we are all not truth seekers here. There are many, likely most here are pushing their agenda.

Some people cant tell the difference between seeking the truth and pushing their agenda.

Both of these comments are flawed

Im open minded, how is my statement flawed?

I misread your comment. My b. I agree.

No worries! Have the best day of your life!

I agree

yeah. Neither zealots nor shills care about the truth.

that is their job. :(

Not all. In fact their all to aggressive presence is a massive tell for those that pay enough attention.

Too many Tea party Trumpets and pro Hillary shills to make this sub even worth coming to anymore.. I miss the good old days when it wasn't so partisan

Killing people is wrong. Don't shit where you eat. Media should report facts.

Every American executive branch has ordered the killing a lot of people.

you sound like a god damn communist!

Im a nihilist. I used to be a hedonist, but Im too old for that shit now. Its a lot of fucking work. Nihilism is soooooo much easier.

Yeah, more or less. I got tired of caring about the differences though.

Nihilism flies out the window when you're persecuted directly or if you care about the well-being of others.

Nihilism is a luxury I have as a rich, white male living in America. I recognize that and am pretty happy about it.

Mostly libertarian. I believe states and regions should have more control over infrastructure and industry.

I'm an anarcho-syndicalist. Look it up, it'll open your eyes.

I could hang my hat there too most days.

I've never understood the apeal of syndicalism tbh, its just worker owned union co-ops in practice.

are you british? most of the syndicalists I've known were british...they're big on councils...

anywho, I'm an anarchist too, just not keen on anything that attracts the evil eye of the iron law of organizations

Less government. Less intrusion. Less taxes. Don't care what you do in your own home (drugs, sex, religion) just don't bother me with it. Treat others as you'd like to be treated. Everyone is equal.

Wherever that puts me in the political spectrum.

I'm a grown up anarchist. So libertarian leaning left, although I have almost nothing in common the actual Libertarian party.

i voted for jill this year and nader in 2000. i voted for bernie in this primary and kucinich in 2008. had ron paul been the repub nominee in 2008 or 2012, and dennis not have been the dem one, i would have voted for him for president. i regret not voting for perot...but i was young and he seemed goofy. such is life.

i support basic income.

i am opposed to bureaucracy. with current technology, bereaucracy should be less now, not more...

i support public education, but don't support the premise that it can only be accomplished in the prussian style, factory system, industrial public school model that was antiquated even when i was growing up in the 80s.

i agree with robespierre that the fundamental human right is the right to exist, which means that no person has the right to restrict another's access to food, water, medicine, and housing.

i'm an un-hyphanated anarchist, who believes the anti-state left and the anti-state right have way more in common with each other than we do with any statists of any flavor.

oh, and money is the root of all evil.

I like to think this sub despises political affiliations. One anti-establishment group is this subs "party".

I generally refrain from adhering to any particular party or ideology, though if I were to quantify my political leanings, it would closest resemble that of a libertarian socialist, which may can paradoxical on the surface.

Basically, I would consider myself a civil libertarian, in that the government should not infringe on your Constitutional or human rights, without exception, but a democratic socialist economically, that large corporations should pay their share of taxes and require regulation so they do not form monopolies or prey on consumers or destroy the economy (for example), while small businesses should be exempt from excessive regulation and beaurocratic red tape, and that social programs should be not only protected but strengthened for the betterment of society. As far as foreign policy is concerned, I wouldn't say I'm an isolationist, so much as a non-interventionist, that we should not be involved in so-called 'humanitarian warfare' under false pretenses as we are now or meddling in the affairs of other nations essentially violating their sovereignty, that we should only engage in conflict or warfare as a last resort and as an act of self defense, however to maintain a strong military (within reason, minus the excess) in the event we should need to defend ourselves in the future.

I generally refrain from adhering to any particular party or rigid ideology, though if I were to quantify my political leanings, it would closest resemble that of a libertarian socialist, which admittedly sounds paradoxical on the surface.

Basically, I would consider myself a civil libertarian, in that the government should not infringe on one's Constitutional or human rights, without exception, but a democratic socialist economically, that large corporations should pay their share of taxes and require regulation so they do not form monopolies or defraud consumers or destroy the economy (for example), while small businesses should be exempt from excessive regulation and bureaucratic red tape, and that social programs should be not only protected but strengthened for the betterment of society. As far as foreign policy is concerned, I wouldn't say I'm an isolationist, so much as a non-interventionist, that we should not be involved in so-called 'humanitarian warfare' under false pretenses as we are now or meddling in the affairs of other nations essentially violating their sovereignty, that we should only engage in conflict or warfare as a last resort and as an act of self-defense, however understand the importance of maintaining a strong military (within reason, minus the excess) and tactical advantage over potential adversaries in the event we should need to defend ourselves in the future.

Generally the anti hypocrisy party

Previous tea party voted Ron Paul 2012 - was following infowars/breitbart/4chan since 2011

My "red pills" are Chem trails/HAARP/geo-engineering -heavy metals having a duel benefit of weather control and human control, 9/11, vaccines (tricky subject) and NWO of course.

Now a left leaning libertarian voted Bernie in the primary then Clinton because I live in a swing state and am absolutely terrified of Breitbart (Pepe) and Alex fucking Jones in the White House.

Huge skeptic of our current administration unlike other truthers in this thread.