The Vatican named their telescope L.U.C.I.F.E.R.
65 2016-07-22 by Skeezin_Squirrelnuts
It stands for - Large Binocular Telescope Near-infrared Utility with Camera and Integral Field Unit for Extragalactic Research.
And lucifer was the best they could come up with? Give me a break. This should be a dead sign as to what the space program is for.
78 comments
15 Sabremesh 2016-07-22
This video, which shows the singing of the Paschal Hymn at the Easter service in St. Peters in Rome (ie the Vatican), which is sung in the presence of the Pope, explicitly states that Jesus is the son of Lucifer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcpVrtv2t-M
The Latin word Lucifer translates literally as the "light-bringer", and this why the Illuminati (ie those who have been illuminated or "enlightened") worship Lucifer.
3 DoYouEvenBrewBro 2016-07-22
Illuminati arent necessarily Luciferians, the jury is still out on that. They have been called Satanists, Zionists, Luciferians, Pagans and everything else
6 Sabremesh 2016-07-22
The clue is in the name.
-1 DoYouEvenBrewBro 2016-07-22
naming of a telescope doesnt give enough evidence to claim the vatican is luciferian. Need alot more than the naming of a private observatory. 2000 years of history and this is how they make their statement, cmon now.
5 Sabremesh 2016-07-22
Right. Did you watch the video I linked?
-2 DoYouEvenBrewBro 2016-07-22
yes, and its still not enough. Large claims take large amounts of evidence.
10 Sabremesh 2016-07-22
You just saw a video of God being referred to as Lucifer, in the Vatican, during the formal Easter Sunday service, in the presence of the Pope. What more do you want, exactly!?
10 Vitalogy0107 2016-07-22
People are unable to think anymore, they need a youtube video from the comment section to tell them how they should interpret this, and why it's not or why it is important. I see this everyday on Reddit. Someone posts a relevant video debunking an idea, and then someone else says they will need proof. The proof was the video. People are not satisified being linked information anymore, they need to be told how to process it.
2 Homer_Simpson_Doh 2016-07-22
Makes you wonder if everything is backwards.
What if the anti-Christ is Christianity itself. Christianity is responsible for millions and millions of deaths over the last 1500 years. God smited more people in the bible than the devil did.
What if we are all in hell and just don't know it? Would make sense with all the Saturn worship in every religion.
1 thinkB4Uact 2016-07-22
"My Conversation with GE" on January 1st, 2014
1 DoYouEvenBrewBro 2016-07-22
one video in over 2,000 years. Must be true!
-4 DaveHyral 2016-07-22
How about some proof that isn't tainted with bias?
4 possiblebraindamage 2016-07-22
What does that even mean? Exactly how do you put forth information about a controversial subject without some kind of bias? Do you live in some kind of fantasy land where random people randomly uncover information and then for no explicable reason they decide to take the time and effort to write a book or make a video about it? Bias? BIAS? How does 'bias' magically invalidate anything?
1 bluefire8q3 2016-07-22
Bias is all there can ever be on earth. We can try all we want to factor in another's POV, but at the end of the day we are stuck in our own perspective.
1 DaveHyral 2016-07-22
Okay, you can stop with the strawmanning.
1) bias in this POV is showing only a single side of the argument. 2) hell with explaining anything to you because you strawmanned me.
1 possiblebraindamage 2016-07-22
And? Again I must ask, what is your point? If I am against something, or trying to expose something, or argueing for/against something then why the hell would I ever try to justify or defend my opponent's actions or the thing I am against?
good thing I am posting this to appeal to a wider audience and don't really care if you specifically answer me or not. Hows that for a non-biased statement?
1 thinkB4Uact 2016-07-22
To reduce bias to a minimum, we'd have to be passionless machines, emotionally void, and then, we'd still have some bias.
4 ItsAJackOff 2016-07-22
Okay. Try this one.
The Vatican is luciferian because it is surrounded with pagan shit that has nothing to do with Jesus and everything to do with self worship. The statues of Mary are really Semiramis, as idol worship is forbidden in the teachings of Jesus and in the Ten Commandments.
The real kicker...
The pope is given the term vicarious christi, the vicar of christ. He is basically Jesus on earth in the flesh and blood. If the pope's word should contradict the teachings of Christ or the bible, catholic doctrine states that the pope's word should take precedent. That is about as close to self worship as you can get (which is the essence of luciferianism and most satanism).
If you think Catholicism is in line with Jesus I highly encourage you to research The Black Pope and The Jesuits. The pope is a snake and Catholicism is a bastardization of Jesus' teachings.
1 DoYouEvenBrewBro 2016-07-22
the essence of Luciferianism is that God feared man becoming intelligent and independent and Lucifer rebelled against God by trying to give man knowledge (Apple eating is symbolic of this) God found out, punished Lucifer and man and basically the bible is propaganda.
Satanism is worshipping the "evil" version of Satan and self.
Luciferianism = God is a mean propagandist, with the bible as his media. Lucifer was trying to help make man independent and was shunned and shot down for it.
1 perfect_pickles 2016-07-22
gonna upset the devout catholics out there.
not to mention give dissenters like protestants,
and other religions ammunition to use against Rome.
1 DoYouEvenBrewBro 2016-07-22
its at best one of the flimsiest arguments ive seen on here, which says alot.
1 possiblebraindamage 2016-07-22
it's almost as if a secret organization that has existed for over 500 years might change their mission or leanings every time a generation dies and is replaced by another. This is exactly how we got the current new world order nonsense.
Originally, a bunch of wealthy protestant industrialists decided that they would use their money to oppress non-english people since they believed the english were literally the master race. Then they all died and the next generation who took over their organizations and all the mechanisms that went with it suddenly started preaching multiculturalism, globalism, and equality.
1 DoYouEvenBrewBro 2016-07-22
but English protestants are who they are because they were conquered by Vikings...
1 bluefire8q3 2016-07-22
They worship Ba'al which is the 1,000 faced pretender god aka Lucifer The Rebel. There's also the other Fallen Angels that descended with it.
2 DoYouEvenBrewBro 2016-07-22
now we are in the tinfoilverse. cmon, you have 0 to back any of this. Next thing you know, we are going to be in bogus entomology. "Ba'al is Moloch, is Satan, Is Lucifer, is God, is all things i need him to be to fit my current argument". Lets get some backing, from anywhere.
1 bluefire8q3 2016-07-22
That's basically what the Freemasons did... They turned their god Ba'al aka Beelzebub (Lord of The Flies) aka Lucifer the god of Light (sun gods?) into the God. The many names come from different people through time, the gods all share similar characteristics, and most required blood sacrifices as well. Their organization encouraged this very belief. Read Albert Pike's Morals and Dogma, I got a copy from Half-Priced books. Torrent any of the Myriad of Occult books; because most are pretty expensive. Look into Alister Crawley. Watch this documentary, it explains the history of the order. I have no backing? What do you have? I view the world through many lenses, but I am entitled to my own point of view. May Jesus Christ watch over you. Peace, love, and safety to you.
1 DoYouEvenBrewBro 2016-07-22
them having similar characteristics doesnt mean much, i have read Pike's Morals and Dogma. Crowley created the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, similar to the Hellfire club, in which rich aristocrats screw around. Crowley never wielded any real authority and there is 0 to substantiate Pike's claims
10 Salai207 2016-07-22
"Light" bringer? It's an allusion to optics IMO
2 big_face_killah 2016-07-22
Its quite fitting really
0 Skeezin_Squirrelnuts 2016-07-22
Lol. Oh yes that's a great reason for the Catholic church to use the name lucifer.
8 Blue_Palasky 2016-07-22
lucifer is venus, bringer of light
-3 Skeezin_Squirrelnuts 2016-07-22
My understanding is the sun brings us light. The one god created. So I suppose you're right, lucifer is a great name to use.. if you weren't using common sense.
1 lbrodieee 2016-07-22
Saturn is the old sun.
1 Skeezin_Squirrelnuts 2016-07-22
So you're saying there was once 2 suns?
1 hillbilly_joe 2016-07-22
two moons, too.
1 possiblebraindamage 2016-07-22
There's a fringe theory that at one point saturn and venus were once extremely close to the earth and ancient people believed them to be an alternate sun and moon.
7 FREETHOUGHTSOPEN 2016-07-22
That's because the church was stolen from the real Hebrews in 70AD by Edom who worship Baal as the Bible clearly states in thousands of ways.
They are watching for Aliens the same reason NASA watches for aliens.
God, is a alien and when he comes back, he's not coming to be all flowers and candy like the wicked will have us believe but instead, to wage war on the wicked.
1 YoureAllRobots 2016-07-22
And you wonder why they worship Lucifer...
2 FREETHOUGHTSOPEN 2016-07-22
What's more interesting is that the King Alfred Plan / Rex 84 was created in order to round up Blacks/Hispanics.
Slavery started 1619 it is 2016.
What I believe is that the Zionist are trying to start Martial Law in order to start Rex 84.
Here is why, in the plans, it states that FEMA will take over State and Federal levels of government. In which small white supremacist militias will help FEMA round up blacks & Hispanics.
In the Bible, in the Book of Jeremiah, it speaks of Jacobs trouble.
As we know, Rothschild is connected to founding the confederacy, the transatlantic slave trade, the Vatican and the government state of Israel. It is also known that these people in Israel are not the Biblical Jews but modern day Jewry.
They will not be able to do it while Obama is in office, it says this in the Bible when Jacob talked to his children in the last days concerning the tribe of Dan. If you know anything about the Danites, they broke away from the other tribes and fell into sin much earlier then the rest of the Hebrews. I believe this was done to hide their true intentions for 1000's of years.
Someone posted earlier that Jesse Ventura claimed that the establishment might have Trump assassinated because they might like Mike Pence more. Well, this would give the perfect reason to establish nation wide marital law or the chain of events that follow would.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmXi8t896QQ
They will try to accomplish their plans but it will not work.
Thus, the Book of Obadiah will begin.
1 possiblebraindamage 2016-07-22
I read a crazy theory the other day: the reason Israel is so concerned with forcing refugees from africa and the middle east into europe and the united states, the reason they so heavily push multiculturalism in western countries, is so that they can have the middle east all to themselves after they nuke the rest of the planet under the pretense of starting the end of days.
Basically: agitate to send muslim immigrants into the western world so when they start their jihad to create a global caliphate, israel's leadership can justify blowing everyone up. Talk about the ultimate holocaust.
1 FREETHOUGHTSOPEN 2016-07-22
No, Globalism and Zionism are not the same, they are different ideals.
Zionism is upholding white supremacy borders that keep the people separated, this in turn creates a pyramid of both racial and class supremacy. This is because once you remove this barrier and people stop using fear and hate, no doubt that the white race would surely disappear because once black starts mixing with white, you will get brown and slowly over time the world is brown again. The only way for the white race to actually exist is through war and hate. Because once this simple, yet powerful evil idea is defeated, people will not want to feel fear and hate anymore, thus people get along, people have kids, people prosper.
Globalism is removing barriers of white supremacy, this in turn will no doubt cause more interracial couples that will have interracial babies thus the world is naturally go back to it's original starting point, mostly brown eyes all around the world. So in essence George Soros is funding the refugees not with evil intent but to move them into white areas to protect them. The evil happens when stranded Syrians wash up ashore and instead of a helping hand, they run into Zionism or white supremacy AKA the barrier mentioned above under Zionism. It was already clear that Syria would be a warzone according to conspiracy videos pre 2005 and before. Therefore, those people had to be moved once ISIS (Zionist Mercs) basically took over Syria.
In other words, by moving these minorities out of heavily single populated areas, they have been saved from such a nuclear strike because the Zionist will not strike their own kind because it defeats the purpose.
Example, moving a million black Syrians into Germany would make it more complicated for them to drop Nukes on these people.
This helps remove nuclear warfare off the table in the short run, not the long run, it would seem that the globalist are not on the attack but on the defense. They are waiting for something.
If you still hold the narrative that ISIS is controlled by Islam at the top, you are indeed mislead.
Israel controls ISIS
Israeli Secret Intelligence Service.
Go through all of Alex Jones videos, you will hear him say Globalist or blame the Muslims or any other minority group you can. But he will never say Zionist.
In the instance of BLM, this too is a way to fight the Zionist with protest and debate. This is why the establishment controlled by the Zionist here in America are trying everything from null arguments to setting up false flags against the group, basically anything to make it look like a terrorist group.
If you search up some of the migrant attacks you will find that a lot of the big stories they covered are indeed fake. They take pictures of women who had been fighting and say that it was a migrant but you can easily find the other story on the internet. Which supports the narrative I am not just talking out my ass.
This in noway shape or form means that there aren't bad people out there, I'd be a fool to claim so.
1 help1me1ryze 2016-07-22
why the secret rulers of our society are so interested in keeping melaninated people downtrodden all over the world? why would they round up 'blacks/hispanics' as part of their plan? u gave delicious bits in your post, but i can get in trouble watching a video on it (im not anywhere private) so please give me some textual meat to bite.
1 FREETHOUGHTSOPEN 2016-07-22
That's for you to find, anyone with a passion for knowledge would just break it down simple and plain. I feel if I type it, you won't believe me anyways.
1 help1me1ryze 2016-07-22
bruh.. i will believe what u say. thats why im asking fod your thoughts, since u seem to be a reliably informed guy.
1 ItsAJackOff 2016-07-22
Lol, Luciferianism is not worshipping Lucifer.
It's about self worship. Making yourself into God.
In certain Christian lure, Lucifer's aim is not to get you to worship Him. It's to educate and enlighten you to the point of unlocking the little slice of God in all of us. While this sounds great and innocent, one must examine the fruits of supposed Christians and Luciferians labors. Often times, they are quite hideous. Some wish to bring about the end times and some wish to bring about the pagan trinity (which some believe will simultaneously fulfill Jewish requirements for their messiah). The perfect human. This is what they want. This is what its all about.
0 PetililPuff 2016-07-22
God isn't an "alien". While I agree that when He comes, it will be to pour out His wrath on the wicked, you shouldn't define God in this way. Trying to use man's words, man's concepts, and man's images to represent God is wrong. We should only be using words that He gave us in the Bible to represent Him, because those are the only words He has given us that He finds satisfactory.
Romans 1:22-23 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
1 FREETHOUGHTSOPEN 2016-07-22
You are quoting Romans but don't understand it. This is concerning Jacobs brother, Esau who did this:
http://www.truthrevolt.org/sites/default/files/styles/content_full_width/public/field/image/articles/jesus.jpg?itok=iZCbcKxD
Jesus Wasn’t White And Here’s Why That Matters
5 PetililPuff 2016-07-22
I'm sorry, I believe I do understand it. I believe that it still applies to us all. We should not make God into an image like to corruptable man. The concept of "aliens" is a concept derived from corruptable man. God never refers to Himself as an "alien" in scripture. We can just agree to disagree on this if you don't see it the way I do. I don't believe the first image is of Jesus, because Christ most likely had short hair. However, his hair is described as being "white as wool." The common types of sheep native to the middle east have blonde-colored wool. Given that Christ was what, 30, when He was crucified, the biblical description that his hair was "as white as wool" makes me conclude that it wasn't gray because I don't imagine that Christ's person would have aged after his death. Regardless, I think the hair and skin color of Christ is absolutely irrelevant to salvation and true faith. And no, we shouldn't be worshipping and plastering images of Him anywhere. Even if it were an accurate depiction. Fortunately I have never personally participated in this behavior.
2 FREETHOUGHTSOPEN 2016-07-22
a·li·en
As for the corruption with the image of white Jesus, yes, it is a sin. Plastering it all over the church is a bigger sin, wearing it on crosses and chains is a even bigger sin. Hell people will even claim that they wear it because Jesus died for their sins but any righteous man/woman knows this is a lie. For Jesus followed the ways of the Old Testament.
So until we are done, everyone shall be punished for their sins. Jesus died to solidify his testament, not for the sins of people.
Good day.
1 PetililPuff 2016-07-22
Sorry I edited my comment.
1 FREETHOUGHTSOPEN 2016-07-22
You seem like you know your stuff, did it mention anything about the color of his skin?
1 PetililPuff 2016-07-22
Lmao I initially made my first comment short & snippy because I saw the 2nd link you shared and thought you were one of those "Jesus was black! Black people are the true Jews!" guys. And I was like "oh boy, I'm not even gonna get into it with this guy!"
The Bible as far as I know doesn't mention anything about the color of Jesus's skin. I doubt He was a pale guy though, considering He went about travelling in the sun. However, the Bible does describe Solomon's skin as being "white and ruddy" in Song of Solomon. And we know from the biblical genealogy, Jesus was descended from Solomon. But we don't know from that what Jesus' skintone was, because there could have been various mixing of skin tones from that point on.
I tell people sometimes, "Those depictions people like to put up of this long-haired Jesus Christ - I wouldn't doubt it if that's exactly what the antichrist looks like!" Not only that, but the world is also so wont to depict Satan as a man with short, blonde hair when there is absolutely no evidence of his appearance. Smh. Everything is twisted. But these are just some things I think of regarding the matter.
1 FREETHOUGHTSOPEN 2016-07-22
Ah so it mentions nothing about his skin tone in the Bible, okay.
2 PetililPuff 2016-07-22
Nope. And I think God specifically didn't have it mentioned in the Bible because it doesn't matter.
2 FREETHOUGHTSOPEN 2016-07-22
Yea you're right man. Thanks for the knowledge.
7 wee_knee 2016-07-22
Oh... those Jesuits...! Such kidders!
4 Long_Shore_Man 2016-07-22
This goes along with what the people at /r/RomeRules have been saying
3 recono85 2016-07-22
Yeah think about this too. The Vatican owns the planets largest telescope.
3 Sir_Edmund_Bumblebee 2016-07-22
Do you have a source for that? A quick google search doesn't seem to have the Vatican even in the top 10 of largest telescopes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_large_optical_telescopes
If you look, it's pretty far down the list.
3 recono85 2016-07-22
Ah, I see now
-5 Skeezin_Squirrelnuts 2016-07-22
And always has for the past 500 years.
3 igottashare 2016-07-22
Some fringe reporting has incorrectly conflated the shared geographic location of the Vatican Advanced Technology Telescope (VATT) with the LBT's LUCIFER acronym. This has led to some erroneous reporting of hidden agendas being held the Vatican.[20]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Binocular_Telescope
On who really operates it and how it got its name: http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2010-04/devil-named-telescope-helps-astronomers-see-through-darkness
2 newusername4231 2016-07-22
Shedding light (understanding/reason) on/to the celestial plane? Is that what it's for?
1 tincanoffish87 2016-07-22
Except its not owned by the Vatican but whatevs:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Binocular_Telescope#Controversy
1 Skeezin_Squirrelnuts 2016-07-22
I was proven wrong already :/
1 pacoflacotutu 2016-07-22
I'm gonna go with " the bringer of light" interpretation, either in direct reference to visually illuminating the night sky through the telescope, or as the bringer of light in the form of knowledge, illuminating the darkness of our ignorance. I would imagine this is the intent of the name, as an intensely secret society probably wouldn't reveal thier true intentions and belief systems so publicly. or I could be wrong and lizard people in the center of the earth control our minds telepathically with crystal skulls. what the fuck do I know
1 911bodysnatchers322 2016-07-22
Great catch. Don't you know that the Pope Francis was one step from being superior general in the Jesuits when he was ordained white pope? Also, he changed the 'no catholics can be freemasons' rule, so now they can. Know why? Because he's himself a freemason. So we have a freemason, jesuit, (probably some kind of knight order) pope.
Of course we have a lucifer telescope! We also have a lucifer hella pope.
1 thinkB4Uact 2016-07-22
Lucifer is a loosh sniffer. Loosh is spiritual food for masters of self-service at the expense of others. It is stolen spiritual energy. Spiritual energy is that which animates the soul which animates the body, essentially animating matter. It is created during experiences of positive emotions, love, laughter, joy, witnessing beauty, feeling gratitude, giving and receiving good will from others, etc. Experiences that create spiritual energy make one feel more like living and doing things in life, inspired, motivated, alive. Spiritual energy is released during experiences of negative emotions, fear, suffering, anger, hatred, anxiety, loss, etc. Experiences that release spiritual energy make one feel less like living and doing things in life, depressed, drained, suicidal.
Many years ago, this planet became a farm for negative ETs, adepts at service to the self at the expense of others. They covertly contaminated the planet with minions, machinations and causes of fear and suffering. "Satanic" rituals are designed to produce loosh by generating fear and suffering. Sadists enjoy stealing this energy. Miserable people that get a high when others around them become miserable also enjoy this energy. Animals that torment their prey enjoy this energy. It's a very dark aspect of our reality. We'd like to deny this energy transfer occurs, but it explains things that baffle us. It's why
demonsnegative ETs like to cause fear, suffering, slavery and destruction. It's a lot of fun for them. Without it, they feel empty inside, drained by their constant emotional states of fear, used by their overlords to maintain control and also for fun.This is not hard to understand, but is hard to accept. Positive emotions, positive beings, and positive civilizations produce spiritual energy. Neutral beings and civilizations do too. Negative emotions, negative beings, and negative civilizations generally don't produce a net amount of spiritual energy and so seek to enslave and harm others to obtain this spiritual energy. Without it, life seems boring, empty and meaningless. Some negative beings and civilizations have been stuck in negative emotions and thought patterns for a long time. This causes them to seek to distill reality down to its constituent parts and put it into mental boxes in order to maximize competitiveness, to avoid suffering the abusive behavior of others, and to be able to secure others as slaves to obtain spiritual energy. This loosh consuming behavior is like a disease, similar to zombies. Except, you would have to get bitten enough for you to see the world as fear, suffering and competition almost exclusively. At that point, you're infected and infect others. Sometimes love can disinfect, but it takes both parties wanting that outcome.
1 JazzFan418 2016-07-22
This is a myth. The Vatican owned telescopes are called the VATT. Another group, who installed a telescope of their own project named it Lucifer. The vaticans is not a near infrared type. It's partial spectrum.
0 Skeezin_Squirrelnuts 2016-07-22
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vatican_Advanced_Technology_Telescope
I like how they don't mention the part about lucifer.
3 toupeira 2016-07-22
It's because Lucifer isn't actually owned by the Vatican, they just share the same building.
2 odplocki 2016-07-22
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Binocular_Telescope
5 toupeira 2016-07-22
See Controversy:
-1 lam777 2016-07-22
I think you are reaching.
7 SlumberMachine 2016-07-22
and touching. grabbing. and holding. Start to study the vatican and a lot of these upside down tricks are found. Why?
-6 lam777 2016-07-22
I'm not saying they are not luciferian. But I'm saying that acronym is a reach.
3 Crangrapejoose 2016-07-22
You must have not looked at many acronyms used by governments. You'd be surprised.
3 Skeezin_Squirrelnuts 2016-07-22
Really, you think they left the B for binoculars, T for telescope, N near infrared, and more out for a reason?
-2 DoYouEvenBrewBro 2016-07-22
yes, and its still not enough. Large claims take large amounts of evidence.
1 FREETHOUGHTSOPEN 2016-07-22
Ah so it mentions nothing about his skin tone in the Bible, okay.
1 DoYouEvenBrewBro 2016-07-22
its at best one of the flimsiest arguments ive seen on here, which says alot.