Sooooo, the camera person just starts filming this dude before anyone around the guy even knows whats about to happen?

Can someone explain how a person could predict such an event... and film it instead of run for their lives? Something stinks...

EDIT 1: Female Instagram account, yet the video has a man's voice as being the camera operator. Could be a video repost from another source. No source was given on the profile.

EDIT 2: Pedestrians on the street are acting normal, as if nothing has happened prior to this footage. YET, we see evidence that other people are running towards the suspect very quickly, and BEFORE he pulls his gun and starts shooting.

EDIT 3: We can presume that no shots were fired prior to the video, as the street pedestrians are not reacting to loud gunshots within their vicinity. You can see the grey haired man jump in shock once the suspect pulls the trigger for the first time. Why are there people running for their lives up the alley though?... and towards the suspect?

EDIT 4: People running up the alley bang a right and run in a straight path, directly in the line of fire of the shooter as soon as he starts shooting. At close range, no one is seen getting shot.

reports of Langwaffen but that was clearly a kleine Pistole!

Langwaffen

Yes, this person seems to only be holding a pistol in the footage. Surprised they didn't spring for the AR-15 debate again. No doubt this will be some form of automatic weapon discussion by the time they feed us all the "facts."

the automatic weaponry must become part of the debate--it was off-camera.

He saw people running around like crazy and maybe heard gunshots and decided to film what's going on. Why does that sound so crazy? Edit: https://www.instagram.com/___su01___/ - It seems to originate from here, which is a typical instagram account, no paid actor

We're speaking on visual evidence please, as seen in this video. We are not making assumptions from things we cannot see or prove.

What I SEE are cars on a road... pedestrians un-phased by anything as if its just a normal day. Then we see a man in black walking around a bit and pulling a gun. It looks as if he cocks it back, and then starts to fire at the crowd of people in front of him... that same crowd of people who do not appear to be reacting to "hearing gun shots" within 50 feet of their location prior to the suspect shooting at them. You will notice the grey haired man jump in shock.

How could this cameraman, who is further from them... be more alerted to what's going on?

But right before he starts shooting, you see people running from the alley or whatever that is called. It looks like he ran with them or ran there to wait for them to come so he could shoot them.

I see what you are mentioning. Yes, it appears they are running directly towards him, and immediately bang a right when they realize he's the one with the gun.

I also notice that he's a terrible shot, not hitting a single person at close range as they run in a linear direction away from him.

Not defending my point, but just raising more suspicious questions. We should wait and see what other media they put out. This one is still active, and has the potential to outdo any of the previous incidents.

If this guy is primed, that's the same as the techniques identified by Mick Ware in his documentary 'Only the Dead'. Jihadists plan attack and have a camera waiting to catch it (in doc it's done with suicide carbombings though).

This exact idea destroys my concept of bribed-terrorism. How could you fund a side to carry out such terrible acts, when in the end, they just blow themselves up? It's paying someone to kill themselves. I suppose that's where religion comes in...

Terrorism can be encouraged and it can be coerced, but I doubt that there's many who have done it for money straight up. (At least, not the guy who's going to be shot at the end of this - the others who will be forgotten probably get a nice paycheck).

You are noticing it is not a shill account, so that's a good step... but anyone could become a "paid actor" or "informant" if the price is right. Let's not rule out humans morality when it comes to bribery.

EDIT: I agree though... that chick likes selfies LOL.

Also note, at the video's end, we can hear a mans voice as being the loudest, presuming he is the one holding the camera.

Why does this females Instagram account have a guy controlling the camera, and why do we not hear evidence of her in the video?

No feet are shown as the recorded is running.

oh yea it's possible that it actually doesn't originate from this instagram account lol

There's no way she would be savy enough to find a video of this already, repost the video in an app to then re-upload to her account, all within the first 20 minutes of this happening with her life in jeopardy somewhere.

There is no tag pointing to an original source. This chick could be at home in the tub for all we know. Could be just a repost indeed. Let's keep our eyes peeled

wtf thats a girls instagram account but that is not a girls voice in the video wtf wtf wtf wtf

Couple of Archives I just posted:

Video of Shootings https://web.archive.org/web/20160722181223/https://twitter.com/Cronikeys/status/756550989524586496

Claims that there were at least three shooters (start the countdown clock until there's only one reported in the media).

https://web.archive.org/web/20160722181223/https://twitter.com/Cronikeys/status/756550989524586496

$100 says he's shot and cannot be interrogated.

three shooters (start the countdown clock until there's only one reported in the media).

Yeah, I was going to bring this up. 3 men wearing black with full military gear becomes 1 man wearing something else.

Well how could reports of a mall shooting, and a McDonalds be the same person at the same time? Did he get hungry, and then decide to start shooting up there too?

If the MSM starts talking about one person, we'll know something else is up for sure. Although, the multiple people and still at large would be something new.

There's ALWAYS three or four to start with...

And later on you have the 'crazy' person drinking in the corner of the bar saying that they saw two or three people 'together' - they weren't confused and attributing one person running around lots of places as multiple perps.

The poster of those articles believes in a two-party political system and supports a side. Cannot be trusted.

Are you referring to me?

Are you a female named Alison? If so, then you have some research to do on how all this political nonsense is just a dog and pony show. Nothing more than a movie we're watching on a screen.

The left side or right side are both just legs that we can choose to lead us in that first step over the cliff to failure.

No I'm not aha, I did however see her tweets on twitter which contained video and so I archived it because last time I linked to a twitter video here someone got annoyed because it got deleted before they could see it.

No worries then :P . I'm sure you're aware of the the illusion of politics too haha.

Thanks for helping provide some links. It seems we have a new case to investigate every week now.

Aha, I am, I am.

And it does. I half feel like we're being overloaded with stuff. Look here, look there, look at BLM, look at ISIS, look at everything shiny and noisey.

Not entirely sure I know what I'm looking away from (and I'd be tempted to say it's not the DNC emails from Wikileaks...)

Bingo!

I like you.

that was no Langwaffen

Reuters tweeted police reporting that there were three men with long rifles.

https://web.archive.org/web/20160722190759/https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/756559930845437952

Twitter reporting that shooter has killed themselves

https://web.archive.org/web/20160722191224/https://twitter.com/Cronikeys/status/756567278007779330

Sky News Live at 21:16 Munich Time just said that of course there's three people now but may end up being just one. Have no idea how to isolate that and share...

Well how could reports of a mall shooting, and a McDonalds be the same person at the same time? Did he get hungry, and then decide to start shooting up there too?

If the MSM starts talking about one person, we'll know something else is up for sure. Although, the multiple people and still at large would be something new.

There's ALWAYS three or four to start with...

And later on you have the 'crazy' person drinking in the corner of the bar saying that they saw two or three people 'together' - they weren't confused and attributing one person running around lots of places as multiple perps.

This exact idea destroys my concept of bribed-terrorism. How could you fund a side to carry out such terrible acts, when in the end, they just blow themselves up? It's paying someone to kill themselves. I suppose that's where religion comes in...

Langwaffen

Yes, this person seems to only be holding a pistol in the footage. Surprised they didn't spring for the AR-15 debate again. No doubt this will be some form of automatic weapon discussion by the time they feed us all the "facts."