Enough with the Trump stories
0 2018-01-10 by fuster_cluq
Anyone else getting sick of trump stories being 2/3 of the content posted on this sub? Don't you people have enough sub reddits to post this crap in? There are literally hundreds of trump hate subs where you can circle jerk to trump articles. It's just getting really fucking old. Anyways, I'm just going to down vote every trump article posted on this sub and I hope the rest of you like minded people do the same.
83 comments
2 stalks-the-north 2018-01-10
Yeah, I agree. This sub needs to learn to submit and not question anything our president says. Make Israel Great Again!
2 Silenerlost 2018-01-10
op is cool.
1 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-10
No.
It’s the biggest conspiracy of my lifetime to go mainstream.
This is a conspiracy sub. Deal with it.
1 Anandamidee 2018-01-10
Which conspiracy, that he is in Israel's pocket?
1 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-10
No, that he’s in Russia’s.
1 Anandamidee 2018-01-10
Selling military arms to Saudi Arabia whom funded and supported the terrorists on 9/11, bailing out the banks in interest rate schemes, recognizing Jerusalem as the capital, being bailed out of debt by Wilbur Ross from Rothschild Inc's bankruptcy advisor team and certainly much more I haven't learned about yet paint a very different picture. I recommend thinking for yourself.
Edit: one of these claims is not well known so I will source it:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chasewithorn/2016/12/08/trump-and-his-commerce-secretary-wilbur-ross-a-look-at-25-years-of-connections/#7fe5d8b4f820
1 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-10
I recommend you not assume I don’t think for myself. I would also recommend you not conflate “thinking for oneself” with “agrees with me”. Because they’re not the same thing.
It is plainly obvious that Russia has a majority stake in Trump’s headspace. Israel may well have some influence too. They aren’t mutually exclusive concepts.
-3 Anandamidee 2018-01-10
By subscribing to the Russia theory it strongly implies that you get your ideas from the media rather than due diligence.
They are in many ways mutually exclusive actually because Russia is supporting Syria and Syria is fighting vs. Saudi Arabian backed terrorist groups.
I don't see any actions of Trump that are pro-Russian where I see many actions that are pro-Israel.
4 psy-op 2018-01-10
Dismissing it strongly implies that you get your
ideasorders from T_D.That's why you shouldn't make stupid assumptions.
0 Anandamidee 2018-01-10
Did you see what I posted? How is any of that pro-Trump or even remotely related to T_D.
He sold weapons to the State who organized and supported the terrorists on 911, making him a traitor, but for reasons wholly unrelated to Russia.
Do you need to associate differing ideas with the lowest common denominator to feel good?
2 psy-op 2018-01-10
Whoosh.
1 Anandamidee 2018-01-10
Insinuating your opponent subscribes to the biggest cesspool on Reddit to discredit them.
Claiming there was something that whooshed on me in your positively pedestrian comment.
You have some low brow conversational tact sir.
1 psy-op 2018-01-10
1 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-10
That “implication” comes from your own assumption. Nothing more.
They’re really not mutually exclusive. Everybody wants to have a piece of the president. Doesn’t mean they themselves are cooperating.
1 UnbearablePenguin 2018-01-10
Apparently somehow you missed all the pro-Russia things Trump has done. Maybe Israel helped him too. I have no doubt the Saudis did also.
1 Pigbristle 2018-01-10
No! Trump needs to be exposed for who he truly is.
1 yellowsnow2 2018-01-10
Yes a great and effective president that stopped the dismantling of America and rolled back the creation of the world government. Also unemployment is down, wall street is up, and the GDP is rising.
1 pacollegENT 2018-01-10
Your talking points are great! I wish they were based on the reality of the situation. It is almost like some things in the world can be going while, while simultaneously having a terrible president. Baffling!
1 yellowsnow2 2018-01-10
Don't take my word for it. They admit to it themselves.
"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." —Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, l950
"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." --David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991
"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an "extraterrestrial" invasion or Russians!!], whether real or promulgated [emphasis mine], that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government." —Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all." --Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992
"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure--one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." —David Rockefeller's Memoirs (Random House, New York, 2002)
"The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent. —Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets
"The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nationstates involved. As managers and creators of the system ,they will rule the future." —U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater in his l964 book: With No Apologies
For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn't. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared "ammunition" in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support...... "The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power. "The depression was the calculated 'shearing' of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market....The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. —Curtis Dall, FDR's son-in-law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father-in-Law
1 Idgafasanymore 2018-01-10
Stopped the dismantling of America LMFAO
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-10
Obama did all those things too. I don't really remember conservatives getting all giddy about it until their guy was handed a good economy.
1 yellowsnow2 2018-01-10
Don't lie. Obama did none of those things, Obama was handed a shit economy and made it more shit.
1 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-10
This is factually incorrect.
Please take a look at, say, unemployment rates.
1 yellowsnow2 2018-01-10
Unemployment was so horrible under Obama that they had to stop counting you in the unemployment rates if you were unemployed for more than a couple weeks. So basically they had to manipulate the numbers it was so bad.
1 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-10
It’s kind of like he went and dealt with a terrible recession his first two years in office.
1 yellowsnow2 2018-01-10
By bailing out the banks and insurance companies.
5 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-10
Sounds like a necessary evil to keep the economy afloat. Short of a revolution you can’t just let those industries die all at once.
2 yellowsnow2 2018-01-10
Giving $9 trillion of tax payer money to private banks may look good in a Fascist or Communist system but in a Capitalist system it is theft and corruption.
2 MoronToTheKore 2018-01-10
Or a bailout to keep the entire system from collapsing.
It isn’t pretty and I have serious moral objections to it, but I also don’t doubt it was a pragmatic move. Much as we want to tear Wall Street apart, Wall Street makes America as fat and wealthy as it is.
Income inequality is the real evil.
3 GuruOfGravitas 2018-01-10
Bail out was done by G.W. in September of 2008.
-1 yellowsnow2 2018-01-10
Was started and carried out under Obama. They are cousins.
1 GuruOfGravitas 2018-01-10
Obama was not inaugurated until Jan. 2009.
https://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/bush-signs-tarp-legislation-oct-3-2008-097742
0 yellowsnow2 2018-01-10
Yes that was when it was signed,but when was it implimented. Obama could have stopped it if he didn't support it.
1 GuruOfGravitas 2018-01-10
It was passed by Congress.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-10
That's a joke right? Obama was handed a completely shattered economy losing 800,000 jobs a month.
Here's the unemployment rate drop under Obama
https://imgur.com/gallery/IP03B
Here's the Dow Jones under Obama
https://imgur.com/gallery/8ZQI0
It's a lot harder to bullshit people when you can easily look things up on the internet.
1 yellowsnow2 2018-01-10
Unemployment was so bad under Obama that they had to change the way they counted it. If you were unemployed for more than a couple weeks you were no longer counted. This is a well know fact. Why are you ignoring it and protecting Obama?
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-10
I'd love a source on this. I'd also love a source that shows Trump changed it so his numbers are somehow more honestly portrayed than Obama's were.
1 yellowsnow2 2018-01-10
Just google it. This should be well known to you. How can you even participate in these discussion if you are so ignorant on the subjects you are discussing? I know you are anti-Trump 24/7, but come on, do a little research and have a little understanding on what you are talking about.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-10
I have been googling it and haven't found shit. Now go ahead and show me your sources or I can go ahead and assume you're full of shit on this.
1 yellowsnow2 2018-01-10
You are a moron that can't even use google.
http://news.gallup.com/opinion/chairman/181469/big-lie-unemployment.aspx
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/10/donald-lambro-obama-hides-jobs-failure-by-not-coun/
https://www.factcheck.org/2012/02/whats-the-real-jobless-rate/
https://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/02/09/dont-be-fooled-the-obama-unemployment-rate-is-11/&refURL=https://www.google.com/&referrer=https://www.google.com/
https://www.thebalance.com/what-is-unemployment-3306222
https://qz.com/877432/the-us-unemployment-rate-measure-is-deceptive-and-doesnt-need-to-be/
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-10
I asked for two things. Your original claim is that Obama didn't count people after they were unemployed for 2 weeks. Blatant bullshit. None of these sources say that. I also asked you to show me that Trump counts unemployment differently than Obama did. None of these say that either.
Would you like to try again bud?
1 yellowsnow2 2018-01-10
Dirty fucking liar. Quote me saying this. I said a "couple" weeks.
I never claimed either way. I was talking about Obama. I'm not your bitch look it up your self.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-10
Yeah in English a couple means 2.
You said Obama changed the way the stats were read. Not true. And Trump uses those same stats.
I know being wrong upsets you, calm down buddy.
1 tatertatertatertot 2018-01-10
Some of us remember how IMPORTANT it was, during the Obama years, that the Dow Jones and GDP are metrics made for corporations and economists looking at aggregate measurements, not actually all that important for the vast numbers of working Americans.
Productivity and wages have been decoupled for decades now.
The Dow Jones measurement is of 30 companies, and has more to do with the potential dividends their stockholders will get than anything else.
Sure some people will cash out their 401k funds during this high point, but tons of people have no such savings and most people won't be cashing out now.
Boasting about corporate measurements on /r/conspiracy, where people know better, is inane. It works at cross-purposes with your attempt to boost Trump. It just reminds people how little he's ACTUALLY done besides sit back and watch certain numbers that steadily rose under Obama continue to rise.
1 fuster_cluq 2018-01-10
Obama can suck a cock, same goes for trump, Clinton and every other piece of shit politician
2 tatertatertatertot 2018-01-10
Interesting how you managed to respond to my comment about the measurements and trends of those measurements, but haven't managed to respond to yellowsnow2's purely pro-Trump comments in this thread...weird!
0 fuster_cluq 2018-01-10
Did not enough people respond to his comment already? The reason I chose yours is because it didn't have any responses
1 fuster_cluq 2018-01-10
At this point I know more about trump than I care to know. I literally give 0 fucks about the guy, I didn't vote for him and if I need an update about his every waking moment then I'll just tune into literally any news channel at any time of day and get an earful of the newest trump rumor
1 belltacom 2018-01-10
So, the front page being being filled with pizzagate, anti-clinton stories etc. over the past year is fine even if they have no new developments, but breaking news on the biggest conspiracy theory should be downvoted. Got it.
1 fuster_cluq 2018-01-10
I daresay trump stories outnumber literally every other topic on this sub
1 iemploreyou 2018-01-10
You aren't allowed to question the President?
1 fuster_cluq 2018-01-10
Yeah, that's exactly what I said. You can question anything your want, personally I'm sick of fucking hearing about the guy. There are so many other places to talk about trump, whether you like him or hate him, but it's getting out of hand around here. There are so many more interesting things to talk about then trump
1 iemploreyou 2018-01-10
Can we also get rid of the anti-semitism as well? I'm tired of that too.
1 fuster_cluq 2018-01-10
I can agree to that, every damn day like 4 posts about how Israel and Netanyahu are controlling America and fucking over Palestinians. I mean, we fucking get it already, Israel bad
1 iemploreyou 2018-01-10
It would be nice if there was a separate conspiracy sub for political stuff. I don't really care about the political stuff but I quite enjoy reading about the slightly weird, zany stuff.
0 UnbearablePenguin 2018-01-10
We’re all sick of hearing about him. If he wasn’t president we wouldn’t be hearing anything except when a new season of Apprentice came out.
1 fuster_cluq 2018-01-10
You mean to say that if Hillary won, the media wouldn't be inundated with daily stories of her every waking moment?
-1 UnbearablePenguin 2018-01-10
No, I didn’t say that whatsoever. Of course we’d be inundated with stories of her every day if she was president. That’s how the media works. Of course she’s smart enough to tweet out every idea that comes into her head so they wouldn’t have as much to work with.
-1 TheCIASellsDrugs 2018-01-10
Literally using talking points from the CIA's JFK coverup "there is no new evidence! Stop listening to conspiracy theories!"
It was recently announced that the Clinton Foundation is under investigation by the FBI. Is that not a new development?
I'm sure you won't respond with any facts and you'll use your vote bots to bury this like you did the OP and all the comments critical of your shitty-and-suspiciously-upvoted comment.
1 tatertatertatertot 2018-01-10
He's the president of the United States. He is one of the most connected and consequential people ON THE PLANET.
His campaign and administration is currently under investigation by a special prosecutor for...conspiracies.
There are various foreign policy and domestic policy decisions he's made and is making that are fertile ground for discussions of...conspiracies.
He's going to have a lot of posts about him.
"LEAVE DONALD ALONE" is not a valid request here, he's the damn president.
Don't be, you know, a snowflake...you can downvote all the posts and comments you like, and I supposed you can even try to recruit a like-minded "brigade" to do the same, but c'mon.
3 oldMiseryGuts 2018-01-10
I think you mean “one of the most connected and consensual people on the planet”
Edit- Im not proud of this
-4 fuster_cluq 2018-01-10
I don't think your getting it buddy. I don't care what your say about trump, I'm just tired of seeing his bullshit posted every fucking day. This sub is starting to look like r/politics, I.e. Filled with trump horse shit. I don't care if you think he's the savior or the anti Christ. it's been long enough since we've been fixated on his every move. Let's talk about something else beside the 2016 election, it's been long enough
3 tatertatertatertot 2018-01-10
So?
Leave and come back in late January 2021?
Until then, he's the president of the United States and any site related to conspiracies is going to have a lot of posts about him if only because of his position and power.
Asking everyone else to assist you in shielding your eyes from Trump posts is not taking personal responsibility nor is it a remotely reasonable request given the person, their position, and the purposes of this sub ("free thinking and discussing issues which have captured the public’s imagination").
-1 fuster_cluq 2018-01-10
Oh jeez, you think parroting whatever new bullshit comes or out of the asshole of the msm is free thinking?
1 RedPillFiend 2018-01-10
Good luck, OP.
1 fuster_cluq 2018-01-10
;)
1 fuster_cluq 2018-01-10
Just to clarify, I down vote both positive and negative stories about trump. The guy is the fucking distraction of the century and ever since 2016 the entire US has been talking non stop about trump ad nauseum.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-10
I can think of one decently large sub you can check out where nobody is allowed to say anything bad about Trump. You'll love it over there.
1 fuster_cluq 2018-01-10
Bad, good, I don't care I'm sick of talking about trump.
1 HansShotGlass 2018-01-10
You need another timeline. He's President of the United States of America. And he's read and lived the Art of War -- never letting your enemies know what your next move is.
1 Rocksolid1111 2018-01-10
What if they're banned there? Should they keep making new accounts and keep coming back spewing divisive garbage like certain people do here??
Look at all of these banned accounts..
/u/PepperoniSizedNips
/u/LongSaggyBalls
/u/Guess_Who_Bitch
/u/HereWeGoAgainDude
/u/ForRealThisTimePlaya
4 MissType 2018-01-10
This really made me chuckle! Awesome.
2 The_In-Betweener 2018-01-10
ヾ(⌐■_■)ノ♪
-2 RareOmen 2018-01-10
And I can think of ~100 other subs where rabid anti-Trumpers like you can post your MSM propaganda and circlejerk.
1 The_In-Betweener 2018-01-10
Follow the hive mind or get ridiculed, lied about, downvoted into oblivion, etc. Russiagate is the only conspiracy you should care about./s Your world must now revolve around Trump and weed.
/r/politics, /r/EnoughTrumpSpam, /r/MarchAgainstTrump, /r/impeach_Trump, /r/regrettingTrump, /r/politicalhumor, /r/political_revolution, /r/LateStageCapitalism, /r/impeachTrump, /r/Trumpgret, /r/shitThe_DonaldSays, /r/fuckthealtright, /r/taxmarch, /r/TopMindsofReddit, /r/the_shulz, /r/Trumpnicknames, /r/againsthatesubreddits, r/the_cheeto, /r/TheDuped, /r/antiTrumpalliance, /r/tinyhandsinc /r/NeverTrump, /r/IndivisibleGuide, /r/BannedfromThe_Donald /r/justicedemocrats, /r/unpresidented, /r/Marchforscience, /r/TrumpforPrison, /r/rightwingwatch, /r/TinyTrumps, /r/hillaryclinton, /r/socialism, /r/MiloForPrison, /r/EnoughRightSpam, /r/the_NewDonald/, /r/ShitRConservativesays, /r/WTFAmerica, /r/EnoughAltRightSpam, /r/EnoughGOPSpam, /r/liesTrumptoldus, /r/Political_Tweets, /r/TrumpAdviceAnimals /r/ourpresident, /r/MarchAgainstDonald, /r/trumpcriticizestrump, /r/RussiaLago, /r/dumptrump, /r/bluemidterm2018, /r/centerleftpolitics, /r/thedonald, /r/The_Mueller, /r/The_Dotard, /r/NewPatriotism, /r/esist,
1 psy-op 2018-01-10
You should update your list because a lot of those don't exist, are empty/nearly, or long dead.
-1 The_In-Betweener 2018-01-10
There you are -
/r/politics, /r/EnoughTrumpSpam, /r/MarchAgainstTrump, /r/impeach_Trump, /r/politicalhumor, /r/political_revolution, /r/LateStageCapitalism, /r/Trumpgret, /r/shitThe_DonaldSays, /r/fuckthealtright, /r/TopMindsofReddit, /r/Trumpnicknames, /r/againsthatesubreddits, /r/TheDuped, /r/antiTrumpalliance, /r/NeverTrump, /r/IndivisibleGuide, /r/BannedfromThe_Donald /r/justicedemocrats, /r/unpresidented, /r/TrumpforPrison, /r/rightwingwatch, /r/TinyTrumps, /r/hillaryclinton, /r/socialism, /r/liesTrumptoldus, /r/Political_Tweets,/r/ourpresident, /r/trumpcriticizestrump, /r/RussiaLago, /r/dumptrump, /r/bluemidterm2018, /r/centerleftpolitics, /r/thedonald, /r/The_Mueller, /r/The_Dotard, /r/NewPatriotism, /r/esist,
Removed -
/r/regrettingTrump,/r/impeachTrump,/r/taxmarch,/r/the_shulz,r/the_cheeto,/r/tinyhandsinc/r/Marchforscience, /r/MiloForPrison,/r/EnoughRightSpam,/r/the_NewDonald,/r/ShitRConservativeSays/, /r/WTFAmerica,/r/EnoughAltRightSpam,/r/EnoughGOPSpam,/r/TrumpAdviceAnimals,/r/MarchAgainstDonald
0 psy-op 2018-01-10
Still missed a few that don't exist, are dead, etc.
r/conspiracy should take issue with your list as well because posts about weed do very well here and most people would place it on an opposing list.
1 The_In-Betweener 2018-01-10
Which ones?
I have been smoking weed every day for 20 years. It takes up too much space on this sub IMHO.
1 psy-op 2018-01-10
You should perform due diligence on your own propaganda, I'm not going to ftfy.
It's not something I'm invested in, but it is the demographic here and there are all kinds of issues and conspiracies related to prohibition.
1 The_In-Betweener 2018-01-10
I went through them all before the previous reply.
1 Spiel_Foss 2018-01-10
Awesome. Those gates don't keep themselves, ya know.
1 ZombieTesticle 2018-01-10
US election cycles run until a Democrat wins. Strap in. It'll be another 3 years.
1 fuster_cluq 2018-01-10
Yeah, that's exactly what I said. You can question anything your want, personally I'm sick of fucking hearing about the guy. There are so many other places to talk about trump, whether you like him or hate him, but it's getting out of hand around here. There are so many more interesting things to talk about then trump
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-01-10
I asked for two things. Your original claim is that Obama didn't count people after they were unemployed for 2 weeks. Blatant bullshit. None of these sources say that. I also asked you to show me that Trump counts unemployment differently than Obama did. None of these say that either.
Would you like to try again bud?