Nope. And that's a good reason to question Assange's true cause.

There was a good post about Wikileaks' connection to russia. Something i never questioned up until the point was that wikileaks seldom (if ever) targets any non western aligned nation/corporation -- correct me if i'm wrong. Why do we never hear about china and russia's wrongdoings?

This was the post. Lot's of links in there to investigate.

Well, it's possibly because nobody from China or Russia leaks shit to Wikileaks or they don't know how to translate it or....they're controlled.

Not sure where I fall about 9/11 being an inside job, but my interest is truly piqued. The info in there could further confirm what did and didnt happen. Coming from MA here and one of our congressmen, Stephen Lynch, has read it and has made comments that it should be released and the public should know.

Check it out.

http://28pages.org/tag/stephen-lynch/

Let's face it, if it was nothing they wouldn't be sitting on it so hard.

But it's also interesting that so many people have seen it and nobody's really talked or leaked.

Maybe, maybe not. To play devil's advocate, they could be holding on to it as false gambit. If enough pressure finally comes along demanding they be released, they release them, and the results are underwhelming. This would be a blow to the momentum of the truth movement, even though it did nothing to actually bolster the official narrative or disprove the allegations of the truth movement. In this scenario, it's not about what can be shown, but how perceptions can be molded.

My honest guess is that it shows financing from inside KSA, possibly from members of the royal family or people with very close connections to them. I don't think such revelations would be terribly surprising to many people, even those who do not believe 9/11 was an inside job, but it would make it very difficult for the US to maintain its relationship to KSA in the way they have.

Not sure where I fall about 9/11 being an inside job,

seriously? dude(ette). take a stand, mate. it's soooooo obvious. the ONLY thing that is holding you back is your sheer disbelief that your own government (those swines in washington, the lot of them) could possible do such a thing. apart from that (rather ironic contradiction), it's so obvious those buildings were controlled demolitions. so obvious. soooooo obvious omg lol i cant even believe this is still even under deliberation, it's so so sooooo seriously so obvious.

Anonymous

define Anonymous?

Wikileaks

no, but... that may only be because no one has leaked them to wikileaks yet. wikileaks can only release what it receives.

The information in those 28 pages is Anti Semetic

The wikileaks guy is complete bullshit, he never leaks stuff critical of you know who and has even attacked 9/11 truthers.

Wikileaks is basically an intel op itself.