Authoritarian left refuses to admit their party is corrupt to the core.

I was planning on voting third party until the MSM started talking about what to do against Russian hacks. I realized that the democrats would take us to war over telling the truth of their misdeeds.

Hillary had to lose. Trump isn't great, but there was no alternative. If he doesn't start going after pedos I fear things will only get worse.

And people hate Trump because he doesn't want to create any aggression towards Russia. We need them as allies...

he doesn't want to create any aggression towards Russia

Then why are we fighting a war against Syria?

We need them as allies

Why? We haven't needed them as allies since WWII and we've been the best of enemies ever since.

I would love you to find a single quote from anyone ever who said they hate Trump because he doesn't want to create aggression towards Russia. That is not why people hate Trump.

You know I'm pretty sure they are trying to start a war...Hillary would have done it for sure!

It's funny, that's a talking point from Russian State media. I'm sure that's just a coincidence.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/why-is-trump-suddenly-talking-about-world-war-iii/2016/10/28/be44cc0e-9d24-11e6-a0ed-ab0774c1eaa5_story.html?utm_term=.4a1e05d1f226

First sentence in the article in wrong. Crimea voted in referendum to rejoin Russia. Why doesn't anyone get that.

Do you feel it was a free and fair referendum?

I do know it was turned around rather quickly. But people did vote no?

Sure. They voted in the Soviet era, too. And under Saddam Hussein.

Wouldn't it have been a Ukrainian vote?

Except of course the Russians moved into Crimea in February and the referendum occurred in March. Ukrainians and Russian soldiers fought and killed each other in that time. You gotta really want to see the world one way to not call that an invasion. Do you consider the Iraq war an invasion?

There was a lot of shadiness around the vote, many pro-Kiev Ukranians stayed home in protest and even the UN declared the vote illegal. When a vote anywhere gets 96% support I'm usually suspicious.

Imagine if Mexico came into Southern California where there was a majority Mexican population. After much fighting with Americans they gained control of the territory and then declared that it was Mexico. The Mexican population then held a vote to decide if that chunk of California wanted to join Mexico. Then it got a 96% vote. Would that feel like an annexation to you? Or a secession?

Its about justifying aggression toward Russia and justifying why HRC, worst candidate in US history, lost to a belligerent billionaire.

Yeah your sort has been running around with this kind of hyperbole since the beginning.

Questioning Trump and co = Cold War II, investigations = all out nuclear war.

So it has to be dropped now, and stop recording the Whitehouse press briefings, and reporting about us turning the cameras off. Just obey and MAGA.

I don't doubt this narrative of yours fools a lot of people.

"Questioning Trump means your children will be nuked, and forget about the false left-right dichotomy and no I don't come from r/The_Donald."

Do you go back there and write "Hurr hurr I bamboozled r/conspiracy and served the God Emperor?"

Keep trying to manipulate people and send more PMs like this they're funny:

You are a fake account and I see all of your vote bots.

Ok.

You keep saying everyone. Why are you not highly up voted if you speak for everyone?

You keep saying everyone. And yet everyone does not in fact agree with you. The FBI director who was fired for investigation Russia disagrees with you.

The US government having criminal elements does not make Russia innocent. Wanting to make sure Trump isn't compromised doesn't equate with wanting war.

Are you a bot?

Literally nobody cares. Either show us proof or stop talking until you have proof.

I care. I've used Google and there is evidence, if circumstantial. You should give it a try. It's not his job to spoon feed you evidence so you can move the goal posts once again.

everyone has been following the Trump Russia story. Including legal authorities. Nobody has found proof yet. Accusations aren't circumstantial evidence, they are just sensationalized for ratings.

Same with JFK and 9/11 and UFOs and literally everything we talk about on here. There is no proof or they wouldn't just be conspiracy theories anymore. And yet THIS is the one where we must have PROOF.

I there is more "circumstantial evidence" that the MSM is trying to help the deep state unseat our president than there is that Trump did anything wrong.

You're just looking at it one sided.

I've googled it a lot. Trump is guilty of using botnets and obviously of many things in his past (money laundering, sex trafficking, etc.). But this Russia hacking story doesn't even have circumstantial evidence, unless you consider the IP address of the hacker evidence, which would be silly.

You're on /r/conspiracy asking for proof before we talk about something? That's rich.

Also that's not how literally works.

its juicy entertaining the theory, after all, the cold war isnt over nor is the USA the only country of doing manipulation.

Yes, the rampant military spending and proxy wars were fake /s

The thousands of dead in South America probably think it's all a bit silly.

u/HighLevel_Insider could we get a general update to what is happening in the world? from the period you started to write here to now. what have changed.. and the orbital ring? have it gotten any momentum ?

Growing understanding. Are you posting about it?

try to spread the world IRL to friends and family, had an interesting conversation whit a friend of my who is studying physics. he told me that they had been presented whit space elevator in school but said it was impossible to build it whit the existing material we have today.. long story short, they had only been presented whit the geosynchronous space elevator. he had never heard about the Orbital ring

That's pretty general. Any specific questions?

like whats the fuzz whit Saudi and Qatar?

People keep conflating two completely different things together and it's infuriating.

Russia obviously favored Trump, consequently the state run media will favor Trump. This is the "Russian influences elections", newsflash BBC influences elections too by the same logic, and so does every single politicized news station. This wouldn't even be newsworthy if anti-Trump media wasn't vitriolic.

Then there is the collusion. So far no proof of collusion, the only thing that is known is that the DNC was hacked, supposedly by some Romanian that was part of a russian-based hacking group. It goes cold here, no link with the russian government, it goes straight from Trump joking asking russians to hack "hillary's emails during the campaign" to "Trump colluding with Russians to undermine democracy"

Frankly it's absurd at this point because the whole thing appears to be the result of poor communication and confirmation bias.

It was pretty perfect. Whilst everyone was running around arguing back and forth over muh Russia, the PG narrative slowly crumbled away from view

Narratives with no evidence tend to do that.

Are you a bot?