How do you know? You don't.

OPs post history is full of r/The_Donald posts.

He's just here to preach his political opinions.

Lmao where?

evidence?? lol. That's not sufficient "evidence" or "logic" to make an opening statement for a high school debate team... gtfo out of here wth that garbage.. Asking us to disprove a hypothetical.. lol

I understand the frustration when people are cross posting directly from r/The_Donald, but this is a pretty benign self post that seems to be a good discussion topic in r/conspiracy.

It’s annoying to see finger pointing based on comment history when op posts a valid topic to debate. Your comment does nothing to help us engage in discourse.

but this is a pretty benign self post that seems to be a good discussion topic in r/conspiracy.

So a sub for discussing conspiracies is now an acceptable place to post completely irrelevant "what-ifs" regarding a thing that literally never happened?

No, this place is just another alt-right cesspool full of scared little white supremacists. Most of the post histories in this sub read like an indoctrination seminar in bigotry and fear.

I don’t wanna ruin the surprise, but a conspiracy is a what-if that may or may not have actually happened. The goal is to seek truth.

Speculating on something that could have happened if someone else was elected President seems like a good comparison to make especially if that group might have acted differently with another leader.

Speculating on something that could have happened if someone else was elected President...

...is in no way, shape or form a conspiracy.

You're kinda missing the main point of the post though right? The Hollywood scandals are the conspiracy that only recently got "proven". Clinton is connected to that conspiracy through donations, and almost got elected president. Just my two cents, but the topic seems pretty reasonable for this subreddit.

I'm not missing the point. There is no point.

There is no fucking conspiracy.

It's a fucking What-If based on something that literally never happened. If it was a post about the Clintons currently working to cover up these crimes, that would be a conspiracy theory. But "what if blue was really yellow, would bees still love the taste of Cinnamon Toast Crunch?" is just dumb, pointless speculation about a situation that doesn't exist. It has been posted here and upvoted to feed on the frothing hatred of something THAT LOS THE FUCKING ELECTION.

Get over it, you people are embarrassing the fuck out of yourselves.

Okay, well let me go a little deeper so you can understand. Reddit is a website based around having discussions with people based on shared interests in different topics.

I'm not missing the point. There is no point.

You kind of are yes. The point is to discuss the Hollywood scandals, and how Clinton probably knows a lot of these people and may have helped to cover some of it up. I think the posts also promotes discussion about these same scandals that happen in other industries and even politics, so again, I'm not sure why this post is not okay here.

The point is this poster really does NOT want you to talk about the patently obvious fact that Hollywood and the pedo's would still be getting away with everything if Hillary were president. For some reason another, it really makes him/her angry, and anyone willing to even to discuss the notion is clearly unhinged.

How is posting about the clintons and sexual abuse an indication of being a white supremacist?

Are you implying that every post in this sub is about the Clintons? If that were true, it would sap even more of this places credibility.

Not everyone that contributes to posts accusing the Clintons are white supremacists, but every white supremacist on Reddit contributes to posts accusing the Clintons.

Lmao you got any statistics to back that up? Obviously not every post on this sub is about the clintons, just like not every post in r/politics is about trump. I'm actually surprised white supremacists don't like bill Clinton more, since he's responsible the incarceration of a generation of black fathers for low level drug crimes

You jerk-offs will upvote the type of speculative bullshit OP posted, but want anyone who speaks out in your safe-space to provide proof. No thanks, I'm done playing this game for now and this post has been deleted anyway. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

You are a 13 day old account. No credibility.

And?

You can't criticize others for their post history, when you have none yourself.

Thats awful logic.

Nope, it's pretty solid actually. Are you just trying to avoid a ban?

Mmmmm, flexing the mod ban three comments in.

So disagreeing with a mod is a bannable offence now.

No, I'm asking you if you are avoiding a ban with your new account.

Now that would be against the rules, wouldnt it?

Maybe I just liked lurking.

Coming out of the lurk to attack others is not a good start for your new account.

That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works.

Peyote_the_Coyote is the alt account of user Blacksunalchemy. Compare their comment history and you will see the same writing style and triggers, and a few times, he comments on his own Minecraft and r/Conspiracy bans.

Nice try, but nope. You are a stalker bot that constantly harasses me with false information.

Did you say I was /u/flytape before too?

Also love how you don't have the balls to actually link to my name.

Peyote_the_Coyote is the alt account of user Blacksunalchemy. Compare their comment history and you will see the same writing style and triggers, and a few times, he comments on his own Minecraft and r/Conspiracy bans.

I just naturally assumed all the mods have alt accounts that they defend. ^{putin-loves-cats}

Please stop harassing me with your Bullshit posts full of false, misleading information.

post history is full of r/conspiracy posts.

you're just here to preach conspiracies

Oh yes I do.

No, you really don't. You have an opinion, try not to conflate that with real knowledge.

I do. I have not said anything to conflate yet. I havent even exposed my opinion, so it looks as if you are projecting IMO. You dont know me about as much as you know what is really going on. I am wrong? How so?

Oh you haven't expressed your opinion? So by saying "you know" you aren't referring the very clearly referenced topic at hand?

If you're here to shitpost you'll have to find someone else to entertain you. In context the comment you left has a very clear meaning, if you wanted to indicate something other than OP's assertion is more than an opinion then the onus is on you to say that, not me to magically know you're trying tit be coy over the Internet.

trying tit be coy

Ah yes excellent point. Someone made a typo therefore no explanation of your own position is needed. I'm glad to see you've really managed to provide a high level of discourse here.

Ah yes excellent point.

Thank you for the acknowledgment! You are the best!

Lol what bots buddy? Are you so full of yourself that you think people not liking your post has to be a conspiracy?

I dont post here. Buddy

Post where? The place you are literally posting right now...?

I am commenting. On a post.

But you don't post where? The question was where do you not post?

Yes. Not here in conspiracy. I made a deal with the MODs.

Ok... so how does telling me you don't 'post' in r/conspiracy in any way respond to my statement? As a reminder I said: "Are you so full of yourself that you think people not liking your post means it has to be a conspiracy?"

"Your post" does not refer to the OP (or original post) it refers to the post you made. The multiple posts you made responding in the comments. I'm having trouble understanding what relevance you "not posting here" has to do with your assertion I use bots.

You assert that Im saying the Hillbots are a conspiracy. They arent. They are tools. You calling comments posts, is neither here nor there. You are trying wayy too hard to support your claim, which was a shitcomment in a shit post but it supports Hilldog Millionaire so I was dv'ed to hell without saying an opinion. And "I know" does not equate to an opinion. Its soo vague, your entire argument is a waste of time. 'Her Majesty' need to accept that she lost the election. And You need to accept there is no level ground to fight on. But you are free to exercize your 1st amendment. Have at it

Errrr.... no. I was pointing out that your assertion of "my bots are showing" was ridiculous because the only reason you would have to believe that I was in anyway connected to bots is because the upvote/downvote ratio didn't show you what you wanted/expected to see which is proof of nothing. So in other words I was pointing out that claiming someone used bots when you're getting downvotes makes you like an arrogant asshole.

Nothing was said anywhere about "Hillbots" and if you meant to say something about them you forgot to, again I'm not magically able to decipher what you intended to say, I only have your statements and words which speak pretty clearly on their own.

But we agree on one thing, this is a waste of time. It was great to occupy through an otherwise dull morning but I'm done responding to your shitposts now. Cheers.

makes you an arrogant asshole

See now that Ive said my piece(which I didnt want to do for this very reason) you resort to name calling. And I do agree and will block you right after I report your harassment. Enjoy your President Hillary fanfic club!

You might want to actually quote me when you send in that false report.

makes you like an arrogant asshole

Hmmm let's see.

Harvey Weinstein is her close personal friend, and political donor, and neighbor in the Hamptons.

Kevin Spacey is her close personal friend, and political donor.

Not to mention she covered up a pedophile ring running out of the State Department when she was SOS. As reported by NBC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfFXWDdLCPc

So? It wasn't Trump that brought any of these allegations to light. What control would she have over some c list celebrity's twitter feed?

The idea that Hillary is all powerful kinda fell apart when she couldn't even secure the presidency. I see no reason to believe she has some supernatural hold on all publications ever including social media posts.

If Clinton were president, the population of Miami would be 0.

Why?

Something something Podesta something Haiti something Clinton Foundation

You know, when you speak of evil, you give it power. Let it go. No one cares about that monster; she is no longer relevant.

This is not a conspiracy.

You people are obsessed with that woman.

She lost. Let it go.

I love that these people want to worry so much about the skeletons in the closet of the candidate that LOST the election, rather than the constant bullshit that the actual President keeps drudging up.

It's not even an either-or thing though. I mean, setting aside the fact that "their team" now controls all three branches of the US government and still can't get shit done, you'd think that there would be no reason to discuss the losing side. Did everyone bitch about Dukakis from '88 to '92? No. Why? Because he fucking lost.

Today I Learned

Clearly you haven't learned anything, snowflake.

You're not pointing out any good though, the Trump admin has nothing to do with whats going on in Hollywood right now. Your post is making an assumption about a person who will never be president of the country.

Hilary is not and will not be in office so you don't really know that. Thats pure speculation.

Yes, it is speculation. What's your point?

Trump didn't bring down Harvey Weinstien. He had absolutely nothing to do with this.

She lost.

You are 1000% correct! ... Which is why this has absolutely nothing to do with the election and her losing, and everything to do with everything else she is possibly involved in. You're going to lose your shilling! Let it go.

this has absolutely nothing to do with the election and her losing

If Clinton Were President

Are you guys purposefully being obtuse or does it just come naturally?

huh?

I guess when you have nothing relevant to say, a dumb Family Guy clip recorded on a smartphone will suffice with you people.

I'm not going to argue with shills. Besides, I don't agree with your original assessment of OP's post/ title. You said, "She lost." like OP was harping on the election and that she should be in office (or something– I really don't even understand what you meant by that). He was making a point about her connection to some of the Hollywood elites (and probably sexual abuse/ pedo/ etc. (the list goes on, really)).

I'm not going to argue with shills.

Proceeds to argue for another full paragraph.

Son, I don't even like Clinton and didn't want her as president. You snowflakes are so fucking defensive and reactionary to anything that doesn't 100% coddle your victimization complex that you instantly group everyone into "us" or "them." It might help if you got out of your bubbles and experienced the world a little.

OP started ranting about what would happen if something that never happened had happened. That's unhinged.

"If Emilio Estevez were president, this Bag of Cheetos would never have gone stale.,"

See, I can do that shit to and it is just about as relevant to today's Hollywood scandal.

Lol you're not going to argue with shills. There's only one shill here and it's the person who supports our current president and his deep state ties.

If you think I support our president then you're completely making something up as well.

Removed. Rule 10. First warning.

I don't understand. For what?

Shill accusations, rule 10. I removed about four of your comments just today.

My bad. I didn't actually know that was a rule.

She's involved in human trafficking rings which are still in operation. And you think we should let that go? https://disobedientmedia.com/2017/01/the-clinton-silsby-trafficking-scandal-and-how-the-media-covered-it-up/

Super. What does that have to do with OPs post not being a conspiracy?

Your issue was that we should just let it go. Since there is undeniable evidence that she is involved in human trafficking, what is the justification for your belief that we should "let it go?"

I'm sure the victims of these rings will have an awful hard time letting it go.

undeniable evidence

Well I'm sure that the GOP, who has hounded this woman for years without making anything stick, and now controls all three branches of the US government, would love to get their hands on this evidence. You should forward it to them.

oh look, somebody who still thinks there is a difference between Democrats and Republicans. The Republicans are guilty as hell too, why on earth would they want it exposed?

I agree with you 100%. Hollywood and the Clinton Cabal are all part of the same sick sex trafficking rings, not a chance in hell that this Hollywood stuff would have came out if she had been elected.

Does anybody really think Anthony Weiner would be going to jail if the Queen of Corruption snuck her way into the White House?

That's why all those pedos cunts invested in her in the first place.

Ding ding ding

Jeeezos fucking Christ.

She lost.

Let.

It.

Go.

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

• [/r/topmindsofreddit] The Hollywood scandal was revealed because Trump!

 ^{If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)}

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

So while we're on the topic, what's up with folks from the Don going after Hillary and the DNC for pizzagate shit all the time while selecting your God Emperor and his own parties frequent abuses? For example

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/04/jeffrey-epstein-trump-lawsuit-sex-trafficking-237983

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-jeffrey-epstien-alexander-acosta-sex-abuse-case-20170321-story.html

True

Today I Learned

Clearly you haven't learned anything, snowflake.

You're not pointing out any good though, the Trump admin has nothing to do with whats going on in Hollywood right now. Your post is making an assumption about a person who will never be president of the country.

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Trump didn't bring down Harvey Weinstien. He had absolutely nothing to do with this.

You assert that Im saying the Hillbots are a conspiracy. They arent. They are tools. You calling comments posts, is neither here nor there. You are trying wayy too hard to support your claim, which was a shitcomment in a shit post but it supports Hilldog Millionaire so I was dv'ed to hell without saying an opinion. And "I know" does not equate to an opinion. Its soo vague, your entire argument is a waste of time. 'Her Majesty' need to accept that she lost the election. And You need to accept there is no level ground to fight on. But you are free to exercize your 1st amendment. Have at it