Illuminati confirmed.

Here's what you do.

Research how accelerometers work.

Download a spirit level app on your phone.

Place it on a flat, stable, level surface.

Wait 1 hour.

Level on your phone should have moved 15 degrees.

It will not. It will stay perfectly level.

Realize earth does not move and that you Ave been living a lie.

Your welcome. Happy holidays.

After this, take a solar panel and put it in a closet, proving that there is no sun.

You dont know what geosynchronous orbit means,do you?

But muh gravity.

Have a good one my man.

Why should it move? The level apps measure the level point by using the accelerometer in the phone. If no acceleration (not already present like the earth's rotation) is used on the phone the level point will not move.

The phone measures the gravity acting on the accelerometer and since gravity pulls down to center of the globe the effect remains the same even if the earth rotates in the meantime.

So if they are affected by gravity, why do accelerometers work the same at the equator as they do at the poles? According to your "gravity" physics, the amount of gravity force on objects change the farther you move from the equator. Please explain?

the amount of gravity force on objects change the farther you move from the equator.

The force of gravity on an object depends on the distance from the center of the earth, not the fucking equator.

The elevation doesn't matter for the accelerometer in phones. As long as x-axis=0, y-axis=0 and z-axis < 0 the phone is level. Slight variations in gravitational pull will not alter this setup.

How do you think the level apps work?

Gravity has NO effect on accelerometers. It's a fact YOU nor ANY other globetard can change no matter how much you want to deny it.

globetard

How about "flatard"?

But that is how the apps in the phones work. The app is preprogrammed with a set of accelerometer setups that are present in certain gravity situations.

Accelerometers in phones work by using little suspended springs and by measuring the compression of those springs when the phone is moved.

If the phones lies flat the springs are compressed only by gravity and this is used to measure the level.

Source

That's all very interesting but it fails to mention one thing. According to "gravity" physics, the force on objects change the farther you move away from the equator. Why do levels work the same no matter where you are on your imaginary ball?

Because every point on the surface of the globe is the same distance from the core. Effects of gravity change when you move away from the globe, not around it.

Really?

http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/42-our-solar-system/the-earth/gravity/93-does-gravity-vary-across-the-surface-of-the-earth-intermediate

But I guess you know better, right?

Hey, thanks for sharing. I didn't mean to be so absolute in my last comment. There's a very small variance (about 0.2% to 0.5%) according to your article.

My point stands. Accelerometers do not take gravity into account but just to play devil advocate, let's say it did. You would have a MEASURABLE difference on different parts of the ball. The fact that levels work exactly the same anywhere you go is proof gravity is non existent.

The fact that levels work exactly the same anywhere you go is proof gravity is non existent.

That's a typo, right? Levels work because gravity exists.

Your point stands if the accelerometers in phones are accurate enough to measure the tiny variance you're describing. I doubt they are, but I could be wrong. Also, how do you think they found those differences in the first place?

That is like saying that fluid should spill out of a glass after leaving it on said surface after 6 hours. It won't.

Also gyros in airplanes, water in general, butterflies fluttering above the sea while gravity magically and selectivity bends water and sucks it in.

Funny how ignorant people are. They mock bible believers for putting faith in God without "actual" proof yet take the theories of men as truth without any "proof" of their claims. God is truth.

Truth is god

Ftfy

They mock bible believers for putting faith in God without "actual" proof yet take the theories of men as truth without any "proof" of their claims.

Proofs have been provided for gravitational attraction (the Cavendish experiment, for example is a nice experiment showing that the model is correct at this scale).

It's called the "THEORY OF GRAVITY."

Why does EVERY globeshit talk about gravity like it's been 100% proven?? How about we have this discussion when gravity is ACTUALLY PROVEN.

It's called the "THEORY OF GRAVITY."

Absolutely.

Do I really have to remind you what "theory" means in a scientific context ? Seriously ?

How about we have this discussion when gravity is ACTUALLY PROVEN.

What's wrong with Cavendish experiment (or the numerous variants that have been made over the last centuries) ? Isn't it a proof that two objects attracts each other with a force proportional to their mass (aka gravity) ?

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Where is the extraordinary proof? Stop pretending you understand how gravity works. NOBODY can explain what it is or even how it works. You nor anybody else can use a THEORY as absolute fact. Stop it. That's not how the scientific method YOUR kind put above God's word. You people are so enslaved to scientism you can't see the blatant lies thrown in your face. I strongly suggest you re-evaluate your belief system before it's too late.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Where is the extraordinary proof?

You don't think that Cavendish experiment is an extraordinary proof ?

Ok, what would be an extraordinary proof of the law of gravitation ?

Stop pretending you understand how gravity works.

Gravity works in mysterious ways ? No, it acts in a very straightforward way : two objects attracts each other with a force proportional to their mass and to the inverse squared of the distance.

You nor anybody else can use a THEORY as absolute fact

Can I use FACT as absolute fact ?

I mean, the two balls in the Cavendish experiment are attracted towards each other. That's a fact, a measurable, repeatable, observable fact.

Please stop. Gravity is still to this day, just a theory. So I guess the Cavendish experiment was not extraordinary proof. What other meaningless experiments would you like to add?

Please stop. Gravity is still to this day, just a theory

Your only argument seems to be that we use the word "theory" in front of the word "gravity". These are just words, and I don't care about vocabulary, I care about physics.

Do you agree with the fact that two objects attracts each other with a force proportional to their mass and to the inverse squared of the distance ?

If you disagree, how do you explain the result of the Cavendish experiment (and all subsequent experiments using the same principle to measure this force, such as the Merkowitzz-Gundlach experiment) ?

Poor lost soul.

If that's your final answer, I guess I win by forfeit ...

Thanks for playing, that was entertaining !

You can lie to yourself forever. Tell yourself the the word theory is just that, a word. You can reference all the "experiments" your cold, little heart desires. You can lie to your loved ones. Tell them that flat earthers are crazy and out of touch with how this magical spinning ball works. You can lie to yourself forever. Sugar coat it, dress it up, changed the definition just enough so it can be passed as fact. But even after you have done all this, one thing will NEVER change.

A theory is just an collection of ideas that attempts to explain something that cannot be explained by the "understandable" laws of physics.

So, yeah you win. You win by default because I'm done with you. Whether you are a real person with real thoughts. Or just a troll doing his job. It really doesn't matter to me anymore. You, don't matter to me anymore. You're godless, soulless and not as bright as you think you are. You win. Congrats to you.

Tell yourself the the word theory is just that, a word.

Yes, the word "theory" is a word. That sentence is a tautology.

A theory is not a word. If you cannot do the difference between the word and what it represents, then you are more confused than I thought ...

Sugar coat it, dress it up, changed the definition just enough so it can be passed as fact.

I'm not changing the definition. I'm not even discussing the theory itself. I'm simply discussing experiments that seem to show that two objects attracts each other with a force proportional to their mass and to the inverse squared of the distance.

A theory is just an collection of ideas that attempts to explain something that cannot be explained by the "understandable" laws of physics.

I truly have no idea where you got that definition. And I have no idea what you mean by "understandable" law of physics.

Anyway, you still didn't answer clearly to a single of my questions so let me repeat it : Do you agree or disagree with the fact that two objects attracts each other with a force proportional to their mass and to the inverse squared of the distance ?

So, yeah you win.

Yeah me !

What role do magnets play in reversing the effects of gravity? What is powering gravity and how do different substances and materials seem to ignore it?

Gravity is one force. There are other forces (including electromagnetic forces). Magnets do not "reverse" the effects of gravity, just like you do not "reverse" the effects of gravity when you lift something up.

I don't know what is "powering" gravity, just like I don't know what is powering electromagnetism. I find it strange that you ask this question on gravity, when you seem to have no problem with magnets.

I'm not aware of any material or substance that seem to ignore gravity. If you are thinking of helium ballons, they are completely subject to gravity, as you can see when you put it in a vacuum. When an helium balloon is in the atmosphere, it's another force (the force created by the gradient of pressure) that is stronger than gravity which makes it seem that the helium balloon ignores gravity

I have some new words for you: thrust drag and lift.

Can you explain why butterflies flying over the ocean disproves gravity?

Their wings providea lift force greater than the force of gravity. Water doesn't have wings, so it just falls.

What about a ball filled with air? Why does it want to reach the surface of water if pressed down? It's all explainable with density and bouancy. Up is up and down is down.

What about a ball filled with air? Why does it want to reach the surface of water if pressed down?

Sometimes, there are more than one force acting on the same object. How is that difficult to understand ?

Buoyancy is a force created by a gradient of pressure in a medium. A ball of air is pulled towards the center of the Earth due to gravity, but is also pushed by the gradient of pressure in water. As this gradient of pressure is in the opposite direction as gravity, the buoyancy force opposes the force of gravity.

As a ball of air is very light, the force of gravity is pretty small. However the ball of air has a large volume, so the buoyancy force is quite strong. Hence, in this case, buoyancy is stronger than gravity and hence the ball is going towards the surface.

It's all explainable with density and bouancy. Up is up and down is down.

No, it's not. Here are two example where "up is up" and "down is down" are no longer relevant when talking about buoyancy.

If you put a ball of air inside water in 0G (like in a parabolic flight), then the ball of air will stay still with respect to the water. That's because in 0g, the gradient of pressure disappears, and if there is no gradient the buoyancy force also disappears.

If you create a different gradient of pressure than the one created by gravity, then buoyancy will not push/pull vertically. For example, if you put an helium balloon in an accelerating car, then there will be an horizontal gradient of pressure (in addition to the vertical gradient created by gravity), and hence the helium balloon will be pushed horizontally by this new component of buoyancy.

Are you confusing accelerometers and gyroscopes, once again ?

Vrolijk kerstfeest, lieve mensen. ( dutch for Happy xmas, dear people) 🌲🥂

My first xmas as an agnostic.

Congrats. Enjoy employing arguments of the standing pillar of radically opposed points (atheist/theist) hereon.

I was agnostic until my NDE. Ever since then, I pop out regularly and get to see all the crazy shit on the other side

Mind sharing the crazy shit you've glimpsed on the other side?

Heavens, hell's, purgatory, angels, demons, aliens, succubus, witches, curses, deceased floating around not even realizing they are dead, Oneness, light, etc

succubus

Go on...

They don’t like being ridiculed. Oh and they appear with a ripple.

What do you mean they appear with a ripple?

Like your looking at a scene of a movie and a ripple appears across the screen. Like you’re under water.

She loves mud bloods.

Only familiar with mudblood in the Harry Potter sense.

Alright I mean impure. Which I guess could very well be the same thing.

It’s all about the liver. Processes blood for the rest of your bodily functions. Alcohol limits that. So if you ave tainted blood (mud, congealed etc)

Why is liquor called a spirit?

Or a truth serum?

People have been saying for years that the teeth of the lion beat the sting of a serpent.

Dandelion tea cleans the liver. It grows for us all.

Now how do I get one?

Right on! Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas.

What is your take on people who question the official story of the "holocaust?"

Much like the vaccine argument, if you mention anything other than what they tell us you are a goof.

That alone makes it suspect to me.

You forgot to use 200 parentheses.

There's laws against questioning it wherever it's legal to create such laws

That's what does it for me

Merry christmas!!!!!!! I am glad I clicked here

Make Christmas Great Again!

Happy Solstice

Really?

http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/42-our-solar-system/the-earth/gravity/93-does-gravity-vary-across-the-surface-of-the-earth-intermediate

But I guess you know better, right?

succubus

Go on...

Now how do I get one?

What do you mean they appear with a ripple?

Please stop. Gravity is still to this day, just a theory. So I guess the Cavendish experiment was not extraordinary proof. What other meaningless experiments would you like to add?