Shit is about to go down
353 2017-11-06 by mxt1988
1) 11 Saudi Prince and 34 high Senior officials arrested.
2) Tony Podesta supposedly arrested.
3) John Podesta supposedly turned himself in for media black out.
4) DNC turning against each other.
5) Manafort, Podesta and Clinton tied to Uranium One Deal.
6) Podesta and Clinton tied to Saudi Arabia relating to funding ISIS.
7) ISIS is fighting a proxy battle against Syria and Russia (Clinton and Podesta supporting both sides at American expense?)
8) JFK files release shows truth about the deep state.
9) Trump sitting pretty in Japan guarded by four carriers.
10) 12 sealed indictment in the US for Monday.
396 comments
1 OutragedOgre 2017-11-06
Saudi Arabia situation about certain U.S. divestment a few years ago and of course Russia.
Indictment and arrest might be Mercer.
TPTB friendly media have designated Democratic as the new terrorist threat. har har.
6) would fit the idea that the Democratic Party was controlled by moles for 2016. 7, 8, 9, ISIS funded by private wealth from tax money but not U.S. government.
Trump might no be allowed back into the U.S.
See OP anyone can say anything.
1 mxt1988 2017-11-06
Lets see what's in the indictment. I believe Hillary controlled the DNC using money made from shell non-profits such as the Clinton Foundation and the Podesta group who was lobbying on behalf of foreign nations at the expense of Americans.
1 OutragedOgre 2017-11-06
Oh fuck! never mind.
1 mxt1988 2017-11-06
I think the JFK release was to say we know what's up.
1 JakeElwoodDim5th 2017-11-06
Exactly. It's a message, much more important, at least for the moment than what it actually contains. Translation: you would never get away with this again.
1 Fuckaduckfuckaduck 2017-11-06
You’re just shitting all over any sort of discussion tonight, aren’t you? All you’re concerned with is running around telling everyone how wrong they are.
Perhaps you’d want to actually contribute to a conversation at some point? I dunno. Just a thought.
1 mxt1988 2017-11-06
don't give a fuck.
1 Fuckaduckfuckaduck 2017-11-06
I wasn’t talking to you. I was speaking to the fellow who is in here derailing your post.
1 mxt1988 2017-11-06
Oh ok, I give a fuck now.
1 Fuckaduckfuckaduck 2017-11-06
Careful. It’s never wise to give too many fucks ;).
Carry on.
1 edwerdz 2017-11-06
FuckFuckFuck a Duck Screw a Kangaroo
Finger-bang an Orangutan Support your local Zoo
1 FruitCreamSicle 2017-11-06
Go back too your swamp OutragedOgre this one is being drained
1 Fuckaduckfuckaduck 2017-11-06
Ding ding. Nailed it.
1 JakeElwoodDim5th 2017-11-06
11) Major false flag today.
1 chronicligua 2017-11-06
Don't forget the Dallas Cowboys beat the Kansas City Chiefs, and the Houston Astros won a World Series Wednesday!
1 SixVISix 2017-11-06
These aren't laughing matters
1 Nlashb 2017-11-06
Calm down, snowflake. A little lighthearted laughter never hurt anymore, unlike Hillary.
1 chronicligua 2017-11-06
A random atheist dishonorably discharged from the Air Force - because of 1 count of spousal abuse, and another count of child abuse - went postal, and shot up people in a church just down the road.
Children, sisters, mothers, and grandparents took shitloads of bullets. --Certainly not laughing, nor piecing-together a bunch of other bullshit random events to try to satisfy some GRAND conspiracy.
1 Stantoninus 2017-11-06
Sanctimonious much?
1 chronicligua 2017-11-06
Not at all. Just saying it's not a laughing matter to me, bro.
1 Nogrim6 2017-11-06
i think right now we ALL need a joke here an there to avoid losing our shit....
1 BlueOak777 2017-11-06
Found the Chiefs fan.
1 KingFerocious93 2017-11-06
I’m Not laughing.
1 Dat_Chad 2017-11-06
no one cares
1 Imsomniland 2017-11-06
lmao :) i thought this was a bright spot of warmth in this thread lol
Houston deserved the win tho
1 Ibespwn 2017-11-06
16) Paradise Papers
1 GeorgePantsMcG 2017-11-06
Hilarious, all these half conspiracies but they leave out Paradise papers. Holy shit.
1 T3hSwagman 2017-11-06
Well supposedly a lot of not so flattering Trump stuff with Russian implications so you know, they are all fake.
1 Stantoninus 2017-11-06
They could easily be fake, anyone who denies that is delusional. Also they are being gated and filtered by the same mass media that lies about literally everything. Still worthy of a mention though.
1 WordGirl33 2017-11-06
Exactly... by a anon "journalist". Im not putting no faith or energy in that read.
1 choufleur47 2017-11-06
Specifically by a soros funded journalist organization. My bullshit-o-meter blow up when I see articles with FAQ in them explaining why this is important and how it's handled. This is how he runs his charities. All his websites have these stupid FAQ explaining why you should care.
1 slantingline 2017-11-06
You’re saying you believe it’s Soro’s-funded because it has a FAQ?
Christ, what has this sub become.
1 choufleur47 2017-11-06
Fuck I hate retards. Insulting people before doing your own research is sure to make you look clever mate. Here for you, from OPEN SOCIETY WEBSITE:
So no, it's not because of the FAQ, I'm saying the FAQ made me look and 2 search queries later I figured it out.
But hey, what have this sub become, amiright guys?
1 slantingline 2017-11-06
From your original comment:
I was just trying to clarify. I fucking hate retards too, especially when they respond to me all up in arms about nothing.
1 anchirite 2017-11-06
Easily faked? How many million pages are there? That's one hell of a labor of love to fake...years of full time work chained to a typewriter...
1 DontTreadOnMe16 2017-11-06
Are there millions of pages just about Trump and Russia? No, therefore, your strawman doesn't apply here. Much of that could be real, and some of it faked to damage Trump.
Or all of it could be real, and it damages Trump.
Both are completely possible... your refusal to entertain any idea that you disagree with is not going to do yourself any favors in the long run. Try being a little more open-minded.
1 Ballsdeepinreality 2017-11-06
Trump has an international business, you seriously think he doesn't have funds tied up with/in Russia?
I'm still waiting for some evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia, so far it's just Democrats and Russia that have had the underhanded deals.
1 T3hSwagman 2017-11-06
We have 3 of his campaign members arrested and Popa giving testimony about illegally meeting Russians to get info that was originally denied by the other 2 that were arrested.
But yea, zero evidence.
1 JakeElwoodDim5th 2017-11-06
You clearly havent read the indictments. At no point do they mention anything about meeting being "illegal".
1 T3hSwagman 2017-11-06
Popa’s testimony directly contradict earlier testimony from the other two. The meetings could have not been illegal, but they illegally tried to cover them up. And their way of obtaining that info actually was illegal.
1 JakeElwoodDim5th 2017-11-06
You mean the volunteer who very well could have been a plant? Right.
1 T3hSwagman 2017-11-06
Right, the possible plant...
I’ll never not be amazed how people on /r/conspiracy need exhaustive amounts of proof for anything critical about the president of the United states to be true. But the flimsiest rumor involving Clinton or Podesta is fact. This sub is practically an executive branch cheer squad.
1 Ballsdeepinreality 2017-11-06
Criminals are criminals. If Trump is doing illegal shit he should be prosecuted, however there isn't direct evidence of that available to the public.
Hillary and co. have done illegal shit, that does need prosecuted, and the evidence is available to the public. It's obvious, still, that it was institutional corruption and not just a few bad apples.
So shitty people around Trump, doing shitty and illegal things is bad, yeah, but none of it implicates Trump. Hillary on the other hand, has a trail of bodies, a shit ton of highly suspicious financial transactions and election fraud to top it off.
Justice has been perverted in the case of Hillary Clinton. Justice has yet to be served to Trump.
1 T3hSwagman 2017-11-06
See I don’t get why people keep on going if it wasn’t Trump personally then there’s a non story. Ok Trump did absolutely nothing, but his campaign was rampant with illegal dealings. I don’t get how it’s just no big deal all of a sudden. If Clinton was legitimately squeaky clean but had everyone close to her breaking the law to give her advantages would it be a nothing story as well?
1 Korlis 2017-11-06
Of course not. It would be a poor hillary, her campaign has been infiltrated by <insert imaginary enemy here> story. And all the crooked people would be taken down, except for those who are protected by hillary because they know too much or are too useful to let go.
Quite likely how this story will turn out too.
1 Ballsdeepinreality 2017-11-06
Yup, hard to dethrone a sitting president. They got Bill for lying about his BJ. Not even getting one, just got caught lying about it.
1 DontTreadOnMe16 2017-11-06
Please stop trying to speak logic to someone who clearly isn't interested in learning or having a real conversation of any kind. It's so hard to watch!
1 Ballsdeepinreality 2017-11-06
My hope is that in the future there is a reasonable response to the bullshitery. All data is good data in the soon approaching world of AI.
1 advertise_on_reddit 2017-11-06
You're just not seeing the bigger picture.
They were right about all those things.
1 SlimLovin 2017-11-06
Yea I'm sure it looks that way when you only read things that agree with you. Buckle up. Two indictments with plenty more incoming.
1 Ballsdeepinreality 2017-11-06
You realize Manafortworked with the Clintons more than he ever did Trump?
1 SlimLovin 2017-11-06
So? Hang em' all if there's corruption, but whatabouting Hillary all the time is not a good look.
1 Ballsdeepinreality 2017-11-06
It's not even. One has evidence against them. One does not. Pretty straight forward.
1 SlimLovin 2017-11-06
I'll be sure to let Mueller know.
1 Ballsdeepinreality 2017-11-06
(I think he knows)
1 yewotmeight 2017-11-06
Wew, lotta new info in there
1 OcculusResurrectio 2017-11-06
Its like Panama Papers 2.0 but with more apathy
1 iemploreyou 2017-11-06
Because it implicates the current government.
1 throwawaymnmnmn 2017-11-06
they leave out papers because it's a red herring
apparently once released it got a lot of quick attention on msm and twitter.
msm purchases stories. this one must have been prepackaged because nothing trends fast in 5 minutes of release you know?
1 Mr_Quagmire 2017-11-06
17) Israel Begins "Largest-Ever Aerial Military Drill", As Saudis Consider Missile Strike "Act Of War"
1 notunhinged 2017-11-06
18) Saudi Prince killed in 'helicopter crash' near Yemen border.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/11/saudi-helicopter-crash-kills-high-ranking-prince-171106045628460.html
1 sock_lover 2017-11-06
Crashed with a Saudi rocket I guess
1 iemploreyou 2017-11-06
19) Billic sacked by the Dido Bros
1 HullGuy 2017-11-06
'Dildo Bros'
After a very busy day at work I needed that. Quality. Thank you sir.
1 iemploreyou 2017-11-06
As an Orient fan it is my pleasure to slag off that team up the road.
1 xleb1 2017-11-06
Kindly find me ONE verifiable legitimate reference to any kind of broken ribs suffered by Rand Paul. One.
You won't.
There have been multiplicities of rubbish spewed all over this sub about Rand Paul's broken ribs, and none of them provided one iota of substance to back it up. None of them.
I offer this ridiculously upvoted thread as proof of the illiteracy on this sub (please note that except for the headline, there is no mention nor reference in the article -from a spamsite- of any kind of broken ribs) - https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/7b2kxy/is_rand_paul_in_danger_after_calling_to_audit_the/
1 rickscarf 2017-11-06
The link I saw was on the Associated Press that specifically said 5 broken ribs
1 xleb1 2017-11-06
Please enlighten me with a link. I have yet to see any real reporting of RP's broken ribs.
1 rickscarf 2017-11-06
https://apnews.com/68fb5bbe2e0441489a4e0002f0edd754
1 xleb1 2017-11-06
Thank_you!
It's the first decent reference I've seen. Appreciate it.
Get well soon Rand Paul.
1 mconeone 2017-11-06
Nobody's perfect. Stay hungry.
1 xleb1 2017-11-06
It's not about anybody, it's about shitty journalism. Of which this sub is full. ;/
1 SixVISix 2017-11-06
Then you clearly didn't read one single report about the incident.
1 aetheradept 2017-11-06
He's trying to waste your time.
1 aetheradept 2017-11-06
Just ignore those guys, they are trying to waste your time.
1 rickscarf 2017-11-06
I'm always happy to provide a good source to anyone
1 aetheradept 2017-11-06
He doesn't care, he is just trying to disrupt the sub. Nobody is that stupid.
1 JimmySnukaFly 2017-11-06
Not good at the google eh?
1 xleb1 2017-11-06
I expect that when someone makes a reference or provides a 'news' post that all of the relevant information is readily accessible.
1 SixVISix 2017-11-06
That's entitlement, nothing more. I should be able to expect someone to be educated before debating online instead of demanding me to educate them, but I don't.
1 JimmySnukaFly 2017-11-06
You don't google to make sure for yourself? I just do it out of curiosity. I understand some people struggle with internet basics. All good.
1 SixVISix 2017-11-06
Exactly. "I'm going to use a smug term like " Enlighten me" before I spend three second using a search engine."
1 SixVISix 2017-11-06
You're so wrong you almost ripped spacetime.
1 talwinnx 2017-11-06
Here you go http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/358782-rand-paul-assaulted-at-kentucky-home-police
1 JakeElwoodDim5th 2017-11-06
One: http://archive.is/GwYnx
1 bukithd 2017-11-06
Rand Paul getting roughed up is a new one for me. They really are trying to make sure none of the good guys get ahead.
1 staytrue1985 2017-11-06
The tolerant, reasoned left
1 GoldenTruth 2017-11-06
Keep your partisan shit out of this. Rand Paul has been continuously shunned and attacked by the GOP establishment. There is no need to throw "muhhh libtard tolerance" into this conversation other than to distract and divide.
1 staytrue1985 2017-11-06
Relax
1 Ifeellikenickcanon 2017-11-06
You have to agree with him though. Violence comes from both sides, the day we try to say that people on one side are evil is the day we are most divided
1 staytrue1985 2017-11-06
I agree. But there is a special hypocrisy in violently asserting intolerance.
1 SlimLovin 2017-11-06
Like when that Nazi Trump supporter murdered a woman with his car over a Confederate statue?
1 GoldenTruth 2017-11-06
The tolerant, reasoned right
😂
1 staytrue1985 2017-11-06
You don't get it. Those are Nazis. They are not preaching peace and tolerance. They are the exact oppposite, and they know that. They are bad people.
The left, however, preaches tolerance, but can be intolerant of anyone who disagrees with them.
1 Beavis357 2017-11-06
They're calling it the Bowling Green massacre.
1 mgtowapprentice 2017-11-06
He was attacked in a long running dispute with his neighbor. It has nothing to do with politics.
1 JimMarch 2017-11-06
The attacker in question has been described in the mainstream media as a quote socialists quote. Not political?
1 mgtowapprentice 2017-11-06
Links please?
If a republican fights his dem neighbor over the dem dude’s dog (for example), was that political?
1 JimMarch 2017-11-06
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/sen-rand-paul-recovering-from-injuries-suffered-in-alleged-assault/2017/11/05/6380c78a-c250-11e7-84bc-5e285c7f4512_story.html?utm_term=.14eb3e20520e
A political motive seems at least plausible.
1 slantingline 2017-11-06
If you actually read the article you linked to—
1 chillbroswagginz69 2017-11-06
Depends - is it a Siberian Husky?
1 BlueOak777 2017-11-06
underrated comment.
1 load_all_comments 2017-11-06
i also believe he is of russian decent.
1 APFSDS-T 2017-11-06
Do you think that the New York attack was a false flag?
1 Chokaholic 2017-11-06
Wow this one got by me somehow. Too much going on I suppose.
1 F0XF1R3 2017-11-06
5 broken ribs, 3 of which are displaced, and a bruised lung. That's some serious injuries. I have trouble believing some kind of blunt weapon wasn't used.
1 JimMarch 2017-11-06
That, or Rand got gang tackled and fell onto something very hard like a curb or pieces of firewood or something. That could do this kind of rib damage without a weapon being involved. They actually released his attacker on $7,500 bail which suggests at least I hope that the bastard did not use a tire iron or something.
If that fucker comes anywhere near Rand again I hope Rand shoots him.
1 IanPhlegming 2017-11-06
$7500 bail? For attacking a Senator? WTF?
1 andr50 2017-11-06
Crime of passion. Complete rumor, but it sounds like the neighbor blamed Rand for his wife leaving him.
.. that could mean many things.
1 I_am_fed_up_of_SAP 2017-11-06
Source? I'm a huge Rand Paul fan and haven't seen this anywhere.
1 andr50 2017-11-06
Twitter rumor mill. Most of it coming from him being charged with an informal 4th degree assault charge (which is a misdemeanor) instead of the felony you would normally get hit with over assaulting a senator (seriously enough to break multiple ribs)
It seems to be Rand isn't pressing charges because he doesn't want it going to court.... for some reason.. feeding the rumor further.
1 BlueOak777 2017-11-06
Well he does have nice hair.
1 IanPhlegming 2017-11-06
Rumors will run rampant. Timing seems suspect. But who knows? We may never. I'd bet against it, frankly.
1 conspiracy_edgelord 2017-11-06
Isn't it a neighbor?
1 JimMarch 2017-11-06
Yes.
1 iemploreyou 2017-11-06
Why wasn't he armed?
1 JimMarch 2017-11-06
Good question. Betcha anything he now packs heat 24/7. He's now probably got one taped up in a big ziplock baggie in the shower :).
1 iemploreyou 2017-11-06
I'm 50/50 on this. On one hand I think the occasional political assaination keeps them on their toes and they should think about what they say, but I also think that you should be able to say whatever (within reason) without consequence.
Glad that he is okay though.
1 JimMarch 2017-11-06
Somebody would have to be a hell of a lot worse than Rand Paul before I would even briefly consider it should be a good idea to shoot them. Or even break several ribs.
1 iemploreyou 2017-11-06
I wouldn't mind if Nigel Farage fell down a flight of steps. Or crashed a plane.
1 JimMarch 2017-11-06
Lol.
1 escalation 2017-11-06
like a lawnmower perhaps?
1 JimMarch 2017-11-06
That would do it. Any number of random items scattered over backyard could do it.
1 sadmep 2017-11-06
Firewood, really?
1 treeslooklikelamb 2017-11-06
I missed this too, wow. Goes to show that there is a lot of bullshit going on right now and distractions really work.
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Or the antifa rioting weekend was made up by conservative media.
Either way.
1 flizzy333 2017-11-06
Almost certainly over-hyped by conservative media, but certainly not made up.
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
100% made up riots. The fact that people fell for it shows pretty strongly that the conservative media will fall for anything and try to stir fears of their viewers.
1 flizzy333 2017-11-06
So you're saying that conservative media (which ones in particular) made UP the idea of the Nov 4th day of action?
Since Refuse Fascism announced it back in the late summer (and it was on their website back then), are you suggesting that Refuse Fascism is "conservative media", or possibly a Russian Troll Factory?
Just because it was a FAILED day of action, doesn't mean it was "made up", unless you're trying to spin a story...
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Here you go!
1 Bone_Thugs_n_Harambe 2017-11-06
Uses Snopes as a viable source. LOL.
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Find me one that contradicts it that isn’t from an alt-right publication.
I’ll wait.
1 numbslutsyc 2017-11-06
snopes is an alt-left publication
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Refute what is says than. And do it without an alt-right publication.
1 numbslutsyc 2017-11-06
i'm just volunteering info i don't even remember what you're arguing about
1 tjay17 2017-11-06
Stop being such a retarded troll and wake up
1 numbslutsyc 2017-11-06
to what
1 Bone_Thugs_n_Harambe 2017-11-06
Intelligent beings shouldn't need a fact-checking site. We should look for multiple sources when investigating a claim, regardless of whether it's about "our side" or "their side". American journalists used to live by a standard of finding 3 legitimate independent sources before going public with a story or claim. Those days are over. Snopes and other "fact-checking" sites are just fronts for certain groups to try to legitimize their opinions.
1 chowder007 2017-11-06
Adam Curry from No Agenda lives in downtown Austin right where they were going to take place. He posted video on his twitter feed that he recorded from his balcony showing protesters. Granted there weren't many. But they did show up.
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
That’s not a publication... nor is what you’re describing a riot 🤔
1 chowder007 2017-11-06
Yeah I agree. I was just pointing out that people did gather. Just not what everyone thought it would be.
1 FULLBOREKORG 2017-11-06
They're weren't any riots.
Check out this guy's post history, he averages about eight words per post, all vague defenses of an amorphous progressiveness that just exists in an adversarial propaganda vacuum with the "alt-right". People who actually follow politics know full well that the "alt right", insofar as anyone self-identifies as it, is an explicitly ethnocentric exercise. White Nationalism, ethnostate, White Separatism, White Identity Er-vopa, whatever you want to call it. If you ain't white, you ain't alt-right. Unless you're Japanese maybe, you sort of get a pass on the anime thing.
The propaganda value for employees like Tally Mail is in disingenuously associating actual firm political opponents with a white identity movement, thus discrediting it. Tally represents a group seeking greater social control on the population, and thus he uses shame as a weapon to corral the public into compliance on global socialism, cultural relativism, the role of masculinity, and counter-intuitively, the attitude towards Muslim and Islam.
Tally Mail has a pretty simple job, but if he better understood that the reason he must defend communists and Muslims is because his group beholden to Saudi Arabian billionaires and degenerate sadomasochist social engineers, he might reconsider the dismissive tone in his posts. It pays the bills, but it must weigh on you by the end of the day.
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Yep, that’s totally what’s going on here. /s
1 FULLBOREKORG 2017-11-06
Yep, exactly eight words that time. Great job.
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
That’s weird. I didn’t know “/s” was a word?
1 FULLBOREKORG 2017-11-06
Yeah, it means "sarcasm", just shorter. Nine now? Ten?
1 sock_lover 2017-11-06
Did you see this gem?
Antifa is a fascist organisation... The ministry of truth is the propagandaministry in fascism, calling themselves the opposite of what they are is what fascists do as a standard...
1 andr50 2017-11-06
Antifa isn't an organization. It's a categorization.
They have no hierarchy, membership or structure.
1 sock_lover 2017-11-06
Then who takes out a two page ad in the New York times? Clearly there are organizers who are being paid to do this stuff, they are the organization Antifa, the people who just show up once something happens are just useful idiots.
1 andr50 2017-11-06
George Soros? IDK, folks are so quick to jump on the 'false flag' bandwagon for everything else, why is this so hard to believe?
1 Interpillar 2017-11-06
yeah bla bla bla. the right is so mentally challenged that you can tell them that nazis were socialist/communist and anti-fascists are fascists. It doesn't get true if you repeat it in your circlejerk often enough.
1 conspiracy_edgelord 2017-11-06
Seriously though. When someone quotes Snopes claiming something is false you can basically take that as being absolutely true.
1 Biggie39 2017-11-06
I have only heard this line of thought here on this sub, if possible can you enlighten me as to why people believe this?
Granted I haven’t done a deep dive into all snopes articles and the sources they are based on but from the ones I have scanned or read they seem pretty accurate.
1 ForeignAlphabet 2017-11-06
Pure stupidity, attacking sources rather than addressing information
1 conspiracy_edgelord 2017-11-06
Funny, because I see breitbart attacked more often, and even though they stretch truths or make things out to be bigger than they are, they're still miles better than garbage ass Snopes. The people who run snopes don't even have any credentials. It's just a couple who run the site from their house and consistently push the mainstream liberal narratives. How can you possibly defend that garbage?
1 ForeignAlphabet 2017-11-06
Breitbart bit is completely irrelevant so I'll ignore that.
Snope posts plenty of biased garbage, but it is almost always actual facts that are then sometimes slanted or twisted to support a narrative (see also: all other MSM). The fact that someone posted a snopes article that does contain actual facts and information and the most upvoted response to it is people like /u/Bone_Thugs_n_Harambe just saying "reeeeee snope is bad" rather than any explanation at all as to what they disagree with is lazy anti-intellectualism that brainwashes people to not doing any critical thinking
1 SlimLovin 2017-11-06
Username checks out, unfortunately.
1 flizzy333 2017-11-06
You might want to read closer... the "claim" that Snopes debunks is "Law enforcement agents have announced that "antifa" is planning extended violent unrest or civil war beginning on 4 November 2017."
NOT that groups like Refuse Fascism were organizing events for Nov 4th, which they were planning since the summer. Snopes even linked to the article from the summer...
https://refusefascism.org/2017/08/06/this-nightmare-must-end-the-trumppence-regime-must-go/
The VIOLENCE and outright civil war fear-mongering in conservative media was certainly overblown (anarchists aren't great organizers, surprisingly), but certain anti-fascist groups WERE trying to coordinate a unifying day of action. I humbly suggest you're confusing the hype around said (non)events with their very existence.
Learn the difference between "made up" and "overhyped" and you'll find your way.
tl;dr - my original comment stands.
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Funny, I don’t see any riots in the news today 🤔
1 flizzy333 2017-11-06
That's because this is Nov 6th.
Learn the difference between "made up" and "overblown", and you might catch a clue.
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Okay, I didn’t see any yesterday either lol.
Maybe you should be more mad at your alt-right media telling you a lie? Don’t blame me.
1 flizzy333 2017-11-06
Haha. Just because I'm pointing out you're wrong, doesn't mean I'm an alt-right media fan. Step outside your false dichotomy. The air is a lot less toxic.
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Hahahaha this is hilarious! You still haven’t proven anything and can’t find any “riots” to prove your point 😂
1 flizzy333 2017-11-06
It's pretty clear from my original comment that I thought that the idea of "riots" and "civil war" were overhyped by conservative media, in that I was at least in part agreeing with you.
I guess you don't understand nuance. You might want to ask your teacher about the meaning.
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Listen, if conservative media said there would be riots, they lied. There is no sugar coating it. You were lied to.
1 flizzy333 2017-11-06
Nope. I wasn't buying what they were selling.
1 FULLBOREKORG 2017-11-06
People thought there would be riots because Antifa is a violent revolutionary group who want to overthrow the United States government. It's not really a stretch, they've instigated a dozen major riots this year, thrown explosives at people, and cracked people's skulls open. They are totally unashamed of any of this, they claim a right to use violence. They write graffiti like "liberals get the bullet too" and chant things like "No Trump, No Wall, No USA at All!"
These are violent masked revolutionaries with weapons and explosives who are proud to describe their beliefs. They explicitly want the the Bill of Rights to be repealed, voting to end, the government to be dissolved, and for YOU PERSONALLY to live in a sterile Stalinist petri dish where they can better control your thoughts, speech, and actions.
They do not have your best interests at heart. Stop carrying water for them.
1 numbslutsyc 2017-11-06
still a day off
1 FULLBOREKORG 2017-11-06
Did you even read your own link? That's a Snopes about Antifa starting a "civil war", not having a major coordinated protest.
If you read it you might learn that "It is true that some groups linked to the antifa movement planned co-ordinated protests on 4 November 2017 . . ." and "There was an uptick in the rumor’s spread on 1 November 2017, when the groups advertised the 4 November 2017 demonstrations in the New York Times."
Some people believed there would be widespread violence because, you know, Antifa are insane LARPing Neo-Maxists who like to beat people up, throw explosives, set things on fire, stab people, break windows, etc. It's not exactly weird to think they might do that kind of thing when they announce coordinated protests in 20 cities on the same day and call it a "Day of Rage".
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Where did the riots and civil war occur that this sub regurgitated for weeks?
1 FULLBOREKORG 2017-11-06
Are you really this dense? You're kind setting of alarm bells over here at the Sincerity House.
One last time. Antifa announced a coordinated 20 city protest through their Facebook groups and a full page ad in the New York Times, calling it a Day of Rage and stating their intent to continue the protest indefinitely until they overthrew the government. Many people upon learning of this assumed that the revolutionary groups would use violence, arson, and explosives, since those have been their tactics for the past 12 months. But, for whatever reason, nobody showed up and it was a bust.
So, you can clearly see that the "riots" are an inference by people who saw that a group who routinely riots and sets things on fire was planning a coordinated Day of Rage. Unabashedly violent Marxist revolutionary group plans huge national protest? Yeah, figure they'll riot, that's what they usually do.
See, nice and tidy. No confusion at all.
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Huh, maybe it didn’t happen because conservative media made it up.
Nah, can’t be!
1 FULLBOREKORG 2017-11-06
Oh, I get it. Carry on, sir.
1 SlimLovin 2017-11-06
Yea we could have had a terrible situation like when that fascist Antifa monster murdered a woman with his car!
Wait....
1 conspiracy_edgelord 2017-11-06
muh russia
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Are you telling me people weren’t indicted in the Russian probe?
1 timstolt1 2017-11-06
The truth is, no one knows if it was made up or not. Hell, maybe NYT even published it on their own, out of their hatred for Trump. It's all very believable because the left has already had so many riots and "resist" movements, encouraged from the very top. So I think everyone was waiting to see what would happen. TBH.
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Lol whatever you say
1 timstolt1 2017-11-06
Yeah, I couldn't possibly be right. :O :P
1 Imsomniland 2017-11-06
Anarchist chiming in. 100% made up.
1 flizzy333 2017-11-06
Refuse Fascism was marketing the Nov 4th day of (non-violent) action since August.
Conservatives were pandering with the "new civil war" hyperbole.
Just because conservative media leaned into the fear-mongering, and the protests failed to gain any real traction doesn't mean there was nothing organized.
Saying 100% made up is like saying that the Vegas shooting was nothing but crisis actors.
1 Imsomniland 2017-11-06
Uh yeah, Refuse Fascism is like what...2 people? Go to the anarchism sub, go to any of the radical subs, hell go search any radical forums you want...there were multiple threads/posts made both ON November 4th and leading up to Nov 4, explicitly stating that there was nothing planned for that day and that it was a fake news operation.
Believe what you want to believe but know you look like you're deliberately ignoring the facts.
1 AutoModerator 2017-11-06
While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 flizzy333 2017-11-06
Because various subs said nothing was planned doesn't mean that that RF wasn't clearly (and poorly) planning exactly what they said they were. The two aren't mutually exclusive.
That RF DID organize also doesn't mean I conflated RF with "antifa" as whole, or that I thought right-wing blogs were right in saying it's going to get violent.
Why do facts bother you?
1 Imsomniland 2017-11-06
You said that antifa rioting was "not made up" but just overhyped. Your words. Our conversation isn't likely gonna go anywhere productive. Peace out
1 flizzy333 2017-11-06
You're right, because it's become bickering over semantics due to false assumptions on my political views. Cool
1 Ifeellikenickcanon 2017-11-06
It was definitely made up by the Russians. Come on guys, the Russians are undoubtedly trying to cause turmoil and turn us against each other politically
1 OYou812 2017-11-06
Soros is a Russian now? Like Brazille? Anyone who supports Trump is a Russian. Dumb.
1 Ifeellikenickcanon 2017-11-06
No. This whole Antifa thing is being perpetuated by Russian “trolls” (for lack of a better term) to stir up anger. Just like they stir up anger among leftists I️n the same manner. They’re trying and succeeding to divide us
1 OYou812 2017-11-06
It must be easy on the mind to just disregard all the corrupt shit from the DFL and GOP by blurting out a safe word. "Russia!" "C'mon guys, we need to get back in line behind our establishment crooks or Russia wins!"
Who cares that Prince Alwaleed made a phone call to get Obama into Harvard all those years ago, then paid for it. Who cares that Alwaleed was the major shareholder in Citigroup who selected Obama's cabinet as proven by emails? Who cares? We need to unite behind the banking elite because Russia!
Good grief. Nice try.
1 Ifeellikenickcanon 2017-11-06
Dude you’re senial
1 OYou812 2017-11-06
When you can't refute facts, make lame personal insults.
1 Ifeellikenickcanon 2017-11-06
You are arguing with me over topics I️ didn’t bring up. The only thing I️ was saying was that Russians are trying to stir up shit by pushing antifa on social media. You are just rambling about shit that’s unrelated. Shut up
1 OYou812 2017-11-06
You're making the claim. Present your evidence that the Russians are behind Antifa. If true, it also means George Soros is a Russian agent. Lay it on me.
1 Ifeellikenickcanon 2017-11-06
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vice.com/amp/en_ca/article/59dwed/a-fake-antifa-account-was-busted-for-tweeting-from-russia-vgtrn
1 OYou812 2017-11-06
Everyone knew the @AntifaBoston account was a parody. Posting messages about the NFL going gluten free etc. Leave it to the ultra left tabloid known as Vice with all the former CNN employees who work there to spin it into some grand Russian conspiracy. One troll account. Laughable propaganda but it seems to be working on some people.
1 Ifeellikenickcanon 2017-11-06
Give me some evidence that antifa is a secret huge organization that George soros and Barack Obama are the leaders of. I️ was just speculating that Russia is pushing antifa on social media, which is not far fetched at all considering what they have pushed on Facebook and Twitter.
1 open_ur_mind 2017-11-06
Interested in your claim that groups such as Antifa are funded by Russians. Got any reading material?
1 Ifeellikenickcanon 2017-11-06
Not saying antifa is funded by Russians, what I’m saying is antifa isn’t even an organization that can be funded. It’s not organized, afaik they have no centralized location, no leaders, no events, etc. the violence that has been blamed on antifa has mostly just been isolated incidents with people who are upset at the current political climate who might be slightly left-leaning and therefore are categorized as antifa. I️ remember seeing articles about how Russian linked social media accounts were pushing for antifa events and antifa violence. I’ll see if I️ can link some of those in an edit.
1 Nogrim6 2017-11-06
well IF these antifa retards are being controlled by clinton and co. and this is all actually happening (i feel like im in a dream with how much weird shit seems to be kicking off) the go signal on their little riots might never have been given.
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Why is it so hard to admit the right leaning people here were duped by right-wing media?
Why not just say you were wrong? Why is it always somehow someone else’s fault?
1 Nogrim6 2017-11-06
IFamazing how hostile you get when an idea is floated.go project your agenda on some one else you angry little communist.
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Amazing you just got so triggered when you found out your media was dishonest.
1 Boneasaurus 2017-11-06
OPs comment wasn't hostile, and you didn't even answer his question. It's ridiculous, the whole Nov 4th thing was a total fucking scam yet you double down on it!
Look how triggered you are. My god. It's like getting conned out of $1000, denying that it happened, then getting mad at someone for telling you that you got scammed.
1 timstolt1 2017-11-06
There were some click-bait sites preaching the terror of Nov. 4, but don't try to say it as though "all right wing media" is propagating the idea that antifa was going to riot. Most right wingers know that "antifa" are mostly distraught and disillusioned college students and disenfranchised city-dwellers who have latched onto the idea of Antifa. lmao. Pretty much everyone knows this. And they know there is really no centralized planning except for faggots like Soros potentially funding this crap (and we don't even know this for sure!!!) What we do know is that the MSM are corrupt lying pieces of shit, getting everyone riled up. Yes, Trump is a blowhard, and yes, Clinton wasis corrupt.
1 TallMail 2017-11-06
Huh, then why did this sub cry about how big it was going to be?
1 timstolt1 2017-11-06
Out of fear of the unknown. Sub is fairly even I think, in terms of right/left/center.
1 tatertatertatertot 2017-11-06
Well, that's because it was mostly a hyped-up hoax event pushed by far-right media to give their gullible readers their traditional weekend panic buzz.
1 nabilhuakbar 2017-11-06
Funny, I didn't know a full page ad in the New York Times counts as far right media now
1 tatertatertatertot 2017-11-06
The hoax, pushed by far-right media, was that it was going to be a day of massive riots and violence, a day of non-whites running around killing white people in the first step toward a racial civil war.
That was the hoax, and it worked! Lots of stupid people pissing their pants over it last week.
That was never true, except in the heads of TV producers and the gullible masses that really want to feel panicked about something so that their lives feel important.
1 He_who_humps 2017-11-06
Stop making sense! Damn you!
1 99monkees 2017-11-06
take off your horseshoes and stay a while... everything printed in that rag is far right propaganda. nothing new about it now.
1 Hot_Sauce_Abuela 2017-11-06
How sure are we that Antifa's day of rage was a dud? That Texas shooter has a goth vibe going on in his high school pic, and then he's got an alterna-m'lady-sharia beard going on in his more recent pic. We don't know his motive yet, right? I could see him latching his loser-ish-ness onto the loser-ish-ness that is antifa.
1 dikmssl2 2017-11-06
Yo from the same town that Rand is. It was an argument with his next door neighbor who's a Democrat. He's an asshole and always has been I'm not surprised in the least it happened no conspiracy there.
1 OcculusResurrectio 2017-11-06
Texas church shooting
1 sadmep 2017-11-06
12) It was never ANTIFA's day of rage to begin with, a bunch of right-wingers can't tell the difference between the RCP and ANTIFA.
1 hjwoolwine 2017-11-06
was Rand Paul really attacked?
1 SlimLovin 2017-11-06
This was never a thing. Please stop trying to make this a thing. You're embarrassing yourself.
1 anthrolooksee 2017-11-06
I saw on the news it Ran Paul got it from a neighbor he mouthed off to, on the border of their yards.
1 Black_Island 2017-11-06
That was an RCP march, not the anarchists. You dont understand the left.
1 onelove1979 2017-11-06
OP what are your thoughts on what’s gonna go down? I’m hoping tomorrow isn’t just a Flynn indictment
1 mxt1988 2017-11-06
I think the indictment is for people in charged of foundations that laundered money using their government positions. They lobbied on behalf of foreign enemies and then received a gift or donation to their foundation. Then they create false flags to push Americans to fight the same people they lobbied to arm.
1 tatertatertatertot 2017-11-06
Nothing is going to go down today. OP, and the poor sources he's operating off of, are presuming that the new sealed indictments filed last week are going to result in fireworks today. That isn't how it works, if they were filed last week it'll take longer than a few days for those to go public and get action. Even if it WAS how it worked, 1/3rd of all federal cases in that district are sealed, so there will be a LOT of sealed indictments apart from anything Mueller-related.
1 onelove1979 2017-11-06
Yea the whole “Podesta is already arrested and Huma on Monday” rumor is a great example of why 4chan isn’t a source
1 mentionbeinglawyer 2017-11-06
And yet this post is heavily upvoted and if you point out that many of the statements in OP are not true, you'll get called a shill.
1 Harbinger707 2017-11-06
The timeframe and rate at which this has all happened makes me think by next monday we're going to be owned by china, Trump will be dead and will all be getting raped by extraterestrials in a globe-o-sphere in space....its like the whole world is drinking wayyyyyyy too much coffee
1 pixelbomb2 2017-11-06
Man you are so right 😂, I have no idea where this is all going but I guess we're all along for the ride.
1 mxt1988 2017-11-06
Do we have a choice?
1 prolix 2017-11-06
If you didn't have access to so much speculation posted as news today would just be a normal day. Almost all of what OP said is speculation except for his first example. You all are getting worked up over nothing.
1 AlvinItchyCock 2017-11-06
If an extraterrestrial wants to have sex with me it doesn't need to rape me.
1 Harbinger707 2017-11-06
playing fast and loose like that is probably why your cock is itchy mate :P
1 ApexBridge 2017-11-06
And people'd be like, "There he goes. Homeboy fucked a Martian once."
1 LeoLaDawg 2017-11-06
Well, I mean, I guess it all depends on the type of alien.
1 Mixelplfft 2017-11-06
Sorry, I'll do my part and cut back to three cups per day.
1 Honkadoo 2017-11-06
at this point, I would take that scenario.
1 ABrilliantDisaster 2017-11-06
::twitches:: did you say Coffee!?
1 prolix 2017-11-06
Why did you laundry list so much speculation? You start off with something that's been confirmed but then derail yourself by listing off 4chan theories. We'll see what happens tomorrow with more indictments but its not like the world is coming to an end.
1 mxt1988 2017-11-06
I thought this is /r/conspiracy not /r/facts.
1 prolix 2017-11-06
Yeah but there is a fine line separating conspiracy and fear mongering. You know you are just trying to stir stuff up about "shit is about to go down" and then you post all this 4chan stuff to back it up.
1 mxt1988 2017-11-06
I'm not scared. You're scared? Pussy.
1 danjo_kandui 2017-11-06
Tell'em. It's not fear mongering, it's justice mongering.
1 mxt1988 2017-11-06
exactly.
1 procgen 2017-11-06
True justice is dispassionate.
1 saracellio 2017-11-06
Rings true from a line in "Hateful 8", quoted from someone else, iirc.
1 tatertatertatertot 2017-11-06
You are scared.
You hype yourself up about all these threats, to get yourself into an imagined state of panic and danger, so that you can prove you're "brave" by "confronting" them.
It's a deluded simulation of bravery, where you've made up the threat, put flesh on its bones, and then killed it (how badass!), all from the comfort of your computer chair.
1 Entropick 2017-11-06
Lol, well said! You laid it right out there.
1 jarde 2017-11-06
God this is so fucking true for /pol/ especially.
I'm here for truth, not for some sick desire that every action in the world is due to a conspiracy.
1 kittypryde123 2017-11-06
Like a dog barking from behind a gate. “I won!”
1 analogchild 2017-11-06
You're talking about the kkk and white supremacy right?
1 User_Name13 2017-11-06
Removed, violation of rule 10, repeated violations will result in a ban from /r/conspiracy.
1 mxt1988 2017-11-06
ban me faggot i don't give a shit
1 lactose_intoleroni 2017-11-06
Nobody is "fearing" that those satanist criminals get what is coming to them. I'd say "hope mongering" is a better term to use.
1 Stantoninus 2017-11-06
Because clearly posts like yours are far superior to 4chan because, you know.
1 tatertatertatertot 2017-11-06
It's also not /r/fanfiction
1 ShutYourFaceJabroni 2017-11-06
What does conspiracy mean to you? It does not mean "I have nothing to back up my claim", it means that there are breadcrumbs that line up to an alternative explanation. What breadcrumbs are you following to get your stories about the Podestas?
1 hillaryclitton 2017-11-06
i'm innocent
1 danjo_kandui 2017-11-06
Better Call Saul.
1 MrJDouble 2017-11-06
HRC obviously colluded to rig the dnc primary and mishandled classified information, (at the very least), but what I want to see on that sealed indictment is charges for high treason for the uranium 1 deal, creating/supporting isis, and the human trafficking stuff, under cover of fine art sales with the Saudi prince that just went down.
I've said it a million times, this isn't a partisan issue, has nothing to do with politics, it's time for guilty people to pay for their evil deeds.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-11-06
I agree with you, but the way the human brain works will not allow the partisans to accept the fact that their leaders (GOP and democrat) are corrupt as fuck and need to hang. They will not accept it. Ever.
1 kravguy 2017-11-06
... Obviously untrue. Your brain accepts it, /u/MrJDouble accepts it, and so do I. We aren't particularly special, just particularly cognitively biased. Just like "them." Minds can be changed. It's how literally every "free thinker" became one.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-11-06
few people change their minds. Its not impossible, just unlikely.
1 kravguy 2017-11-06
True. But not everybody needs to change their minds for there to be change. All it takes is action by a passionate and dedicated few. Give knowledge to the right people and watch the world shift in an afternoon.
1 LoveTrumpedHate 2017-11-06
Be honest.
Let's say, for the sake of argument, that Trump enlisted the Russians to help win the 2016 election.
Can you really sell me on not being grateful to Russia for beating Hillary and allowing 2017 to unfold the way it has?
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-11-06
Maybe yes, maybe no. We do not yet know what will happen in the future. Maybe in the short term it would appear Hillary losing to Trump was a good thing for the reasons you state, but what about the long term? That is unknown.
1 Koboldsftw 2017-11-06
I know this is a crazy notion, but let’s imagine, just for the sake of argument, that Clinton did something illegal ** and ** Trump did something illegal.
1 LoveTrumpedHate 2017-11-06
That has nothing to do with my comment.
I'm not even disagreeing with your unrelated comment.
1 Koboldsftw 2017-11-06
Oh sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were saying Russia stopped the Clinton presidency all on their own, and any benefit the Trump Admin has given Russia is just because they were thankful. In that context, I hope you see where my comment was coming from.
1 LoveTrumpedHate 2017-11-06
No I'm saying that if elected the Clinton cartel would be untouchable. Those brave patriots at CNN wouldn't have the rallying courage to stand up to Hillary the way they stand up, so bravely, to Drumpf.
Those Russians who I forgot were our enemies for the last 30 years really helped us out. Now Hillary can go to jail for fraud, embezzlement, and accessory to like 15 suicides and Trumpler can go to jail for being unscrupulous and saying mean things. Also probable mafia ties which like nobody talks about.
1 Koboldsftw 2017-11-06
You see, here’s where my comment comes into play. Why does it seem like I’m the current dialogue, either Trump is a horrible criminal, or Clinton is, but it can never be both? First of all, Trump has personally admitted to sexual assault, which seems to be skated past. Obviously this is not a huge issue compared to the allegations towards Clinton, but I am definitely also expecting Trump to be charged with money laundering and possibly human trafficking. However, unlike most people, I don’t think that the crimes that I believe Trump committed make the crimes that Clinton committed fine.
1 LoveTrumpedHate 2017-11-06
Because the crimes Trump committed with regard to Russia enabled Clinton and podesta and so on and so on to have a shot of facing justice.
My comment was asking "you" to explain to me how that crime is a bad thing. To me it's on the order of a doctor breaking the speed limit on his way to the hospital in order to save a patient.
1 LoveTrumpedHate 2017-11-06
Also for the record I wasn't being sarcastic about the mob ties. He built a casino in Jersey ffs
1 tryptronica 2017-11-06
Offsetting penalties. Replay down.
1 EnoughNoLibsSpam 2017-11-06
well he did qualify his statement by specifying the partisans
1 MrJDouble 2017-11-06
The winds of change are blowing; can you feel it?
1 chostings 2017-11-06
When the shit clings to the air
1 ohshititsjess 2017-11-06
When shit clings to the air?
1 anonjailbreaker2016 2017-11-06
That's just Trump's hand on your pussy.
1 MrJDouble 2017-11-06
Coolest of the cool stories, bro.
Keep banging that drum and making it purely about red or blue.
1 factualbarnmonarchy 2017-11-06
If you go to /r/politics, literally every time it gets brought up that a Democrat may have done something illegal or corrupt, the response is overwhelmingly "good, take them down too."
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-11-06
maybe things have changed there. My experience was different.
1 factualbarnmonarchy 2017-11-06
I'm there most days, and that's what I've seen every single time.
1 doc_sommah 2017-11-06
They have definitely changed imo.... the idea that all powerful people can potentially be not virtuos and evil seems to reach the masses... i used to have so many "idols" not so long ago, but i recognized the deception around many of those just recently so only few remain
1 SlimLovin 2017-11-06
No it wasn't. You're just strawmanning. We disavow our own. That's the difference between me and you.
1 Mike_McDermott 2017-11-06
You are disagreeing with my personal experience? Interesting.
The difference between me and you, based on what youve said, is that you have a political affiliation and I dont. :)
1 Easter420PraiseIt 2017-11-06
Yeah, I'd consider myself fairly progressive (on most issues) but corruption is corruption. It should not have a place in the United States and the people responsible should be brought down.
Both sides have corruption and only acknowledging one party damages the country further.
1 DontJoinTheMilitary 2017-11-06
News Flash: Democratic party isn't progressive. Progressives are just the people they're in charge of duping ad they therefore say progressive-sounding things and try to slap a progressive spin on their actions.
Always remember: RNC dupes conservatives; DNC dupes progressives. Both parties serve the corporate-military-intelligence complex; both parties carry out their agendas. Only the spin changes.
1 raycharlespride 2017-11-06
I accept. I want all the bastards to hang.
1 FuckJeffSessions 2017-11-06
How is the U1 deal treason? How did she create ISIS if she left State before it started? What human trafficking stuff?
What you want is people punished for stuff you made up in your head.
1 doc_sommah 2017-11-06
This case comes to mind: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-25/clinton-silsby-trafficking-scandal-and-how-media-attempted-ignorecover-it
1 MrJDouble 2017-11-06
Mos def this^ and this is well documented
1 talented 2017-11-06
So, the clintons were responsible in negotiating that she remain to be prosecuted and then the state department, which was headed by Hillary, had that lawyer arrested and convicted to 3 yrs of prison.
1 MrJDouble 2017-11-06
Made it up in my head, sure. Keep telling yourself that, champ.
1 FuckJeffSessions 2017-11-06
Still haven't answered any of my questions. Silsby was not human trafficking.
1 MrJDouble 2017-11-06
Must he new around here. Honestly don't have time to explain all of it to you
1 FuckJeffSessions 2017-11-06
I've probably been here longer than you. I've read all the allegations, and they're bullshit.
1 MrJDouble 2017-11-06
Your username is easy enough to remember; I'll swing back through when hrc and the podestathamolesta bros are in chains.
1 He_who_humps 2017-11-06
How could she be tried for treason when the selling decision was approved by a nine person committee?
1 SlimLovin 2017-11-06
How could you possibly believe this?
GWB created the insurgency by sending all the Baathists underground while attacking a country that had nothing to do with 9/11.
1 DMzeff 2017-11-06
As an independent, I wish I could bring this shit up without people trying to bring up Kushner, Trump, Russia etc. If they are guilty, we'll get to them, but right now, we have damning evidence to lock some crooked people up, lets get to work.
1 MrJDouble 2017-11-06
It's impossible to get through to those people. Personally I'm tired of being called out by one side or the other, as this is some directed smear campaign or something. You just want to shake the due hard state lovers that are stuck on the rather archaic 2 party system. News flash: even though shit gets rigged against us and we don't have a proper voice, there are other options and scenarios, (libertarian party member myself, but identify more accurately as a minarchist)
1 joosnigga 2017-11-06
no wonder they killed seth rich.
1 mxt1988 2017-11-06
interesting, a high stake game.
1 badmotherfucker1969 2017-11-06
There isn't four carriers in Japan
1 badmotherfucker1969 2017-11-06
You're full of shit so you downvote, pathetic.
1 GetItOuttaUrAss 2017-11-06
Wow, look at this bad motherfucker!!
1 badmotherfucker1969 2017-11-06
Look at this Proctologist
1 badmotherfucker1969 2017-11-06
What does my username have to do with my comment or OP's lie?
1 SlimLovin 2017-11-06
muh seth rich
1 Interpillar 2017-11-06
shit is about to go down. For how long do you guys say that? 4 months?
1 dancing-turtle 2017-11-06
12 sealed indictments filed in DC on a Saturday, on the same day as dozens of Saudi officials were arrested. Plenty more details, but just take those two facts alone. If you don't regard those as signs something big is going down, I have to ask, what would be?
1 tatertatertatertot 2017-11-06
They were filed in the last week and reported on Saturday.
1/3rd of all indictments filed in that court are sealed.
1 mentionbeinglawyer 2017-11-06
The Saudis were arrested by the Crown Prince to consolidate his power. It's literally textbook monarchy regime change in action. Have you read any history?
1 dancing-turtle 2017-11-06
I'm not saying it isn't that. Of course it is. But you are aware of just how heavily involved the Saudi royal family is in US politics and business, right? One of the princes arrested is also one of the richest people on Earth. What's happening is going to have major ramifications beyond Saudi Arabia -- the question is just what those ramifications will be.
1 6265657020626f6f70 2017-11-06
Someone should scrape this subs posts and plot the number of "shits about to go down"s over time. It would be really interesting to include a timeline of major events for comparison. Someone over at r/dataisbeautiful jump on this!
1 ABrilliantDisaster 2017-11-06
The whole year has been shit going down.
1 Marcuskb91 2017-11-06
Shit has never stopped going down.
Watch for Abe.
1 NothinToSeeHere 2017-11-06
I believe Weiner has to turn himself in today.
1 tatertatertatertot 2017-11-06
Oh, you believe that?
It's not a thing people believe or don't.
According to many many many public sources, and the public record itself, it is WIDELY known that Anthony Weiner begins his 21 month jail sentence today.
1 SafetyDaily101 2017-11-06
if Q Anon was correct 11.3 was podesta and 11.6 will Huma, interesting times ahead
1 faups 2017-11-06
.
1 you_get_CMV_delta 2017-11-06
Good point! Honestly I hadn't thought about it that way before.
1 scragglebear65 2017-11-06
It never goes down :-(
1 sherm50599 2017-11-06
Wow.
1 forum8417 2017-11-06
can anyone point me t oa good podcast that mainly focuses on this stuff?
1 edmiston1042 2017-11-06
I’m interested in a good conspiracy podcast as well.
1 RonWisely 2017-11-06
I listen to Lift The Veil. He’s a little weird at times and he goes on a little too much about his YouTube channel and such before getting to the actual issues but his calm delivery is refreshing. Plus he usually puts out several episodes per week. I also listen to Ground Zero Radio. It’s a syndicated radio show out of Oregon that uploads episodes each day from the night before. Those two are probably the most topical that I’ve found since they put out podcasts so often they can comment on current issues. Higherside Chats with Greg Carlwood is good for general conspiracy discussion but his interviews are typically planned out in advance so it doesn’t normally include current events. Crrow777 puts out a podcast on his website (crrow777radio) every Thursday. He’s a little more out there but has some interesting ideas. His show is sometimes more topical but he usually has more broader conspiracy theories he wants to discuss.
If anyone else has anymore resources, I’d love to expand my horizons more.
1 RonWisely 2017-11-06
I replied to the comment under yours but I wanted you to see it in case you don’t check back here.
1 tatertatertatertot 2017-11-06
Huh? What on Earth are you talking about.
1 Yousunkmyredditship1 2017-11-06
The judge that issued the indictment for manifort has 12 more, that have been issued but are still sealed. As in, we won't find out who they are until after the arrest (usually done to keep people who are about to be arrested in the dark so they don't know to flee).
1 tatertatertatertot 2017-11-06
Yes, but they're not getting acted on today (Monday), which OP somehow believes.
And 1/3rd of all indictments issued in that federal court are sealed, it's not something done only for Special Prosecutor cases. These may or may not have anything to do with Mueller.
1 redstorm12 2017-11-06
7. Putin bombs everyone but ISIS and Assad.
ISIS not bombed by Obama because useful to Israel (they created the conditions leading to ISIS, not that actual ISIS creation)
ISIS is useful to Putin. World needs Assad because he needs to fight ISIS, but is really fighting his own people and his other enemies.
1 TruthandPeace 2017-11-06
Okay let's see what happens...nothing. y'all are really weird.
1 Justinsider55 2017-11-06
They really want us distracted by the texas shooting, its so obvious. They are acting like nothing else is happening. So keep eyes peeled on anything else.
1 pegasuspect93 2017-11-06
When can we expect the indictments to go public?
1 Nogrim6 2017-11-06
while im still pretty skeptical, there is also that whole Tom Delonge and his starship disclosure thing thats going on too.
im still waiting to see something actually disclosed but its deserves a look too, what ever the hell it actually is.
1 Part-Time_Scientist 2017-11-06
Likely nothing except taking peoples money.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rO-hAm4g47o
1 Nogrim6 2017-11-06
thats the vibe i got, although the rest of his cast is fairly impressive.
1 rockytimber 2017-11-06
1 False flag missle attack in southern Saudi Arabia downing helicopter with Saudi royal(s) abord being blamed on Iran and Israel conducting it biggest readiness exercise hours later is the biggest of "shit about to go down" elements, very possibly.
In other words, the markets/economy could not be allowed to crash, would be propped up at any cost, to maintain certain domestic illusions and expectations and mandates, none of the players was willing to take the heat for "causing" the end of the bubble. Yet the bubble has to end, and blaming the end of the bubble on Iran is the ideal solution for these mental cripple psychopaths. I certainly hope I am wrong, we have seen the devastation already enacted on Syria, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, we have effectively been in WWIII since 2003 as far as the victims of the US preemptive wars in the middle east would see it, with hundreds of thousands, maybe millions dead already, (especially if you count the half million children Madeline Albright justified) and millions more refuges. Pictures of ruined cities in Syria, and how many other countries, pictures of the refugee crisis in Europe should be proof enough as well. Hope Iran is not the next to be added to the list, especially since Russia and China would not stand by any more than they have stood by in Syria or the Ukraine where the US is trying to close down their naval bases. This has been ramping up but we are at a high stress point with the motivations of the capitalist systems cyclical crash pattern screaming for a signal for releasing 10 years of witheld bad news. When the bad economic data is finally allowed to come out, it will flow with a vengance, many cities and states and pension systems will default, and the corporate statements will unload all the hemoraging they have been hiding for a decade. Like sheep, the whole mood will change. The crash will be orchestrated and they need a scapegoat that blames it all on someone else, when it is themselves that have been running a crumbling impossible ponzi scheme way way way past its expiration date as if nothing was rotten to the core.
1 wwwes32 2017-11-06
I stop checking often for just a few days and y'all convince yourselves that not only is Tony Podesta secretly indicted, but John as well. God, this sub is delightful.
1 Madman4sale 2017-11-06
It's hilarious, even with all this in the light - We are still those whacky conspiracy folk..
1 ClintonLiesTroopsDie 2017-11-06
where are those indictments?
1 Petosh 2017-11-06
Aliens.
1 TokingMessiah 2017-11-06
Podesta brothers were arrested?
Forgive me, but arresting public figures isn't something you can keep quiet. This didn't happen.
1 BlueOak777 2017-11-06
only proof I can find is a screenshot of some random 4chan comment posted to a hubpages forum. Super reliable.
1 TokingMessiah 2017-11-06
And the FBI came out and denied it.
I'm not one to blindly believe everything I hear, but the FBI isn't in the business of lying unnecessarily. They have heavily relied upon the "we do not comment on ongoing investigations" line, so if they didn't want to divulge information or lie they would have simply use that quip again.
1 NeauxDu 2017-11-06
In with you except for the part about the FBI not being in the business of lieing...
1 BlueOak777 2017-11-06
Just one comment....
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!!!
1 SlimLovin 2017-11-06
Spoiler: It did not happen.
1 FuckMeBernie 2017-11-06
lol I know there was literally a live feed of John speaking on a panel at George Town when this was posted.
1 Thompson_S_Sweetback 2017-11-06
"Shit is about to go down" is the new normal.
1 EarthIsOverpopulated 2017-11-06
OP, is it possible the DNC got setup?
I know it doesn't sound likely but listen to this for 20s: Former KGB Agent on US
He says that removing the leftist party (aka Democrats) is the final move.
1 mxt1988 2017-11-06
If true, do you think DNC cheating Bernie was part of this setup?
1 EarthIsOverpopulated 2017-11-06
I'll say yes, they setup Bernie for this too.
There hasn't ever been a democratic primary that heated before?
They wanted to split the democratic party, and then paint Hillary as evil, so now the democratic party is divided. Divide and conquer.
Obviously Hillary and Bernie wouldn't be in on this setup if it was against them.
But it's kinda weird how so much shit can just come out of nowhere? I mean, who knows what the CIA and FBI have been setting up to just fuck over people. We live in a day and age where anything can be falsified, where no one knows what the fucks going on, and as the fuckery increases, it just justifies more and more executions and prisoners because people want more and more change but it's all going the wrong way.
1 clark_addison08 2017-11-06
Why is it that every single one of these theories always leads back to Hillary being the final boss lurking behind the curtain? And Trump and his cronies are always valiant heroes that emerge from this scandal completely squeaky clean? I am very far left and still completely willing to concede that the entire DNC machine (Clinton, Soros, Podestas, etc) is obviously corrupt and they all should likely be rotting in jail for the rest of their lives. Why is it so difficult for the Trumpers on this sub to admit the same?
1 Green_Lives_Matter 2017-11-06
muh russia
1 clark_addison08 2017-11-06
Brilliant counterargument. Truly compelling stuff.
1 Green_Lives_Matter 2017-11-06
Because cheesedicks like you keep repeating the same bullshit about Russia getting Trump in office despite everything that has come out that proves the Russians were working with the DNC. It sounds stupid now and you deserve a stupid reply.
1 KidCharlemagne333 2017-11-06
He didn't even say that, put your TD talking points away for one fuckin' second and consider what he's actually asking you.
1 moochee22 2017-11-06
Why don't you answer the first part of his question, and stop fellating Trump.
1 clark_addison08 2017-11-06
Paul Manafort - Trump campaign chair; forced to resign and eventually indicted over Russian lobbying and money laundering.
Rick Gates - Trump deputy campaign chair; indicted over Russian lobbying
George Papadopolous - Trump campaign foreign policy advisor; pled guilty to lying to FBI about communications with Russians
Jeff Sessions - Trump Attorney General; Forced to recuse himself from investigation after lying about his communications with Russians
Michael Flynn - Trump national security adviser; forced to resign after lying about communications with Russians
Donald Trump Jr. - Trump’s son; met with Russians during campaign and offered to review Magnitsky Act in exchange for dirt on Clinton
Jared Kushner - Trump’s son-in-law; lied on disclosure forms about financial dealings with Russians
Carter Page - Trump campaign foreign policy adviser; forced to resign after meeting with Russian officials during campaign
But that's all just bullshit right? The Democrats were the only ones conspiring with Russia. The rest is just fake news, because dear Daddy Trump told you so.
1 Green_Lives_Matter 2017-11-06
There is a lot more to the story for all of those entries and yes once again acting like any of these is going to finish Trump only shows how little you've been paying attention.
1 ohshititsjess 2017-11-06
Yeah his whole circle is dirty but I bet you the man in the middle is squeaky clean.
1 Green_Lives_Matter 2017-11-06
Probably not squeaky but given all the spying, leaks, and Obama holdovers you can bet your ass if they had something on him we'd know about it by now.
The fact that they were so desperate they paid millions for a fake piss dossier should tell you they have nothing.
1 SlimLovin 2017-11-06
And yet zero posts about the actual fucking conspiracy going on in America. It's almost as if this sub's been brigaded recently...
1 laika404 2017-11-06
Woah, woah, woah... Just because a bunch of people are working together in secret to win an election through illegal means and eventually give all their friends tax cuts and steal billions from the American people, doesn't mean it's a conspiracy.
I think we should focus on actual conspiracies like how the Democrats are doing stuff. I mean have you even heard about Hillary Clinton before? She must be the source of literally everything wrong with the world right now. I heard that she was the one actually colluding with Russia and hacking the DNC to help the Republicans even though she totally controlled it the same way party nominees usually do, just so she could sell US minerals to a foreign country that cannot export them outside of our borders, just to fund a pedophile ring that somehow does not include Epstein and Trump.
1 moochee22 2017-11-06
Down-voted for not adding to the conversation.
1 hjwoolwine 2017-11-06
I really don't get the conservative bias this sub has.
1 opiniongenerator5000 2017-11-06
it's a contrarian thing most likely.. after 8 years of obama, this sub leans right. After 4 or 8 years of trump, this sub will lean left.
however, this sub has always had a libertarian bias. this group, myself included, is extra suspicious about anything centralized.
1 SlimLovin 2017-11-06
Twenty articles about Hillary and Podesta on the frontpage, not a single post about the literal conspiracy going on in the current administration.
1 apricotasd10 2017-11-06
Republicans made conspiracy theories and retardation mainstream. When one side screams for two decades about how the other side are literal enemies of the state who want to steal your guns and murder you, and how they assassinate people and rape children, and how they're going to destroy society, it's pretty obvious why conspiracy theorists would be conservative.
1 postal83 2017-11-06
We all know both sides are dirty. Hillary is just more insidious and snakelike. Trump is just a raging idiot. Not sure which is more dangerous.
1 Lizards_live 2017-11-06
Yeah wth is going on. Lots of movement but nothing breaking quite yet. This really is chess. And we're the pawns :(.
1 Willertz 2017-11-06
and most of it is to distract us from the pedophilia incidents within our goverments.. zzz
1 yeahivelostit 2017-11-06
EMP
1 infiniteprogress 2017-11-06
When you say about to go down...
You lose all credibility
1 The_Sprigs 2017-11-06
Do you think this is why there was a mass shooting? To distract the media from this list?
1 TheHighBlatman 2017-11-06
Number 9 is honestly genius. I need him to do something prolific for the people before I like him though. Id hate to think he's killing the cabal to create his own.
1 onetesttickle 2017-11-06
Wait there is 12 indictments now?
1 deplorablecalifornia 2017-11-06
B2 Bombers Also Guarding President Trump in Asia
1 kajep33 2017-11-06
Events in Saudi Arabia have nothing to do with all other events you've listed.
1 meloddic 2017-11-06
Did anyone see that they released more docs on SANDY HOOK? It is almost all redacted. Looks to me like they are trying way too hard to make it seem like Adam Lanza was a real person. Timing is weird.
1 BuryMeInABaconSuit 2017-11-06
John has not been arrested. He is currently giving a speech in Georgetown.
https://twitter.com/christianmesaa/status/927597809196560384
1 Rick_Rubin_Reborn 2017-11-06
Shhh, it’s a secret.
1 moochee22 2017-11-06
2, #3, If you could stick to facts, we wouldn't all be looked at as conspiracy nuts.
1 marionfamous 2017-11-06
Has anything actually happened to substantiate 2 and 3.
1 marionfamous 2017-11-06
Meaning articles that eliminate the "supposedly" in these statements, as I'm not saying they aren't possible.
1 thesheep88 2017-11-06
can someone link the source for "12 sealed indictments in the US for Monday"? I saw it earlier, but can't find it now.
1 no_easy-way 2017-11-06
True; but when will 'Joe public' be aware that "ISIS" isn't real?
1 kregkreeg 2017-11-06
doubtful
1 Neubeowulf 2017-11-06
I really really wish some "Night of the Long Knives" style purge would happen... Because it would be awesome! But that is far fetched and unrealistic. Too much hope for too many large, complex, inter connected schemes. Like some Dr. Evil is gonna pop up and demand a ransom for $1million dollars. It's like how car crashes always blow up in the movies. We're all too influenced by Hollywood fantasy.
1 joosnigga 2017-11-06
Far crazier things happened. JFK assassination?
1 Star-comandante 2017-11-06
Pulling out a really deep rotting tooth.
1 astro80 2017-11-06
wake me up when someone actually goes to jail
1 boomtnt46 2017-11-06
It's just another day in this crazy world.
1 vivek31 2017-11-06
Why is this shit still here? And upvoted?
1 TheMostRecentOne 2017-11-06
Aaaaand the internet is down
1 jonnyredshorts 2017-11-06
John Podesta was part of a panel about Bill Clinton, today.
1 SweetSugar_021 2017-11-06
And I was just beginning to REALLY doubt Q Patriot
1 Sublimefly 2017-11-06
John and Tony Podesta have since been photographed out and about as if nothing is going on...
1 JamesCarterMD 2017-11-06
Wow look at all these shills in the comments. Good post op.
1 prolix 2017-11-06
Yeah but there is a fine line separating conspiracy and fear mongering. You know you are just trying to stir stuff up about "shit is about to go down" and then you post all this 4chan stuff to back it up.
1 xleb1 2017-11-06
It's not about anybody, it's about shitty journalism. Of which this sub is full. ;/
1 tatertatertatertot 2017-11-06
It's also not /r/fanfiction
1 GetItOuttaUrAss 2017-11-06
Wow, look at this bad motherfucker!!
1 ShutYourFaceJabroni 2017-11-06
What does conspiracy mean to you? It does not mean "I have nothing to back up my claim", it means that there are breadcrumbs that line up to an alternative explanation. What breadcrumbs are you following to get your stories about the Podestas?
1 Nogrim6 2017-11-06
IFamazing how hostile you get when an idea is floated.go project your agenda on some one else you angry little communist.
1 flizzy333 2017-11-06
It's pretty clear from my original comment that I thought that the idea of "riots" and "civil war" were overhyped by conservative media, in that I was at least in part agreeing with you.
I guess you don't understand nuance. You might want to ask your teacher about the meaning.
1 JimMarch 2017-11-06
Good question. Betcha anything he now packs heat 24/7. He's now probably got one taped up in a big ziplock baggie in the shower :).
1 timstolt1 2017-11-06
There were some click-bait sites preaching the terror of Nov. 4, but don't try to say it as though "all right wing media" is propagating the idea that antifa was going to riot. Most right wingers know that "antifa" are mostly distraught and disillusioned college students and disenfranchised city-dwellers who have latched onto the idea of Antifa. lmao. Pretty much everyone knows this. And they know there is really no centralized planning except for faggots like Soros potentially funding this crap (and we don't even know this for sure!!!) What we do know is that the MSM are corrupt lying pieces of shit, getting everyone riled up. Yes, Trump is a blowhard, and yes, Clinton wasis corrupt.
1 Ifeellikenickcanon 2017-11-06
You are arguing with me over topics I️ didn’t bring up. The only thing I️ was saying was that Russians are trying to stir up shit by pushing antifa on social media. You are just rambling about shit that’s unrelated. Shut up
1 Ifeellikenickcanon 2017-11-06
Give me some evidence that antifa is a secret huge organization that George soros and Barack Obama are the leaders of. I️ was just speculating that Russia is pushing antifa on social media, which is not far fetched at all considering what they have pushed on Facebook and Twitter.