Can we agree that "The Russians..."

0  2018-02-06 by EnoughNoLibsSpam

Can we agree that "The Russians didn't call bullshit on the moon landing hoax" is NOT an argument?

Can we also agree that idiots ought to stop plagiarizing and regurgitating this lame argument?

28 comments

1  Spynde 2018-02-06

Can we agree that this post servers no purpose other than to try and bully people into your way of thinking instead of providing counter-arguments and discussion?

1  EnoughNoLibsSpam 2018-02-06

can you explain why "muh Russians" is such a compelling argument? it seems to be one of the first arguments that idiots reach for when they defend the the moon landing myth

along with this lame argument:

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/7tj2j0/this_13_minute_long_shaggy_dog_story_is_often/

1  afooltobesure 2018-02-06

Can we agree that you're just posting random crap and then not responding to legitimate criticism:
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/7vgm69/the_moon_landing_hoax_is_a_litmus_test_for_stupid/dttbzqe/?context=3

You were happy to shoot back with a snappy little reply until I took the time to type out the text from your little image macro thing and lay out a very thorough argument for why the photos aren't what you say they are, and then suddenly you couldn't be bothered.

You don't care about the theory. You're just spamming.

1  14_16_22_BlisterBlue 2018-02-06

Thought I was having deja vu for a second

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/7jyhav/let_your_eye_find_the_star_closest_to_the_center

1  14_16_22_BlisterBlue 2018-02-06

Thought I was having deja vu for a second there

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/7jyhav/let_your_eye_find_the_star_closest_to_the_center

1  afooltobesure 2018-02-06

Lol wtf. Can’t say I’m surprised.

1  EnoughNoLibsSpam 2018-02-06

three things that cannot remain hidden for long:

1 the sun

2 the moon

3 the truth

just the fact that you are in this thread is significant progress from where you began with the moon landing myth.

you can't un-ring a bell

1  afooltobesure 2018-02-06

You can't seem to explain the photo. You keep implying that it explains itself, but it doesn't.

1  EnoughNoLibsSpam 2018-02-06

you keep asking for it to be explained over and over, after its already been explained. its almost as if you don't want to understand

https://i.redd.it/qknfo3qgr1401.jpg

1  afooltobesure 2018-02-06

So just the one shadow then? I refuted that.

1  farmersboy70 2018-02-06

Funny that you should mention "idiots" and "regurgitating" ...

1  EnoughNoLibsSpam 2018-02-06

if enough people tell you some bullshit, eventually you will believe the bullshit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_men_make_a_tiger

1  farmersboy70 2018-02-06

Twice in a row? Is that your idea of a rebuttal?

1  tatertatertatertot 2018-02-06

But it is an argument, and a good one, so why would anyone "agree" with you that it isn't?

1  EnoughNoLibsSpam 2018-02-06

"so and so didn't say i didn't" is not proof that you did something

its pathetic that this weak argument also seems to be the most compelling.

in other words, if you had a more compelling argument for why men have walked on the moon, you would cite it, instead of this weak argument

it tells me that you don't have any credible evidence that men have walked on the moon

1  ogrelin 2018-02-06

Can we agree to stop calling people names?

1  EnoughNoLibsSpam 2018-02-06

would you consider a person to be an idiot if they still believed in santa claus at age 18?

yes the moon landing hoax is like that

1  ogrelin 2018-02-06

I’d consider them naive and misinformed.

1  EnoughNoLibsSpam 2018-02-06

would you consider a person to be naive and misinformed if they still believed that men walked on the moon at age 18?

1  redditeditard 2018-02-06

Wait, what are you saying? Santa's.... not.... real?!

1  EnoughNoLibsSpam 2018-02-06

for real though. the moon landing hoax stands out among "conspiracy theories" because its so easy to understand, almost as easy as santa claus

and once you have breached the minds of the normies with something like the moon landing hoax, then its easier for them to understand things like the holocaust hoax, climate change hoax, sandy hoax, boston hoax, etc

1  Vienna1529 2018-02-06

Can we agree that this is a pathetic attempt at gatekerping?

1  CaptainApollyon 2018-02-06

Stop trying to change the definition of gatekeeping

1  EnoughNoLibsSpam 2018-02-06

well lets talk about gatekeeping, as long as the subject came up

i wonder why /u/Vienna1529 thinks OP is gatekeeping

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gatekeeping_(communication)

1  D0ctahG 2018-02-06

Interesting to see the amount of aggression towards op. It always the real ones, I keep saying.

1  EnoughNoLibsSpam 2018-02-06

the more i talk about the moon landing hoax, the more perfect it seems to be as the ultimate red pill

it destroys the legitimacy of all of the establishments of authority

and as a bonus, it seems to make people very angry when you tell them that men haven't walked on the moon.

especially old people. its hilarious watching them get so mad that they almost get violent

1  CaptainApollyon 2018-02-06

Yes it's a non argument. You don't see the different religions calling each other out on their bullshit. People in glass houses.