...It isn't really a good thing. It's easy to shout "SHILL!!" from the mountain top, and you never really know if its a shill or a ignorant normy. But A trend seems clear. Confuse, Disorient, Distract, and degrade(the conversation.)
The primary talking point seems to be: Taking a position like a 9/11 truther, but claiming a commercial airline did in fact hit the pentagon. Then if anyone argue against, they call you a "No planer." Whats important is that years ago another campaign was going on. It was a disinfo campaign designed to infiltrate 9/11 groups and post videos, taking the position that No Planes were at the twin towers, they were holograms(The original No Planer). Obviously the idea is a confuse outsiders with competing no plane story's and a series of contradictions in the 9/11 truth community. What I Believe to be the case is that Planes did actually hit the towers, but not the commercial airliners they are suppose to be. I also believe its pretty obvious that it was a drone with explosives that hit the pentagon. It was decorated to look similar to an American Airlines plane, but is drastically smaller.
My final thought is this: I don't know exactly what happened, and many things are in the realm of possibility. But we know as a fact that the official story is a lie.