hi :)

hi :)

High Five!

:)

Create a new sub earthquakepredictions

I am sure they have one -

the problem is it isn't a prediction. It is all based on the inference of data-

In curious now, what's the difference between a prediction and an inference from past data. Are you referring to the paradox known as "past performance is not indicative of future performance"? When all we have is past data to go by. Is there another way to predict without knowing past data?

I could say without any data there is going to be a car wreck outside my home.

I suppose it may seem trivial, but 'Predict' (at least to me); Comes off like "magic".

I don't come to a belief because the voice in my head told me. I come to a conclusion based upon data exploration and testing various hypothesis.

Invalid question: prediction is a word that can mean one based on nothing or very certain data.

What is the sun telling you in regards to powerball numbers?

Oh boy I wish I knew. Here are 6 random numbers though

3 15 05 06 01 32 16

Can we split it?

Oh boy I wish I knew. Here are 6 random numbers though

3 15 05 06 01 32 16

Works for me.

Can we split it?

Sure thing!

I wish us luck :)

I basically am just happy to answer most questions:)

is pee stored in the balls?

Yes son. Now get your McDonald's uniform on, you're going to be late.

Ok, so what is your next step?? Congrats btw, I think...

I truly feel Californias northern coast will exhibit a 5.0 somewhere in between the aftershocks (within 7 days). Likely alaska also-

so that prediction isn't based on data but gut? I like gut feelings.

Sounds more like a combination of both.

Uhh...any chance solar flairs predict lottery numbers?

If they could I would be rich haha. However there is a winning advantage if you persistently study the mathematical algorithms involved; No system is unbeatable or so they say :)

Oh man That's awesome You are going to have to explain, I don't understand how what you said works, but it does

I just had a user give me an update that literally will revolutionize this theory! Stand by for updates in the coming days :)

Mirror Online: Teenager films 'meteorite' burning across sky following Japanese earthquake. http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIwqZfmnzI

Unrelated?

Hey what about New Zealand's earthquake? Is that of importance?

All earthquakes are - However I try to find remarkable data points, pointing out potentially vulnderable regions, that will more or less provide an adequate argument with the variables in play.

Essentially I could say 1.2 in california. How note worthy is that. I do however have two witnesses that can verify (Even showing a back dated email) That I did indeed write; Which shows I had made such a private announcement to them.

To me that was the main Event that stimulated the activity that we saw postulate in Japan. I believe USGS has it all wrong essentially, and that there is a direct correlation to the largest seismic events and cosmic radiation via solar wind streams.

So since you can tell the future? Are there any natural disasters coming for the South East US?

I can't predict the future I apologize -

/u/GlobalHell predicts 7.5-9.0 Earthquake in Alaska, California or Japan 5 days ago. 7.3 Earthquake was just reported in Japan.

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5dal9j/75_90_within_48_hours_likely_soon_11161118/ http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5e6mp7/uglobalhell_predicts_7590_earthquake_in_alaska/

He predicted it by looking at the Sun?

Solar flares.

Solar wind.

Coronal holes from the sun.

Cornholio

It just starts with the sun. Solar winds slow down and store energy in the earth, solar winds stabilize, energy is released, volcanos erupt, plates shift , boom earthquake.

Damn! That is impressive.

Wow

https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5dal9j/75_90_within_48_hours_likely_soon_11161118/da3x23e/

Also he was asked where in Japan

Well done, /u/GlobalHell! You put yourself out there with a risky claim, and I recall thinking two days ago "ha, that dude was wrong!" Now, I think you were spot on, even down to the country.

You're doing great work - please keep it up!

I was pretty sad when winds didn't recede to the area I felt was indicative of the events described. I felt that if the current coronal holes wind speeds increased rapidly the event wouldn't have postulated. Thus I felt equally as disappointed initially.

I gotta be honest, I was calling bs on you, touche' sir!

wipes egg from faces

I would have done the same thing -

It's much easier to see the reality, once it is inherited; :)

Something did happen??? Do you have further information on that??

Edit: found it

/u/GlobalHell we need you in here. You clearly are onto something and as such we need an AMA.

In there now :)

Ok, now do an AMA.

Or post a new post with your methodology.

Yeah with those big words and numbers and acronyms I don't know!

But in seriousness id like a new post

I am basically inferring data points which are all pretty easy to understand. If you have a hard time following I am happy to help.

Questions get answers - :)

You're pretty cool man, thanks! I'm probably gonna re read over your original post first lol

If you have questions feel free to shoot :)

Dank username

This is an ama haha. Its not too hard to understand; And I am sure they will refute everything I say...

It is weird because I find myself saying "I am not crazy!" "Wait?"

How does this feel?

It is sad that I am still trying to locate the user that lived in japan.

I am most worried about fukushima daichii reactor 1's cover not being in position and collaborating with another forum to mitigate a nuclear disaster - and insure the safety to others. I suppose it feels nice that people may begin to take the science in as a more validated way of future eq predictions :)

Yes, but don't recall the link.

Yeah I was just wondering about this as well.

Yes, sun spots or something. Perhaps he should share his methods

I pretty much did?

It's not too hard to understand. Basic cause and effect vs data available. Not too hard to understand :)

My apologies! Ill reread the post. I skimmed it, and blew it off, as quackery. Jokes on me.

I would have done the same thing more than likely - I might have read it and not immediately dismissed it; But buying into it is typically done post judgement -

Did this event provide you with information that will make predictions more accurate, or do you think your methodology is refined as possible in that respect?

Im sure, someone in japan would love to see that post. I remember reading they have even used snakes as predictors of earthquakes.

Edit: accurate in regards to time. You even called the location.

If anything I just hope to push the narrative into the main stream world of science, as there are many arguments that either validate the relationships or refute them.

I believe my own personal theory will always lack the financial tools, and private research that could easily be conducted by a higher scientific researching center. But their requests of funding, and team leadership, as well as team members need to be fully on board with the concept. I think you either get a lazy scientist that discredits it entirely, or a single researcher that's funding and resources are too shallow to make a real dent in the field. The financial aspects, and the "predetermined" outcomes, are what are stopping this field from making progress, and users like suspicious observers, are charlatans, that are making future funding options / platforms less considerable. I really would like to give him credit for attempting to gear towards the science itself, but by ripping off thousands of people with a failed eq prediction application. He has tarnished the entirety of the science as a whole; Which is why people typically take these posts as laughable first glance-

Keep predicting earthquakes correctly and well you'll have everyone listening.

I am making extreme progress on my theory due to another users suggestion. Should be updating forum soon ;)

If correct you can save lots of lives with preventative measures.

That is my only actual goal in this.

If I were profit oriented I wouldn't have posted it in a public forum by example. I truly think I made a huge breakthrough tonight :)

Dont teach no one. Make some money then spend it on pure cocaine and whatever flavour of sex you preffer.

I am against the values in which you prescribe (at a personal level).

May you celebrate your uniqueness vividly.

Have you tried it? then your opinion isn't based on fact and is actually an anti-scientific approach to the creation of an opinion.

But do you bro.

no. No substance abuse for me ty.

indulgence is many steps away from abuse. Experimentation lower then that.

I just don't need drugs - Please find someone else to offer them too-

not an offer just a perspective.

wtf is wrong with you

Showing hypocrisy of having a scientific approach while formulating an opinion on a subject without the experience to understand the results.

As soon as I saw the headline I thought about that dude

I just saw the news and immediately came here to post the same thread. Creepy shit.

I too am late to the party and was skeptical. I am now more open to the idea that the sun plays a key part in seismic activity.

/u/GlobalHell thoughts on this: http://mediawhores.co.nz/2016/11/14/worlds-biggest-seismic-testing-ship-amazon-warrior-parked-on-top-of-new-zealand-fault-line/ ?

Linked in another thread on the recent quake with the comment suggesting the blaster at the start of the article was to blame. Personally I found the article to be a bit ridiculous and decided not to finish it, but from what I did read it doesn't actually imply the blaster did it, but possibly it's related to oil drilling around NZ and it definitely makes a claim navies/govts were aware of it beforehand.

My main question, do you think they've got the same technique as you're using hidden behind the veil?

I try to base my thoughts on solar observation.

NZ is known for large seismic events, and naturally, the research vessel could have been in the area due to existing signs of stress build up in the area- I just don't speculate on manmade; Intentional disasters, because in my maybe naive and young mind; I just don't see people intentionally trying to cause harm to others, by creating manmade disasters. I hope that helps?

Good to see more interest in this. I've been following Suspicious0bservers on YouTube for a few years. That channel points out similar studies and information about solar activity and correlations.

It has me suspecting there is a greater correlation between solar activity and climate change than they realize, and less anthropogenic climate change.

Thanks /u/GlobalHell, for posting so much good info! I think this is well worth studying.

I do too - Probably sounds stupid to say -

What pisses me off about ben I.e.Suspicious0bservers is he literally has funding and resources, yet appears to be focusing on the wrong areas of relationships with seismic / solar incidences. His application didn't register these as an example.

I like this research, and I may have been performing it far longer then he had - Dutchsinse, and SolarObserver were the originals; I have a handle I just don't self promote.

Neways - This was an openly talked about thing that I feel he turned into a corporation. What went from an open community of researchers became a funding competition, and User's like myself that lacked funding were ousted out of our own perspectives within the arguments on the table.

Not only that his Push for funding and rushing a bugged not working application only showed the bulk of his intentions, being infringed by profits, and I think he owes his users an apology for accepting donations on a non vetted application in the first place.

If you want to go public and be the chairman of the society, that is good and fine; But if you want to make us look like were pseudo-scientifically speaking cons, then kindly fuck off - He didn't need to launch his Application, and to me it is an edison vs tesla argument. While I respected his original ideas It's now a claim of glory in which his team does all the real brainstorming, and he essentially collects the profits. Again that would be fine, but after pushing the application it truly urges future researchers requesting grants and funding, Hopes for aide deep into a coffin they will be locked in for all eternity.

(Sorry if that was a rant), Just a personal grudge -

There is really beginning to be a lot of people making progress in this field though, and I think were just years or even days away from making a real connection!

So I truly hope articles that are crowd sourced like this, will help make all the difference. It is all the questions being asked and brainstorming going on that truly makes others intrigued. And that is what makes all the difference :)

Yep!

i saw that thread and came here wondering if anyone else remembered that

Didn't he predict it was going to be in California?

Or Japan or Alaska.

Yes

Yeah I got the remind me a day early, but I live in Japan and felt the quake lol

Oooh I 'member!

Not really a conspiracy though, the guy used science to predict a natural event. This is like seeing dark clouds and predicting rain.

I haven't been keeping an eye on his predictions but he did call the NZ quake weeks in advance. Frankie

I just saw it on facebook and started my search on reddit for this guy's post. Pretty damn insightful.

I totally do, and his reasoning was some crazy sun rays shit or something lol!! There was just another one in New Zealand or something too. Not quite as big, 6.5 or something! Crazy though!!!

Yes

I gotta be honest, I was calling bs on you, touche' sir!

wipes egg from faces

no. No substance abuse for me ty.

Sounds more like a combination of both.