Hillary Clinton email reveals Benghazi was financed by Saudi Arabia
95 2016-03-10 by bulla564
Here is the article in Medium.com about the email.
And here is the fateful email.
95 2016-03-10 by bulla564
Here is the article in Medium.com about the email.
And here is the fateful email.
18 comments
11 DarthUcket 2016-03-10
Comic Sans... the font of choice for international conspiracies...
-1 beanie1816 2016-03-10
This looks bogus. That doesn't look at all like the emails I looked at.
1 HulaguKan 2016-03-10
Because it's Russian propaganda.
1 ENYAY7 2016-03-10
it's insane she still claims the "video" making fun of islam had anything to with the bengahzi attack.
1 bulla564 2016-03-10
It was a great setup to topple yet another non-US-banking-cartel-friendly government with a made-up narrative that a complacent US populace would swallow. It's a tired playbook of the warmonger neocons... I'm sad as a Democrat that Hillary is one of them.
1 Jon_Beveryman 2016-03-10
You realize Benghazi happened, like, a year after the Qaddafi government fell, right? There wasn't a whole lot there to topple in 2012...kinda sinks your claim.
1 bulla564 2016-03-10
I don't know how the process of toppling governments by Western neocons and Arab states is not clear as day now to anyone that spends a bit of time reading and understanding history:
Step 1 : In and before 2011, Saudi Arabia and the West fund rebels in Benghazi (jihadists in the case of Saudi Arabia) to go against the western-arab-oil-banking-cartel unfriendly government of Gaddafi.
Step 2 : the West through the UN and NATO claim that now Benghazi is a potential humanitarian crisis that needs military intervention because the domestic government is fighting against said funded rebels (jihadists in the case of Saudi Arabia).
Step 3 : UN/NATO/France/US/Saudi Arabia convince the world that they have to militarily intervene in favor of rebels they initially funded against the local government.
Step 4: establish a base of operations in Benghazi for the "Transitional Council" from where rebels (helped militarily by the Western coalition, and funded by the likes of Saudi Arabia, especially the jihadist groups) can plot and topple the anti-West anti-Gulf government.
Step 5 : overthrow the unfriendly dictator, and let NATO/Saudi/Qatar/etc. funded rebels (especially jihadists) have a field day killing Gaddafi, while ignoring the ethnic cleansing of entire areas of black Libyans by said Saudi-backed jihadists.
Step 6 : Profit? (or witness a failed state fall into the hands of ISIS... yet another group funded by Saudi/Qatar/Turkey/etc.).
You can follow the same steps in toppling governments followed by the West in Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, etc. etc. etc. It's such a normalized script by now from neocons and the military industrial complex, that Gaddafi was well aware of what was going to happen to him (and Assad...).
1 Jon_Beveryman 2016-03-10
You completely sidestepped my point. The Benghazi consulate attack, in 2012, could not have been in any way a justification for the toppling of Qaddafi's government, because that government was toppled in 2011. The nice little script you posted is irrelevant, because it describes (or doesn't, because I personally think it's full of shit, but that's neither here nor there) events that happened in 2010 and 2011.
1 ryanjack 2016-03-10
nice try...Iran
1 eyeziontheprize 2016-03-10
Is it possible for Guccifer to be a limited hangout?
0 HulaguKan 2016-03-10
This looks fake as fuck
2 bulla564 2016-03-10
And yet it's an email received and subsequently forwarded by Clinton...
1 HulaguKan 2016-03-10
According to some anonymous russian hacker. Brought to you by the Kremlin's own propaganda outlet.
Totally legit I'm sure.
1 bulla564 2016-03-10
Anonymous Russian hacker? the guy is being extradited to the US for hacking the emails. It's not some random Russian hacker...
1 HulaguKan 2016-03-10
According to RT.
Has the guy ever confirmed that he sent those emails to RT?
0 SoCo_cpp 2016-03-10
Medium.com is a blog, not a news outlet.
3 bulla564 2016-03-10
And yet the article points to actual emails from Hillary. Don't attack the source and ignore the data.
1 HulaguKan 2016-03-10
No, it points to Russia's main propaganda site.
There is no credible source for this.
1 [deleted] 2016-03-10
[deleted]
1 HulaguKan 2016-03-10
Why is it hard to believe? RT is notorious for lying, especially when it's about something that makes the US look bad.
There is literally no evidence that this email is genuine and therefore no reason to believe that it is.