So what’s the deal with QAnon?
31 2017-11-08 by DazedOutDude
Just wondering if anyone has any info on this user who posts questions to 4chan QAnon info
31 2017-11-08 by DazedOutDude
Just wondering if anyone has any info on this user who posts questions to 4chan QAnon info
45 comments
1 mattymattC 2017-11-08
+++
1 uontheotherside 2017-11-08
I personally believe its an amusing and sophisticated LARP I know that may not be the most popular opinion on this reddit
1 LoganTheBishop 2017-11-08
Always assume LARP until proven differently.
1 antifathroway 2017-11-08
4chan isn't a hub of secrets and special information and leaks it's literally just mostly kids LARPing.
1 Stellaaahhhh 2017-11-08
It's kids, and adults, pretending and circle jerking. The thing with role play is that people know it's role play, but enjoy the game. A one sided role play is just a guy bullshitting.
1 Mr_TedBundy 2017-11-08
Not everyone is LARPing
1 Stellaaahhhh 2017-11-08
I reject the new 'definition' of LARP, but yeah, obviously some people are circle jerking and others are just commenting on, or laughing at, the jerk.
I don't doubt that some of the members have jobs in government or Hollywood or law enforcement, everyone needs to relax sometimes and I get the entertainment appeal.
It just seems super unlikely to me that a legit person at a high level would choose that forum to release important information.
1 isyad 2017-11-08
It's a larp, he's been caught lying.
1 GMPollock24 2017-11-08
What were the lies?
I haven't dove too deep into this as 4chan confuses the hell out of me. Most comments seem to be people remaining skepitcal.
1 isyad 2017-11-08
Said John Podesta was one of the sealed indictments and had agreed to turn himself in, but did a runner. Then he appeared in public at some summit.
Said HC was another sealed indictment and would be arrested Monday. Nope.
1 Chokaholic 2017-11-08
He never said he would be arrested Monday, to be fair. He said could be arrested as early as Monday. And until we know who those sealed indictments are for, we don't know shit.
1 frankthecrank1 2017-11-08
he also never said John.
1 ReadRightRed99 2017-11-08
he actually did say last weekend that john podesta was "on the run or dead". obviously, blatently not true
1 clownkriller 2017-11-08
it doesn't have to be literally dead physically has no pulse and no heart beat.
If your primary job is politician or political advisor and you lose the trust of all your compadres - your career is dead. which if that's all you know - it's as good as being dead.
As for being on the run - if the other team has legit data/facts/evidence against you - and you are making moves to try to stay ahead of them until you get caught - that would also be considered - on the run.
1 Straightfromthe 2017-11-08
Trust your gut instead of asking a community filled with shills. I personally think he's legit, although misdirects us at times for various reasons.
1 EXXIT_ 2017-11-08
You mean he’s wrong.
1 Straightfromthe 2017-11-08
Trust your gut instead of asking a community filled with shills. I personally think he's legit, although misdirects us at times for various reasons.
1 goofboi 2017-11-08
I feel like he has an excellent grasp of world politics and has put it in a format that is getting people excited to read between the lines of everyday news articles.
As far as secret intelligence clearances? Hard to say. Most his predictions were telegraphed pretty clearly. I am curious what people feel is the single most difficult prediction/conclusion he has drawn.
1 torkarl 2017-11-08
He has frequently used a construction that is like "people wouldn't believe it if they knew"
That's been dropped about who actually runs North Korea, which I find weird because we all thought they were insane already, and he implies its even insaner than that - by far.
Same goes for the whole trafficking thing - seems like its worse than we could even imagine, and what we imagine (as in p-gate) is as bad as it can be, as far as I can tell.
1 goofboi 2017-11-08
I'll take some time to review the NK angle more closely.
Check this out.
https://app.smartsheet.com/b/mpublish?EQBCT=e3d1071b533c412f8bc08ebbb1b444f6#sheet
1 Straightfromthe 2017-11-08
He's said several things that I have never heard before anywhere.
It makes sense to me that they would be leaking to the public who is hungry for that kind of information. It all just resonates very strongly.
1 klondike1412 2017-11-08
Even if he isn't an insider, he asked extremely important questions in a manner that was so virally effective that I can't ignore the possibility it's legit.
Now, why would he lie about martial law, blackouts, military arrests etc.? Q seems aware his enemies are reading the same thing we are. Hence, you throw all the bread crumbs out there, but you also add in a healthy dose of "we are about to pull out all the stops", scaring the shit out of everyone who was worried about getting arrested. Sounds like a brilliant way to get your enemy to start talking, planning, and reacting to the proposed "martial law roundups" - and it even turns the idea of an EMP blackout into something that helps the bad guys, into something the bad guys want to avoid at all costs.
Game Theory. Know your enemy. Misinformation and disinformation, as long as held together by a hearty dose of truth, are extremely valuable weapons and I think the idea was really to spook the shit out of everyone they're threatening and cause un-forced errors by sparking all this activity.
1 torkarl 2017-11-08
This.
I find myself in awe of the whole operation - true, false, or in between. Can't be some teenager or neckbeard in the basement. Any way it turns out, it's internet hall of fame material.
Think of what this implies - somebody says: "I'm going to tell you the truth, but in that truth I have to sprinkle in a bunch of lies, which will eventually turn out to be good lies, because when you good guys let the bad guys know that you think these lies are true, it will cause the bad guys to stumble, so whether these are true or false, you still need to go publicize this stuff."
1 TWK128 2017-11-08
I think at one point someone mentioned 4G warfare and the Art of War.
The pinnacle of military strength to Sun Tzu was attacking their plans.
John Boyd and his acolytes took this and after conceptualization of the OODA loops discussed the power of getting into the decision cycle of your enemy, effectively attacking and breaking their will to fight and thus winning without losing or killing a single soldier (if and when possible).
1 Wheresmyfoodwoman 2017-11-08
Liar or not, this brings me back to the good ole days of conspiracy. Not as good as the Trump time traveler, that was....epic.
1 [deleted] 2017-11-08
[removed]
1 JamesCarterMD 2017-11-08
Anyone thinking it's a larp hasn't been paying attention close enough and is sadly unable to read between the lines.
1 g3374r2d2 2017-11-08
Thank you and yep.
1 Doc_Molotov 2017-11-08
Right!? There's to much connected happenings in the meatspace. Twitter, SA, BO's "jury duty" HC at the FBI today? Even Vegas! Idk what it is, but I know it's no larp!
1 willo494 2017-11-08
True or false I can't wrap my head around the "+++" at the end of the comment.the chances are astronomical that it was a coincidence
1 theHoffenfuhrer 2017-11-08
I have been reading his posts but I am bit confused on the "+++" could you please explain a little more.
1 greens760 2017-11-08
Trump tweeted 7 minutes beforehand, ending his tweet mysteriously with +++, QANON then did the same thing, signing off with +++
1 theHoffenfuhrer 2017-11-08
Okay thanks, I feel like it would've been more strange had Qanon posted it first and than Trump tweeted it though.
1 willo494 2017-11-08
QAnon dis tweet it first....
1 theHoffenfuhrer 2017-11-08
Oh the poster before said DT tweeted it and then Q did. That was why i posted that.
1 willo494 2017-11-08
Wrong. QAnon wrote it first. Look at the timestamps
1 greens760 2017-11-08
OK, like I said, when I checked that post last people seemed to be confused as to who posted first. They both ended their posts with +++ within 7 mins of each other. How's that?
1 greens760 2017-11-08
When I saw the thread there was some confusion as to who had actually posted first due to twitter posting times in your local timezone. So there you have it. Either way, they both signed off with +++
1 DazedOutDude 2017-11-08
Tbh I know what you know and I don’t understand the +++ unless it’s a signature
1 futhersake 2017-11-08
I am more and more convinced Q anon is actually Trump. It's bizarre but it makes the most sense to me. The +++ was a slip up. The format, the quick fire questions, its his style.
When did Q anon last post? Trump is a bit busy with work right now.
1 onelove1979 2017-11-08
Dan Scavino
1 DazedOutDude 2017-11-08
Thanks for the responses just wanted to know what r/conspiracy thought
1 DazedOutDude 2017-11-08
Thanks for the responses just wanted to know what r/conspiracy thought
1 ChapelPerilousBooks 2017-11-08
Again, most of Qanon are questions, pointed questions, so how can a question be a LARP?
1 Mr_TedBundy 2017-11-08
Not everyone is LARPing