9/11 A new pearl Harbor

41  2015-12-26 by Greg_Roberts_0985

INTRODUCTION

0.01:02 - 12 parallels between Pearl Harbor and September 11

0.14:10 - The debate: main issues

PART 1 - AIR DEFENSE

0.14:55 - Where are the interceptors?

0.16:12 - The "incompetence theory" (radars, transponders)

0.22:00 - The military drills

0.29:40 - Specific warnings

0.33:08 - The chain of command

0.38:10 - Promotions, not punishments

0.39:50 - The Mineta case

0.47:38 - Debunkers: "Mineta was mistaken"

0.53:18 - The Mineta case - A summary

PART 2 - THE HIJACKERS

0.57:15 - "Piss-poor student pilots"

0.59:38 - Marwan al-Sheikki (UA175)

1.01:52 - Ziad Jarrah (UA93)

1.03:06 - Hani Hanjour (AA77)

1.04:00 - The debunkers' positions

1.06:00 - 2 simulations of the Pentagon attack

1.13:10 - Someone knew?

1.16:40 - Airport security cameras

1.20.15 - The missing black boxes

PART 3 - THE AIRPLANES

1.26:50 - Passenger planes or military drones?

1.28:20 - Impossible speeds

1.37:30 - What happened to the passengers?

1.38:35 - The cellphone calls

1.48:30 - The debunkers' position

1.50:38 - If not from the planes, from where?

DVD 2

PART 4 - THE PENTAGON

0.02:35 - Downed light poles

0.03:30 - The missing plane

0.04:30 - The official version

0.05:24 - Problems with the official version (wing, ailerons, tail, engines)

0.13:09 - The mystery hole

0.14:10 - The debunkers' explanations

0.16:20 - Conclusions on damage analysis

0.17:00 - The missing tapes

0.18:30 - Security video analysis

0.23.40 - Pentagon summary

PART 5 - FLIGHT 93

0.24.15 - The empty hole

0.28.00 - The debunkers' explanations

0.33:00 - Plane crash or bomb explosion?

0.34:50 - The debris field

0.37.20 - The shootdown hypothesis

0.38:50 - The small white plane

0.41:40 - "Let's roll"

0.44:25 - Summary of Flight 93

PART 6 - THE TWIN TOWERS

0.45:10 - Introduction

0.47:45 - The Towers' small dirty secret

0.53:10 - Larry Silverstein

0.56:15 - NIST vs. Architects & Engineers

0.58:00 - Robust or fragile buildings?

1.04:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #1

1.05:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #2

1.07:35 - Problems with the official explanation

1.18:00 - The full collapse - No official explanation

1.18:50 - Law of physics violated

1.20:50 - The Twin Towers and freefall

1.27:50 - Debunkers' response to A&E

DVD 3

(Twin Towers continued)

0.00:20 - The hypothesis of controlled demolitions

0.01:08 - Debunkers: "Impossible to place explosives"

0.07:34 - Explosions in the Twin Towers (witnesses)

0.15:00 - "Fuel in elevators shafts" theory

0.23:25 - Debunkers: "Explosions not recorded by tv cameras"

0.30:26 - Squibs

0.33:00 - Explosive force (montage)

0.35:00 - Ejecta

0.38:00 - Diagonal cuts

0.40:15 - What happened to the hat trusses?

0.42:20 - Extreme temperatures

0.45:30 - Debunkers' explanations

0.46:45 - Twisted and mangled beams

0.47:40 - Molten steel

0.51:05 - Molten concrete

0.53:50 - Pulverization

0.57:40 - Victims vaporized

1.02:20 - Conclusion on the Twin Towers

PART 7 - BUILDING 7

1.05:10 - Introduction

1.06:35 - Official version by NIST

1.09:36 - Collapse computer simulation

1.11:00 - Fire computer simulation

1.12:20 - Debunkers: "Building 7 weaker"

1.14:25 - Pre-knowledge

1.19:00 - Symmetry

1.20:00 - Freefall

EPILOGUE

1.22:30 - John McCain

1.24:35 - The last word

11 comments

4  RedditIsPropaganda23 2015-12-26

9/11- Where hijackers flew unmolested in the most heavily guarded airspace in the world for an hour... then where 2 planes took down 3 buildings.

2  holocauster-ride 2015-12-26

One of the things that strikes me suspicious is that the official investigations don't even mention a LOT of the evidence that has been collected. They chose certain pieces for some reason to fit the narrative that the Government suggested.

1  RODEO_ANUS_BANGER 2015-12-26

this is the funniest part: the government hired itself to do the investigation. think about that good and hard for a sec.

1  holocauster-ride 2015-12-26

And the people who led the investigation still said that the truth was being covered up and that this was a 30 year conspiracy.

0  [deleted] 2015-12-26

[deleted]

0  holocauster-ride 2015-12-26

Think Pearl Harbour was real?

2  [deleted] 2015-12-26

[deleted]

0  datpurp 2015-12-26

Did you not watch the video?

0  holocauster-ride 2015-12-26

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_Harbor_advance-knowledge_conspiracy_theory

1  [deleted] 2015-12-26

[deleted]

1  holocauster-ride 2015-12-26

Who paid for 9/11?

1  shmusko01 2015-12-26

"However, the Pearl Harbor advance-knowledge conspiracy is considered to be a fringe theory and is rejected by most mainstream historians"

1  holocauster-ride 2015-12-26

Indeed. Are you on a mainstream forum right now?

0  loserlame 2015-12-26

I know for a fact that the Japanese attacked the US that day, because it wasn't just Pearl harbor that was attacked. They are definitely treated in the same way though, and its pretty hypocritical considering how the US always tells other countries to just forget about the past.