million on a vaccination project, when wells to provide access to clean drinking water have been constructed for less than $3,000 by the International Committee of the Red Cross?

http://www.gavialliance.org/support/nvs/meningitis-a/ http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/chad_61754.html

Original Economist Article http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21678205-vaccine-rarely-makes-news-big-public-health-success-knockout-jab

8 comments

3  Asshole_PhD 2015-11-13

The primary reason for handing out vaccines to 3rd world nations (and who knows, maybe even first world as well) is population reduction. No, this is not a conspiracy theory or misleading. This is the actual reason as reported by Bill and Melinda Gates.

Gates began consuming data that startled him. In society after society, he saw, when the mortality rate falls—specifically, below 10 deaths per 1,000 people—the birth rate follows, and population growth stabilizes. “It goes against common sense,” Gates says. Most parents don’t choose to have eight children because they want to have big families, it turns out, but because they know many of their children will die.

“If a mother and father know their child is going to live to adulthood, they start to naturally reduce their population size,” says Melinda.

In terms of giving, Gates did a 180-degree turn. Rather than prevent births, he would aim his billions at saving the kids already born. “We moved pretty heavily into vaccines once we understood that,” says Gates. - http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper/2011/11/02/the-second-coming-of-bill-gates/

I find it strange that, in this case, they are only giving out vaccines and not bothering with the water supply. If the goal was to decrease mortality so that mothers have fewer children, vaccines are clearly not a priority in many situations, and should only be a small part of a wide range of things done to decrease mortality for 3rd world nations.

2  FREETHOUGHTSOPEN 2015-11-13

Damn Red Shield and Red Cross just pulled a double WHAMMY...

-1  FortoReibus 2015-11-13

Presumably giving people injections is easier than creating an infrastructure throughout a drought-ridden continent riddled by war and corruption.

2  timo1200 2015-11-13

Yes, digging a god damn well is MUCH more difficult than moving and entire medical team into that same jungle, setting up a clinic and spending hundreds of millions of dollars. Yes, you are totally right...

I'll take dumbshit for $100 Alex...

-5  goober_boobz 2015-11-13

Seriously, who actually cares about black people in Africa? I mean, most people just use them as petri dishes for new vaccines. It's called bioengineering and population control.

4  FREETHOUGHTSOPEN 2015-11-13

Seriously, who actually cares about black people in Africa? I mean, most people just use them as petri dishes for new vaccines. It's called bioengineering and population control.

Um, there are millions that care, can't imagine what type of sub-human would believe death by rich elite men who control the world would be a "meh" situation?

5  s70n3834r 2015-11-13

Millions that can't do anything about it. The ones that can don't care.

1  [deleted] 2015-11-13

[deleted]

1  goober_boobz 2015-11-13

It was sarcasm, and yes I am black. Twist endings right?