Yeah I hear you. Whenever we need to lean on someone else (Qanon, FBIanon, Guccifer, Dotcom) to inform us about the next conspiracy tidbit or rabbit hole...we're doing it wrong. We're doing it way wrong. They found a way to extract your energy. You should be using your energy for what suits you best. Conspiracy research is not a tier where "anonymous pseudo-idols" feed the lower class some work to be done. Come on people!

voat still down by the looks of it, been all day on my side..

Getting downvoted on a conspiracy sub for posting your theory... Welcome to “totally organic” Reddit. I don‘t have much interest in this video because it’s more than likely fake and I don’t use voat, but it seems silly to downvote a fellow conspiracy believer for posting their theory on a sub made specifically for exactly that.

Right, the bot armies are strong today

Wrong. Rumors of a Huma and Hillary with a child doing nasty things to it have been around since the Weiner laptop was seized, prior to the election, and prior to the appearance of Q.

I do agree that the hype around it lately seems to be just another psyop, though.

Yeah, I don't know whether or not the frazzledrip video is real or not, but those rumors did come out immediately after Weiner's laptop was taken. I saw these latest rumors and thought back to the original rumors that popped up here last year.

Yeah, I don't know whether or not the frazzledrip video is real or not,

Yes you do. You're too smart to hedge like this.

I'm not hedging though, I truly don't know for sure. I believe it's more likely that this is more partisan distraction from actual events, yes, but I've experienced enough in my personal life to understand that sometimes there's no gauging the level of depravity in certain individuals.

Do I think it's likely? No. Do I know without equivocation? No, no one does.

I'm not saying that to be deliberately obtuse and I understand the potential perceived implications to what I'm saying, but I meant nothing past what was directly stated.

Sorry if I came acorss as vague; the whole point of my previous comment was simply to state that these rumors aren't new, and were bouncing around here last year in the wake of the Weiner laptop/ NYPD rabble.

I appreciate the nuanced answer. I stand corrected.

I always assume others have like me, experienced 30 years of right wing smears on the Clintons and watched nothing come from any of it ever beyond the blowjob. I just can't take any new stuff with a straight face knowing that over that 30 years none of the salacious gossipy smears ever bore fruit.

ever bore fruit.

Well, Bill himself told people at a press conference that Hilary told him to tell people she was channeling Eleanor Roosevelt. I don't think a lot of the general populace knows of her occult side.

That does not prove the worst of the smears leveled against them: murdered Vince Foster, pay to play with CF, pizzagate, this shitty CT right here. All of it proven wrong and lies and yet, repeated ad nausea.

Proven is a strong word. How many normal people reference Molech? Seriously?

I don't like people who have a segregationist as a friend and mentor. I don't like people that open their arms to segregationists and name buildings at a state college after them. I don't like people who are friends with former Klan leaders and recruiters. Kiss them even. And no, not everyone deserves to be absolved of their past. Some things should not be forgiven and they certainly should not be forgotten. And these people shouldn't be celebrated as mentors. Crazy, hey?

I think you responded to the wrong comment or I'm an airhead and am lost.

I responded to the right comment. You mentioned smears against the Clintons and how none of them were proven or whatever. I just pointing out that I lost respect for the Clintons long before any recent years. I think it is inexcusable to have people like Robert Byrd and William J Fulbright as friends and mentors. Fulbright should not have a college of science named after him in Arkansas or any scholarship fund either. Beautiful eulogies should not have been delivered by the Clintons or any other democrat. They should never have been part of the Democratic party and they certainly should not have been collecting tax payer money as federal or state employees. Like I said, some things should not be forgiven and they certainly should not be forgotten. The repercussions of the actions of people like those two are still being felt today. Our leaders should not be calling them mentors. In it really inexcusable and I am justified in thinking so.

I just pointing out that I lost respect for the Clintons long before any recent years.

I don't necessarily love the Clinton's either. But I fucking loathe with the passion of a million suns, the right wing smear machine and its lies that keep us from being bipartisan in our corruption crusade.

Boy who cried wold for political gain muddies the waters for the real deal.

Pay to play with CF...isn't there an ongoing investigation by the FBI and the DOJ regarding this?

Has the investigation finished?

I form my opinions of people based on a comparison of their words to their actions. Go figure, I'm not all too fond of many in Washington, regardless of where they hang their hat. I do however try my best to base those opinions on the verifiable. I dislike Hilary for her hypocritical views on equality for women and for her war mongering most of all. She spoke of Libya and Syria as if they were inevitable scenarios. I do however have a strange respect for her openness regarding her opinions on the middle east; she didn't hide behind rhetoric in this instance like many other have.

The shifting "collectively understood" definitions of left, right, democrat, republican, liberal and conservative have left me in a position of having no idea which party best fits my personal system of ideals. All in all, I think we could stand to benefit from dismissing the vast majority of the familiar faces on capitol hill.

And now we're far from the point of the original comment, which was that these statements regarding this alleged video are nothing new. As a victim of abuse, I've got something of a stake in wanting abusers to be brought to justice. There were over 100 victims in the case in which I testified. It's more common than most believe, and often times it's a crime that turns the abused into an abuser themselves. It's truly despicable.

Forever trying to reconcile my hope that the sick are brought to justice while simultaneously trying to not let rumors shape my political views.

gtfo with this silly nonsense.

Wtf is Q trying todo? Get more downvotes than flat earth?

Agreement not an argument.

That seems interesting; but pedophile and human trafficking arrests are UP compared to previous administrations.

https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/40084/has-trumps-administration-been-making-more-human-trafficking-arrests-than-the-o

So what gives?

Also, I agree that blindly following a 4chan LARP without having your own boots on the ground is something between Lazy & delusional.

Now taking the fight directly to the enemy: Like this organization:

https://vets4childrescue.org/

Is a better angle.

Be the change you want to see in the world.

The work done to get us to where the arrests for human trafficking are up was done over the last decade in a massive upgrade to the police forces that work on this shit.

The definition of human trafficking has been amended to include prostitution. It has vastly changed the numbers. You're being played

But

what if,

it is indeed real?

https://qanonposts.com/

Whenever someone gives dates about some event occurring... they most likely either have a negative agenda or are parroting someone who does.

i agree

QAnon has served to create a furver of rabid conspiratorial oriented Trump support. It has also served to tell Trump people to "trust the plan" and trust sessions and even Mueller.

Trust nobody. And distrust people who ask you to put unwavering support of something unknowable.

At this point I could see Q being a protrump or antitrump psyop... But its goals could potentially even be mostly indifferent about Trump.

All I know is that it's not a good idea to wholeheartedly believe anonymous cryptic bullshitters on the internet.

There have been rumors of a compromising video featuring Hillary ever since the fall of 2016 when it was said to be part of an "insurance" discovered on Anthony Weiner's computer. That rumor did not come from Q anon.

The great thing about VOAT and the Chans is that it is completely decentralised and there is no single uniting figure that is then subverted and/or replaced as a controlled opposition or false figurehead. The Qanon thing is potentially an attempt to get round this.

We should be very, very skeptical of the source that claims to be Q, and all his/her information should be regarded as potentially compromised disinformation. The same as any other source. AS OP says, lets go back to methodically and comprehensively building a picture of the elites. We have rattled them and they have awoken to our threat (just in time too); and hence the shilling, D&C and attempts to leverage fracture points on the "alt-right" in general have been intensified to almost incredible levels. This is a psychological, memetic, and spiritual war we are waging and we are winning; but we have to remain vigilant.

The work done to get us to where the arrests for human trafficking are up was done over the last decade in a massive upgrade to the police forces that work on this shit.

The definition of human trafficking has been amended to include prostitution. It has vastly changed the numbers. You're being played