It’s more likely to be MI5/MI6. But the CIA is definitely the next likely suspect. The only thing I know for sure is that it was not anyone Russian.

There is no motive for Russia. He was exchanged by Russia, and if he still had any intelligence value to Britain he would not have been given up. They had him in jail, why not kill him then and be done with it.

The only countries the benefit from this are the UK, US and their allies who can point the finger at Russia before their election/World Cup.

And with the advanced nuclear weapons Russia revealed last week, and their advanced air defence systems, they would not come off worse than the US in the event of a nuclear exchange.

Porton Down is one of the most advanced chemical agent labs in the world, we don't need the CIAs help.

But it was definitely a Russian attempted assassination like a dozen or more other brazen assassinations.

It's the exact same thing Putin has been doing since he came to power.

http://www.businessinsider.com/list-alleged-russian-assassinations-in-britain-litvinenko-2018-3

You should read more about Russia and Putin.

He does this for kicks.

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2017/apr/18/hunting-the-kgb-killers-gripping-documentary-more-outrageous-than-a-spy-movie

Putin isn't trying to avoid being detected.

He is taunting the West.

It's a game, now he gets to see how Trump behaves, puts pressure on NATO, looks like a strong man prior to the Russian election...

Who says they're not doing anything? Threat have been made that there will be a response...

Yeah hopefully we kick every Russian out of the country and cancel all deals with them.

lmao.

you're dancing, but its not you.

you're being puppeteered

But it was definitely a Russian attempted assassination

Gonna need some actual proof of that assertion. So far, your statement is only a simple assumption.

I don't think Trump or anybody working for him wants to go to nuclear war with Russia.

I think anybody would understand in just a 10 minute presentation that a nuclear war would mean the end of all life on earth. There are no winners. And on top of all that, Trump doesn't even say mean things about Russia. I highly doubt he would want to bomb them.

Trump would have to give the thumbs up on a nuclear attack. He wouldn't give that thumbs up. Russia isn't going to attack the UK either. I know it's fun to play around with theories, but I wouldn't worry about this one.

While I agree with you,

has this sub forgotten all the doomsday bunkers being prepped in last 10 years and the Denver Airports time capsule being set to open around 2094. Georgia Guide Stones could be relevant too.

Now all this means nothing to most, but old r/conspiracy would understand that DIA murals depict war (nuclear/chemical), and with the belief that there really does indeed exist an occult-belief based PTB, WW3 with WMDs is not impossible but inevitable for whatever reasons. Regardless of the details, either way, most of us die while a NWO is ushered in around 80-120 years from now.

Remember, a person is smart but people are stupid.

I don't know why the elite would want to sacrifice all their treasure, power and workers just to start doing their own laundry in a bunker.

Nuclear war = massive population cull

They can then reboot the world and society how they see fit.

Apparently questioning the logic of such a sloppy public hit against the grain of the Corporate Media narrative makes you a Russian to all of the hysterical drones lapping up the propaganda.

The unhinged don't want to think conspiracy they want emotional, unthinking reaction to the phony narratives being presented.

Every so often a murdered member of a country’s intelligence service will show up.

Sergei Skripal Alexander Litvinenko Gareth Williams

Countless spies are also imprisoned all over the world.

It’s all just part of the game.

What you describe is exactly how firms like the CIA work. For example, a German spy never walks around with a German weapon. A Russian spy never uses Russian poison.

There are other reasons for the US or UK to do this, just like there are reasons for Putin not to have done it.

Force Trump into taking a stand against Putin thereby causing a rift between Trump and Putin which many have wanted since his election. In fact, Trump is in a no-win situation. If he asked for the evidence (a reasonable request) he would then be pilloried by the press for being Putin's Poodle.

Corbyn has already fell into the trap of asking for evidence, which whoever did it knew he'd ask for, which has already put him against many in his party, and also given the tabloids new ammunition for tomorrows headlines. Great for the tories especially when you take into account Labour had a several point lead in the polls.

Add to the above it has raised anti-Russian feeling astronomically.

Now, why would Putin do something that would create worldwide revulsion, risk harming members of the public, police and emergency services. Use something that is easily traced back to Russia. When they could have did the bullet in the back of the head, or even a gentle push down some stairs. Both of which would have caused anyone worried about being assassinated even more concern.

In fact, the only reason to use something so dangeorus, so publicly is to achieve what has been listed above.

While I agree with you,

has this sub forgotten all the doomsday bunkers being prepped in last 10 years and the Denver Airports time capsule being set to open around 2094. Georgia Guide Stones could be relevant too.

Now all this means nothing to most, but old r/conspiracy would understand that DIA murals depict war (nuclear/chemical), and with the belief that there really does indeed exist an occult-belief based PTB, WW3 with WMDs is not impossible but inevitable for whatever reasons. Regardless of the details, either way, most of us die while a NWO is ushered in around 80-120 years from now.

Remember, a person is smart but people are stupid.