Is this a radio that can pick up transmissions across the world? How can you do this online?

The link the other guy gave me goes up to 28,000 khz, I didn't even know it could go in the millions of khz wow

28,000 khz is just 28mhz, that CB radio area.

FM radio like in the car is 87-108mhz.

I have the exact answer if you're willing to listen.

Are you using a standard cheap dongle? Not a special one or anything?

If so, what you're seeing isn't real. I've encountered these before, what you're seeing is USB signal noise https://www.sigidwiki.com/wiki/High_Speed_USB_Noise

Note what it says

"High Speed USB 2.0 clock noise. Shows up at multiples of 480 MHz."

So 480mhz, 960mhz, 1440mhz...

What you're seeing is just isn't happening in reality, I can find the same error at 720mhz, 660mhz, 600mhz 540mhz, 480mhz, etc varying from weak to strong.

Yours ins't exact on 1440 because of frequency drift, and doing higher frequencies(anything past 900mhz) will cuase it to heat up fast and cause more drift and more error from this not being designed for that range. Hell, I don't believe you can actually use that frequency at all with a cheap generic rtl.

go take a look and listen to 480mhz and see the similarity.

I'm glad you're getting into radio stuff, I highly suggest listening to business radio things since that's always fun, find your local ham repeater frequencies. But google a bit.

Who is bill? you've called me bill twice now...

Here is the one I use:

http://websdr.ewi.utwente.nl:8901/

thank you sir

only goes up to 30Mhz.

this signal is 1.4Ghz

My apologies, I was not aware of this. Let us know if you find one which can recieve this signal.

there prob isn't one, and 1.4Ghz is microwave and line of sight.

Any way to throw it on SoundCloud or GDrive for a link? I'd love to hear it! Bonus points if it's downloadable, I could analyze the audio with a handful of neat programs!

Do you have a link?

[removed]

gdrive as in GOOGLE drive? you are on a conspiracy forum and want to use google? WHAT? double standards much?

Relax man, we're not swapping classified docs, it's an easy way to share files and we're not all balls-deep in this tinfoil hat shit. Keep your shirt on.

So youre making excuses for using Google drive by saying that "its not classified"??? That's like saying you don't care about privacy cause you got nothing to hide. What difference does it make what content it is??? Your are using the enemies service. On a conspiracy reddit. Don't you see how hypocritical that is. And wow so many downvotes. Pathetic. You people probably use Facebook too? Or do you all who downvote don't think fb and Google is the enemy??? You're all hypocrites or part of the problem. Pick one.

First of all, it's hard to be hypocritical when I never declared google "The enemy "in the first place… You're connecting a lot of dots that aren't there, and making a metric shit-load of assumptions… A lot of people on here are open-minded, casual lurkers, contributing on the occasion that something actually peaks their interest, or when they can be of service to the subject at hand.

It sounds to me like a little time away from your sub might be a good thing for you… I don't mean that to come across the way snarky anonymous Internet commentary usually goes, nor do I mean it to have the usual judge mental tone you should expect from a stranger online… I myself went pretty deep and hard on this sub for a long time, and while I do think that critical thinking and investigation is important, and there's a lot of "fighting the good fight " happening here, it's also very possible to have too much of a good thing, to the degree that it actually starts affecting you negatively. I myself lost plenty of sleep getting worked up about the shit on the sub, and it definitely affected the way I was interacting with the people around me, and certainly strangers online.

So Google is not the enemy is that what you're saying

I don't agree with the largess of their practices as a corporation, certainly their "algorithms" raise a lot of questions, if not out right provable accusations… There's certainly a staggering amount of evidence that they also handle privacy terribly. As a consumer, I do use some of their services casually, and cautiously.

I don't think they're either the "enemy" or the "shining leaders in technological progress" either. I mainly just wanted to be realistic in my solicitation of efforts to get something from someone on the Internet.

And I can see plainly that the entire point of my last response seems to have been missed, but nonetheless, for your own sake, you should strongly examine your relationship with the sub.

i dont have any relationship with this sub. other than that i visit it. thats it. the sub isnt the issue here. nor is my relationship with it the issue. and if you cant see what the issue is, then noone can help you see it.

The medium of file sharing is less important than the content in this instance.

I see your frustration with Google, as do many others, but they're still ubiquitous for most internet users. Additionally, Google drive doesn't require a sign-in to download a video. In this instance, this is 'much ado about nothing'.

¡Odelay!

It's about the principle. You can't complain about something then go ahead and use the very same it's hypocritical and i dislike it, feel free to downvote me

There's no reason for downvotes. Disagreement and discussion can bring understanding and progress. What would you recommend as a good replacement for Google's stuff? I'm actually in process of hunting for a new browser to replace chrome, because they removed 'backspace to go back'. I'm probably going to get a new email as well, but the phone platform is a concern for me. I don't have the money or desire to support Apple, and there's not much else out there afaik.

it doesnt matter dont you realise that? using the service of the enemy meanwhile complaining about the enemy is completely ludicrous. you cant have a sub devoted to red pilling the people about google and facebook then at the same turn USE their service?? DONT YOU SEE THAT?

You replied twice to me, and you're significantly angrier today than yesterday. Are you a bot or multi-user account?

I don't keep track of who replies to my comments and reddit doesn't give you much when you click on the notifications. And no I'm not a bot. Do i seem like a bot to you? And what about my point don't you get or disagree with?

Well, nothing really. Read my response to your other comment.

Yeah I saw it. Thanks

Fair enough.

Legit question, no need to be condescending.

What was the question? And which part was condescending to you?

Your question was legit but your last line is why your comment got so many down votes.

im sorry but i dont know what is condescending about it. and like i said, if you use services like google drive, facebook and stuff like this - while being on a sub constantly saying that these are the enemies (just look at the hot pages) - then you are either being part of the problem, or a hypocrite.

I agree with your sentiment but talking down to the rest of the users is why you got down voted.

I was only talking down to those using Facebook and Google while still participating in a sub where it's clear they are the enemies and I dislike that blatant hypocrisy, so feel free to downvote I feel those who agree with me wouldn't downvote because it wouldn't be referring to them.

Well I gave you an up its for common sense

PERRRRRRFECT!

1.4 Ghz !?

THIS is my big conspiracy.

1999 the UN reported a microwave signal coming from space, it was focused on Alaska, reports came from Morgues there reporting the dead were being cooked.

A week later the news had a blurb about a new US anti-tornado Satelite that warmed the air to disapate Tornados, "The only problem is it can cause Flying things like Birds, Aircraft and Missiles to explode" the news report went on to this this was the system they were testing when the UN made its enquiry.

I could be totally wrong here, but I think the US is testing their "anti-tornado" Microwave Satelite.

Oh and good luck finding ANYTHING about it anywhere, I know I and others who were with me when we saw the news report have tried, for YEARS.

http://tornado.sfsu.edu/geosciences/classes/m302/Microwave_Destroying_Tornadoes/Microwave.html

SFSU made something similar in 2000 is this what you're talking about?

That sounds a lot like it, but the news described a working system, which is what was first reported as a strange happening which was noticed by the UN who made the enquiry and the news reveal.

Ya no problem I love to look for stuff speaciallywhen it comes to conspiracy. I also noticed that the SFSU paper I linked isn't even it. You say it happened in the 90s that paper was written in 2000 or 2001. Just goes to show the government is years ahead of the public sector

I more impressed they found a way for microwaves to only cook dead people.

Like enough it was noticeable. But not living people.

Oh and it doesn't interfere with anything? Watts of power 500 feet to make birds explode.

So. Lets say 4000 watts to heat a mass of .1 gallons of water to 212 degrees from 100 in 30 seconds. About bird size and temperature I would assume. And longer and the bird probably dies.

Cool. So lets say this bird is at 500 feet. Where most of the birds tend to be. And lets say the satellite is in a 2000km orbit. So, transmit power would need to be only 16000000000000000 watts.

Only 16 quadrillion watts to make a bird boil in 30 seconds. Would it blow up? Maybe. Antenna gain? Sure that is a thing. But what is powering this? Lets say it takes...say 1 billion times less power with antenna gain. How are we powering a 16 MW transmitter in space. Average power. Not peak.

I really do wish I had more information about this, that's why we have dug into it, it was really just "blurbs" of information 15 second sound bites following a 2-3 min information stream.

I really don't have any concrete answers aside from what I posted, only questions.

I've lived in Alaska since 1997. I've never heard anything about this.

"L-band"

The 21cm L-band is typically used for radio astronomy. Any observations would need a satellite dish. Interesting this is being picked up on HAM. Maybe interference from a radio telescope?

Is it a numbers-station trying a new frequency?

If memory serves microwave tech works on pulse theory so microwaves is a fair assumption.

I would say to you as well if you put this stuff up here to do with number stations use a good proxy & VPN "sleeve". And dont use the reddit account often. Have "multiples".

Kudos & keep safe.

I think he means if this is a real number station to use a VPN(virtual private network) and change Reddit accounts in order to increase your security etc... I'm thinking he believes you will become targeted for messing with number stations

I have no clue I was just trying to interpret the dude who made the suggestions.

Just a question here, not a "Ham" guy but could it be a Pulsar transmission? Does it a have specific duration and repeat schedule/time?

Sounds like the radio waves talking. Government's making you say this!

I recently wondered what's happening on the old analog TV bandwidths, now that no one has a tv hooked up to an old antenna.

I heard the PR with no sourcing years ago, thanks.

So, no one here has ever checked it out?

I think they got sold off to mostly cell phone providers when analog signal was discontinued.

Digital TV took some of it, and others were auctioned off for cell phones

I heard that too. I was wondering if anyone has tuned in with a TV to see and hear the truth. The ''news'' is rarely accurate about anything.

What do you mean? Truth about what?

You seem off topic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_2008_wireless_spectrum_auction

More of the same well known rumors, as everyone pretends I have no fucking idea about the STORY . Has anyone tuned in to the frequencies?
Cue: someone rehashing the old PR, with nothing to add to answer my questions, that have nothing to do with writing or talking about the frequencies, but rather listening in on them, and nothing else.
Quick, someone else pretend I have no ability to understand the obvious talking and writing I have no interest in, and did not ask about.

People tune in with digital TV antennas all the time... many watch OTA digital broadcast on their TVs. Many millions of others use LTE cellular data and are similarly "tuned in" to the 700MHz spectrum. What is it that you want to "listen" to?

You seems confused.

You seem manic.

Inb4 I'm an actor in Contact

Could you please keep us updated on this. This is my own personal favorite conspiracy.

US asset Star Wars Microwave Satellite, that's the jist of it.

Also could be something different, I'm not a HAM radio guy, the vocals thing is interesting.

IIRC Star Wars was a "layered defence network" not just nuclear satellite but a series of counter measures.

Would this be within a frequency that a ShortWave radio would be able to pick up. Either way I have found some weird shit playing around with the SW radio that I got from a old relative including some weird cryptic transmitters at times or faint voices that are to fuzzy to make out, l live in Alberta.

Calgary here!

Would this be within a frequency that a ShortWave radio would be able to pick up.

Not even close. Also it isn't real, it's USB noise from his device.

The voices and stuff you are hearing is just far off shortwave stations, likely in another language as shortwave isn't used in North America but mildly popular in other countries. It's possible you're hearing faint Russian radio or even Japanese radio.

Seems to be interference from other electronics

Don't know if it's related, I'm no expert. Page 2: IMT bands

It's the frequency of a nearby processor or electronics. You don't have the infrastructure to receive spacecomm. To receive l band signals you need directional antenna/dish.

It's USB noise from the rtl device, it's a known issue.

^{Reposting to top level so people can see}

I have the exact answer if anyone is willing to listen.

Are you using a standard cheap dongle? Not a special one or anything?

If so, what you're seeing isn't real. I've encountered these before, what you're seeing is USB signal noise https://www.sigidwiki.com/wiki/High_Speed_USB_Noise

Note what it says

"High Speed USB 2.0 clock noise. Shows up at multiples of 480 MHz."

So 480mhz, 960mhz, 1440mhz...

What you're seeing is just isn't happening in reality, I can find the same error at 720mhz, 660mhz, 600mhz 540mhz, 480mhz, etc varying from weak to strong.

Yours ins't exact on 1440 because of frequency drift, and doing higher frequencies(anything past 900mhz) will cuase it to heat up fast and cause more drift and more error from this not being designed for that range. Hell, I don't believe you can actually use that frequency at all with a cheap generic rtl.

go take a look and listen to 480mhz and see the similarity.

I'm glad you're getting into radio stuff, I highly suggest listening to business radio things since that's always fun, find your local ham repeater frequencies. But google a bit.

The link the other guy gave me goes up to 28,000 khz, I didn't even know it could go in the millions of khz wow

THIS is my big conspiracy.

1999 the UN reported a microwave signal coming from space, it was focused on Alaska, reports came from Morgues there reporting the dead were being cooked.

A week later the news had a blurb about a new US anti-tornado Satelite that warmed the air to disapate Tornados, "The only problem is it can cause Flying things like Birds, Aircraft and Missiles to explode" the news report went on to this this was the system they were testing when the UN made its enquiry.

I could be totally wrong here, but I think the US is testing their "anti-tornado" Microwave Satelite.

Oh and good luck finding ANYTHING about it anywhere, I know I and others who were with me when we saw the news report have tried, for YEARS.

"L-band"

The 21cm L-band is typically used for radio astronomy. Any observations would need a satellite dish. Interesting this is being picked up on HAM. Maybe interference from a radio telescope?

I have the exact answer if you're willing to listen.

Are you using a standard cheap dongle? Not a special one or anything?

If so, what you're seeing isn't real. I've encountered these before, what you're seeing is USB signal noise https://www.sigidwiki.com/wiki/High_Speed_USB_Noise

Note what it says

"High Speed USB 2.0 clock noise. Shows up at multiples of 480 MHz."

So 480mhz, 960mhz, 1440mhz...

What you're seeing is just isn't happening in reality, I can find the same error at 720mhz, 660mhz, 600mhz 540mhz, 480mhz, etc varying from weak to strong.

Yours ins't exact on 1440 because of frequency drift, and doing higher frequencies(anything past 900mhz) will cuase it to heat up fast and cause more drift and more error from this not being designed for that range. Hell, I don't believe you can actually use that frequency at all with a cheap generic rtl.

go take a look and listen to 480mhz and see the similarity.

I'm glad you're getting into radio stuff, I highly suggest listening to business radio things since that's always fun, find your local ham repeater frequencies. But google a bit.

So Google is not the enemy is that what you're saying

¡Odelay!

I heard that too. I was wondering if anyone has tuned in with a TV to see and hear the truth. The ''news'' is rarely accurate about anything.

It's about the principle. You can't complain about something then go ahead and use the very same it's hypocritical and i dislike it, feel free to downvote me

it doesnt matter dont you realise that? using the service of the enemy meanwhile complaining about the enemy is completely ludicrous. you cant have a sub devoted to red pilling the people about google and facebook then at the same turn USE their service?? DONT YOU SEE THAT?