Why have TPTB/Establishment/Elite allowed Trump to go this far?
2 2017-01-20 by asslena
These are the same people who killed JFK and brought down the towers. There was a countercoup in the letter agencies, but thats about it. They control all things why are they seemingly unable to rig elections?
34 comments
n/a IronSavage3 2017-01-20
Once you accept that Trump is part of that establishment it all makes sense.
n/a asslena 2017-01-20
Ive never heard a politician, and I would bet if you look at all 45 or 44 or whatever presidents inauguration speeches none but trump lambasted the establishment and politicians as liars. Said there were forgotten americans. And that we need to focus on our own and take care of our own.
Ive never heard anything like that. Politicians dont talk like that, and haven't.
Im not saying he's what he says he is, or what trump supporters think he is, but when speaking on the government being hijacked by people who dont have our interest in mind, he's absolutely right. And what politician has ever said this?
n/a DrDougExeter 2017-01-20
Who cares what he said?? Talk is cheap. You don't judge a man by his words you judge him based on his actions. Anybody can lie to your face and tell you what you want to hear.
n/a IronSavage3 2017-01-20
Politicians aren't the establishment, they're puppets on a string to the real masters of society, big banks and big corporations.
n/a jaydwalk 2017-01-20
and now the corporations have one of their own running the country...
n/a IronSavage3 2017-01-20
Several of their own, 5 total former GS execs and the CEO of the biggest oil company in the world who will have direct influence over issues that greatly impact his business
n/a Hope_Summers_Is_Sexy 2017-01-20
Did you ever stop to think that is just a new tactic of tptb?
Anti-establishment ideals have been consistently on the rise. So how do they combat that? They get someone willing to be vocally anti-establishment that in the end will play along. His cabinet picks should be more than enough indication of this.
n/a Rottweiler_Yorkie 2017-01-20
This I do believe, it's all fun and hoopla now but come Monday and onward, I think we're going to start seeing a more horrifying NWO side of Trump.
n/a UnderwritingRules 2017-01-20
Because he's one of them.
n/a ProbingLinguist 2017-01-20
Bam! For some of them, he's Their Hero, constructed to perpetuate the lessons They think are most fill_in_the_blank (noble, weaselly, whatever). The truth of Trump will be found in the design he leaves for us.
n/a bwayne123 2017-01-20
I personally believe that while they're incredibly influential, they don't have absolute power or even full control. I also believe there are many groups with different objectives too, not some Simpsons cartoonized masonic cult.
If you study history there is some rhyming going on here with nationalist vibes.
n/a PsychedelicPhlegm 2017-01-20
They're not unable to rig elections, it's been done countless times throughout history. However, they were unable to rig the most recent one to Hillary because WikiLeaks basically destroyed her and it would have been too obvious.
Failing rigging it for Hillary, they got Trump to play the part of the establishment outsider and ride the wave of anti-establishment sentiment among the public. They aren't stupid. Trump was their only way of holding on to power.
n/a Rottweiler_Yorkie 2017-01-20
Also Trump and Hillary are cousins....In fact all of the presidents are all related....So there's that.
n/a Hope_Summers_Is_Sexy 2017-01-20
Sources for the lazy:
http://washingtontimes.com/news/2015/aug/25/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-are-related-genealogy/
All but Van Buren.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2183858/All-presidents-bar-directly-descended-medieval-English-king.html
John of Gaunt is the great-great-great-grandson of King John. So Trump and Hillary are a part of that bloodline as well.
n/a ban_me_pl0x 2017-01-20
Well shit, first I've heard of Trump and Hillary being a part of that bloodline.
n/a quantumcipher 2017-01-20
One of my ancestors happens to have been King Edward II, who is also descended from King John. Sadly, this would also make me their 'cousins' as well.
n/a quantumcipher 2017-01-20
One of my ancestors happens to be King Edward II, also descended from King John of England. Sadly, this would make me their 'cousin' as well.
n/a Hope_Summers_Is_Sexy 2017-01-20
Well I'm first cousins (don't remember exactly how many times removed) with Jesse James. :P
n/a nsfwgaming 2017-01-20
Uh oh.. I have presidential bloodlines as well.
n/a Rottweiler_Yorkie 2017-01-20
No you're not important to the establishment. You're safe ;) lol
n/a nsfwgaming 2017-01-20
Haha I know.
n/a Rottweiler_Yorkie 2017-01-20
Hahahaha - no. ◔_◔
n/a nsfwgaming 2017-01-20
Que?
n/a Rottweiler_Yorkie 2017-01-20
pasa? lol
n/a nsfwgaming 2017-01-20
Si
n/a Rottweiler_Yorkie 2017-01-20
fi
n/a quatrequatredeux 2017-01-20
They share a common ancestor 500+ years ago
n/a Rottweiler_Yorkie 2017-01-20
Right, so the fact that all of them being related means nothing. Right. ;)
n/a quatrequatredeux 2017-01-20
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2183858/All-presidents-bar-directly-descended-medieval-English-king.html
The girl in this article is 18th cousin of Obama, Trump and Hillary Clinton are 19th cousins
You and I are probably 18th cousins tbh
n/a Rottweiler_Yorkie 2017-01-20
Really? Well if you and I are cousins, let me borrow five bucks cousin. LOL :P
n/a WooTs_67 2017-01-20
What Ive learned over the years, is never lend money to your cousins :D
n/a Rottweiler_Yorkie 2017-01-20
Ok well at least buy me some hot chocolate with marshmallows LOL :P
n/a Hope_Summers_Is_Sexy 2017-01-20
Do you think she descended from King John, though? Cuz that's the pertinent bit.
n/a quatrequatredeux 2017-01-20
It's certainly possible that she is
n/a Hope_Summers_Is_Sexy 2017-01-20
Yeah, I might be too, but I'm not in any connection with the ruling/rich class. DJT is, and adds one more to the number of US presidents descended from King John, as John of Gaunt is the great-great-great-grandson of him.
n/a quatrequatredeux 2017-01-20
If you are, and this lass is, and I might also be then is it any surprise that presidents are?
n/a Hope_Summers_Is_Sexy 2017-01-20
Maybe, maybe not. I'm not saying that this is definitive evidence of rule by bloodline, but it does make you wonder.
n/a IanPhlegming 2017-01-20
It's the military that's made the difference. They are sick and fucking tired of taking the CIA's shit and sending off their guys to die in wars instigated by civilians.
A LOT of ex- and current military is fully aware of what went down with the 9/11 shit show and they're done with it. They're also a lot more aware of the kid-fucking.
For a long time, the really horrible people were able to keep this stuff under wraps. The internet has ripped the veil away. You thought 2016 was fucking crazy? Wait until you see what goes down in 2017.
n/a redditeditard 2017-01-20
Because they aren't done raiding the coffers yet. There's still viable resources that they need to profit from before zooming off to thier space bases.
n/a LightBringerFlex 2017-01-20
They tried and tried to stop him but failed. I don't think he's with the elite cabal but I do suggest keeping an eye on every major figure in Washington to make sure they don't pull the rug from under our feet yet again.
n/a janmon86 2017-01-20
they want to humiliate him when he gets impeach
n/a WTCMolybdenum4753 2017-01-20
Complacent and overconfident?
Maybe not all?
List of controversial elections
This is a list of notable elections involving accusations of direct voter fraud or in which the results were procedurally contested, extensively protested, or recognized as fraudulent by a reliable international organization.
Some 120
n/a Balthanos 2017-01-20
Because you don't have to rig the election if whoever is elected has to bend the knee.
The President is just a CEO. He's the guy that the government uses to place blame upon in order to continue running the ship without changing course or dealing with a mutiny.
Every four to eight years there is a reset. Democrats and Republicans just take turns being scapegoat.
n/a MackOfAllShades 2017-01-20
he's another ringer like Obama was. first they used Obama to catch everyone off guard when the country was sick of government and on the verge or revolt, so they threw in "first black president" to get everyone to think things would be different this time. they're doing the same with Trump, with the media spin that he's an "outsider" and "for the people" ,"anti establishment" blah blah blah. and the elites and media are pretending to freak out about it to get our guard down yet again. but in all reality, its business as usual. it isn't whos in the white house thats the problem, its government itself thats the problem