The Russia stuff is a set-up
0 2018-03-20 by Jobposting1
The deep state can't control Russia, that's why they are out to get it.
The US election wasn't hacked anymore than any other election in the world or in the past. We play around in everyone's elections and they play around in ours.
The CIA has Anti-Putin Russian's in Russia. These people serve a double purpose - 1) to fuck over Putin and 2) to fuck over Trump, neither of whom the deep state likes. It turns out if you spin it the right way, you can fuck both over at the same time.
The rumor always was prior to the election that Clinton was going after them if she won. With the anti-Russia stuff since then, it's pretty clear the foundation is being laid. The latest assassination is just another addition to it.
The Russian election rigging this week was another joke. They have no need to rig elections on video when they can do it in private on a much larger scale.
Putin and Russia aren't perfect, hell Russia created one of the biggest threats to our civilization there is - Socialism, but this is a battle for oil and control.
34 comments
1 Jobposting1 2018-03-20
SS - Russia is a set-up. They are being overly obvious with it and it's clear it's more of an attempt to demonize them.
1 no1113 2018-03-20
^
1 Pumpkin_Creepface 2018-03-20
1 no1113 2018-03-20
⇩
1 Pumpkin_Creepface 2018-03-20
✘
1 Littletowe 2018-03-20
Like it or not, with the rise of technology, some form of socialism is the only end goal of humanity. Not the biggest threat. No matter how much you put it off, socialism will be the ending every time. Unless you plan to oppress and or kill a large population, it's unavoidable.
1 Jobposting1 2018-03-20
This is totally off-topic.
We have millions of things that need repaired right now and housing/subways/trains would all be welcome to be built. Unless you are mentally disabled, there is a job you could do somewhere.
We also have at bare minimum 12.5 million illegal immigrants who have no business here. With them gone, 12.5 million jobs and houses/apartments would be available(dropping rent prices and increasing wages) while we would have 12.5 million less people consuming our natural resources and ruining the environment.
1 Littletowe 2018-03-20
That's nice, and surely short term solutions. But as I said, the end goal will still be the same, 10, 15, 50 years from now.
1 bradok 2018-03-20
Why not shoot for Libertarian Socialism? A decentralized state with the goals of the community in mind? There's no reason Socialism has to end in dictatorship or even with the State.
I'm a Leftist who has been drawn increasingly towards Anarchist thought and especially its Leftist strains. I think Socialism done right is the preferred end game- but only if conducted via a decentralized, stateless society based on the principles of Direct Democracy and Action in the Economy and Politically. And oriented around the Local/Municipal/Commune scale.
1 RMFN 2018-03-20
Anarcho monarchism is the only rational political philosophy for the hyper modern age.
1 bradok 2018-03-20
I am genuinely curious RMFN on a couple of points here- How do you ensure that the Royal Family actually maintains the interests of the People? And how would succession be handled?
1 RMFN 2018-03-20
Monarchy =/= genetic royalty. The king/queen are chosen in the way ancient Norse rulers were chosen, through a round robin of arm wrestling and competitive slam poetry.
1 PlumRugofDoom 2018-03-20
What are you basing this assertion on?
1 Littletowe 2018-03-20
With a severe rise in population, and the reliance we as a species have on one another to form communities, a proper and fully functioning socialist society is basically the "end game" of humans as a species. I'm on my phone so I won't go into all the particulars, but the rise of the current technology we have and the increased usage of automation, a large portion of society will be essentially deadweight. And as tech advances more, EVERYONE will be deadweight. Figuratively speaking. Hopefully by that point humans will truly decide altruism is an ultimate truth, otherwise you will have to cull a large portion of society. Even if you didn't actively get rid of them, they would die off as they are unable to work, forage food, or live in society. That is what I base my assertion on.
1 Nightlight64 2018-03-20
I was with you up until this. Talk about a sharp turn. Ouch.
1 Jobposting1 2018-03-20
Hasn't ended well anywhere it's been tried.
cue that's not my specific brand socialism
1 Nightlight64 2018-03-20
Yeah, not having that circular inane conversation another time. Educate yourself about socialism. Like, you know, pick up books and read them. Might be difficult but self education is a must.
1 Jobposting1 2018-03-20
I'm happy with what capitalism has gotten me. I have a longer life expectancy than 99% of every other human in the history of earth, car, house, the internet, freedom of speech, food on my plate and a safe place to live.
The only thing fair in life is that everyone dies.
1 Nightlight64 2018-03-20
🙄 At the expense of what? Wait, you don't care. Typical ostrich.
1 Jobposting1 2018-03-20
Dealing with liberals.
1 Nightlight64 2018-03-20
I hate liberals.
1 Jobposting1 2018-03-20
I hate a lot of groups and most of them would be prime useful idiots for socialism.
1 KiwiBattlerNZ 2018-03-20
I hate idiots that think they know what Socialism is... but who think that Russia invented it.
1 Jobposting1 2018-03-20
I'm not into anything left and if I can make you upset by confusing it, that's a win for me.
1 Symbiotx 2018-03-20
How is that a win for you? If your goal is just to make other people mad with your words, that's really pathetic.
1 Symbiotx 2018-03-20
Dealing with people that believe in different things than you? You're gonna have to do that a lot in life buddy.
1 Jobposting1 2018-03-20
Socialists/communists aren't people. It's no loss.
1 KiwiBattlerNZ 2018-03-20
Utter bullshit.
You seem to be mistaking Socialism for Communism.
Neither of those ideas were created by Russia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism#History
For fuck's sake... Karl Marx was a GERMAN! Didn't that clue you into the fact that Russia had nothing to do with the "creation" of Socialism? "The Communist Manifesto" was first published in London!
Your opinion is utterly worthless because you are utterly ignorant of the topic.
1 JakeElwoodDim5th 2018-03-20
I agree with .ost of your points, OP, but German collectivists are the ones who came up with modern socialism. They even made a "national" version when the international one failed to catch on.
1 godlameroso 2018-03-20
No way every single element of our government is now Russian owned. Russia calls the shots, that's why our free speech is being taken away with assault bridges. My shill blue upvotes prove I'm right and you're wrong. The MSM says Russia owns the government, listen to them they're on your side and would never mislead you except when they tried to sell us the Iraq war, but that was different, they pretended they were against it afterwards with perfect hindsight.
1 fellatio-please 2018-03-20
Well done.
1 Nogrim6 2018-03-20
im pretty convinced the video snowden tweeted is actually a few years old, im pretty sure i saw the same one pulled up during the crimea vote talking about how russia does elections.
if its not the same one, its in nearly the same building and is staged almost exactly the same way.
1 Pumpkin_Creepface 2018-03-20
Do you mean Cambridge Analytica?
1 bradok 2018-03-20
I am genuinely curious RMFN on a couple of points here- How do you ensure that the Royal Family actually maintains the interests of the People? And how would succession be handled?
1 Littletowe 2018-03-20
That's nice, and surely short term solutions. But as I said, the end goal will still be the same, 10, 15, 50 years from now.