Watch for shills pushing globalism
0 2018-03-14 by Townie_Jesus
This subreddit is being diverted from criticizing globalism. You can rule 12 me all you want, but this is becoming an ostensible problem.
0 2018-03-14 by Townie_Jesus
This subreddit is being diverted from criticizing globalism. You can rule 12 me all you want, but this is becoming an ostensible problem.
100 comments
1 Rockran 2018-03-14
What are you referring to, specifically?
1 kbluep7 2018-03-14
I don't see anyone ever pushing globalism on here, he's making stuff up.
1 Anontifa 2018-03-14
"Globalism" is one of those things that exists in the minds of its opponents more than its so-called supporters.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Behavior I’ve analyzed the past several months. Interesting increase in anti-nationalism. Nationalism has its woes, but it’s imperative for sovereignty and impeding globalism. And it’s being associated with a negative and erroneous understanding of nativism.
1 Rockran 2018-03-14
... For example? . . . . . .
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
......read......yourself......like,,,,be......awaaareeeee.....
1 Rockran 2018-03-14
Great.
Your thread will now be rightfully downvoted to oblivion. You had a chance.
Bye bye
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
go Kill yourself you useless fucking faggot. Bots and narrative pushers shill the ever loving shit out of this board. Evidence is rife within the fucking comment sections. If you even suggest nationalism is an appoproste answer to globalism, you will be censored.
1 Rockran 2018-03-14
You're adorable.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
You’re a retard.
1 Rockran 2018-03-14
That may be, but you're still adorable.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Actually, you’re a retarded shill. Interesting post history you have. So you flock to conspiracy to discuss current events and nonsensical bullshit to perpetuate diverting discussions? Repeating a phrase doesn’t make you look smart, just so you know.
1 Rockran 2018-03-14
That's cute, you think you're the first person to look at my post history?
How about you focus on legitimizing your own post instead of whatever this is.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
You’re the exact example I’m trying to delineate (I.e sidetracking, perpetuating nonsensical discussions and trivial media). Thank you for doing your part. Now keep repeating ‘cute’ and ‘adorable’ so that you feel intelligent. It’s really funny. Like watching a mentally stunted human being try to reaffirm their importance to no avail.
1 Rockran 2018-03-14
Meanwhile i''m still waiting for you to post anything in favor of your initial post.
So... petty.
1 aleister 2018-03-14
Removed. Rule 10.
1 aleister 2018-03-14
Removed. Rule 10.
1 kittypryde123 2018-03-14
If they remove any of his comments (like the one below) for rule violations he can claim it’s further proof of censorship, despite posting no actual evidence for the claims.
1 TheMadQuixotician 2018-03-14
he's waaaay ahead of you
Sad really
1 kittypryde123 2018-03-14
Ha! I also just realized he probably made this post because he got downvoted in another thread for being vague
1 TheMadQuixotician 2018-03-14
The comment was derogatory to say the least, though he deleted it before it was removed so I'm not sure what the story is there
1 kittypryde123 2018-03-14
oh hmm, i just saw that a mod removed his and rockran’s comments. Maybe a moment of clarity?
I don’t get a lot of people on this sub. Make claims, post no/poor explanation or evidence, get wildly angry when people ask for some, call people shills, get comments removed or downvoted, make claims of censorship, repeat...profit?
1 Rockran 2018-03-14
Suspicious suspicious...
Mod /u/axolotl_peyotl has some explaining to do.
1 kittypryde123 2018-03-14
My best guess is that he might say you were alluding to brigading the thread with your comment, though I interpreted as get ready for downvotes bc nothing of substance was offered and OP was needlessly vague and defensive.
1 Rockran 2018-03-14
Your interpretation is what I intended.
However even if the alternative is what I meant, it alone doesn't break any rules.
Very suspicious.
1 kittypryde123 2018-03-14
I agree. Things have been a mess here so I’ve just been lurking and quietly reporting lately.
The one mod who actually used to look at my evidence of sock puppets is inactive and no other mods seemed to present my evidence of sockpuppeting and turfing to the admins, as the admins told me complaints about it had to come from the mod team if they wanted to actually suspend ban evaders.
1 ladystardust1847 2018-03-14
This is a conspiracy sub, not a nationalism sub. Mystery solved.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Great reasoning, Aristotle. Nationalism is a solution to the prevalent globalist conspiracy.
1 ladystardust1847 2018-03-14
No, I reject that entirely and my opinion is still welcome here. That is what I think you're seeing - people with different opinions. That's not a conspiracy.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
No, you’re not getting it. It’s not a matter of opinion. It’s the only option available to counter globalism. Without a healthy and United nationstate, it is susceptible to globalism. It is IMPERATIVE.
1 ladystardust1847 2018-03-14
You don't even understand the basics of it, then.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-globalization_movement
The recent far right, nationalistic wave took their anti-globalist talking points from the same far left groups they criticized and often imprisoned. And you're falling for it. At least understand the history of what you're saying and know that the history of anti-globalism is not rooted in nationalism.
1 HelperBot_ 2018-03-14
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-globalization_movement
HelperBot v1.1 /r/HelperBot_ I am a bot. Please message /u/swim1929 with any feedback and/or hate. Counter: 159703
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
What? I’m not even concerned about right or left. Nationalism, regardless of political leanings, IS the only solution against globalism. You can not withstand globalism if a nation loses its national identity. Plain and simple.
1 ladystardust1847 2018-03-14
I'm not sure you understand what globalism is if you don't care about the left or right but you think nationalism is any kind of solution.
Also, spoiler - all national identities evolve and are eventually "lost".
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Ethnicities only disappear through being replaced, which is being done intentionally. That is how nationalism erodes.
Globalism is not concerned with it being a certain leaning. Bipartisan politics are used as an illusion to generate schisms. In the end, the very affluent share a common objective. Some lean right, some lean left with their strategies, but in the end they share a common purpose.
1 Anontifa 2018-03-14
False dichotomy.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Okay, tell me then: if a nation loses its identity, how will it retain itself as a country in the face of globalism. If japan became densely infused with dozens of different migrants and was absorbed by an East Asia free trade pact, would that make it stronger or weaker?
1 Anontifa 2018-03-14
If your identity is founded on ethnocentrism and racism, then your nation deserves destruction.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Okay, you live in a fantasy world where we are all genetically equal and that race is an unrealistic and distructive abstraction. You are incorrigible.
1 paulie_purr 2018-03-14
You mean those brave nationalists who indirectly support imperialist corporate capitalism and the blind "support your troops" mentality/Holy War bullshit that has allowed the US to sell its globalist wars?
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Hahaha I love reddit. Yes, all “nationalists” support corporate imperialism. A smart person recognizes that they are part of the globalist conspiracy.
1 paulie_purr 2018-03-14
It isn't as simple and reductive as "nationalism is the solution to globalism" but I think it does the trick.
1 YoshiTakimatsui 2018-03-14
I see no effort in stifling criticism of neo liberal policy.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
HA. There isn’t enough.
1 toomuchpork 2018-03-14
It will happen eventually. The Romans tried. The British tried. Germany tried.
It will take eventually. It has to. The world is getting smaller everyday. As a species we do have many common goals. A united Earth in one form or another is coming.
The UN. International trade agreements... All baby steps towards a united Earth.
What we really should do is form a union. Unionize the humans and have a globalist system set up by the people for the people. Before a government or corporation does it.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Unfortunately this won’t work well that way. Third world societies and first world societies would have a terrible time diplomatically. It’s just logistically, culturally and intellectually improbable.
1 toomuchpork 2018-03-14
Your point is actually a reason why it should be done though. Getting poor countries into the modern age should be a humanitarian goal.
1 Anontifa 2018-03-14
Given the ethnonationalism he's pushing elsewhere, I'm guessing he blames the poverty of the third world on inherent, innate attributes of the people living there.
1 toomuchpork 2018-03-14
That sounds logical.
There are people living just as bad in the US as is almost anywhere.
There are millions of starving people in the US it is just that they are obese and it's not as obvious.
If you calculated true net worth and not debt I would wager the US has some appalling poverty stats.
They use to say we are a paycheque away from revolution. Well most are now so deep in debt the next five years is already spoken for.
Hopefully that new credit card comes in so we can go on holiday this year!
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Japan, China, and Korea are suffering so badly from ethnonationalism. Retaining ethnic homogeneity is a strength.
1 10Cb 2018-03-14
If everybody polluted like America and China, the world would become uninhabitable.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
There is a difference between having fair trade relations and eroding borders and shipping boat loads of third worlders into the first world.
1 toomuchpork 2018-03-14
What does it say on the base of the statue of Liberty?
I am an immigrant. You are barking up the wrong tree with your rubbish
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
My father is an immigrant as well, Suzy. Immigration act of 1965 brought forth an unsustainable mass of uneducated third worlders. You should be advocating quality of quantity if you’re not an amygdala damaged brainlet.
1 toomuchpork 2018-03-14
Right. There are enough stupid people in America already.
Please. Poverty causes these issues. If someone is bold enough to up root their world to try and improve their lot in life, why should you stop them
The major push against open borders is from the lazy dim witted set who fear their cushy lot in life made by their grandparents.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
You think with your feelings, and here you are calling other people dumb lol. Why is it that they are poor and have a hard time escaping poverty? Because they have low skills and are not nearly as intelligent. It takes several generations to catch up to speed with established people. In the mean time, low skilled laborers inevitably bring their mindsets with the, and create a cultural replica in their environment.
Juxtapose Korea and Chinese immigrants with Central American immigrants. There is a reason certain groups of immigrants succeed. HINT: it has to do with the brain, dumby.
1 toomuchpork 2018-03-14
We can leave them.there and build the factories around them then. Ship the goods.
Look. Future man won't see earth as an amalgamation of countries but as a whole... Earth.
Like it or not.
"Think with your feelings" is an asinine comment. Thinking without them is pathetic. Don't good morals dance between emotion and logic?
I didn't "call" anyone stupid. I stated a fact. There have been studies on this stuff. "They took our jerbs" is this same sentiment
The powers that be will outsource your ass or import your replacement, what's the actual difference? Ships instead of trucks I guess.
Nationalism is pathetic.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
This is a fantasy notion created by westerners. Trust me, many nations and ethnic groups are not nearly as altruistic. I would love for a United Eatth, but it’s improbable without chaos. Nationalism is what is preventing this forced chaos. Do not trust the institute of international affairs, CFR, the U.N, etc. They seek world amalgamation for nefarious reasons. They know what will result.
1 toomuchpork 2018-03-14
No. Basically it comes down to energy.
If we survive we will discover vast power sources to the extreme that money will be pointless.
Kardashev's type 1
You choose to wallow in our current mud.
There is an old expression, fake it till ya make it. Some say "if you want to be rich act rich."
We should be acting like we want "futurean" to be.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Try explaining this to a Cambodian
1 toomuchpork 2018-03-14
Pfft. Refer back to my previous take on this sentiment.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Mate, I live in that region. I mean, most people in America can barely wrap their heads around this, let alone the third world. I just believe we should let them live, trade fairly, and have them retain their cultures. The best we can do is help educate these people. Have their educated improve their countries the best they can. This will take generations. Many generations.
1 toomuchpork 2018-03-14
You are wrong. I live in a city where there has been a large increase in Chinese immigration.
One generation is all it takes. Hell I emigrated at three and have no accent or ties to my "fatherland"
Your little doesn't mind the rich coming. It is new rich that will push you down the ladder. Bringing in the disenfranchised will improve the middle class... No?
Again... What's it say at the base of that statue?
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Hahahaha, now what if those migrants were Central Americans or Cambodians? There is a lot of evidence around the United States showcasing how no all ethnicities have evolved equally. I’ve worked in ghettos. I’m not a sheltered know-it-all. I also live in a third world country. You couldn’t be more of an insolent, retarded faggot even if you tried. I have a much more complete and realistic grasp of how ethnicities function.
Please, just shut the fuck up you sheltered child.
1 toomuchpork 2018-03-14
That's a rule breaker.
Your nationalistic attitude will change when the US economy crashes and Cambodia offers to give you refuge.
1 Balthanos 2018-03-14
Removed. Rule 1
Removed. Rule 10
1 yoyoitsquavo 2018-03-14
There is still hope for European. A grand awaking has occured over the past few years. Globalism will be defeated. The European race shall succeed
1 toomuchpork 2018-03-14
You do see my point how we are becoming closer. I always thought the internet would bring cheap global communications and show people how they have more in common with someone around the world than their own neighbor.
Break down the barriers rather than strengthen them.
We need to back away from nationalistic divisive bullshit.
Get ahead of it and stop these pricks from enslaving us with the same idea.
1 10Cb 2018-03-14
The way you're thinking is interesting. I just don't see how that would work in terms of leadership, logistics, bureaucracy. Everything takes money - would everybody on the planet pay dues? Also, in discussing terms with the corporations, who would decide what we want when everybody has different opinions?
1 toomuchpork 2018-03-14
I just see it as inevitable. Our world is figuratively as small as it's ever been. With travel and communication costs dropping borders will become a thing of the past... eventually.
Money, like religion, is a growing pain of humanity. We will one day see our present system as barbaric.
1 Rayfloyd 2018-03-14
I'd estimate about 30-45% of interactions here are with actual users interested in discussion. The rest is just bots and narrative pushers. Point it out and you'll be at -10 in no time. They have plenty accounts that we wouldn't even be able to ban them fast enough lol
They have a job and a mission and they won't let go until the fight is over.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
THANK YOU. This is what I’m trying to say.
1 Rayfloyd 2018-03-14
Just know you're not crazy, this place is heavily manipulated, especially voting patterns and consensus building. You can even see some here obviously.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
It’s so much worse than I thought, mate. I took a break from commenting here since after the election. Things that were once upvoted or reasonably agreed upon are now censored into oblivion. Thanks for corroborating this. I really appreciate it.
1 Rayfloyd 2018-03-14
Oh boi, it ramped up progressively post-election when Trump won..
As of about 2 months ago they doubled or tripled their effective numbers or something because of Submission statements I think. They can't forum slide anymore by posting junk topics and links so they have to increase the consensus building techniques as it's their only tool at the moment or something along those lines
I'm just back from a 2 month break from the sub tip: don't call anyone a shill and don't criticize mods, even the obvious controlled ones, the sub ain't dead, AP is holding the fort but as you can see in the nomination thread, the shills ain't happy about it
You can talk about them as group but don't point to one, he will report you and you will get a warning/ban
Oh! lastly, the best place to be is /new/, that's where you'll find most real users, and also the battleground of ideas
Don't be surprised if good comments get buried in the negative, lots of people sort by controversial anyways
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
You’re the man, ray. Thank you for this. Much needed. I have been terribly out of the loop. I’m considering flocking to the chans for now on.
1 Rayfloyd 2018-03-14
If you're not familiar with Q, I highly suggest you hop on 8ch /qresearch/ and get to reading all the data amassed
https://qanonposts.com/ for the posts only but you won't understand much on its own if you don't have backstory, previous confirmations on why you should take this seriously etc etc
If you need me just pm or something, if you have discord I can get you an invite for a small discord, fun place
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
I’ve was frequently involved on 8ch until not longer after the mass migrations. Type board still holds its own. You can pm me the backstory behind this Qanon stuff. Not familiar with this. I honestly don’t know what happened to most of the users. Major brain drain. Some fled to endchan, others went to meguca lol. I’m so out of the loop. Dealing with third world idiocy abroad is enough on my plate.
1 fuckedyourfaceoff 2018-03-14
Extremely obviously.
1 Anontifa 2018-03-14
We're already living in a globalized world, held together in enslavement by Capitalism. Confused nationalists like yourself run interference for them.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
So explain to what me why there are still countries and immigration laws. That is not a true globalized world. We are interconnected through technology, but the entire global far being totally globalized. However countries it is happening via ASEAN, NAFTA, E.U, etc.
1 Anontifa 2018-03-14
I did. To keep labor immobile while capital is mobile, thus making labor more exploitable.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
You’ve never traveled. You’re an ignoramus who knows nothing about countries and espouses Marxist horseshit.
1 Anontifa 2018-03-14
I've been all over actually, and I've felt 10x the kinship with third world peasants than I ever will with the rich vampires who run my home-country and the planet.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Thais, Vietnamese, Laotians, etc. think you’re a useful idiot.
1 Anontifa 2018-03-14
Those places are full of individuals with a diversity of opinions, just like everywhere else on Earth.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Spoken like someone who has never lived in a 3rd world country. I respect them, but they are not individualistic. Not nearly. Most are simply not smart enough.
1 Anontifa 2018-03-14
Dunning Krueger in full effect. The first world can hand you a comprehensive education from birth through widely available children's media, books, and school...and still churn out a complete idiot who borrows opinions from his masters.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
You are stupid lol
1 aleister 2018-03-14
Removed. Rule 10.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Oh my god, you talk like a moron. Globalism DOES NOT EQUAL what you are trying to explain nor what I am emphasizing. It’s not solely a capitalist conspiracy. In fact, the end game is to generate a socialist dystopia and capitalism is the vehicle used to achieve that. What I am saying is, a nation cannot retain its nationhood if it is ethnically cleansed. It will be weaker the longer it is divided. Thailand and many countries in Asia are still far away from being globalized. They trade among each other, but they still have strict immigration laws. They are distinct. But now they are slowly being diversified. This is how globalism works it’s way in, and through other things.
1 Anontifa 2018-03-14
Capitalism is already making them rich beyond all comprehension, socialism would only get in the way of greater profits down the line.
Nations and ethnicities are fictional divisions of the working people of the world. Your capitalist masters love it when you focus on these illusions instead of the actual, objective, material conditions that divide you from your masters/owners.
The division is between masters and owners. Divisions of race, ethnicity, creed, religion, etc, are all delusions which the capitalist class gladly exacerbates and exploits.
You've been duped beyond recognition, I pray that one day you'll come around and see how you've been deceived and distracted.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
Yurt Bezmenov thinks you’re a moron.
1 Anontifa 2018-03-14
Bezmenov was a propagandist in the USSR, and defected to become a better-paid propagandist in the US. In both places he learned to push a narrative for profit.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
But he’s absolutely correct about what he says.
1 Anontifa 2018-03-14
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
You are stupid. If you understood the history of communism, you wouldn’t spout your nonsense. Furthermore, I don’t think capitalism is perfect. It’s a perfect economic philosophy for psychopaths. Let me reiterate: it is ruined by psychopaths.
1 aleister 2018-03-14
Removed. Rule 10.
1 fuckedyourfaceoff 2018-03-14
Don't feel bad, this guy bots votes and does this all day every day. We all agree with you. The votes are bullshit.
1 fuckedyourfaceoff 2018-03-14
Leave it to anontifa to defend globalism. I swear, it's always right on cue with this guy. He may as well be the official ambassador for the left on r/conspiracy.
1 fuckedyourfaceoff 2018-03-14
Anontifa is botting votes, he does it I'm every thread he's in.
1 Townie_Jesus 2018-03-14
THANK YOU. This is what I’m trying to say.
1 Rayfloyd 2018-03-14
Just know you're not crazy, this place is heavily manipulated, especially voting patterns and consensus building. You can even see some here obviously.
1 kittypryde123 2018-03-14
Ha! I also just realized he probably made this post because he got downvoted in another thread for being vague
1 Anontifa 2018-03-14
Those places are full of individuals with a diversity of opinions, just like everywhere else on Earth.
1 toomuchpork 2018-03-14
What does it say on the base of the statue of Liberty?
I am an immigrant. You are barking up the wrong tree with your rubbish
1 toomuchpork 2018-03-14
Pfft. Refer back to my previous take on this sentiment.