[deleted]

racist bigotry

You don’t have a fucking clue what either of these words mean, which is why you think they’re magically an ‘argument’.

It’s full of racism and bigotry.

You don’t know what these words mean.

The fact that you’re pretending that your invocation of the words means that 1) doing so is an argument in any form 2) you are correct and the opponent is wrong.

Never mind that neither racist nor bigoted statements are being made.

IF YOU SCROLL DOWN TO THE COMMENT SECTION. That very specific part PROVES that I am valid.

No, because again, there’s no racism/bigotry there.

After all this evidence, denying it any further shows that you’re a biggot

LEARN. WHAT. WORDS. MEAN. BEFORE. USING. THEM.

You’re gonna have to come with some realllllyyy taste evidence if you want to save your part in this discussion

Fucking prove your own point first. You don’t know what racism or bigotry are.

You’re saying I don't know what those words mean because I didn't prove a clearly proven point?

No, I’m saying you don’t know what they mean because you’ve deluded yourself into thinking a point has been proven by invoking their use itself rather than by actually HAVING a point.

first screenshot

Disregard the vulgarity and then explain how the statement is wrong. We can run through it line by line, if you like.

This will end in disaster if we don’t stop them.

Coudenhove-Kalergi plan exactly, yes.

It is impossible to integrate millions of non-white, non-Christians

Yes, this is also proven–by history, by practice, and by the fundamental nature of the invaders’ ideology itself.

Their IQs are way too low

Rather than give any statement as to the absolute intelligence required for the concept of integration (or any necessities in that regard), we can simply say that their IQs are, factually, lower than that of Europeans’.

zero impulse control

I sort of don’t want to split up the two groups, but we may as well. Islam explicitly says to have no impulse control in the invasion of non-Islamic areas. Numerous studies show that male behavior is heavily influenced by the operational sex ratio–or the ratio between fertile females and sexually active males.

If male and female numbers are equal then the best strategy is for a male to find a female, pair off, and protect/provide for his own kids.

If there are more fertile females than males, the best mating strategy for males is to put less resources caring for their kids and more resources trying to mate with multiple females. (note l: urban blacks in America fall into this category because of the amount of young black males either in prison or killed by other black males. result is that black males spend more time chasing other women and less time being fathers) (note 2: possibly bigamy became common in these societies to prevent the excess of available females from encouraging men to sleep around instead of be fathers)

If there are more males than females, the males that have mates get obsessed with protecting them from the surplus males, who form rape gangs to try to get access to the smaller numbers of females.

In polygamous societies, every man that has two wives creates a man who can never mate unless he rapes. Bigamy effectively turns a balanced operational sex ratio into a heavily male-biased one. Islam is a codified set of behaviors for protecting females from rape gangs (burka, can’t go outside without male guardian) and exporting the surplus males to neighboring societies so they don’t bother the local females (jihad). That is, essentially, Islam–a code of behaviors designed by a guy with multiple wives in a bigamous society to keep womanless men away from his wives.

The surplus males generated by bigamy are told, “These women are off-limits; they’re spoken for by more powerful men in your society. If you want to get laid, your only option is to go out and conquer something and take their women.” This is how Islam spread so quickly in its first few centuries and this is the driving force behind the huge amount of young men flooding into Europe today. They are not refugees, they are sex tourists. It should be no surprise they are so rapey.

As for the subsaharan invaders, here’s what we know: 1) The melanocortin system partially controls physical aggression. 2) MAOA-L is more prevalent in genetic negroids than in other groups. There is a well-defined correlation between MAOA-L and aggression. You should know what these two things imply by now. Oh, and vitamin D deficiency is linked with a decrease in impulse control, and Europe receives less solar vitamin D than other regions.

Mixing with such an inferior breed

Again, let’s work only with the relative rather than the absolute. Miscegenation has been long proven to cause genetic damage. In most cases, the children are at a much greater risk of being incompatible with any potential external medical treatment than any other group. If you’re mixed and need a bone marrow transplant, you’re dead. End of story. Never mind if you need an organ. Neither of your parents will be compatible.

It’s a site for Nazis.

Fuck’s sake; learn what Nazis are, too. East asians refuse miscegenation and you’re not fucking whining about them.

First of all, the issue at hand isn’t about right or wrong

That’s literally the only thing that matters, and thus is definitionally the issue at hand.

it’s about racism and bigotry.

And as you understand what neither word means, it’s no surprise that you don’t comprehend what right and wrong are.

IQ isn’t a very effective measurement for intelligence.

Yes... the INTELLIGENCE quotient isn’t good at measuring intelligence...

Science hasn't found a correlation between IQ and race.

Please don’t act stupid.

Science has however found a correlation between Quality of life and IQ.

Nope. Even the richest negroes in America are less intelligent than the poorest caucasians.

Seeing how a lot of black people in America have had a poor integration into Society

AND WHOSE FUCKING FAULT IS THAT, EXACTLY? The “civil rights” movement’s, in the modern era. Oh, and, again, since it doesn’t matter over genetic intelligence, “integration” is not a matter of societal factors.

Poor point, try again.

Same point. YOU try again.

We’re talking here about the Khalegi plan.

So it’s wrong for caucasians not to want to miscegenate but fine for east asians.

Show me a valid piece o’ research that proves said point.

Melanocortin system. MAOA-L (and another). And androgen receptors, as a freebie.

these people are often not reached proper conduit and better moral understanding.

“Proper” (which is only subjective insofar as this argument requires it to be) is not included in Islam, and thus is proof of their inability to integrate. Same with “better moral understanding”.

once integrated properly,

THEY DO NOT INTEGRATE. THEY DO NOT WANT TO INTEGRATE. THEY HAVE NO INTENTION OF INTEGRATING. THEY ARE EXPLICITLY TOLD NOT TO INTEGRATE. THE POINT IS NOT FOR THEM TO INTEGRATE. THE POINT IS FOR THEM TO DESTROY THE SYSTEM THAT IS ALREADY THERE, AS WELL AS THE PEOPLE THAT ARE ALREADY THERE. THE QURAN EXPLICITLY TELLS THEM TO DO THIS.

What, exactly, is confusing about this?!

It’s about whether or not that comment contains racism and bigotry.

Objective truth exists. I don’t give a fuck about moral relativism; it’s not real. If the statements are true, they’re true. If the statements are false, they’re false. It is not wrong to say true things. It is wrong to say false things.

Time for a triple kill.

As I said before, your links agree with me.

What the fuck. Are you confusing me for someone else?

I’m confusing you for someone who is capable of reading posts before replying to them, it seems.

When there are more than 10 versions of the Quran

One version.

Only orthodox muslims abide by every rule in the Qu’ran.

So... ALL MUSSULMEN, then. Because, by definition, you are not a mussulman if you don’t believe the Quran.

I like how every political troll I’ve seen so far has this familiar way of being self-descriptive.

You’re illiterate and your posts prove it. Either prove me wrong or don’t reply.

That’s good, that means you agree with what I said about some of those comments being racist.

Nope.

I guess 90% of all the muslims in my country aren’t Muslims then.

What part of this is unclear to you? The fact that you’re a moral relativist or the fact that truth exists regardless of what your feelings say?

Good to know.

Was the prophet Muhammad a mussulman? Did he lead an exemplary life by Islamic standards? As he spent most of his as a roving warlord, the Islamic State is living the example much more than any westernized kebab.

Do you agree that beliefs affect behavior? For example, if one believes that homosexuality, apostasy, and blasphemy are crimes that should be punished by death, do you think that makes the person holding that view more or less likely to commit violence against a blasphemer, apostate, or queer?

What counts as “Islam” and “Islamic”? If the words spoken by Muhammad and the life he lead don’t count as Islamic, you’re a retard. Do the things Jesus said count as Christianity? Of course.

If a Quaker or Buddhist or Hare Krishna goes on a killing spree and says he is doing it in the name of Jesus or Buddha or Krishna, are there any parts of the Bible or Buddhavacana or Bhagavad Gita that support him? Did the Buddha ever encourage murder? No. So you could very easily say that the attack was un-Buddhist or un-Krishna.

Saudi Arabia has public stoning as a (rare, but) legal form of execution. Homosexuals, adulteresses, blasphemers, and apostates are regularly executed. Is that un-Islamic? Seriously, is Saudi Arabia un-Islamic? That would be like suggesting that Vatican City isn’t Catholic.

This all boils down to people thinking that religious beliefs are all the same, which is utter bullshit. Some religious teach peace and have long histories thereof (Buddhism, Jainism, Hare Krishna-ism, Quakerism, etc.); others teach violence and have histories of violence–Islam being the chief proponent.

Thanks for admitting you were wrong.

KK.

it sounds stupid

because I say so

This isn’t an argument. The Coudenhove-Kalergi plan is what is happening to Europe. It’s what has happened for the last century. There’s not really anything to refute that.

What’s their end goal with this plan?

The destruction of all borders and the mongrelization of all races.

I read that it’s to ruin diversity

Hey! You understand that ‘diversity’ means having different people remain different! Fuck yeah; good for you!

My argument of it being counter-intuitive falls with the fact that a lot of people are being indirectly controlled through the diversity that the Khalergi plan wants to eliminate.

How are they being controlled through diversity? How are hundreds of disparate elements easier to control than one large element?

Picture this. You’re out on the Texan plains, riding your horse, tasked with bringing down to pasture your herd of animals.

You ride over the ridge, and there they are, in all their glory. Two of every animal (within reason; this is an analogy). Lions, tigers, bears, elephants, giraffes, sheep, cats, pigs, cows, emu, aardvarks, etc.

Now it’s time for you to open up all their individual pens and herd them a hundred miles north. Together.

Good luck!

Or you could have a herd of only cows. Or sheep. Or goats. Then you actually have a herd mentality and the motion of one can directly affect the other (like fish). Heck, to move sheep around, you can even employ the use of a non-human! A sheepdog! That’s even less work for you.

they claim it to be the end of the white race.

Because it is.

Even though it applies to every race.

No, this plan applies specifically to Europeans (and thus caucasians) and always has. The addition of non-whites does not mean that their numbers are affected in the genocide of whites (in any way but increasing).

The addition of fast transport and the global Unification of communication (Le Internet) has made this an inevitability

Complete bullshit. That’s the opposite of a foregone conclusion.

Here is a black dick for your insult 8====D

Insult? I’m complimenting you.

Well, sadly enough for your analogy,

Use the greater-than sign to quote. Like this

>words words words

races aren’t the same as species.

Yeah, about that...

since in reality, people aren’t mentally divided by race.

Every single study ever done and the whole of human history proves otherwise.

You can insert any race you want into that analogy.

Sure, and it would STILL be wrong.

A person’s subconscious sheep is not inherently more inclined to follow the decision of a black or white person until an actual difference is made.

Your statement is just false.

I personally doubt the Khalergi plan can ever function properly

It’s coming apart at the seams, at least. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.

I quote however I want to.

Right, you just look stupid doing it and you reduce readability.

Unless we all die or get another Hitler, mongrelization is an inevitability.

Complete bullshit. Again. You have zero evidence for this.

BTW, mongrelization means to make impure

And it does. Both by definition and as proven by medical science. Which is why I used it.

that sounds very fascist

No, it sounds very accurate.

you don’t happen to be one now. Would you.

Nah; I’m not a fan of the fascist –> bundle of sticks –> faggot association.

That shows the different wavelengths we’re on.

You... understand that true diversity is the preservation of differences. I also understand this. And this means we’re on a different wavelength?

I see no argument.

Then look harder. The difference, white and black, is inherent.

I think these guys are misinterpreting the words of this man.

“The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear... The Eurasian-negroid race of the future... ...will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals.”

YEAH, REALLY EASY TO MISINTERPRET.

Not for a healthy thinking human being.

Except no, your analogy is just bullshit.

Awh, you think this is a debate, don’t you?

No, I know for a fact that you’re wrong. There’s nothing to debate here, because there are no sides. It’s factual information that you just don’t have and which I am giving you.

Nobody is watching this shit but you and me.

And?

So you can stop the bending of my post and words into your favor

Direct quotes every time. Try the fuck again.

Racial differentiating came to life by people creating brotherhoods around their race

That and thousands of years of genetic disparity.

to make it easier to recognize your supposed enemies and allies.

Nope, ‘living in different places with different situations’ did that.

I personally doubt the Khalergi plan can ever function properly in the future with our new means of information sharing and in our modern society.

Yes, I agreed with that.

This racial differentiating is no longer a core part of modern society.

[citation needed]

And people don’t have to rely on creeds anymore in order to survive.

What kind of stupidity is that? Do you know what a creed is? I suppose if you want to live a completely unfulfilled life you can try to pretend you don’t have any creed...

I couldn’t give less of a shit about your preference.

Not mine, the site’s.

The unification of humanity doesn’t serve as proper evidence to you.

No, the complete lack of unification of humanity is not evidence of the unification of humanity. The genocide of groups of humanity is reason enough to not do this.

Show me evidence proving how this racial unification of Humanity is NOT inevitable?

Common sense, reason, and the actions of every human in history.

You've not given actual proof so far, only your words.

Nah, try again.

You see a backhanded insult as a compliment. I don’t.

... In what way is agreeing that diversity is the preservation of disparate elements an “insult”?!

That however hasn’t created factual noticeable inferiorities.

All medical science disagrees.

The site itself doesn't have a preference.

They built in the fucking formatting. Are you being intentionally dense about EVERYTHING?

using history as its backbone is a bad thing.

YEAH, it’s not like every single thing we are in every measurable capacity is based thereon or anything.

Oh, wait...

Ah, you're lazy and unmotivated.

Reported. You’re a fucking retard with absolutely no arguments whatsoever and no refutation to anything I have presented.

Check my other post for some that do agree.

a quora question that contradicts all studies

uncited wikipedia

third link agrees with me 100%

Thanks for proving me right!

You ignoring every question in which I asked if you are trolling.

Why the fuck would I give the time of day to anything that doesn’t pertain to the discussion at hand?

Give me a reason as to how that is not the case.

Already proven the association between genetics and intelligence.

Already proven the association between violence and Islam.

Already proven the association between mongrelization and genetic defects.

Your entire argument is destroyed, and you have been shown the purpose of the K-C plan.

Because it appears to be your only motivation for continuing said discussion at hand.

Yep, which is why I’m explicitly refuting everything else you’re saying which is actually on topic.

Nope.

Reported for blatant trolling.

Orthodox Islam. Nothing to do with any argument I made.

And yet relevant to the discussion.

The part you had proven was the donor part.

And the blood type part and the heart disease part and the...

[removed]

Rules 1 & 10. Removed. 1st warning.

IF YOU SCROLL DOWN TO THE COMMENT SECTION. That very specific part PROVES that I am valid.

No, because again, there’s no racism/bigotry there.

After all this evidence, denying it any further shows that you’re a biggot

LEARN. WHAT. WORDS. MEAN. BEFORE. USING. THEM.

You’re gonna have to come with some realllllyyy taste evidence if you want to save your part in this discussion

Fucking prove your own point first. You don’t know what racism or bigotry are.