"Cultural Marxism" is already a rebrand of "cultural bolshevism".

Guess who used that phrase!

You're aware you're repeating a Nazi talking point

Would you agree with this statement:

Europe should see and recognize the danger of Bolshevism. We will never tire of pointing it out. 

Shall I continue?

Bolshevism and Jewry are two words for the same thing. Just as the Jews are the string-pullers of Bolshevism uprisings, the leaders of Bolshevist criminality, so, too, are they the inventors of Marxism and Bolshevism, which flow from their character. He who wants to write the history of Marxism must write the history of Jewry in the world, since he will conclude that Marxism and Bolshevism are not only phenomena of our age, but rather the expression of Jewish rule over foreign peoples and states since time immemorial.

whoosh

Stop rehashing Nazi memes and people won't call you a Nazi.

Your intellectual dishonesty makes me believe you really are a Nazi. They're crawling around more and more these days.

So because things change, it must obviously be the work of communists who have been hitherto marginalized and largely powerless? You can see where a lot of what's happening is coming from, and it is largely coming from monied interests who are, if anything, aligned with capitalism or the aristocracy.

Do you even have a coherent definition of "cultural Marxism"? Conservitards can't even muster that, they just apply the Marxism bugaboo to whatever they don't like because it sways the ignorant. As mentioned, the Nazis used basically the same concept, and the Nazis cribbed it from rumors spread by 19th century conservatives to discredit the liberals. The principle is always the same and is older than dirt.

No but you are literally peddling the fiction of Alfred Rosenberg.

Also.

Stop bullshitting.

This is exactly my point. A long time contributor put together a well thought theory for discussion purposes. Obviously wrongthink, accusations of anti-Semitic behavior followed, along with a wave of up and down votes.

An effort to paint a user as anti-Semitic is an attempt to shut down discussion and that is a violation of Rule 10.

Time to take back our sub.

u/Sabremesh u/Mangora7

"See? They're saying that everyone is equal and deserves the same freedoms as we wealthy property owning whites! Pretty soon, they'll try to overthrow us. Better make sure the underclass gets it in their heads to be afraid of those filthy leftists. They'll even spread the message for us if we keep at it! We're the ones protecting them from revolution, see?"

The people who have no problem changing labels. Judaeo-Bolshevism > Bolshevism > communism > globalism. The same exact things, but the label is changed once it gets a baggage that's too heavy for the mainstream.

They made the new label 'globalism' themselves. This isn't some Stormfront creation or anything like that. They're normalizing it themselves, same as they did every time before that. They say that globalism is here to say, they are the globalists and so on. Rising Marxism is just the social policy of these people.

I'm a communist and "globalism" has little to do with communism in the context people mean it. While the goal of communism is global stateless, classless, moneyless socialism... that is not at all what "they" (whoever your token bad guy is) want.

Doesn't help that America has spearheaded a century-long war against socialism and communism and the social zeitgeist portrays an almost mythological interpretation.

Don't you realize that the only reason that communist regimes fell was that the west existed and showed a better way? West is by no means perfect, usury-based economy is wrong, but at least people aren't starving. I would know. My country HAD communism.

The ideal utopian vision of communism can't even exist. It interferes with human behavior which is present in all of us. Greed, self preservation, etc.

You have to admit that there are quite big overlapping goals between what communists tried to achieved and what globalists are trying to achieve now. Some of that stuff is too obvious.

Don't you realize that the only reason that communist regimes fell was that the west existed and showed a better way?

Usually due to conquest or convenient uprising.

Socialist Spanish Catalonia was destroyed by Spanish Nationals, that didn't make it an inherently inferior system of governance.

Showed a "better way" through assassinations, coups, terrorism, an arms race, embargoes, blockades, sanctions, etc.

I agree. I would say that the left has a unconstrained view of society vs the right who has a constrained view. The unconstrained view tends to believe there is a solution to every issue and they know the solution. This tends to lead towards centralization of power and basically everything you described. These labels have been ingrained into us to have a natural disbelief to discredit them. I totally agree with you, but what I see as the biggest issue here is that the left wing generally does not put out a solid position on issues. For example, there are many people that want to repeal the 2nd amendment yet they only call for common sense gun control. Their positions are masked in rhetoric. There is also no accountability, for example Obama and the stimulus was credited with stoping the recession yet that infers that markets are not self correcting. I'm sorry if I was jumping around there but I see this as a major issue in our society that has corrupted peoples mindset. Hopefully our society can survive.

And the big money is completely hijacked by government.

When I say the "left" I was speaking about the general unconstrained mindset of liberals and Democrats. Yet liberals seem to be splitting from the typical Democrats. I would say that the Democratic party is essentially liberals now tho, if it wasn't for Hillarys corruption Bernie would have been the representative.

The political process is extremely frustrating especially when any policy or law is passed it is extremely difficult to go back. I just don't understand why we continue failing policies with more of the failing policies. I was watching Milton Friedman debate back in the 80's and 90's and it was the exact same inequality and affirmative action being pushed and we have come nowhere since then.

For example, Frannie Mac and Freddie May was a GSE (government sponsored enterprise) which led to the support and bailout of this company. With the known GSE label there was inherently riskier business ventures. I guess I wasn't arguing that big business is taken over by the government but there are policies that force these companies to make decisions, like the lending of loans to riskier individuals. Having power to interfere in market decisions leads to corruption or decisions benefiting one while hurting others.

there is no such thing as "Cultural Marxism" -- it's just a very broad heuristic that captures everything that a certain subset of anti-SJW SJW's want to discredit. "Cultural Marxism" is the SJWism for the anti-SJW set...

You just have an absence of results, and a surplus of rhetoric. You can "warn" all you want against it, and the purity of pretend-land you speak of will get your your followers, so it'll work. But it's only just anti-tribalistic tribalism you're actually talking about.

You know what you are, and what you're about.

SJWism for the anti-SJW crowd.

It'll get upvotes! It always has!

Just own it.

Thanks for bowing out. It's less tiring.

This post is really relevant considering my post earlier... Take notes.

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

There absolutely is such thing as cultural Marxism. It exists in the warped minds of reactionaries; therefore it exists. You need to brush up on your Stewart Home.

reactionary

? Yes?

Mag.. You know me. You know what I know and what I do. Don't blow my cover, bro.

I just said it does exist..

"There absolutely is such thing as cultural Marxism. It exists in the warped minds of reactionaries; therefore it exists. You need to brush up on your Stewart Home."

Read it carefully and try to understand why I would address who I addressed with this comment.

Things existing in the mind doesn't make them any less real.

I can show a picture of a small man wearing green with a shamrock and or a horse with a horn to 99% of children in the US and they would identify them for what they are.

You should listen to Jonathan Bowden's talk on Stewart Home if you want to know more.

Note the snarky non argument presented by the subject.

Postmodernism as derived from Derrida's works and deconstructionism = Cultural Marxism.

Everyone tries to detract and pretend it doesn't exist, but the tenants are literally taught in every liberal arts program.

Everytime someone attempts to discredit it they only stay skin deep and only look at the present, and fail to even consider that there is historical precedent from the French postmodern kooks.

Has really nothing to do with Marxism. Or DA JEWS.

It has nothing to do with the Jews, that's fairly correct.

Only way I can see them thumbed in is because a large majority of postmodernist we're reactionary toawrds the second world war.

Y'all want everything to be about the fucking Jews...

I don't know. I think marxism is still to blame, just because it seems to be Marxist-Leninism style revolutionary tactics being used. Read about the Russian revolution and you will see the parallels of today's cultural takeover.

I understand your position and was in agreement until I thought about it further.

I really think the finger should be pointed in the most direct direction for those seeking answers by using the correct terms. The whole idea that society can misuse a term so badly that it becomes a trigger is not good. The term is a description of the concept that created Leninism and the millions of deaths. By self censoring the term we are also self censoring the concept it represents and thus the knowledge of the foundation that created the most authoritarian government is modern history. Stalin's government. And once this concept is lost we will just be doomed to repeat history all over again.

I do agree with you. I just don't like that terms need to be renamed out of fear it will obscure the pursuit of understanding. But just as terms like "Fascism".... have been misused until they no longer convey their original/true concept, it is no surprise that the term "marxist" will befall the same fate.

Cultural Marxism doesn't mean literal Marxism, it means behaving like a Marxist on the surface-level but for culture.

Marxism = "Take over the means of production".

Cultural Marxism = "Take over the means of production but for a different reason".

Better not let people stand up for themselves too much, otherwise they might get crazy ideas about changing society, right?

Seems to me you're onto the same backwards, hateful nationalism that the United States fought against a few major wars ago. Same as the Trump crowd. Being exploited and fooled and loving it.

They are triggered because many people here are sympathetic to left-wing authoritarianism and socialism.

They think being opposed to big-oil, the Jews, and other boogeyman make them the rebels. When in fact they are supportive of the true players of the 21st century and their goals. The tech companies are far more powerful. They are increasingly in control of global free speech, communication, the news, commerce, and thought. They are almost unanimously in favor of globalism and supportive of authoritarian government tactics. The heads of this industry are smarter than anyone else and some of them likely have god complexes.

Can you give a few examples of this cultural takeover?

For context

A pamphlet, The Jewish Bolshevism, became current after the 1917 October Revolution in Russia, featuring prominently in the propaganda of the anti-communist "White" forces during the Russian Civil War.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Bolshevism

A pamphlet, The Jewish Bolshevism, became current after the 1917 October Revolution in Russia, featuring prominently in the propaganda of the anti-communist "White" forces during the Russian Civil War.

The theory was later propagated by the Nazi Party and their American sympathizers.

How is this 65% upvoted? That was about the most diplomatic well intentioned post I've seen in awhile. Not to even mention the other comments...

The mockingbirds are back again.

Lenin, and the rise of communism in Russia in the culture, was heavily backed by JP Morgan and the Rothschilds. This is a matter of public record, JP Morgan transferred $25 million to fund Lenin during his rise.

Citation needed. I'm going to guess "Anthony C. Sutton", in which case it's quite a fictional account.

For example, Frannie Mac and Freddie May was a GSE (government sponsored enterprise) which led to the support and bailout of this company. With the known GSE label there was inherently riskier business ventures. I guess I wasn't arguing that big business is taken over by the government but there are policies that force these companies to make decisions, like the lending of loans to riskier individuals. Having power to interfere in market decisions leads to corruption or decisions benefiting one while hurting others.

Stop bullshitting.