Totally disappointed that trump posts are dominating this sub.

15  2017-03-03 by Wooxoo09

31 comments

I know, right? It's going to get so much harder to find weird porn online if MK-ULTRA gets dragged into the sunlight and all its perps jailed.

Don't worry, there will always be young women with daddy issues to keep you in porn.

Yuck. I was joking.

AFAIK, the porn I actually like doesn't have anyone mind-controlled in it. Or, y'know, anyone at all. Sometimes fiction is stranger than reality.

My apologies, of course.

I counted three on the front page right now, and one of them is this post talking about not taking anti-Trump news as gospel means pro-Trump.

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5x34hk/meta_this_subreddit_not_taking_every_piece_of/?utm_content=title&utm_medium=hot&utm_source=reddit&utm_name=conspiracy

Oh STFU you cuck-beta-dem-libtard.

Sarcasm doesn't come through

It tends to let people down in a pinch, yes.

Rule 4

It is. Hopefully they die down soon and they migrate back into the shadows and quarantined to r/the_donald

Trump is the state now. He's an executive asshole who lost my respect with that botched yemen raid and failing to be responsible/respectful about it.

Part of me hopes that asset forfeiture & private federal prisons are to accomodate for all the rich folks that can have their BILLIONS in assets seized after getting convicted for treason, child trafficking, corruption etc. since we have heard that ~30% of the establishment may be indicted. That could mean thousands of criminal trials and billions in asset forfeiture. Of course the cops will always abuse that and steal any property they can, but to be honest they're doing it already and I don't know if it would get worse.

I'm just salivating over the concept of seizing Epstein, Clinton, Obama, Schumer, Pelosi etc. and their huge bank accounts and needing the space to keep all of them in federal prison for life. But unfortunately to get that it requires giving up valuable rights. Sometimes the revenge isn't worth the cost, and I foresee that being the problem with asset forfeiture.

I assure you asset forfeiture never get used on rich people, they can afford lawyers..

it's you and me who get hit with that shit and can't afford lawyers.

Looks like the daily "/r/The_Donald 2.0" thread has arrived right on schedule.

It's a psy-op to build the cognitive dissonance. anyone with principles who stood strong against the Obama, DNC and clinton corruption should smell Trump's corruption in a heart beat.

I don't get why it's so hard for everyone to understand the "enemy of my enemy is my friend" principle with Trump. So long as he keeps stirring up corruption scandals in establishment politics, wonderful. As soon as he starts to side with big companies in a very clear or direct manner, which de-regulation happens to align with but is not as clear-cut as pay-for-play regulation manipulation in terms of proving the intent for corruption, then I am sure this community will attack him.

Also anyone curious why nobody cares about Russian collusion, even if purposeful and nefarious, go watch Putin's "New World Order has failed" speech to understand why /r/conspiracy wouldn't be concerned about Russia upsetting the global unipolar Western order.

It's timed to follow the daily "everyone anti-Trump is a shill" thread.

If you hang out here more, you'll see that the antiTrump posts get plenty of airtime too. Then there's someone else to complain about those.

I complain about them both - as they are thinly veiled political rant posts pretending to be hearty conspiracies.

But I am sure we as a sub are very very sad to hear you are totally disappointed.

There is no conspiracy with a lot of them, just politics. I guess that's not against the rules?

Modern politics has become infested with conspiracies.

But still - there is a post right now about an Ann Coulter tweet. Really?

She tweeted about a political conspiracy to insulate a high-profile criminal from prosecution, so... yes.

nah

It has. Ideally if emotion was left out and political conspiracies were posted without bias, we'd be sitting pretty. Shills and regular emotional people don't give us that much consideration.

Sadly it isn't against the rules, or maybe it isn't sad - as many conspiracies are government based - but hard to get people to not infuse political emotion into it.

c'est la vie?

Maybe because the most visible people who oppose him represent the pedophile satanic criminal Cabal.. kind of what this sub likes exposing.

Yeah, you got me. I'm a filthy rich satanist spending my time on reddit. Or I could be a concerned citizen worried about the destruction this pos in office, and his administration are waging on this country. But yeah, go satan.

He's talking about John "North Vietnam Brainwashed Me" McCain, Chuck "Knights of Pythias" Schumer, Nancy "Goat Hill" Pelosi, John "Skippy The Molesta" Podesta etc., they are all pretty hardcore with their secret societies and kiddy-diddling so it's hard not to celebrate anyone trying to put them in jail.

Hates Trump posts

Goes and makes a Trump post.

by my count about 60-70% of front page is some kind of pro Trump anti DNC circlejerk..

Earlier today I counted 10 out of 25 threads on the front page were anti-Democrat/anti-Hilary/anti-Obama.

There was 1 thread about Trump and the thread only had 1 comment.

I just counted again, I got 13/25 now.

But still - there is a post right now about an Ann Coulter tweet. Really?

It has. Ideally if emotion was left out and political conspiracies were posted without bias, we'd be sitting pretty. Shills and regular emotional people don't give us that much consideration.