Something to consider regarding Vegas shooting.
27 2017-10-14 by Sumner67
You have more and more corruption scandals popping up all over Washington D.C. now that involve the majority of politicians and federal agencies/depts. Each month we see new information, new documents, new witnesses that if it was anywhere else would have already resulted in massive FBI raids and people led in cuffs to the paddy wagon. Citizens on all sides out there are not only pissed at each other but a growing anger FINALLY is starting to focus on our politicians and agencies.
So what happens? a mass shooting. BUT it's sloppy. There are constant changes in the story, blatant coverups...almost like it was a rush job.
Shortly after we get almost a dozen new bills for gun regulations/bans being pushed...but this time around it's not just the usual Democrats doing it, but we are seeing Republicans as well pushing for these. And these bills aren't targeting specific things, they are worded precisely in "legalize" to be vague and give the feds all kinds of power as to what they can claim falls into their definitions in these bills.
Gun legislation to disarm/regulate/restrict the angry public wouldn't pass in the current congress and hasn't been able to pass in the previous 8 years...
Unless something big was rushed forward and done to give them an "excuse" to suddenly try a mass bombardment of legislation from both sides of the aisle.
20 comments
1 jiggetty 2017-10-14
I own guns and I absolutely hate the "They're coming for our guns!!" Crowd.
No they're fucking not coming for your guns.
1 Sumner67 2017-10-14
I take it you didn't read any of the dozen bills that are proposed then?
1 jiggetty 2017-10-14
Got a link? I'd love to peruse them and find out how they don't apply to me
1 Sumner67 2017-10-14
quick list, think there are a few more but just copy pasting one list from gunpolitics.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/3998?r=8 Protect America Act of 2017 - permitting the Attorney General to deny the transfer of firearms or the issuance of explosives licenses to known or suspected terrorists, and for other purposes
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/3999?r=71 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the manufacture, possession, or transfer of any part or combination of parts that is designed and functions to increase the rate of fire of a semiautomatic rifle but does not convert the semiautomatic rifle into a machinegun, and for other purposes.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4018 To provide for a 3-day waiting period before a person may receive a handgun
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4025 Multiple Firearm Sales Reporting Modernization Act of 2017 - To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand to all firearms the requirement that Federal firearms licensees report sales of 2 or more handguns to the same unlicensed person within 5 consecutive business days.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4052?r=18 To prohibit the transfer or possession of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, and for other purposes
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4057?r=13 basically the same as 3998
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4064 To impose restrictions on the sale of binary explosives, and for other purposes
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/1945/text/is?overview=closed&format=xml Keep Americans Safe Act - To regulate large capacity ammunition feeding devices.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/1916?r=6 Automatic Gunfire Prevention Act - similar to HR3999, but worse
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/1923/text?r=2 Removes default-pass from Brady Bill.....basically allowing a de facto ban on all new purchases and transfers
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/3962 Online ammo sales ban
3998 - violates 4 separate amendments in the bill of rights 3999 - is not only extremely vague, but could be used as an outright ban on all semi-automatics 4018 - a delayed right is not a right
I'm too lazy to keep going
Added: HR3987 - allocates $10 million / year to the CDC for gun violence research and requires lost / stolen firearms to be reported to the police within 48 hours of discovery. Failure to report can lead to a $10,000 fine and / or up to 1 year imprisonment per lost/stolen firearm.
1 jiggetty 2017-10-14
I could go line by line but seriously I'm fine with every one of those laws...
High capacity magazines, bump stocks, tenarite, 3 day waiting periods, funding CDC research into gun violence... sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
And no I'm not trolling, I sincerely have no problem with any of this.
1 Sumner67 2017-10-14
then we're done talking.
1 DontDownVoteJustDie 2017-10-14
Increments, my friend. Increments.
It's a cultural thing. Not an immediate thing.
They are conditioning the future generations to despise gun ownership.
Give it...20...maybe 30 more years...if you own a gun...you will be synonymous with psychopath.
Because by this point, the media will have successfully convinced that anyone that takes an interest in guns or gun ownership are the same people that going postal and firing off guns in public places for no good reason. One patsy after another until it finally seeks in that guns = bad.
I'm calling it now.
1 Sumner67 2017-10-14
yep, they tried a federal level assault gun ban (which did nothing at all to the crime levels btw) and after it expired, have never had the votes to ram through a more stringent version....
So they've gone to the state and local levels trying to push through laws there first with the incremental plan and the billions of dollars Bloomberg and others have used. The more places they get those passed, the easier it is to get state level shit passed, then enough of those pass and they can then get back to federal level stuff.
1 UncontactedPeoples 2017-10-14
I don't own guns.
But yes, it absolutely appears to me that "they" are coming for your guns.
Not only that, but obviously those in power are interested in (and able to act on) disarming those not in power.
What, you think they aren't, out of the goodness of their heart?
Bitch, please.
1 mybluejeans 2017-10-14
interesting to think about - if the characters are ignored for a moment and the big picture observed, you see massive power and financial concentration, a population increasingly expressing its dissatisfaction (countless examples since 2008 and NAFTA), wealthy buying panic rooms/shelters, bill of rights stripped, stock market soaring while rates artificially suppressed, gov spending like Monarchs - its like they see an uprising looming and don’t want pesky guns shooting at their armored vehicles, drones, neurally networked cooperative surveillance robots. Hmm
1 Sumner67 2017-10-14
and with hearings on Anwan starting up that could implicate a whole mess of politicians in crimes that carry jail time, you can see the panic starting to creep through DC.
1 holographictomato 2017-10-14
This won't make me popular here, but honestly guys if any of you think governments would do something as risky as a false flag mass shooting over fucking gun laws you are brain dead.
I know a lot of you struggle with logic, but the US government does not need to take away your guns, your police force is like a military and could already crush any dissent.
It absolutely wouldn't be worth the risk when the potential reward doesn't really make a difference, your government controls you and your guns haven't stopped it, if anything letting you have them makes you all delusional enough to think you have some sort of freedom from tyranny.
1 UncontactedPeoples 2017-10-14
The the government would never do anything risky, immoral or dangerous or anything like that.
What a bunch of stupid idiots we are for thinking they might!
1 holographictomato 2017-10-14
Congrats on missing my point entirely and posting 3 irrelevant things.
Like I said, brain dead.
1 UncontactedPeoples 2017-10-14
Cant decide whether you are a shill or a troll?
1 holographictomato 2017-10-14
Honestly hilarious, it's like you all follow a carbon copy version of the same argument techniques.
Make bizarre Irrelevant comparisons to other conspiracies that aren't even remotely comparable.
Ignore any flaws in your logic that have been pointed out to you.
When you're challenged accuse the other person of shilling or trolling and don't address any of the ratonal arguments.
Beyond stupid.
1 UncontactedPeoples 2017-10-14
Like many on Reddit, I can't fucking stand people like you.
1 perfect_pickles 2017-10-14
there is a solution for these treason troopers.
1 alexman2323 2017-10-14
Look what sub reddit you're in. If you expect logic or evidence go to world news. Even there good luck. Yeah no government would do anything such as a false flag.
1 fresh1134206 2017-10-14
While I'll agree that the other user didn't post the most relevant info regarding the matter, I will also agree with the point they're trying to make. Were I the other user, I would have linked Operation Northwoods.
TL;DR: The US government was willing to commit false flag attacks against American citizens in the 1960s. No doubt, they'd be just as willing today.
Your claim that the gov would never do something like this is completely incorrect. Now, I'm not saying that Vegas was a false flag, but that the US gov is certainly willing and more than able to orchestrate attacks of this scale.
If Vegas was a false flag, I believe the purpose was to push for tighter security/surveillance regulations. I don't hear as many people as I would imagine talking about the guns. I do hear people asking questions about the lack of security footage, though.
Whether false flag or not, if the government can use Vegas to pass laws to increase surveillance (with a little gun control sprinkled in), they'd be very pleased.
1 passivehate 2017-10-14
Gun laws are not the end game.
If our full police force did turn against the populace, our citizens are more numerous and better armed than the police, there would be no more police left after day one.
1 Allinon72 2017-10-14
They can't run forever...
1 FeenixArisen 2017-10-14
It may seem minor but any laws regarding reporting of stolen firearms are the most dangerous of them all. The Liberals quietly slipped this into Canadian law recently, and it is the first move of a vicious trap.
Note how the penalty for not reporting a lost or stolen firearms is extreme. All they have to do is casually ban a specific firearm and the trap is sprung. All they have to do then is knock on your door, and you have no choice but to hand it over. Any attempt to conceal it and claim you don't have it for whatever reason results in getting slammed with failure to report it - with devastating consequences.
You can expect widescale magazine size limits as a result of this. Here in Canada a semi-auto rifle can only hold 5 rounds, with a couple of odd loopholes to exploit. The RCMP has carefully fought the Liberals all the way through this, and would not agree that a welded plug was necessary. A rivet in the mag is the accepted standard, which was a triumphant compromise for gun owners.
Remember folks, the U.N. wants serial numbers on every cartridge. Hilary would have pushed that agenda hard had she won the election. Don't let any bills pass that talk about limitations on ammo storage, that will be their next target.
1 sidebycide 2017-10-14
Bass pro and cabellas merged or one bought out the other right?
1 UncontactedPeoples 2017-10-14
The the government would never do anything risky, immoral or dangerous or anything like that.
What a bunch of stupid idiots we are for thinking they might!
1 passivehate 2017-10-14
Gun laws are not the end game.
If our full police force did turn against the populace, our citizens are more numerous and better armed than the police, there would be no more police left after day one.
1 Sumner67 2017-10-14
quick list, think there are a few more but just copy pasting one list from gunpolitics.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/3998?r=8 Protect America Act of 2017 - permitting the Attorney General to deny the transfer of firearms or the issuance of explosives licenses to known or suspected terrorists, and for other purposes
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/3999?r=71 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit the manufacture, possession, or transfer of any part or combination of parts that is designed and functions to increase the rate of fire of a semiautomatic rifle but does not convert the semiautomatic rifle into a machinegun, and for other purposes.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4018 To provide for a 3-day waiting period before a person may receive a handgun
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4025 Multiple Firearm Sales Reporting Modernization Act of 2017 - To amend title 18, United States Code, to expand to all firearms the requirement that Federal firearms licensees report sales of 2 or more handguns to the same unlicensed person within 5 consecutive business days.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4052?r=18 To prohibit the transfer or possession of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, and for other purposes
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4057?r=13 basically the same as 3998
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4064 To impose restrictions on the sale of binary explosives, and for other purposes
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/1945/text/is?overview=closed&format=xml Keep Americans Safe Act - To regulate large capacity ammunition feeding devices.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/1916?r=6 Automatic Gunfire Prevention Act - similar to HR3999, but worse
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/1923/text?r=2 Removes default-pass from Brady Bill.....basically allowing a de facto ban on all new purchases and transfers
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/3962 Online ammo sales ban
3998 - violates 4 separate amendments in the bill of rights 3999 - is not only extremely vague, but could be used as an outright ban on all semi-automatics 4018 - a delayed right is not a right
I'm too lazy to keep going
Added: HR3987 - allocates $10 million / year to the CDC for gun violence research and requires lost / stolen firearms to be reported to the police within 48 hours of discovery. Failure to report can lead to a $10,000 fine and / or up to 1 year imprisonment per lost/stolen firearm.