Newsflash, everyone in r/conspiracy, including the commie shills, know that the alleged chemical attack in Syria is a false flag. No one is buying the Establishment story.
The problem with propaganda.outlets like TDB is that they've lied and spyn so much that their information van reasonably only be considered unreliable. Are they right occasionally? Sure, as with any media outlet. However they've spun things and lied so much in the past that no reasonable person would trust their claims.
They actually have a really good track record, they dont just publish shit without verifying the sources and facts. Not everything is propaganda or on the same level as ShareBlue or Breitbart. I'd say it's on the same level as daily wire or national review
The one that did it for me was during the run up to the election when they claimed that Guccifer 2.0 leaked the DNC emails. But really, pick any TDB article, and even if it isn't outright lies it's spun so hard in favor of blue team that it might as well be.
The one that did it for me was during the run up to the election when they claimed that Guccifer 2.0 leaked the DNC emails.
That's has been found to be true... Guccifer has been identified as a Russian intelligence agent who was a part of the hacks during the campaigns
But really, pick any TDB article, and even if it isn't outright lies it's spun so hard in favor of blue team that it might as well be.
That doesn't even make any sense, if it's in favor of blue that'd probably be because of all the negative Trump coverage.. But that assumes he doesn't deserve the negative coverage in the first place. But he does
Please do your research before you spout off on this sub. Guccifer 2.0 was tied to some Russian nationals. However, he was completely unrelated to the DNC emails leak. Thise were leaked by Seth Rich.
I saw an RT (English) segment that aired before the attack, in which some translated Russian gov guys were saying they know there will be a rebel attack framed against Assad, and they showed footage of some civilians carrying around large white bags of something. So their word on it (no evidence presented) and unsourced footage.
Which is weird, cause even if they were right, that means they knew there would be an attack and didn't/couldn't stop it...but still had footage of who they believed would carry it out, and didn't stop them.
35 comments
1 aleister 2018-04-12
Removed. Rule 13.
1 Thy_Weapon_Of_War 2018-04-12
Why are you spamming communist Lamestream propaganda?
1 Datasaurus_Rex 2018-04-12
Best to push RT sources right?
1 Thy_Weapon_Of_War 2018-04-12
Newsflash, everyone in r/conspiracy, including the commie shills, know that the alleged chemical attack in Syria is a false flag. No one is buying the Establishment story.
1 Datasaurus_Rex 2018-04-12
and how do you know the false flag information is valid?
1 Thy_Weapon_Of_War 2018-04-12
For starters, because I know that the jewish-controlled commie Lamestream media, neocons, and Establishment are liars.
1 ShinigamiSirius 2018-04-12
Dailybeast? Check
"Conspiracy theorists!11!" repeated every other sentence? Check
White Helmets apology? Check
Russian trolls spreading conspiracies against White Helmets? Check
Main narrative is correct without any scrutiny? Check
Congratulations, OP, you're spreading propaganda!
1 talleyhooo 2018-04-12
You are spreading your own propaganda. Your post reads like an RT article.
1 ShinigamiSirius 2018-04-12
You got me champ, I'm on the RT payroll.
1 Datasaurus_Rex 2018-04-12
No your not, but you'll never admit that you've been fooled into peddling an adversaries propaganda.
1 dahdestroyer 2018-04-12
You mean The truth sounds the same?
1 talixansoldier 2018-04-12
No SS foh
1 rodental 2018-04-12
Who the fuck posts thedailybeast - a well known blue team propaganda outlet - to this sub?
1 talleyhooo 2018-04-12
Plenty of red team stuff gets posted here daily. What's wrong with some balance
1 rodental 2018-04-12
And I don't like that any better.
1 lohan0 2018-04-12
Wow! What a horrible accusation!
Can you show us the substantial evidence you have to back this up?
1 rodental 2018-04-12
Find me a single daily beast article that isn't pushing the blue team agenda and then we cam talk.
1 SirOliver_Clothesoff 2018-04-12
Wouldn't the important measure be the accuracy of the information, not which team it supports...
1 rodental 2018-04-12
The problem with propaganda.outlets like TDB is that they've lied and spyn so much that their information van reasonably only be considered unreliable. Are they right occasionally? Sure, as with any media outlet. However they've spun things and lied so much in the past that no reasonable person would trust their claims.
1 SirOliver_Clothesoff 2018-04-12
They actually have a really good track record, they dont just publish shit without verifying the sources and facts. Not everything is propaganda or on the same level as ShareBlue or Breitbart. I'd say it's on the same level as daily wire or national review
1 rodental 2018-04-12
Lolno.
1 SirOliver_Clothesoff 2018-04-12
What's one of the worst things you've seen them publish? Do they make up lies and spread them?
1 rodental 2018-04-12
The one that did it for me was during the run up to the election when they claimed that Guccifer 2.0 leaked the DNC emails. But really, pick any TDB article, and even if it isn't outright lies it's spun so hard in favor of blue team that it might as well be.
1 SirOliver_Clothesoff 2018-04-12
That's has been found to be true... Guccifer has been identified as a Russian intelligence agent who was a part of the hacks during the campaigns
That doesn't even make any sense, if it's in favor of blue that'd probably be because of all the negative Trump coverage.. But that assumes he doesn't deserve the negative coverage in the first place. But he does
1 rodental 2018-04-12
Please do your research before you spout off on this sub. Guccifer 2.0 was tied to some Russian nationals. However, he was completely unrelated to the DNC emails leak. Thise were leaked by Seth Rich.
1 SirOliver_Clothesoff 2018-04-12
Yet there is 0 proof of that and there is confirmation through indictments that guccifer is GRU
1 rodental 2018-04-12
Like I say, try doing some research, lol.
1 SirOliver_Clothesoff 2018-04-12
I have, stop listening to Q
1 rodental 2018-04-12
Well, no, you haven't.
1 SirOliver_Clothesoff 2018-04-12
Try doing some research
1 rodental 2018-04-12
I have. That's why I know what you don't.
1 SirOliver_Clothesoff 2018-04-12
Well, no, you haven't.
1 dahdestroyer 2018-04-12
Do they really think that the government tells trolls who they will gas?
1 paulie_purr 2018-04-12
I saw an RT (English) segment that aired before the attack, in which some translated Russian gov guys were saying they know there will be a rebel attack framed against Assad, and they showed footage of some civilians carrying around large white bags of something. So their word on it (no evidence presented) and unsourced footage.
Which is weird, cause even if they were right, that means they knew there would be an attack and didn't/couldn't stop it...but still had footage of who they believed would carry it out, and didn't stop them.
1 SirOliver_Clothesoff 2018-04-12
What's one of the worst things you've seen them publish? Do they make up lies and spread them?
1 SirOliver_Clothesoff 2018-04-12
Yet there is 0 proof of that and there is confirmation through indictments that guccifer is GRU