I follow it a lil bit. Dont know if he is larping or not. Dont really care. But I did think it was kinda crazy 2 days ago tho... he posted something like, (paraphrasing) the FBI is investigating Q for the Austin Bombings. (because Q said "Boom" a bunch of times in his recent postings). Then Q said, fake narrative, 4 am wednesday. And sometime around 4 am on wednesday the austin bomber blew himself up.
It was being talked about on /r/CBTS_stream but that got banned the other day.
I didn't personally buy into it. Maybe a little at first, but the longer it went on saying "it's happening!", and the constant nothing happening made me realise it's just a subversion of attention. Still, I don't think the sub should have been banned. No one was hurting anyone and now all that's gonna do is convince all the followers that they're being silenced because they were onto something. I'm generalising, of course, but yeah that's briefly my thoughts on the whole thing.
Q doesn't really predict anything. Basically he's like "Hey everyone look at that tree. Isn't that a cool tree?" Then the tree spontaneously catches fire. Did Q predict that? Would you call that a prediction? Does that mean Q isn't a LARP? Maybe he just knew ahead of time that was going to happen.
For your 2nd question, yes people are still talking about it, just not here really.
No it’s more like Q saying “fire” and then somewhere in the country a tree catches fire and everyone looks at it and decides that must have been what Q meant.
Meanwhile three houses, an office building, and a handful of cars had also caught fire around the same time, because sometimes things catch fire.
I'm already more on the q didn't predict shit school of thought. Q knows some shit. But no I wouldn't call it a random tree somewhere in the United States. He knows enough and pointed out several specific trees before they caught fire. I believe in coincidences but mathematically there is no way it's coincidence. I'll repeat what I told someone else q has slightly better than average information and weaves it into his narrative as things happen sometimes before but mostly after the fact. If it's a larp then we are looking at the next evolution of entertainment and man the future looks like loads of fun.
I would agree with you that now that we're in "Q Theory: Season 2", he has become reactionary with his hints, or kind of explain why something happened. Early on though, he did have explosive information before I read it anywhere else.
So maybe this guy did have enough to start the story, and is now just trying to continue it, much like when a TV show starts declining.
The biggest example I can think of is the Saudi Arabia thing. He was mentioning it, drilling it in, and that very weekend, the Saudi Arabia shake up happened. That was a huge deal.
There are other things that I personally believe, but nothing I would throw into the ring of scrutiny, other than the Saudi Arabia thing. If that doesn't convince you, then I can't really tell you anything that wouldn't be equivalent to these Q fan boys' wet dream scenario's they are making up in their heads in an attempt to "connect the dots".
Right. Inside information though. Nobody reported "They are going to arrest all the Saudi Princes tomorrow at 2:30 pm. Please wear business casual attire."
Q was harping on it like a day or two before it happened. "Look at that tree." Like I said, that's the best I have. If you're not satisfied with my answer, I can't really try nor need to convince you. Just thought this sub should hear from someone ankle deep in the Q waters, instead of hardcore Q worshippers (which he directly stated not to do, btw).
I could try to find it, but searching for "sa" leads to like 1,000 results. I know, likely story huh? Q refers to Saudi Arabia as SA, so that sucks. https://pastebin.com/3YwyKxJE I think it happened around November 11th or something like that, if memory serves. There were two rounds of arrests.
Mate, you asked for links, I gave you the link and even dates, the rest you can do on your own.
Step one: Google saudi prince arrested. Find date(s)
Step 2: Click on link I showed you, scroll to Q posts before/after this time frame. They are in chronological order.
Step 3: Make whatever conclusions you like.
Q has mentioned a bunch of things over the past 8 months so people draw their own dots and think he somehow predicted things. But if you look at his actual predictions, nothing has come true. He's said a few times that Hillary would get arrested. He's always hinting at the podestas being arrested. He said Obama lawyered up. And most recently he said a super undeniably damaging Hillary video was about to drop. None of that happened. But his followers are told to trust the plan. So it doesn't matter in the slightest when the stuff he says doesn't come true. All you gotta do is believe that someday it will. Which is surprisingly easy for a bunch of people to believe in.
Interesting analysis and seems the most plausible to me.
Until Q addresses hoaxes and media fakery, a few of which have happened under Trump's watch and similarly delicate topics then it's all just a show, as usual.
If you throw enough shit at a wall eventually something will stick. Its just cold calling. "Oh, you had someone important in your life that died at some point". No shit.
The one I was referring to is by a dude who takes trump’s tweets, picks a tangentially related number, puts the letters from the tweet into a grid with the dimensions of the number (sometimes, since he sometimes ignores the number he picked because reasons), then tries to find anagrams there to assemble words and then assemble words into sentence structure. Basically playing boggle but instead of a 4x4 grid where you have to find actual words, sometimes it’s a 20x20 or bigger grid where you only have to find anagrams. It’s actually hysterical seeing the thread filled with “I don’t really understand it but great work” comments with the 2 or 3 people that aren’t sheep list a bunch of nonsense sentences they made the same way the OP does.
The rest of the sub follows the same pattern. Take 10 vague and cryptic predictions or statements from Q, interpret them to mean something connected to TPTB, they don’t come true, something else happens that looks related to one of the things he said, sub circlejerks that its happening and that’s what he meant all along.
So, they basically use an ever changing formula to make it mean what they want, and they assume that Trump is taking all this time to use the same exact formulas for his tweets.
Almost. For example, q makes a post that includes “11:11” (make a wish lol) so he put Trumps next tweet in an 11x11 Grid. The one on the front page right now is 26xsomethinglessthan26, because trumps tweet was deleted and retweeted after 26 minutes. But the thing is, the grid size doesn’t actually matter in large part because in their mind the grid doesn’t need to make words, you only need to make anagrams of words and you can do so with letters both next to each other as well as above and below each other lol
He predicted the Austin bomber being caught. Exact date and time
Do your own research. There's a lot of effort going into silencing platforms that talk about Q and shills here try to discredit it with the same lines and methods you'd see in r/politics
How exactly did he predict that, and how far in advance? The exact day and time the Austin bomber was caught wasn’t even pre planned by law enforcement. In order to predict that down to the time, you would have to be in the bombers head (his future head) and know every thought and move he would make to lead to that exact moment.
I don't think it's a LARP, I think it's some sort of intelligence operation. As to who is running it and for what purpose, no one can say for sure. But it is fun to follow.
It's one that would've been dead on arrival had they not lucked out with Trump's Twitter going down for 15 minutes. He got really lucky with that.
Besides the Twitter shit, everything has been nonsense or information that was already in the news. People were going nuts over him "predicting" the arrest of the Saudi royalty, but weeks prior there were already questions as to why Kushner was taking an unannounced trip there. He only said "why is JK in S.A.?" Which anyone could have assumed would be realized eventually.
The thing that really makes me mad is how people thought the whole "4, 10, 20" shit that was "code" for DJT, as if a top secret government agent would consider numbers matching directly to letters as being a cool way to "prove" themselves.
All of that aside, why the Hell would someone with information for what would be the most significant revolution in modern history choose 4chan to expose details? That would be the stupidest fucking thing they could do.
They wouldnt ever disclose shit like this on any website, let alone a popular and easily-accessed clearnet forum.
All of that aside, why the Hell would someone with information for what would be the most significant revolution in modern history choose 4chan to expose details? That would be the stupidest fucking thing they could do.
I mean, just look whats happening to reddit. As far as anonymous postings go... 4chan would make the most sense. Least controlled outlet.
Lol djt doesn't mean donald j Trump. You heard that from a simpleton or some YouTube channel lol. I have no rebuttal nor support for any of your other statements.
So far, the evidence I see regarding Q looks like stretches and leaps. People say things like “I understand how it decodes to this, because I have spent countless hours researching it” But, how much “research” can you do to come to the conclusion that some plus symbols and numbers mean a particular thing? That’s not research, it’s guessing and speculation. A lot of it is stuff people have been saying for a while.
The only straight out predictions that don’t require decoding, such as arrests and saying video will be released, haven’t happened, aside from Trumps twitter going down, which was just some disgruntled twitter employee, and how would a Trump insider have known about that ahead of time? They would had to have been personally involved in some way with that employee. It’s not like it was a top secret government action that had been perpetrated by deep state to shut down Trumps twitter for only 15 minutes. I’m thinking no on Q.
Is that all he said to predict the Austin bomber? What do people think, that he had an inside connection with the bomber? If that was really the case, wouldn’t he have apprehended the guy before hand, or at the least warned the public? So, he KNEW the bomber was going to do it before it happened, and all he does is cryptically say “boom” a few times, followed by a heartless, sociopathic comment “enjoy the show”? Enjoy it? ....Really?
Understand where your coming from and kind of agree, however, if you are playing chess against an opponent, shits going to go up in smoke, you can see the move being made and you let it go, then make your next move.
look i don't know, Since the last election has come and gone, the rules of engagement has changed given social media, This Q business could be one big Larp, However, real or not, a lot of people are glued into to this Q person, believing all that they are told, it's Genius actually, a way to steer and control a whole bunch of people.
For me this Q show would make a great movie, I'd watch to see both sides, it's strange, one moment I'm like this is BS the next I'm having a scratchy chin moment when the bombings happened,
It's all fucking nuts and interesting if you ask me.
So, is Q on Trumps side, or is he a diabolical Joker maniac who somehow had foreknowledge of a murderous crime spree, and chose to do nothing but say “boom”?
Some fucks believe its actually Trump at the beginning, Yes definatly a Trump creation or someone close to him with clearance to sensitive information.
Either way, true or not, Trump once again is looking clean and creating a magical mystery tour for a whole bunch of peopling following Q who look to Trump as their savior.
People on that sub don’t have agreed upon concrete theories on anything he posts, so anything can look correct in hindsight. Some currently believe he predicted the bomber getting caught because 4AM Wednesday was in one of his posts and that is when the bomber was caught, but when he mentioned a time and day he was referring to the time when MSM gets talking points from deep state (op mockingbird?) the BOOM BOOM BOOM post some people think refers to doj fbi and state dept taking losses. Could also be a reference to an injury reserve song. You can cold read a restaurant menu and get just as much info as many of his posts
i love that every single person who believe in Q in this thread has no given a single piece of evidence that Q did shit. only telling you that Q did predict it, now how, or when or anything? that should be your answer right there.
They make "predictions" by being vague and cryptic. They don't even say "x will happen on Friday." They say "boom" and nothing more, but people read that as predicting that bomb in Austin despite lacking any kind of specific information. Misses are ignored, like when they've talked about politically connected criminals being secretly locked up, while hits are lauded as proof of them being correct or good or or useful or something.
Q didn't predict the bombs. The booms have to do with news dropping like the McCabe firing and facebook getting exposed and such. 3rd graders over here "decoding" Lol.
The actual prediction I remember (not the usual vague, code word stuff that was the usual bait) was that the Roy Moore election was some kind of trap to catch the dems rigging an election.
that didn't happen and I immediately stopped caring.
Understand where your coming from and kind of agree, however, if you are playing chess against an opponent, shits going to go up in smoke, you can see the move being made and you let it go, then make your next move.
look i don't know, Since the last election has come and gone, the rules of engagement has changed given social media, This Q business could be one big Larp, However, real or not, a lot of people are glued into to this Q person, believing all that they are told, it's Genius actually, a way to steer and control a whole bunch of people.
For me this Q show would make a great movie, I'd watch to see both sides, it's strange, one moment I'm like this is BS the next I'm having a scratchy chin moment when the bombings happened,
It's all fucking nuts and interesting if you ask me.
People on that sub don’t have agreed upon concrete theories on anything he posts, so anything can look correct in hindsight. Some currently believe he predicted the bomber getting caught because 4AM Wednesday was in one of his posts and that is when the bomber was caught, but when he mentioned a time and day he was referring to the time when MSM gets talking points from deep state (op mockingbird?) the BOOM BOOM BOOM post some people think refers to doj fbi and state dept taking losses. Could also be a reference to an injury reserve song. You can cold read a restaurant menu and get just as much info as many of his posts
Right. Inside information though. Nobody reported "They are going to arrest all the Saudi Princes tomorrow at 2:30 pm. Please wear business casual attire."
Q was harping on it like a day or two before it happened. "Look at that tree." Like I said, that's the best I have. If you're not satisfied with my answer, I can't really try nor need to convince you. Just thought this sub should hear from someone ankle deep in the Q waters, instead of hardcore Q worshippers (which he directly stated not to do, btw).
72 comments
1 DanIsSwell 2018-03-22
I’m just trying to see if there is really credibility to this, and if people are still talking about it.
1 BakedBlunts 2018-03-22
I follow it a lil bit. Dont know if he is larping or not. Dont really care. But I did think it was kinda crazy 2 days ago tho... he posted something like, (paraphrasing) the FBI is investigating Q for the Austin Bombings. (because Q said "Boom" a bunch of times in his recent postings). Then Q said, fake narrative, 4 am wednesday. And sometime around 4 am on wednesday the austin bomber blew himself up.
1 DontTreadOnMe16 2018-03-22
Whoa really? You have links to all of this?
1 Ieuan1996 2018-03-22
It was being talked about on /r/CBTS_stream but that got banned the other day.
I didn't personally buy into it. Maybe a little at first, but the longer it went on saying "it's happening!", and the constant nothing happening made me realise it's just a subversion of attention. Still, I don't think the sub should have been banned. No one was hurting anyone and now all that's gonna do is convince all the followers that they're being silenced because they were onto something. I'm generalising, of course, but yeah that's briefly my thoughts on the whole thing.
1 brotherjonathan 2018-03-22
Did the sub take themselves down and claim martyrdom?
1 Ieuan1996 2018-03-22
I don't know nearly enough about the situation to make any assumptions.
1 safe_as_milk 2018-03-22
mike green plane crash, Bangladeshi terrorist attack amongst others
1 _Slayton_ 2018-03-22
It's LARP.
1 scaredshtlessintx 2018-03-22
i thought LARP was guys with foam swords and shields playing Dungeons&Dragons in the woods, when did it start meaning fake online government leaks? jc
1 DontTreadOnMe16 2018-03-22
Good question. I had never heard this phrase re-purposed until Q started posting.
1 Philhelm 2018-03-22
For what it's worth, I've heard "LARP" used to describe people claiming to be important, anonymous insiders (FBI agents, etc.) before Q was around.
1 DontTreadOnMe16 2018-03-22
True. Was Kimdotcom before Q? I guess it was really around the last election, not necessarily Q postings.
1 Philhelm 2018-03-22
Kimdotcom was definitely before Q. I don't remember Q until after the election. I do remember that FBI Anon filled the Q role at the time though.
1 troy_caster 2018-03-22
Q doesn't really predict anything. Basically he's like "Hey everyone look at that tree. Isn't that a cool tree?" Then the tree spontaneously catches fire. Did Q predict that? Would you call that a prediction? Does that mean Q isn't a LARP? Maybe he just knew ahead of time that was going to happen.
For your 2nd question, yes people are still talking about it, just not here really.
1 procgen 2018-03-22
I think OP wanted examples - you might be embellishing (not that I'm accusing you of doing so).
1 DontTreadOnMe16 2018-03-22
I too would like some examples.
1 Scroon 2018-03-22
That's the best characterization of Q posts I've read.
1 afooltobesure 2018-03-22
No it’s more like Q saying “fire” and then somewhere in the country a tree catches fire and everyone looks at it and decides that must have been what Q meant.
Meanwhile three houses, an office building, and a handful of cars had also caught fire around the same time, because sometimes things catch fire.
1 troy_caster 2018-03-22
I'm already more on the q didn't predict shit school of thought. Q knows some shit. But no I wouldn't call it a random tree somewhere in the United States. He knows enough and pointed out several specific trees before they caught fire. I believe in coincidences but mathematically there is no way it's coincidence. I'll repeat what I told someone else q has slightly better than average information and weaves it into his narrative as things happen sometimes before but mostly after the fact. If it's a larp then we are looking at the next evolution of entertainment and man the future looks like loads of fun.
1 afooltobesure 2018-03-22
All of Q’s information could easily have come just from watching the news and /pol/, as far as I can see.
What specific statements of his leads you to believe he has better than average information?
1 troy_caster 2018-03-22
I would agree with you that now that we're in "Q Theory: Season 2", he has become reactionary with his hints, or kind of explain why something happened. Early on though, he did have explosive information before I read it anywhere else.
So maybe this guy did have enough to start the story, and is now just trying to continue it, much like when a TV show starts declining.
The biggest example I can think of is the Saudi Arabia thing. He was mentioning it, drilling it in, and that very weekend, the Saudi Arabia shake up happened. That was a huge deal.
There are other things that I personally believe, but nothing I would throw into the ring of scrutiny, other than the Saudi Arabia thing. If that doesn't convince you, then I can't really tell you anything that wouldn't be equivalent to these Q fan boys' wet dream scenario's they are making up in their heads in an attempt to "connect the dots".
1 afooltobesure 2018-03-22
There had been rumors going around about SA for weeks before though.
1 troy_caster 2018-03-22
Right. Inside information though. Nobody reported "They are going to arrest all the Saudi Princes tomorrow at 2:30 pm. Please wear business casual attire."
Q was harping on it like a day or two before it happened. "Look at that tree." Like I said, that's the best I have. If you're not satisfied with my answer, I can't really try nor need to convince you. Just thought this sub should hear from someone ankle deep in the Q waters, instead of hardcore Q worshippers (which he directly stated not to do, btw).
1 afooltobesure 2018-03-22
Well thanks for the input, at least. Any chance you have a link to the relevant Q posts?
1 troy_caster 2018-03-22
I could try to find it, but searching for "sa" leads to like 1,000 results. I know, likely story huh? Q refers to Saudi Arabia as SA, so that sucks. https://pastebin.com/3YwyKxJE I think it happened around November 11th or something like that, if memory serves. There were two rounds of arrests.
1 afooltobesure 2018-03-22
I’ve heard this same thing any time anyone asks for evidence of Q’s legitimacy. It’s always too hard to find and “le do your own research”
1 troy_caster 2018-03-22
Mate, you asked for links, I gave you the link and even dates, the rest you can do on your own.
Step one: Google saudi prince arrested. Find date(s) Step 2: Click on link I showed you, scroll to Q posts before/after this time frame. They are in chronological order. Step 3: Make whatever conclusions you like.
1 SJWPussyLibtard 2018-03-22
Q has mentioned a bunch of things over the past 8 months so people draw their own dots and think he somehow predicted things. But if you look at his actual predictions, nothing has come true. He's said a few times that Hillary would get arrested. He's always hinting at the podestas being arrested. He said Obama lawyered up. And most recently he said a super undeniably damaging Hillary video was about to drop. None of that happened. But his followers are told to trust the plan. So it doesn't matter in the slightest when the stuff he says doesn't come true. All you gotta do is believe that someday it will. Which is surprisingly easy for a bunch of people to believe in.
1 realityexposed 2018-03-22
They Want to believe
1 devils_advocaat 2018-03-22
Tony podesta had his firm shut down and, given the number of sealed cases, we can't be sure he wasn't charged.
1 hrccbr1000rr 2018-03-22
McCabe firing up as a recent one.
1 clovize 2018-03-22
What’s Q Anon All About?
1 bombsaway1979 2018-03-22
I think that's a fair assessment. Replace AI with Brad Parscale n co. (https://www.vox.com/2018/2/27/17058208/brad-parscale-trump-campaign-russia-cambridge-analytica), and I think that pretty much sums it up.
1 zombie_dave 2018-03-22
Interesting analysis and seems the most plausible to me.
Until Q addresses hoaxes and media fakery, a few of which have happened under Trump's watch and similarly delicate topics then it's all just a show, as usual.
Rather interesting, nonetheless.
1 iemploreyou 2018-03-22
If you throw enough shit at a wall eventually something will stick. Its just cold calling. "Oh, you had someone important in your life that died at some point". No shit.
1 babaroga73 2018-03-22
"I sense there must've been some disappointment in your life before?"
1 benjwgarner 2018-03-22
*cold reading
1 iemploreyou 2018-03-22
God damn it I always make that typo.
1 [deleted] 2018-03-22
[removed]
1 FauxMoGuy 2018-03-22
Lol that “decoding” thread
1 DanIsSwell 2018-03-22
Did he actually say all that stuff, or did someone just look at so numbers and plus symbols, etc, and come to those conclusions?
1 FauxMoGuy 2018-03-22
The one I was referring to is by a dude who takes trump’s tweets, picks a tangentially related number, puts the letters from the tweet into a grid with the dimensions of the number (sometimes, since he sometimes ignores the number he picked because reasons), then tries to find anagrams there to assemble words and then assemble words into sentence structure. Basically playing boggle but instead of a 4x4 grid where you have to find actual words, sometimes it’s a 20x20 or bigger grid where you only have to find anagrams. It’s actually hysterical seeing the thread filled with “I don’t really understand it but great work” comments with the 2 or 3 people that aren’t sheep list a bunch of nonsense sentences they made the same way the OP does.
The rest of the sub follows the same pattern. Take 10 vague and cryptic predictions or statements from Q, interpret them to mean something connected to TPTB, they don’t come true, something else happens that looks related to one of the things he said, sub circlejerks that its happening and that’s what he meant all along.
1 DanIsSwell 2018-03-22
So, they basically use an ever changing formula to make it mean what they want, and they assume that Trump is taking all this time to use the same exact formulas for his tweets.
1 FauxMoGuy 2018-03-22
Almost. For example, q makes a post that includes “11:11” (make a wish lol) so he put Trumps next tweet in an 11x11 Grid. The one on the front page right now is 26xsomethinglessthan26, because trumps tweet was deleted and retweeted after 26 minutes. But the thing is, the grid size doesn’t actually matter in large part because in their mind the grid doesn’t need to make words, you only need to make anagrams of words and you can do so with letters both next to each other as well as above and below each other lol
1 Yeahson21 2018-03-22
proof?
1 shredzorz 2018-03-22
He predicted the Austin bomber being caught. Exact date and time
Do your own research. There's a lot of effort going into silencing platforms that talk about Q and shills here try to discredit it with the same lines and methods you'd see in r/politics
1 DanIsSwell 2018-03-22
How exactly did he predict that, and how far in advance? The exact day and time the Austin bomber was caught wasn’t even pre planned by law enforcement. In order to predict that down to the time, you would have to be in the bombers head (his future head) and know every thought and move he would make to lead to that exact moment.
1 dennisbergkamp10 2018-03-22
Sunday of Last Weekend I believe, he was spot on, really spot on. I'm still on the fence and keeping an open mind.
1 shredzorz 2018-03-22
https://i.redd.it/cb8ao0rx9bn01.png
1 troy_caster 2018-03-22
I dont think q predicted the bombers arrest. Again people talking leaps, well moreso than usual lol.
1 hillarys_cloaca 2018-03-22
I don't think it's a LARP, I think it's some sort of intelligence operation. As to who is running it and for what purpose, no one can say for sure. But it is fun to follow.
1 do-lop-qol-ob 2018-03-22
There isn't a shred of credibility. It's a LARP.
It's one that would've been dead on arrival had they not lucked out with Trump's Twitter going down for 15 minutes. He got really lucky with that.
Besides the Twitter shit, everything has been nonsense or information that was already in the news. People were going nuts over him "predicting" the arrest of the Saudi royalty, but weeks prior there were already questions as to why Kushner was taking an unannounced trip there. He only said "why is JK in S.A.?" Which anyone could have assumed would be realized eventually.
The thing that really makes me mad is how people thought the whole "4, 10, 20" shit that was "code" for DJT, as if a top secret government agent would consider numbers matching directly to letters as being a cool way to "prove" themselves.
All of that aside, why the Hell would someone with information for what would be the most significant revolution in modern history choose 4chan to expose details? That would be the stupidest fucking thing they could do.
They wouldnt ever disclose shit like this on any website, let alone a popular and easily-accessed clearnet forum.
1 DontTreadOnMe16 2018-03-22
I mean, just look whats happening to reddit. As far as anonymous postings go... 4chan would make the most sense. Least controlled outlet.
1 troy_caster 2018-03-22
Lol djt doesn't mean donald j Trump. You heard that from a simpleton or some YouTube channel lol. I have no rebuttal nor support for any of your other statements.
1 DanIsSwell 2018-03-22
So far, the evidence I see regarding Q looks like stretches and leaps. People say things like “I understand how it decodes to this, because I have spent countless hours researching it” But, how much “research” can you do to come to the conclusion that some plus symbols and numbers mean a particular thing? That’s not research, it’s guessing and speculation. A lot of it is stuff people have been saying for a while. The only straight out predictions that don’t require decoding, such as arrests and saying video will be released, haven’t happened, aside from Trumps twitter going down, which was just some disgruntled twitter employee, and how would a Trump insider have known about that ahead of time? They would had to have been personally involved in some way with that employee. It’s not like it was a top secret government action that had been perpetrated by deep state to shut down Trumps twitter for only 15 minutes. I’m thinking no on Q.
1 yellowsnow2 2018-03-22
He predicted the Austin bomber.
1 troy_caster 2018-03-22
No he didn't.
1 Crikett 2018-03-22
Proof?
1 dennisbergkamp10 2018-03-22
As far as I can tell he predicted the Austin Bombings, with a post last weekend stating Boom Boom Boom, enjoy the show.
I have to say, real or not, it's fascinating, I'd defiantly go watch the movie.
1 DanIsSwell 2018-03-22
Is that all he said to predict the Austin bomber? What do people think, that he had an inside connection with the bomber? If that was really the case, wouldn’t he have apprehended the guy before hand, or at the least warned the public? So, he KNEW the bomber was going to do it before it happened, and all he does is cryptically say “boom” a few times, followed by a heartless, sociopathic comment “enjoy the show”? Enjoy it? ....Really?
1 dennisbergkamp10 2018-03-22
Understand where your coming from and kind of agree, however, if you are playing chess against an opponent, shits going to go up in smoke, you can see the move being made and you let it go, then make your next move.
look i don't know, Since the last election has come and gone, the rules of engagement has changed given social media, This Q business could be one big Larp, However, real or not, a lot of people are glued into to this Q person, believing all that they are told, it's Genius actually, a way to steer and control a whole bunch of people.
For me this Q show would make a great movie, I'd watch to see both sides, it's strange, one moment I'm like this is BS the next I'm having a scratchy chin moment when the bombings happened,
It's all fucking nuts and interesting if you ask me.
1 DanIsSwell 2018-03-22
So, is Q on Trumps side, or is he a diabolical Joker maniac who somehow had foreknowledge of a murderous crime spree, and chose to do nothing but say “boom”?
1 dennisbergkamp10 2018-03-22
Some fucks believe its actually Trump at the beginning, Yes definatly a Trump creation or someone close to him with clearance to sensitive information.
Either way, true or not, Trump once again is looking clean and creating a magical mystery tour for a whole bunch of peopling following Q who look to Trump as their savior.
Again, stuck in the middle on this.
1 FauxMoGuy 2018-03-22
People on that sub don’t have agreed upon concrete theories on anything he posts, so anything can look correct in hindsight. Some currently believe he predicted the bomber getting caught because 4AM Wednesday was in one of his posts and that is when the bomber was caught, but when he mentioned a time and day he was referring to the time when MSM gets talking points from deep state (op mockingbird?) the BOOM BOOM BOOM post some people think refers to doj fbi and state dept taking losses. Could also be a reference to an injury reserve song. You can cold read a restaurant menu and get just as much info as many of his posts
1 DanIsSwell 2018-03-22
“The sub currently believes that George soros, Obama, and Clinton are all in gitmo”
Wow. I wonder what they’ll say when one of those people suddenly appear in public. Then, comes the conspiracy theories about body doubles.
1 troy_caster 2018-03-22
There are currently people who think Hillary has a body double in India. I don't think that came from 8chan though.
1 Luvs2Spooooge 2018-03-22
Q is yet another distraction from where we are all supposed to be looking.
1 Yeahson21 2018-03-22
i love that every single person who believe in Q in this thread has no given a single piece of evidence that Q did shit. only telling you that Q did predict it, now how, or when or anything? that should be your answer right there.
1 Afrobean 2018-03-22
They make "predictions" by being vague and cryptic. They don't even say "x will happen on Friday." They say "boom" and nothing more, but people read that as predicting that bomb in Austin despite lacking any kind of specific information. Misses are ignored, like when they've talked about politically connected criminals being secretly locked up, while hits are lauded as proof of them being correct or good or or useful or something.
1 troy_caster 2018-03-22
Q didn't predict the bombs. The booms have to do with news dropping like the McCabe firing and facebook getting exposed and such. 3rd graders over here "decoding" Lol.
1 vivek31 2018-03-22
Nothing at all. But any day now...
1 yokothespacewhale 2018-03-22
The actual prediction I remember (not the usual vague, code word stuff that was the usual bait) was that the Roy Moore election was some kind of trap to catch the dems rigging an election.
that didn't happen and I immediately stopped caring.
1 realityexposed 2018-03-22
They Want to believe
1 babaroga73 2018-03-22
"I sense there must've been some disappointment in your life before?"
1 devils_advocaat 2018-03-22
Tony podesta had his firm shut down and, given the number of sealed cases, we can't be sure he wasn't charged.
1 benjwgarner 2018-03-22
*cold reading
1 dennisbergkamp10 2018-03-22
Understand where your coming from and kind of agree, however, if you are playing chess against an opponent, shits going to go up in smoke, you can see the move being made and you let it go, then make your next move.
look i don't know, Since the last election has come and gone, the rules of engagement has changed given social media, This Q business could be one big Larp, However, real or not, a lot of people are glued into to this Q person, believing all that they are told, it's Genius actually, a way to steer and control a whole bunch of people.
For me this Q show would make a great movie, I'd watch to see both sides, it's strange, one moment I'm like this is BS the next I'm having a scratchy chin moment when the bombings happened,
It's all fucking nuts and interesting if you ask me.
1 FauxMoGuy 2018-03-22
People on that sub don’t have agreed upon concrete theories on anything he posts, so anything can look correct in hindsight. Some currently believe he predicted the bomber getting caught because 4AM Wednesday was in one of his posts and that is when the bomber was caught, but when he mentioned a time and day he was referring to the time when MSM gets talking points from deep state (op mockingbird?) the BOOM BOOM BOOM post some people think refers to doj fbi and state dept taking losses. Could also be a reference to an injury reserve song. You can cold read a restaurant menu and get just as much info as many of his posts
1 troy_caster 2018-03-22
Right. Inside information though. Nobody reported "They are going to arrest all the Saudi Princes tomorrow at 2:30 pm. Please wear business casual attire."
Q was harping on it like a day or two before it happened. "Look at that tree." Like I said, that's the best I have. If you're not satisfied with my answer, I can't really try nor need to convince you. Just thought this sub should hear from someone ankle deep in the Q waters, instead of hardcore Q worshippers (which he directly stated not to do, btw).