Things to remember about this sub...
53 2018-03-16 by meat_for_the_beast
Conspiracy Theorist = Critical Thinker
There is nothing wrong with questioning official stories. In fact, it should be welcomed. There is a reason why they don't want you thinking for yourself...
Politics = Theatre
We gotta pull out of the daily political banter and develop what is actually important... Living our lives free from debt slavery and government control.
False flag event ≠ The event did not happen and people didn't get injured or killed
It simply means it happened under false pretenses and the truth of the matter is completely manipulated to fit an agenda of some sort.
CorbettReport.com = Best overall provider of solid information
He's been at it for years and continually improves his production and always provides a sourced view and informed opinion on all kinds of interesting subjects.
Other notes:
PG may or may not be real... but they sure do arrest a lot of pedophiles in prominent positions as well as arrests in child trafficking... and the people accused have very weird/coincidental connections to all kinds of shady stuff.
Crisis Actors may or may not be present at terrorist events... but there are sure are all kinds of weird anomolies/stories/witness testimonials at just about all terrorist attack events.
Chemtrails may or may not be real but there really is not much official information about the stuff they do admit to spraying in the name of geo-engineering or weather modification. It's only salts and silver iodide that gets mentioned... but it could be anyhting and we have no way to know what's what.
31 comments
1 bBAMEr 2018-03-16
Upvoted = Solid Post
1 Step2TheJep 2018-03-16
Nobody died = nobody got hurt. Period.
1 AIsuicide 2018-03-16
Very rational thinking behind this post OP.
1 Step2TheJep 2018-03-16
thought-provoking username to post content ratio.
1 The_In-Betweener 2018-03-16
There's so many users that are here in bad faith now that conspiracy theories are put on blast by the MSM daily.
That these simple concepts need be pointed out daily is indicative of the effectiveness of the campaign to derail "conspiracy theorists."
Who would've thought that a conspiracy sub would be dominated by the same headlines that make the nightly news. Even Inside Edition covers all the nonsense that's posted here.
1 afooltobesure 2018-03-16
Corbett report is pro-Trump propaganda more and more these days tbh.
1 meat_for_the_beast 2018-03-16
I'm not seeing that... do you have a video/article source that is pushing you to that conclusion?
1 afooltobesure 2018-03-16
I have seen it firsthand and I have been watching it lately.
1 dystopian_love 2018-03-16
No you haven't because only scientists can directly observe phenomenon, remember?!
1 afooltobesure 2018-03-16
Anyone can observe, scientists record.
1 dystopian_love 2018-03-16
How old are you?
1 afooltobesure 2018-03-16
Old enough to have performed a few experiments.
1 dystopian_love 2018-03-16
So five?
1 MR902100 2018-03-16
When you're a baby, you're a scientist - Justin Trudeau
1 afooltobesure 2018-03-16
You saw 5 chemtrails?
1 dystopian_love 2018-03-16
It sounds like you're right around 20 which means you wouldn't remember a time when chemtrails weren't a thing. So I don't think you can say anything else on the topic.
1 afooltobesure 2018-03-16
Your hearing must be bad if that’s how it sounds to you. I wouldn’t have even commented if I didn’t remember a time when contrails quickly dissipated.
1 JusticeMerickGarland 2018-03-16
You're right. It has been very tempting for some independent reporters or analysts to tend toward stories that support Donald Trump because DJT supporters share more. It's a sort of internal corruption.
1 Michaatje 2018-03-16
He asked for a source, where is it? I have watched almost every video Corbett uploaded for the last three years. He was one of the most vocal alternative news reporters that questioned the legitimacy of Trump, during a time when a lot of alternative news websites paraded the "Trump's legit! Believe it or not, but this fraudulent billionaire with a questionable history really wants to help the working day American!" He is an anti-globalist and he is anti-war!" - bs rhetoric.
He has made like a 30 or more minute video about Trump's so called draining the swamp. Never once have I heard him talk positive about Trump, let alone praise him. I am really curious why you would say such a thing. Sure, you are entitled to your opinion but without proving proof to such a claim, it sounds like a smear to a long time fan of James.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-03-16
I think it's hard to declare something the best source. I think the best source is multiple sources. Nobody should get everything from one place.
Everything else you said was technically true. My only qualm is in my opinion, a conspiracy theorist isn't always the same thing as a critical thinker. There are plenty of people that question everything they see on TV, but believe something they see on 4chan or a screen shot from Twitter as long as it fits their world view. That's not critical thinking. And some people think that if a lot of people are saying a theory is dumb, then it must be true because they are trying to silence me! That's not critical thinking either. Other than that. Yeah I agree with most of what you said.
1 meat_for_the_beast 2018-03-16
You make a good point about "the best source" ... yes, we should have multiple solid sources. I just find Corbett so damn consistent.
I can also appreciate your comments on the critical thinking aspect.
-2 Hypocrosee 2018-03-16
"Conspiracy theorist" should equal "investigative journalist". This requires both critical thought, and evidence.
5 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-03-16
Yeah it should. It often doesn't though.
1 robbin_karma 2018-03-16
Thank you
1 ignoremsmedia 2018-03-16
Great stuff OP.
Corbett has a great head on his shoulders and consistently analyses events well.
1 Step2TheJep 2018-03-16
I like Corbett but let's be real here: when it comes to the fake events, he doesn't touch the 'nobody died, nobody got hurt' angle with a ten-foot pole.
1 ignoremsmedia 2018-03-16
(I agree) I dont like that he doesn't look at some things but he really does the stuff he does look at very well.
1 zombie_dave 2018-03-16
I’d guess his channel is his primary income now. He knows which topics would threaten that.
1 Step2TheJep 2018-03-16
Yep, and I for one think that is fair enough. Same as Jay Dyer not touching the nuke hoax when he can avoid it. These guys have bills to pay just like the rest of us, and they owe us nothing.
1 NagevegaN 2018-03-16
False flag = attacking yourself (or staging an attack against yourself) and saying someone else did it; traditionally another country (another flag).
1 dystopian_love 2018-03-16
How old are you?
1 Step2TheJep 2018-03-16
Nobody died = nobody got hurt. Period.
1 afooltobesure 2018-03-16
Old enough to have performed a few experiments.