because the Mannilcher Carcano is a pile of shit rifle.

This, all on its own is enough reason to believe the conspiracy.

http://22november1963.org.uk/lee-harvey-oswald-marksman-sharpshooter

Oswald was a terrible shot, with an even worse rifle shooting at a moving target from a decent distance.

their story is impossible to beleive so what part of it do you find plausible? [and really?]

Have you ever fired a rifle? the 2 shots that hit the president (of 3 taken in 6 seconds) are nearly impossible to replicate with the best gear in the world. and with the mail order dog shit rifle he had, its even harder. There has to have been multiple shooters. Oswald could have been 1, but if you know anything about shooting, those are impossible with a single below marksman shooter

i know my feeling is they had teams in the grassy knolls then inside the very car as well as the car right in front with all the secret service stuffed in .....

the kill shot was very close range the brain disappeared in transit

his shirt covered in blood all on one side ....

was jackie mk ultraed controlled to pull the final shot and then did she climb on the trunk to retrieve incriminating evidence after she pulled the gun away ...

whats screwed up, im related to 2 of the biker cops, lol

dont worry it always skips a generation or two [have did they ever recant their own eye witness to it all?]

i dont understand what you are asking in brackets

Not to mention the fact that "oswald" ordered the rifle in his own name via mail, when he could have walked into a store and bought one. Total setup.

Watch Everything is a Rich Mans Trick.

I prefer "JFK 2" but that one is pretty good.

Oh do tell. I haven't heard of it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLfFzgVEsRM

This? Thank you for bringing it to my attention.

Better Yet:

WHY the FUCK do you believe anything the fucking LIARS at the CIA-FBI-DoD tell you?

There is too many inconsistencies with Oswald taking the shot on his own, which other posters in the thread have covered pretty good. I like the theory that at least one shot was by accident from the secret service in the car behind. If that was the case it pretty much explains all of the other fuckery that followed.

I saw that documentary. My biggest hangup is I have a hard time believing the shot was accidental, especially since they called off the agents who would have been riding on the car right before it happened.

I agree there is still some oddball stuff with the shooting, but the occams razor part of my brain says it makes most sense.

I think- if you watch the video with a clear mind instead of thinking about all the bullshit you've been told and looking for what you've been told to look for- it's pretty obvious that Jackie shoots him through the head, stuffs the gun behind the seat, and either a bullet shell or some piece of evidence that she felt she needed to grab flew back onto the trunk of the car so she goes back to retrieve it. All of this while in an MKUltra-induced state of action.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-NlJQJUUqR4

Did anyone happen to read the report of the house sub committee on assassinations? Did you see their opinion regarding a second shooter?

Besides lee Oswold was right where he said he was during the shooting, out front... Photo evidence backs this up..

Lunch room.

Lunch room encounter didn't happen

Hmm. Can you link the pic you mention, then?

Look at James Files. Also look at the Remington XP-100 he claimed to have used.

Some others have already explained the difficulty of making the shot that is said to have killed him, and the fact that Oswald's military record reflected that he was not a skilled marksman. In addition, it would have been challenging, for any one person, to pop off that many accurate shots in the short time span that they occurred (with the weapon he is said to have used.)

The official story also involves what is referred to as "The Magic Bullet Theory" - which basically defies physics.

Then you have several strange occurrences and procedures around how his body and autopsy were treated once he was taken to the hospital. The original autopsy was said to have been burned because there was blood that got on it, and then the doctor "sketched a new one from memory" - that's the official autopsy that was used.

There was a custody battle over the body and disputes about where it should be transported to and how it should be handled.

There were also witnesses who were on the grassy knoll at the time of the shooting who claim shots were fired "over [their] heads" - aka, not where "Oswald" was shooting from.

There are also people who claim they saw Oswald at the time of the shooting, in the lunch room on a different floor than he was said to have been shooting from.

Secret Service did not follow typical procedure that day and Dallas Police were ordered to stand down.

Take all of that into consideration and then examine the official story, which contains several inconsistencies in itself. I actually visited the 6th floor museum, which is where Oswald is said to have shot from. There were several "facts" in the museum that even conflicted with each other.

6th floor.

Thanks, that was sloppy of me.

Have you looked into it at all? Like, at all?

Start with evidence of 11 bullets hitting the car, the road, the overpass, the grass.

Continue with Oswald's identity being used across Texas to buy trucks and guns, while Oswald was in Russia. Try to figure out how the Dallas PD was circulating Oswald's description, when no one ever claimed to have seen the shooter. Ask yourself if, "I am not resisting arrest. I am a patsy," is relevant testimony by Oswald in the heat of the moment.

Look into umbrella man. Look into Jack Ruby and Richard Nixon. Look into Operation Zapata & the Bay of Pigs. E Howard Hunt & Frank Sturgis & David Ferrie and Guy Bannister and Allen Dulles and Prescott Bush.

Just a little bit.