The right did the same thing to the Clintons and Obama., it's politics as usual.

If he was impeached, Pence would be sworn in. If there was a legitimate reason to impeach him though, he'd probably resign like Nixon did.

impeachment does not mean you have to leave. its an procedure that "wipes the slate clean" Clinton didn't leave. Nixon willfully resigned. its meant to embarrass the shit out of a sitting pres or at least expose misgivings. or try. to actually unseat a sitting pres is a monumental task. and they need to have they're ducks in a row before they try and they know it.

Yes, I never said it did mean that. My point is that if there is an actual real reason for impeachment proceedings where it looks like there is enough evidence to actually impeach, I doubt the sitting president would go through it and would rather resign.

trump would say" do what you have to do, have fun, i have work to do."

Republican controlled congress would have to agree to proceed with the impeachment. Unless there is something flat out illegal, I don't see it happening.

If the alphabets investigation yields enough evidence to warrant an impeachment that won't result in an embarrassment for the dems, they'll insist on starting the proceedings to maximize the republican embarassment around midterm elections to flip as many seats as they can.

They don't need proof, or conviction, just enough embarrassing innuendo to damage the reputation of Reps who support Trump.

If the alphabets investigation yields enough evidence to warrant an impeachment that won't result in an embarrassment for the dems, they'll insist on starting the proceedings to maximize the republican embarassment around midterm elections to flip as many seats as they can.

They don't need proof, or conviction, just enough embarrassing innuendo to damage the reputation of Reps who support Trump.

That's pretty much what they're counting on.

What happens if drumpf gets his hands on the nuclear codes amirite

We burn the the homes of known deep state puppets. And I hope they're reading this.

Before I even start...

Impeached FOR WHAT?

I don't like him or agree with his policies isn't grounds for impeachment. So sick of this bullshit and the word traitor being thrown around. He has hardly been able to even do anything because of all the shit slinging from the opposition, of anything, impeach Pelosi, Shumerrrr, Fienstein, Graham, and McCain so we can get on with it.

Clinton got one for lying about getting a blowjob...

there's not that much of a requirement for one.

it wasnt the bj, it was the committing perjury

Exactly, had he just admitted it he probably would have gotten away with infidelity, I mean who could blame him after being with who he is married to?

it's very possible they can get him for lying under oath if they ever get him under oath...

I don't it will happen though, there's no one they can get enough votes, they might be able to get a trial.

And if the media hates him, I feel I've become conditioned to believe that maybe he's actually doing something to benefit more than just the elite.

Think about that for a second.

It is no secret that the majority of people no longer trust the mainstream media. The media know it. The elites know it.

Do you think they would use the media to push their favoured candidate, knowing that the people will automatically distrust that candidate due to their distrust of the media?

The elites have been manipulating populations for centuries. They know how to play the game. They know that sometimes the easiest way to get someone to do what you want is to tell them not to do it.

Bernie Sanders was opposed by the media. Genuinely opposed. How did they deal with him? Did they spend all day, every day telling you not to vote for him?

A new study by the Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy validates that critique, finding Sanders received far less media exposure than any other major political candidate in the race.

http://reverbpress.com/features/bernie-sanders-was-right-media-blackout-badly-hurt-campaign-harvard-study-confirms/

No, they simply ignored him. The left him to languish on the sidelines while they legitimised Trump and Clinton instead. Sanders never had a chance because the media made it a two horse race right from the beginning.

Do you really think they would have made Trump one of the leading contenders if they actually opposed him?

Trump wasn't opposed by the media. They made him.

Well, there are two reasons.

Firstly, continuing to attack Trump solidifies his support. People who otherwise might question Trump's actions are being tricked into supporting everything he does because "he's the outsider".

Remember, it's only been a couple of months - there is a long time between now and the next election... which brings us to the second reason.

Problem - Reaction - Solution.

We are at the Problem stage. The media are laying the groundwork for the next handover - polarising the people (Reaction) so that when the time comes they can offer the Solution.

Trump was the Solution to the Obama problem. Obama was the Solution to the Bush Jnr Problem, Bush Jnr was the Solution to the Clinton problem. Clinton was the Solution to the Bush Snr Problem.

Around and around it goes.

They create the problem, wait for the reaction, then offer the solution. All the while, they control the whole game. They ensure that the real outsiders are marginalised and ignored - they are "unelectable" - and ensure that only the people they control are ever considered "viable".

They give you a choice between Team A and Team B while telling you that Team C is not even worth thinking about. Why? Because they are Team A and Team B. They want you to think you have power, but in reality you're just pushing the buttons they tell you to push, like a trained monkey.

You're playing their game, and they have rigged it.

The only "hope" we have is that some day enough people will realise how the game is played... that there is a game being played... and will reject the "solutions" offered.

But even here we see we're a very long way away from that day.

Right now, all we can do is continue to point out that the game is real and we're the pawns.

to be fair:

The Trump administration has been, so far at least, embarrassing at best. It is pretty likely that he is not the leader you were all hoping for, given the fact that he isn't a leader at all. He has no leadership skills whatsoever.

However, I am very glad he is in office as opposed to Hillary. I think if Trump can work out the kinks he might do some good but I am not holding my breath as it appears he is just another establishment puppet.

What I think is that it will just get worse. Trump will run himself into the ground. By that time, the people will be so desperate that they will accept any alternative to Donald Trump.

Even enslavement.

2/10

Actually, with Trump we just have to listen to the words he says. The media need only quote him and most but blind supporters see him as the childish charlatan he is.

because our perception towards Trump is only based on what the media portrays to us

Speak for yourself amigo. I don't even own a TV. I watch Trump's media appearances on youtube, I read his twitter, I pay attention to primary sources.

I still think he is an embarrassment and a buffoon.

Pence is one of the Neocons, so they'll be ok with that.