HMA

Found an interesting email when searching for HMA (Health Management Associates), the company run in the 80s by a crony of the Clintons who gave 33,088.777 hemo kids AIDS and HepC, only to have her brag about her support of AIDS decades later, as a campaign talking point (dispicable!).

Instead of HMA, I found a doc on Huma Abedin. Isn't that super, DUPER curious? Huma => HMA. I guess that makes them blood-sisters. Rofl. Anyway: turns out Human Abedin has been under investigation for a very long time by the OIG, who informed the FBI and they did nothing. Maybe the $33,000 informed them that this was a Obama-level thing and they should look the other way, lest they step on the feet of the global freemason mafia (that's what 33,000 means...it's 33 on a global 1000 level scale). Basically, the FBI didn't want to be embroiled in geocryptopolitics and looked the other way.

We won't though. Enough with this triple agent spyshit: If the FBI and CIA can't do their job, the open source intelligence movement will...

["Fwd: HMA Leaks Timeline" (attachment):: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/34003]

---

UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURES RELATED TO INVESTIGATIONS INTO MS. HUMA ABEDIN’S TENURE AT THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE

When Ms. Abedin ended her full-time employment with the State Department, she received...

a payment of approximately $33,000^{[33k-1][33k-2]}

[...] to compensate her leave time that she had earned but not used. In the late summer of 2013, the State Department’s Office of the Inspector General (OIG) opened an inquiry into that payment to determine whether Ms. Abedin had been overpaid. Ms. Abedin cooperated fully with OIG’s inquiry, including by providing a recorded interview on October 10, 2014. On January 26, 2015, the OIG finalized a report in which it concluded that Ms. Abedin was overpaid approximately $10,000.

Relying on the OIG’s report, the State Department’s Global Financial Services Center’s Office of the Comptroller (the Comptroller) sent Ms. Abedin a letter on April 30, 2015, requesting repayment of approximately $10,000 for alleged overpayments that she received. In response, Mr. Rodriguez requested copies of all records relating to the alleged overpayment. At that point, Mr. Rodriguez was provided a redacted copy of the OIG’s January 26, 2015 report for the first time.

On May 29, 2015, Mr. Rodriguez, sent a letter to the Comptroller stating that Ms. Abedin would exercise her right to appeal. (Exh. 1) Mr. Rodriguez’s letter detailed factual inaccuracies and methodological deficiencies in the OIG’s report, including, for example OIG’s miscalculation of the time Ms. Abedin spent working after giving birth to her son. Mr. Rodriguez also noted that the OIG had refused to provide Ms. Abedin or Mr. Rodriguez an opportunity to inspect and copy documents that formed the basis of the OIG’s report.

Ms. Abedin’s appeal is currently pending. In the interim, there have been at least three unauthorized disclosures (or leaks) relating to OIG’s investigation and Senator Charles Grassley’s parallel inquiries into Ms. Abedin’s tenure at the State Department. Information about these leaks is provided below.

Note: {Brackets} are used to designate information that is not available from public sources. All other information in this document and its attachments is now available through reporting, leaks, non-private letters, or otherwise

---

The First Leak: A “confidential source” provides Senator Grassley with non-public information about OIG’s investigation into Ms. Abedin’s payroll records at the State Department. Senator Grassley uses that information as the basis for letters to the FBI, the State Department, and Ms. Abedin.

July 30, 2015 Exh. 2	Senator Grassley sends a letter to Ms. Abedin stating that “[i]t has come to this Committee’s attention that in 2013, the Office of Inspector General for the Department of State (OIG) opened an investigation into [matters relating to Ms. Abedin’s work arrangement at the State Department].”
July 30, 2015 Exh. 3	Senator Grassley sends a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry stating: “The Judiciary Committee has learned that the Office of Inspector General for the Department of State (OIG) opened an investigation involving potential criminal conduct by Ms. Huma Abedin.”
July 30, 2015 Exh. 4	Senator Grassley sends a letter to the OIG requesting “[a]ll documents and communications referring or relating to investigations of Ms. Abedin [and] [t]he complete investigatory file, including, but not limited to, any exhibits, Memoranda of Investigations or Reports of Investigation, related to your review of potential misconduct by Ms. Abedin.”
Aug. 2, 2015 Exh. 5	The New York Post reports: “An aide to Grassley told The Post on Saturday that the senator learned details of an internal State Department investigation completed in May from a ‘confidential source.’”
Aug. 5, 2015 Exh. 6	Senator Grassley sends a letter to FBI Director James Comey stating: “[T]he [Judiciary] Committee has learned that the State OIG transmitted a letter, notice, or other similar communication (“letter”) to the FBI in October 2013 placing it on notice that State OIG’s investigation was no longer a preliminary matter but a full-fledged criminal investigation into Ms. Abedin.”
Aug. 21, 2015 Exh. 7	Mr. Rodriguez sends a letter to Mr. Richard Visek, the State Department’s Deputy Legal Advisor, rebutting the allegations contained in Senator Grassley’s July 30 letters to Ms. Abedin and Secretary Kerry.
Aug. 24, 2015 Exh. 8	The New York Times reports: “A former investigator on the Finance Committee who worked with Mr. Grassley there and was at one point expected to work for him on the Judiciary Committee, Emilia DiSanto, is now a Deputy Inspector General at the State Department.”

Translation: Emilia DiSanto was bought off by Kerry to cover for Abedin.

---

The Second Leak: An unidentified source provides the Washington Times with copies of highly confidential OIG materials, including the audio recording of an interview with Ms. Abedin and documents containing Ms. Abedin’s personally identifiable information. OIG disavows responsibility for the leak.

Sept. 9, 2015 {Exh. 18}	{John Solomon, the editor of the Washington Times, leaves a voice message for Mr. Rodriguez in which he says: “I have obtained some information about your client, Huma Abedin, concerning what the State Department investigation substantiated, what she told the State Department investigators in her interview, and also some ongoing concerns about some timesheets she filed[.]”}
Sept. 9, 2015 Exh. 9	The Washington Times publishes a report by Mr. Solomon that relies on confidential information that previously had been in the OIG’s exclusive possession, including excerpts of Ms. Abedin’s interview with the OIG’s investigators.
Sept. 15, 2015 Exh. 10	Mr. Rodriguez sends a letter to the OIG raising concerns about the leaks to the Washington Times and requesting that the OIG meet with Ms. Abedin’s attorneys and conduct an investigation into the matter. Mr. Rodriguez’s letter also described applicable legal provisions, including the Privacy Act. The letter copies relevant senators, but it was not released to the press.
Sept. 25, 2015 Exh. 11	OIG Acting General Counsel Harrison Ford responds to Mr. Rodriguez’s September 15 letter stating that OIG “is aware of no evidence that OIG was the source of the September 9 report.” Mr. Ford’s letter concludes by stating that “we see no reason to take any of the steps requested in your letter,” including a meeting or an investigation. Mr. Ford’s letter copies the same Senators that were included on Mr. Rodriguez’s September 15 letter, but it is not released to the press.

Translation: Abedin's lawyering up, trying to accuse OIG of wrongdoing and getting told those claims are wrong. Then they go into secret meetings

---

The Third Leak: On September 21, 2015, the State Department produced confidential documents to Senator Grassley’s office. Those documents bore a watermark stating that they were for Judiciary Committee use only and were not authorized for public release. Nonetheless, the documents were leaked to Politico.

Sept. 22, 2015 Exh. 12	POLITICO reporter Rachel Bade emails Mr. Rodriguez and Ms. Dunn and attaches a copy of a document that bears a watermark stating that the document was provided by the State Department to the Senate Judiciary Committee only and that the document was not authorized for public release.
Sept. 23, 2015 Exh. 13	Ms. Bade writes an article in POLITICO about the leaked email. The article acknowledges: “Abedin’s legal team maintains that the part-time jobs were appropriate and approved by Abedin’s supervisors at State and that she did nothing wrong. Indeed, in the email request obtained by POLITICO, there is no evidence that Abedin interceded on behalf of Teneo as it sought a new appointment for Judith Rodin, a Teneo client and the president of The Rockefeller Foundation.” Mr. Merrill is quoted in the article as saying: “This email — from before Huma Abedin was an SGE — is yet another attempt to smear a hardworking public servant in the press through ill-informed partisan leaks[.]”
Oct. 2, 2015 Exh. 12	Mr. Rodriguez sends a letter to Mr. Visek at the State Department to bring the leak to his attention and to request information about steps that the State Department will take to prevent further leaks. Mr. Rodriguez includes a copy of Ms. Bade’s email and the leaked document with his letter.

Translation: Huma Abedin is likely some kind of triple agent for an illegitimate shadow government...what's a spy doing in a presidential campaign? Isn't this a conflict of interest? Clinton Email Fracas Raises Question: What Is a 'Special Government Employee?'