Computer Scientists claim to have found statistical anomalies that favoured Trump in the results of counties that used voting machines in at least 3 states

2  2016-11-23 by Lamont-Cranston

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politics/hillary-clinton-challenge-results/index.html

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/11/activists-urge-hillary-clinton-to-challenge-election-results.html

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/election-results-hacked-3-states-trump-won-article-1.2884089

Even before this Greg Palast was claiming there was fraud: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/investigative_reporter_greg_palast_gop_stole_2016_election_20161116

And its not hard to see when North Carolina Republicans openly admit to voter suppression: http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/11/7/13552832/north-carolina-republicans-black-turnout

Jill Stein is raising questions: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/23/jill-stein-election-recount-fund-michigan-wisconsin-pennsylvania

Senate elections in the states in question also appear to be affected: http://tdmsresearch.com/2016/11/15/2016-us-senate-elections/

30 comments

4  TheFreeMarketeer2 2016-11-23

TIL regular ass muricans = statistical anomalies lmao

0  Lamont-Cranston 2016-11-23

Could you explain this it doesn't make a lot of sense to me

3  poolskooled 2016-11-23

I don't care about McCain or the Republican Party if that's what you think.

1  Lamont-Cranston 2016-11-23

I don't care about double standards

Well alrighty then thanks for playing who is the hypocrite

3  Telenerd 2016-11-23

George Soreass had his machines rigged to vote Trump so they could recall and get him out.

3  Tha_Dude_Abidez 2016-11-23

Makes sense to me. Great way to split up a nation. Have Trump "win", claim hacking or the like, Clinton is put in, protests lead to an uprising like the world has never seen, martial law, etc etc etc. This scenario could very well happen.

3  Pexarixelle 2016-11-23

And the irony is while democrats have emphatically stated they didn't see rigging or hacking the election as a real possibility Trump has made it clear he thinks it's possible.

Is this opinion about to be used as ammunition against him to prevent the this is impossible narrative?

3  Lamont-Cranston 2016-11-23

Its pretty ironic Republicans crying fraud given their track record of voter intimidation, voter suppression, gerrymandering, and Florida 2000.

Making this accusation is the standard tactic of attacking your opponent on what you yourself are weakest on.

I think Trump said that to spoil the result if he lost and to encourage his supporters to behave recklessly, what do you think he meant about gathering your friends and watching polling stations in "those places"

1  Pexarixelle 2016-11-23

I think you are correct on his reasoning! I've often wondered what kind of situation we would be facing right now if the results had been reversed on the projected electoral vote and the popular vote...I imagine pandemonium.

As a side note, Jill Stein just officially announced she's raising money to call for a recount in MI, PA, and WI.

2  Lamont-Cranston 2016-11-23

I don't think pandemonium, I think it would be a case of a couple of the white nationalist/militia groups trying to act like clowns at some polling stations, trump supporters trying to protest, /r/conspiracy going crazy,and then back to normal

1  Pexarixelle 2016-11-23

That's optimistic and hopefully what would have happened.

After nearly a year of being surrounded by dedicated Trump supporters I saw their reactions to anything negative were both emotional and dramatic and only increased as it was fed by others. My worry of how quickly things could've escalated came from emotional aspect of feeling slighted.

2  Lamont-Cranston 2016-11-23

What do you think they'd have done?

1  Pexarixelle 2016-11-23

Worst case scenario, I think we would have seen a lot of the same protests that we began to see after the election...using an example that I actually saw first hand, more in the style of Ferguson. The type that ends up such a spectacle in the end it's fueled by pure rage more than the cause itself. Think mob mentality. The calls to "watch" the polls and talk of accepting the results "if I win" played perfectly into the setup for this type of situation.

An extreme example but one that illustrates the train of thought, I mentioned this concern a group of friends and they were honestly surprised that I would think that was an unacceptable reaction because the alternative to Trump was evil.

Best case scenario, peaceful protest and wild outrage on all the sites that were 100% Trump is almighty (think 4chan)

Realistically, I think it would have fallen somewhere in the middle though.

1  Lamont-Cranston 2016-11-23

That seems a little complicated. Why do that?

2  wolfmannic 2016-11-23

Or to start a civil war when they give it to HRC.

0  Lamont-Cranston 2016-11-23

if I don't win I'll take up arms

Really? But with a 2 million majority in the popular vote I wonder how that would go?

0  Lamont-Cranston 2016-11-23

I feel like aliens should be involved in that theory somewhere.

3  Telenerd 2016-11-23

I feel like you're trying to discredit what I'm saying.

1  Tha_Dude_Abidez 2016-11-23

I don't think he understands perhaps? I'm not sure. Break down your theory for him :)

0  Lamont-Cranston 2016-11-23

He doesn't own any, stop reading news on facebook.

2  Lamont-Cranston 2016-11-23

This is 2000 all over again.

3  poolskooled 2016-11-23

Or the Dem primary

0  Lamont-Cranston 2016-11-23

Well that's an internal party dispute not an election.

But if you're so concerned about party machinations then what of the republicans in 2000? Someone was conducting push polls against McCain in southern states asking voters "Would you be more likely or less likely to vote for John McCain for president if you knew he had fathered an illegitimate black child?"

4  poolskooled 2016-11-23

Not an election? Is that what you zombie Clinton supporters tell yourself? Ha.

1  Lamont-Cranston 2016-11-23

Its an internal party poll. Not a public election for public office. Next you'll claim that shareholders voting on matters regarding the company they own stocks in is an election too. And could you please quote me supporting Clinton?

4  poolskooled 2016-11-23

It's a Primary Election. Not a primary party poll.

0  Lamont-Cranston 2016-11-23

its a shareholder election

You also never answered my question about 2000

2  iwillnoteatgreeneggs 2016-11-23

It's a primary election

2  poolskooled 2016-11-23

You don't make an ounce of sense. Thanks for playing I'm pissed because my shitty candidate lost.

2  Lamont-Cranston 2016-11-23

What doesn't make sense?

4  poolskooled 2016-11-23

Not an election? Is that what you zombie Clinton supporters tell yourself? Ha.

3  Telenerd 2016-11-23

I feel like you're trying to discredit what I'm saying.