/r/conspiracy "Guest" Upholds the Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory (planes, not explosives, responsible for Twin Tower demise)
4 2016-02-15 by ctd911
I'm only an engineering school expelee, but I buy that the stress by the adjacent collapse of 1 WTC and 2 WTC could have led to cascade failure. But I'm not saying I'm sure either way. I don't know. I DO know 1 and 2 WTC weren't brought down by controlled demolitions. 7, maybe.
My follow up question (he didn't respond to any further questions):
What information do you have that contradicts Newton's laws of motion?
You might be able to grapple that Nobel Prize from the gravitational waves candidates!
Who was that fraud and what business did he have lying to users about things he hasn't looked into?
Edit: looks like that "AMA" lasted 3 days total on the front page. People were starting to ask questions.
39 comments
5 Orangutan 2016-02-15
Always question these guests and question those who are inviting them here. Good points and observation.
1 Flytape 2016-02-15
I notice you're a Sanders fan, good on you. Out of curiosity has Sanders made an official statement about his belief of what happened on 9-11-2001?
4 Orangutan 2016-02-15
Not that I know of. Get him to do an AMA here though and I'll ask him.
2 Flytape 2016-02-15
Well why should we question those who invite a political cartoonist to do an AMA because he doesn't think the towers were brought down in a controlled demolition, but not question a person promoting Bernie Sanders for president when Bernie Sanders doesn't think the towers were brought down by a controlled demolition?
I'm trying to figure out which people are to be discredited for thinking that terrorist brought the buildings down with hijacked planes and which people get a free pass for the exact same belief.
I guarantee you that Sanders answers the litmus test question the exact same way the cartoonist did!
-1 ctd911 2016-02-15
He KNOWS the Twin Towers were not brought down in a controlled demolition.
DO NOT LIE about the AMA candidate's claims concerning 9-11-01.
It's clearly meant to dissuade users from asking questions about the controlled demolitions of the Twin Towers.
The Twin Towers were both brought down in controlled demolitions.
4 canihaveahint 2016-02-15
The cartoonist? He's a fuckin cartoonist! His opinion is worth exactly dick.
1 ctd911 2016-02-15
It was a front page "sticky" for a few days. He parrots the Official CONspiracy Theory of 9-11-01.
A few users called him out and the "sticky" came down relatively fast for an /r/conspiracy AMA. Hope that helps.
3 Putin_loves_cats 2016-02-15
I found that comment weird as well. Mainly because he said "I know...". I was gonna comment to him how "he knows" without really looking into it, but decided not to.
1 ctd911 2016-02-15
If it stinks you're probably smelling shit.
3 Lestat087 2016-02-15
"What information do you have that contradicts Newton's laws of motion?"
I lold
1 ctd911 2016-02-15
The Nobel prize is up for grabs if he can disprove Newton's observations on conservation of momentum.
1 Lestat087 2016-02-15
Yeah but they gave one of them to Obama so I dont think they carry the same value as they once did.
2 Flytape 2016-02-15
People aren't required to believe whatever 9-11 theory you subscribe to. Our AMA guests, users, mods or anyone else won't be held to a litmus test about 9-11.
3 ctd911 2016-02-15
People aren't required to parrot the Official Conspiracy Theory.
It's a valid question whether you like it or not sir.
3 Flytape 2016-02-15
Life tip: expect people to have opinions that differ from your own.
6 ctd911 2016-02-15
Life tip: expect people to challenge opinions that are meant to parrot the Official Narrative, ESPECIALLY when they are stickied to the front page of /r/conspiracy.
1 Flytape 2016-02-15
I don't know man it sounds like you're complaining that he was allowed to do an AMA here because he doesn't subscribe to ae911.
Would you be more satisfied if he was a Judy Woods exotic space weaponry theorist?
3 ctd911 2016-02-15
It's obvious you're using ae91 as a strawman 'punching bag' against my statement.
My words are clear; if an AMA candidate steps up to the plate in /r/conspiracy and answers a pertinent conspiracy question with an 'infallible' answer that has no basis in Newton's laws of motion (I DO know 1 and 2 WTC were brought down by...), they will be challenged by users who question the Official Conspiracy Theory.
That seems to bother you. Why?
1 Dysnomi 2016-02-15
BC he's got a hate boner for 911truth. He got Orangutan removed from moderators because 911blogger has some of the most accessible research out there.
1 Flytape 2016-02-15
You're supporting a person who is asking us to disallow people to speak if they don't agree with his theory of choice.
Really? And you're going to bust my balls over it?
1 Dysnomi 2016-02-15
Why do you have a raging hate boner for AE911? You hate them as much as you hate 911blogger. Ffs, you got Orangutan removed from moderators because of your bullshit.
1 Flytape 2016-02-15
I have no hate for ae911.
My bullshit had nothing to do with orangutan's removal.
2 777dot 2016-02-15
link the ama please
1 Orangutan 2016-02-15
Ted Rall - Cartoonist
2 e546h45e6h54e 2016-02-15
storm in a teacup, you probably have beliefs too you know
0 ctd911 2016-02-15
It took 3 minutes to receive the first down vote. Looks like reddit.com is being gamed.
5 dejenerate 2016-02-15
Or maybe people believe that guests and participants here are allowed to believe what they want or don't want to believe about whichever conspiracy they want without obnoxiously being called "frauds" by other users?
-1 ctd911 2016-02-15
It is obnoxious to claim you "KNOW" things without facts.
4 dejenerate 2016-02-15
Sorry, calling people frauds because you don't agree with them and acting like people aren't worth listening to at all if they don't agree with one of your favorite theories wins the obnoxiousness contest.
-3 ctd911 2016-02-15
It is obnoxious to claim you "KNOW" things without facts.
Nothing you said makes the "political cartoonist's" words worthwhile.
Why are you arguing so hard for a political cartoonist's viewpoint to be heard, which eliminates all elements of conspiracy from 9-11-01 and puts in place the Official Conspiracy Theory?
Your actions are suspect.
2 dejenerate 2016-02-15
You guys always have the same MO.
Go batshit over stupid stuff, then threaten people with stuff like "your actions are suspect."
One might think you're actually against 911 truth by turning people off of it because the people associated with it on Reddit act like Grade A creeps.
-2 ctd911 2016-02-15
Why are you arguing so hard for a political cartoonist's viewpoint to be heard, which eliminates all elements of conspiracy from 9-11-01 and puts in place the Official Conspiracy Theory?
On might think you're actually against 911 truth by turning people off of it because the people associated with it on Reddit act like Grade A creeps.
6 dejenerate 2016-02-15
I just said your post was obnoxious.
Also, not Flytape. Pretty sure he thinks I'm an SJW bitch who should go fuck herself. :)
Anyway, keep threatening people and acting insane on Reddit, that will SURELY bring people over to your viewpoint.
2 Flytape 2016-02-15
We disagree on a few points that are... Central to my personal world view. That being said I wouldn't call you a creep over it, or a bitch. I would call you wrong on a few subjects but that would be "wrong from my PoV" and not necessarily objectively wrong.
I think you're more interesting than most.
-2 ctd911 2016-02-15
Why are you arguing so hard for a political cartoonist's viewpoint to be heard, which eliminates all elements of conspiracy from 9-11-01 and puts in place the Official Conspiracy Theory?
3 dejenerate 2016-02-15
Wow, you follow directions nicely! :) Thanks, Jack.
-3 ctd911 2016-02-15
Why are you arguing so hard for a political cartoonist's viewpoint to be heard, which eliminates all elements of conspiracy from 9-11-01 and puts in place the Official Conspiracy Theory?
Missed your answer good chap
4 dejenerate 2016-02-15
I argued that it's obnoxious to freak out and call an AMA invitee a fraud because he or she doesn't believe in your pet theory and I stand by that. It will push others from not doing AMAs, which may well be what you little brats want, but I don't think it's what the users here would prefer.
-5 ctd911 2016-02-15
Stop missing my point. He has no business stating lies as fact.
Why are you arguing so hard for a political cartoonist's viewpoint to be heard, which eliminates all elements of conspiracy from 9-11-01 and puts in place the Official Conspiracy Theory?
1 ctd911 2016-02-15
If it stinks you're probably smelling shit.
2 dejenerate 2016-02-15
You guys always have the same MO.
Go batshit over stupid stuff, then threaten people with stuff like "your actions are suspect."
One might think you're actually against 911 truth by turning people off of it because the people associated with it on Reddit act like Grade A creeps.