Trump pardons Dinesh D'Souza immediately following a meeting with Kim Kardashian about prison reform. what is the connection b/w kardashian and d'souza?
None, he just thinks it'll trigger liberals and it's a good distraction from the million other things blowing up in his/the administration's/country's face.
i appreciate the correct answer, but i was hoping for some of that r/conspiracy magic. you sure this doesn't involve some sort of sinister cabal or hologram moon or something?
I do think it's hilarious whenever celebrities etc. try to act like they know anything about stuff like prison reform. Seriously, what is KK even saying in that meeting? lol
So I guess other than the disproportionate influence wealth/fame gets you and that most people with one or the other know each other/are connected in one way or another, probably not.
I do think it's hilarious whenever celebrities etc. try to act like they know anything about stuff like prison reform. Seriously, what is KK even saying in that meeting? lol
What makes you think you know anything more than her? Because of your preconceived ideas of who she is?
Have you gone into the slums of LA to talk to actual homeless people about how they ended up homeless, what impacts their criminal history has had their lives, and how they're struggling to get back on their feet due to minor convictions years ago?
Kim has.
I do think it's hilarious whenever celebrities etc. try to act like they could handle being president.
I never said I was an expert. But I’d be willing to bet Trump could find 10 people more qualified than she and I combined within 20 miles of the White House daily.
Agreed. But "Trump meets with policy makers to talk about prison sentences" does not make as many headlines as "Trump meets with Kim K."
Kim isnt writing policy. Publicity and the public push for policies to be made by professionals (unfortunately they're fighting a bigger lobby funded by private prisons and led by fuckface Jeff Sessions).
she could be the worst human being ever, but she has millions of followers and lots of influence. Imagine if she were to tweet something about the elite or pizza gate. MSM would implode.
She doesn't have to say anything. There is a photo of them together that both will spin to serve their own purposes and that is 90% of what happened here.
Would you disagree? All they did was set up the system. We're the suckers crashing with it? They literally printed and released documents about their plan and still the public just goes with it.
I'm not saying it's hopeless and the world is ending. Never does. But. You don't think passive manipulation was their end game? As long as we stay on their financial system and follow their morals. They win.
Oh now I get it. New World Order from WWE. Haha. Yeah. Ya know. Enjoy your time I suppose. The world shall never end, but it can be oh so much more uncomfortable. Should you find yourself where most will.
During a emotional divorce his wife claimed he karate kicked her in the head. That's pretty crazy.
He is a conservative speaker, writer, and film makers. I guess that is why you call him a liar.
He was on probation for going over the allowed campaign contribution by about $5000 and accused of trying to set up strawman contribution to get $20k through.Which he claimed innocence. All by the Obama admin who he criticized heavily.
No, he pled guilty and stated that he knew he was breaking the law.
During the plea proceeding, D’SOUZA admitted before the Court that he caused two close associates to contribute $10,000 each to the Long Campaign with the understanding that he would reimburse them for their contributions and that he did reimburse them. D’SOUZA also admitted that he knew that what he was doing was wrong and something the law forbids.
It was a plea agreement. By taking a plea deal you are by threat admitting guilt instead of going to trial where you could be railroaded and face decades in prison.
If you read into the story more he contended through the whole thing that he was a victim of selective prosecution by the Obama admin.
Even if it was "selective prosecution" They selectively prosecuted a guilty person. A valid defense to a crime isn't to say "but the liberals do it too and they aren't all getting thrown in jail!" Claiming selective prosecution is admitting that you broke the law but you don't think you should be charged because there are other people also breaking that law without being charged. But "guilty guy plays the victim" is pretty funny.. what a cuck!
He pled guilty to the strawman donations, hence why he needs a pardon.
So are you going to claim anyone convicted under the Trump Administration, who criticise Trump, should be let off, even after pleading guilty?
What is wrong with all the mindless Trump apologists? Does "No man above the Law" mean anything to you anymore? This guy knowingly broke the law and pled guilty to it.
Why are you diminishing your argument with ridicule and insult? You were doing so good. LOL
When the DOJ of the presidential administration you have been criticizing heavily goes after you you are kinda of just fucked and should take whatever lenient plea deal they offer so you don't get water boarded.
So should we care when someone knowingly committed a crime or not? If they criticise Trump and get prosecuted by "his DOJ" then it must be Trump being corrupt? Conversely when "his DOJ" convict his campaign staff, no one can claim unfairness?
Looks like he's said/done some other pretty shitty/shady things to me. Also a bit of a hypocrite.
the Abu Ghraib scandal, for example, was actually the fault of liberals because the soldiers who enacted the despicable acts, Lynddie England and Charles Graner, were divorced, sex-crazed partiers who were therefore “act[ing] out the fantasies of blue America.”
Pretty rich coming from the man who got engaged and was allegedly sleeping with another woman while both were still married.
On May 20, 2014, the day the trial was to begin, D’Souza pleaded guilty to the illegal campaign contribution charge (taking the second charge off the table) and professed to take responsibility for his actions. The next few months would be critical, as the judge would be deliberating on the appropriate sentence. The moment called for humility. D’Souza enlisted 27 people—colleagues, friends, and family members in India—to write to the judge on his behalf. While they got busy attesting to his remorse, he began publicly conveying just the opposite. Brafman begged his client to keep his mouth shut, but D’Souza couldn’t resist.
What a nice forthright guy. Especially when he asked the judge to suspend his sentence so he could go on tour promoting a movie first.
Generally an inflammatory dickhole for the purpose of being one and uses the cover of an occasional accurate bit of insight to use it all to make money on books and tv hits.
Conservatives think Gays getting married ruins their marriage and that there's a war on Christmas....Americans are easily triggered and thin skinned, not just liberals.
yep that's me, excusing trump again. no reason my previous post saying basically "r/conspiracy might come up with something funny from this" should be treated as the minsinformation it is.
You said crimes of this presidency. I don't think russians buying facebook ads or someone who committed fraud years before can be counted as "crimes of this presidency".
The dude's campaign manager has been caught laundering money. His national security advisory been caught taking bribes from foreign governments in exchange for affecting our policies. His personal lawyer, and the RNC's deputy finance chair has been caught selling access to the president as without registering as a lobbyist.
But heyyyyyyyy I'm sure they were all low level people not connected with the administration or the president in any way. lol
So Trump pardoning D'Souza was to distract from process crimes that had nothing to do with the Trump Presidency? Something about your logic just doesn't check out. That shit might fly in r/politics, but not here.
Yes, being selected by Trump to be the nation's national security advisor, then influencing president Trump based on bribes you took from foreign governments has nothing at all to do with the Trump presidency.
A team of lawyers could find process crimes and technicalities on any halfway prolific businessman. Its telling that the crimes Mueller has found have nothing to do with the Trump Campaign or Administration. To me it looks like they are trying to give the investigation legitimacy with these inconsequential crimes, and it seems to be working on some people.
I disagree that our National Security Advisor secretly accepting payments from foreign governments to affect our military policy abroad is a crime of process/technicality.
If that was something that actually happened then you might have a point. In my opinion, you should carefully consider the fact that you are being subjected to propaganda before you decide to believe unsubstantiated bullshit because it confirms your biases.
I get why so many people are rabidly anti-Trump, and its because of shit like this. Propaganda is an incredibly powerful tool.
Flynn has admitted to lying to the FBI about taking $530,000 during the Trump specifically to represent Turkish interests should Trump become president.
Are you saying the FBI, Flynn, and bank records showing the transaction are all propaganda?
Flynn has admitted to lying to the FBI about taking $530,000 during the 2016 campaign specifically to represent Turkish interests should Trump become president.
lol how many fake r/politics propaganda pieces do you have up your sleeve?
I will help you out: Flynn pleaded guilty to making false statements that he did not discuss sanctions with the Russian Ambassador.
Flynn made a bad decision, lied to the VP about it, and was fired for doing that. No, that isn't a crime of the President because Flynn did that without Trump's authorization or consent.
And you're also cool with our national security advisor secretly accepting payments to advocate for foreign countries?
There you go again, you just can't help yourself! As I said before, this is bullshit propaganda and you should be more skeptical of the sources you use for news, because they are manipulating the way you think.
The new documents show Inovo wrote six-figure checks to Flynn's firm in September and October as he served as a top national security aide on Trump's campaign. The final payment of $145,000 came on Nov. 14, 2016, just days after Trump captured the presidency.
No, I'm saying that Flynn was lobbying as a foreign agent, which is completely legal believe it or not. USA Today is trying to manipulate you into thinking that this is somehow unusual and potentially illegal, when its not. It looks like they succeeded.
You could have just said that without linking the shady propaganda story. The truth is that he was covering his ass by registering as a foreign agent. He was actually lobbying for a Dutch firm but he was concerned that it could be construed as lobbying on behalf of the Turkish government through some tenuous connections. Probably a smart move on his part, since he has had a target on his back.
"Former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn pleaded guilty Friday to lying to the FBI about conversations with Russia's ambassador and disclosed that he is cooperating with the special counsel's office."
Although I don’t like Kim Kardashian, she does have a career and the whole Kardashian clan are pretty smart. I don’t see their show but I’ve actually read up on their successes. The fact that they’ve had a successful reality TV series for the last 15 years outta say something.
How am I wrong? Clooney isn’t a politician, he’s a celebrity. Just because he has organizations, that has nothing to do with what I talked about in regards to Obama and having celebrities meet him at the White House.
First link, I don't think you actually read.
"Obama and the Colombian entertainer met briefly after she had meetings with staff from the National Security Council and the Domestic Policy Council to talk about early childhood development."
And you second link has nothing to do with the conversation, it's just pictures with celebs, big deal.
As if Clooney’s humanitarian work is on par with that airhead’s ideas on prison reform. The man has actually worked towards his goals while this dumb bitch just found someone trashy enough to let her in the front door.
Did you even read the article of why she met with him or are you just talking out of your ass? Maybe if you actually read the article, you would understand. How many people met with Obama and talked about their own concerns and agenda? Give me a break.
I think what /u/socalfive is trying to communicate is "TRUMP!!!! BAD!!!!! (spittle)." He is, admittedly, confusing the message with pretend rationales.
ignoring the misuse of the words "film maker," now we are getting somewhere - but her sex tape is public, so no blackmail potential unless he has a second, secret sex tape where, uh, i guess kanye fucks jordan peterson
Everyone can laugh that a whore Kardashain is talking to the President about legit issues this country has. "Why is she there?!" When a lot of the people who find it laughable are the same people who love how many celebrity friends Obama and the Clintons have. And they love to hear celebrities opinions on political and social issues.
Also, the pardon for D'Souza means Rosie's in the clear, even though it appears she was never going to get in trouble.
Trump and Rosie feud goes back decades, via Stern show.
Trump pardons Dinesh out of left field.
Media goes in a frenzy overshooting criticism of his campaign donation violations.
Rosie is suspected to have done the same.
Trump’s 69D chess move shows liberal media bias.
dopers and insane-os? you are adorable. if i prompt you to tell me more about the kennedy's, do you promise to use weird outdated language, you ol' whore hopper, you
Who gives a shit if it's Kim k or anyone else, at least he's talking about prison reform which is a good thing.
There's literally a post several up from here talking about how we have the largest prison population in the world...and now your all whining bc someone wants to fix it.
As if Clooney’s humanitarian work is on par with that airhead’s ideas on prison reform. The man has actually worked towards his goals while this dumb bitch just found someone trashy enough to let her in the front door.
Yes, being selected by Trump to be the nation's national security advisor, then influencing president Trump based on bribes you took from foreign governments has nothing at all to do with the Trump presidency.
127 comments
1 ClassicFives 2018-05-31
None, he just thinks it'll trigger liberals and it's a good distraction from the million other things blowing up in his/the administration's/country's face.
1 evenflow5k 2018-05-31
i appreciate the correct answer, but i was hoping for some of that r/conspiracy magic. you sure this doesn't involve some sort of sinister cabal or hologram moon or something?
1 ClassicFives 2018-05-31
I do think it's hilarious whenever celebrities etc. try to act like they know anything about stuff like prison reform. Seriously, what is KK even saying in that meeting? lol
So I guess other than the disproportionate influence wealth/fame gets you and that most people with one or the other know each other/are connected in one way or another, probably not.
1 AlbanyHockey 2018-05-31
What makes you think you know anything more than her? Because of your preconceived ideas of who she is?
Have you gone into the slums of LA to talk to actual homeless people about how they ended up homeless, what impacts their criminal history has had their lives, and how they're struggling to get back on their feet due to minor convictions years ago?
Kim has.
1 ClassicFives 2018-05-31
I never said I was an expert. But I’d be willing to bet Trump could find 10 people more qualified than she and I combined within 20 miles of the White House daily.
1 AlbanyHockey 2018-05-31
Agreed. But "Trump meets with policy makers to talk about prison sentences" does not make as many headlines as "Trump meets with Kim K."
Kim isnt writing policy. Publicity and the public push for policies to be made by professionals (unfortunately they're fighting a bigger lobby funded by private prisons and led by fuckface Jeff Sessions).
1 Babble610 2018-05-31
kim got famous for releasing a sex tape with brandy's little brother.
Neither of them should be in the oval office.
1 FauxMoGuy 2018-05-31
kim has a net worth of 175 million and is a successful businesswoman. seems pretty savvy to me
1 Babble610 2018-05-31
her mother released the sex tape. exploited her children and signed them to an opportune tv deal with E at the height of the reality tv wave.
kim has done nothing to warrant any respect as a human being what so ever.
Her mother is the smart one. Kim was the figure head.
1 AlbanyHockey 2018-05-31
Trump got rich because of his dads fortune.
1 Babble610 2018-05-31
yeah hence the neither of them should be in the oval office comment
1 NYC_Subway 2018-05-31
she could be the worst human being ever, but she has millions of followers and lots of influence. Imagine if she were to tweet something about the elite or pizza gate. MSM would implode.
1 Dhylan 2018-05-31
200 feet.
1 NYC_Subway 2018-05-31
Good man...wish more people would prefer the truth instead of repeating the same echo chamber talking points
1 russianbot01 2018-05-31
She doesn't have to say anything. There is a photo of them together that both will spin to serve their own purposes and that is 90% of what happened here.
1 Weareone2 2018-05-31
No. The Cabal is just watching us destroy ourselves. They don't have to do anything anymore. The NWO is complete.
1 evenflow5k 2018-05-31
cool. i always like scott hall
1 Weareone2 2018-05-31
Would you disagree? All they did was set up the system. We're the suckers crashing with it? They literally printed and released documents about their plan and still the public just goes with it.
I'm not saying it's hopeless and the world is ending. Never does. But. You don't think passive manipulation was their end game? As long as we stay on their financial system and follow their morals. They win.
1 evenflow5k 2018-05-31
my point was scott hall was great. would you disagree? he had that great ladder match with hbk.
1 Weareone2 2018-05-31
Oh now I get it. New World Order from WWE. Haha. Yeah. Ya know. Enjoy your time I suppose. The world shall never end, but it can be oh so much more uncomfortable. Should you find yourself where most will.
1 yellowsnow2 2018-05-31
During a emotional divorce his wife claimed he karate kicked her in the head. That's pretty crazy.
He is a conservative speaker, writer, and film makers. I guess that is why you call him a liar.
He was on probation for going over the allowed campaign contribution by about $5000 and accused of trying to set up strawman contribution to get $20k through.Which he claimed innocence. All by the Obama admin who he criticized heavily.
1 reasonably_plausible 2018-05-31
No, he pled guilty and stated that he knew he was breaking the law.
https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/newyork/news/press-releases/dinesh-dsouza-sentenced-in-manhattan-federal-court-to-five-years-of-probation-for-campaign-finance-fraud
1 ClassicFives 2018-05-31
Thanks for beating me to the punch.
1 yellowsnow2 2018-05-31
It was a plea agreement. By taking a plea deal you are by threat admitting guilt instead of going to trial where you could be railroaded and face decades in prison.
If you read into the story more he contended through the whole thing that he was a victim of selective prosecution by the Obama admin.
1 kgt5003 2018-05-31
Even if it was "selective prosecution" They selectively prosecuted a guilty person. A valid defense to a crime isn't to say "but the liberals do it too and they aren't all getting thrown in jail!" Claiming selective prosecution is admitting that you broke the law but you don't think you should be charged because there are other people also breaking that law without being charged. But "guilty guy plays the victim" is pretty funny.. what a cuck!
1 StGabriel5 2018-05-31
The horror.
1 MoochiMoochiMooch 2018-05-31
He pled guilty to the strawman donations, hence why he needs a pardon.
So are you going to claim anyone convicted under the Trump Administration, who criticise Trump, should be let off, even after pleading guilty?
What is wrong with all the mindless Trump apologists? Does "No man above the Law" mean anything to you anymore? This guy knowingly broke the law and pled guilty to it.
1 yellowsnow2 2018-05-31
Why are you diminishing your argument with ridicule and insult? You were doing so good. LOL
When the DOJ of the presidential administration you have been criticizing heavily goes after you you are kinda of just fucked and should take whatever lenient plea deal they offer so you don't get water boarded.
1 MoochiMoochiMooch 2018-05-31
So should we care when someone knowingly committed a crime or not? If they criticise Trump and get prosecuted by "his DOJ" then it must be Trump being corrupt? Conversely when "his DOJ" convict his campaign staff, no one can claim unfairness?
Trump bringing waterboarding back?
1 OT-GOD-IS-DEMIURGE 2018-05-31
source?
1 ClassicFives 2018-05-31
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/09/dinesh-dsouza-avoids-prison-in-obamas-america.html
Don't see anything about him objecting to the claim he beat his wife, can't find anything about it either.
https://www.salon.com/2016/10/21/dinesh-dsouza-adulterous-felon-and-disgraced-academic-has-hit-a-new-low/
https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/newyork/news/press-releases/dinesh-dsouza-sentenced-in-manhattan-federal-court-to-five-years-of-probation-for-campaign-finance-fraud
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2015/04/dinesh-dsouza-video-life-after-conviction
Looks like he's said/done some other pretty shitty/shady things to me. Also a bit of a hypocrite.
Pretty rich coming from the man who got engaged and was allegedly sleeping with another woman while both were still married.
What a nice forthright guy. Especially when he asked the judge to suspend his sentence so he could go on tour promoting a movie first.
1 OT-GOD-IS-DEMIURGE 2018-05-31
thanks for this. I was unaware of this guy and his background besides seeing his name floating around
1 GobBluth19 2018-05-31
Now you see why trump is a fan
1 ClassicFives 2018-05-31
Generally an inflammatory dickhole for the purpose of being one and uses the cover of an occasional accurate bit of insight to use it all to make money on books and tv hits.
1 Clemson4Wheel 2018-05-31
Dont cut yourself on that edge little lefty.
1 ClassicFives 2018-05-31
Don’t hurt yourself thinking of an actual argument not ad hominem nonsense bud.
1 Clemson4Wheel 2018-05-31
Whats that? all i hear is ReeEEEEeee
1 ClassicFives 2018-05-31
I’m sorry. I confused you for someone with a working brainstem. But yeah making random noises is just as good as responding to what I actually said.
1 airzoom23 2018-05-31
He could literally do anything and it would “trigger” liberals. They are the most trigger prone folks on earth.
1 _JukeEllington 2018-05-31
Conservatives think Gays getting married ruins their marriage and that there's a war on Christmas....Americans are easily triggered and thin skinned, not just liberals.
1 airzoom23 2018-05-31
No one said anything to the contrary bud.
1 LurkPro3000 2018-05-31
My God how this sub has degraded.
1 Apersonofinterest666 2018-05-31
November 2016 was the mass triggering.
Scott Adams believes that it caused a serious mental health crisis on the left.
He also says to prepare for more when Korea announces peace on the peninsula.
1 airzoom23 2018-05-31
Oh yeah November 2016 was the Ultimate Triggering. It’s when the more extreme leftists completely lost their mind.
1 lroosemusic 2018-05-31
Low effort attempt at distraction from the real shortcomings and crimes of this presidency.
1 evenflow5k 2018-05-31
yep that's me, excusing trump again. no reason my previous post saying basically "r/conspiracy might come up with something funny from this" should be treated as the minsinformation it is.
12 more years of president maggot brain.
1 yellowsnow2 2018-05-31
And what "crimes" would that be?
1 lroosemusic 2018-05-31
How many guilty pleas are we up to?
At least that many plus whatever comes from the pending and sealed indictments.
1 yellowsnow2 2018-05-31
You said crimes of this presidency. I don't think russians buying facebook ads or someone who committed fraud years before can be counted as "crimes of this presidency".
1 lroosemusic 2018-05-31
Changed presidency to administration for ya.
1 yellowsnow2 2018-05-31
But none of the charges stem from acts committed during anyone's time as part of the administration.
1 lroosemusic 2018-05-31
The dude's campaign manager has been caught laundering money. His national security advisory been caught taking bribes from foreign governments in exchange for affecting our policies. His personal lawyer, and the RNC's deputy finance chair has been caught selling access to the president as without registering as a lobbyist.
But heyyyyyyyy I'm sure they were all low level people not connected with the administration or the president in any way. lol
1 RedYagoda 2018-05-31
So Trump pardoning D'Souza was to distract from process crimes that had nothing to do with the Trump Presidency? Something about your logic just doesn't check out. That shit might fly in r/politics, but not here.
1 lroosemusic 2018-05-31
Yes, being selected by Trump to be the nation's national security advisor, then influencing president Trump based on bribes you took from foreign governments has nothing at all to do with the Trump presidency.
Totally logical, what was I thinking?
1 RedYagoda 2018-05-31
Explain yourself then, because this sounds a bit like anti-trump hysteria bullshit to me.
1 lroosemusic 2018-05-31
He's surrounding himself with criminals in positions of high power. We may have to agree to disagree on whether this is an issue.
1 RedYagoda 2018-05-31
A team of lawyers could find process crimes and technicalities on any halfway prolific businessman. Its telling that the crimes Mueller has found have nothing to do with the Trump Campaign or Administration. To me it looks like they are trying to give the investigation legitimacy with these inconsequential crimes, and it seems to be working on some people.
1 lroosemusic 2018-05-31
I disagree that our National Security Advisor secretly accepting payments from foreign governments to affect our military policy abroad is a crime of process/technicality.
1 RedYagoda 2018-05-31
If that was something that actually happened then you might have a point. In my opinion, you should carefully consider the fact that you are being subjected to propaganda before you decide to believe unsubstantiated bullshit because it confirms your biases.
I get why so many people are rabidly anti-Trump, and its because of shit like this. Propaganda is an incredibly powerful tool.
1 lroosemusic 2018-05-31
Flynn has admitted to lying to the FBI about taking $530,000 during the Trump specifically to represent Turkish interests should Trump become president.
Are you saying the FBI, Flynn, and bank records showing the transaction are all propaganda?
1 RedYagoda 2018-05-31
lol how many fake r/politics propaganda pieces do you have up your sleeve?
I will help you out: Flynn pleaded guilty to making false statements that he did not discuss sanctions with the Russian Ambassador.
The other stuff is just bullshit propaganda.
1 throwaway1923791273 2018-05-31
So Flynn, the National Security Advisor hire by President Trump lied to the FBI about meeting with Russians and Discussions sanctions yes or no
1 RedYagoda 2018-05-31
There ya go, I'm so proud! Yes, Flynn lied about discussing sanctions with the Russian Ambassador.
1 throwaway1923791273 2018-05-31
So the Trump presidency did commit a crime?
1 RedYagoda 2018-05-31
No.
1 throwaway1923791273 2018-05-31
So in your mind, a member of the Trump team selected by Trump (and you admit committed a crime) isn't a part of the presidency?
1 RedYagoda 2018-05-31
Flynn made a bad decision, lied to the VP about it, and was fired for doing that. No, that isn't a crime of the President because Flynn did that without Trump's authorization or consent.
1 lroosemusic 2018-05-31
And you're also cool with our national security advisor secretly accepting payments to advocate for foreign countries?
1 RedYagoda 2018-05-31
There you go again, you just can't help yourself! As I said before, this is bullshit propaganda and you should be more skeptical of the sources you use for news, because they are manipulating the way you think.
1 lroosemusic 2018-05-31
You're saying documents submitted by Flynn's own team are some how fake and he is waging a propaganda war against, uh, himself?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/03/08/michael-flynn-received-530000-from-turkish-client-during-trump-campaign/98917184/
1 RedYagoda 2018-05-31
No, I'm saying that Flynn was lobbying as a foreign agent, which is completely legal believe it or not. USA Today is trying to manipulate you into thinking that this is somehow unusual and potentially illegal, when its not. It looks like they succeeded.
1 lroosemusic 2018-05-31
That you think it is okay for our national security advisor to be an active lobbyist for a foreign agent is pathetic.
1 RedYagoda 2018-05-31
You could have just said that without linking the shady propaganda story. The truth is that he was covering his ass by registering as a foreign agent. He was actually lobbying for a Dutch firm but he was concerned that it could be construed as lobbying on behalf of the Turkish government through some tenuous connections. Probably a smart move on his part, since he has had a target on his back.
1 throwaway1923791273 2018-05-31
"actually happened" didn't Flynn plead guilty for lying to FBI about this exact issue?
1 RedYagoda 2018-05-31
No.
1 throwaway1923791273 2018-05-31
"Former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn pleaded guilty Friday to lying to the FBI about conversations with Russia's ambassador and disclosed that he is cooperating with the special counsel's office."
1 Hitachi3 2018-05-31
Don’t leave the part out where the laundering took place years before the campaign. Kinda important lol
1 HTownian25 2018-05-31
Five? Six?
None of them are from Hitlery Killington, though. Sad.
1 lroosemusic 2018-05-31
smart criminal vs. dumb criminal
1 Globie2017 2018-05-31
I'm sorry, WHAT?
Donald J Trump ispresident of the United States and having meetings to discuss policy with Kim fucking Kardashian?
The world is so broken. Maybe the UK will vote Simon Cowell in as PM, who can then discuss foreign policy with the goddamn Spice Gitlrls or something.
1 pinchmeplease 2018-05-31
It’s just like when Obama invited Matt Damon to the W.H. and many other celebs. It’s not new or anything.
1 Globie2017 2018-05-31
Not new, but still broken.
At least the people you mentioned have a career in something other than having a gigantic arse.
1 pinchmeplease 2018-05-31
Although I don’t like Kim Kardashian, she does have a career and the whole Kardashian clan are pretty smart. I don’t see their show but I’ve actually read up on their successes. The fact that they’ve had a successful reality TV series for the last 15 years outta say something.
1 IHateCircusMidgets 2018-05-31
What's it say about her qualifications to discuss prison reform policy?
1 pinchmeplease 2018-05-31
https://www.popsugar.com/news/Why-Did-Kim-Kardashian-Meet-Donald-Trump-44892782
1 socalfive 2018-05-31
Wrong
https://enoughproject.org/upstanders/celebrity/george-clooney
1 pinchmeplease 2018-05-31
How am I wrong? Clooney isn’t a politician, he’s a celebrity. Just because he has organizations, that has nothing to do with what I talked about in regards to Obama and having celebrities meet him at the White House.
1 Tritiac 2018-05-31
You can almost say his acting work is secondary to his humanitarian work at this point.
1 MettaAhimsa 2018-05-31
Its not the meeting. Its the effect on policy.
1 thepottsy 2018-05-31
Pretty sure none of them were there to discuss policy. Feel free to correct me though.
1 pinchmeplease 2018-05-31
“President Barack Obama and pop superstar Shakira are talking about U.S. policy toward children at the White House.”
http://www.today.com/id/35524376/ns/today-today_entertainment/t/obama-shakira-meet-white-house/#.WxAKbspMGhA
1 thepottsy 2018-05-31
First link, I don't think you actually read. "Obama and the Colombian entertainer met briefly after she had meetings with staff from the National Security Council and the Domestic Policy Council to talk about early childhood development."
And you second link has nothing to do with the conversation, it's just pictures with celebs, big deal.
1 pinchmeplease 2018-05-31
Actually click on the pics. Clooney met with Obama to talk about Sudan.
Also, want to know the reason why she met with Trump? Maybe if you actually read this article, you’ll understand why.
https://www.popsugar.com/news/Why-Did-Kim-Kardashian-Meet-Donald-Trump-44892782
1 socalfive 2018-05-31
As if Clooney’s humanitarian work is on par with that airhead’s ideas on prison reform. The man has actually worked towards his goals while this dumb bitch just found someone trashy enough to let her in the front door.
1 pinchmeplease 2018-05-31
Did you even read the article of why she met with him or are you just talking out of your ass? Maybe if you actually read the article, you would understand. How many people met with Obama and talked about their own concerns and agenda? Give me a break.
1 Raptisoft 2018-05-31
I think what /u/socalfive is trying to communicate is "TRUMP!!!! BAD!!!!! (spittle)." He is, admittedly, confusing the message with pretend rationales.
1 socalfive 2018-05-31
“I love trump pardoning campaign finance criminals! law and order!”
-you
1 Raptisoft 2018-05-31
Absolutely! If lefties don't have to obey campaign finance laws, then I would pardon all non-lefties who got prosecuted as a matter of course.
Man, the left does not like it when their opponents play by the same rules, not one bit.
1 socalfive 2018-05-31
At least you admit to being a partisan bootlicker who supports criminals.
1 Raptisoft 2018-05-31
Non-partisan if you please. No prosecuting some people for crimes while others get the nod+wink.
1 BigPharmaSucks 2018-05-31
Clooney is likely a CIA asset.
1 HTownian25 2018-05-31
Isn't Clooney's wife a UN ambassador?
1 LurkPro3000 2018-05-31
Member when Gaga shook her booth for Hillary and Bill? What a proud American moment.
1 cathasyourtongue 2018-05-31
I thought it was an onion article when I saw it
1 Joe_Sapien 2018-05-31
Yeah, she belongs nowhere near the whitehouse.
1 Zarathasstra 2018-05-31
The world isn’t “broken” you just don’t understand it
1 DarthHugePenis 2018-05-31
Law an order president hiring criminals and pardoning them.
1 Upupabove 2018-05-31
Lol are you aware of how many people and the kinds of people bush obama and Clinton pardoned...
1 thepottsy 2018-05-31
Well, he's a film maker, and she has a sex tape?
1 evenflow5k 2018-05-31
ignoring the misuse of the words "film maker," now we are getting somewhere - but her sex tape is public, so no blackmail potential unless he has a second, secret sex tape where, uh, i guess kanye fucks jordan peterson
1 jhops77 2018-05-31
heh
1 FuckHimUpHisStupdAss 2018-05-31
Everyone loves a good comeback story.
1 everythingwas19 2018-05-31
It's a way to highlight more hypocrisy.
Everyone can laugh that a whore Kardashain is talking to the President about legit issues this country has. "Why is she there?!" When a lot of the people who find it laughable are the same people who love how many celebrity friends Obama and the Clintons have. And they love to hear celebrities opinions on political and social issues.
Also, the pardon for D'Souza means Rosie's in the clear, even though it appears she was never going to get in trouble.
1 evenflow5k 2018-05-31
i don't understand - please elaborate on both points
1 bronxboston 2018-05-31
Trump and Rosie feud goes back decades, via Stern show. Trump pardons Dinesh out of left field. Media goes in a frenzy overshooting criticism of his campaign donation violations. Rosie is suspected to have done the same. Trump’s 69D chess move shows liberal media bias.
... is one interpretation of this episode.
1 Zyklon_Bae 2018-05-31
Why the FUCK is the leader of the free world meeting with a old porn queen?
1 evenflow5k 2018-05-31
did you miss the stormy daniels thing? it's sorta his thing
1 Zyklon_Bae 2018-05-31
JFK was a prolific whore-hopper, but nobody cared as long as the nukes stayed in the silos.
1 evenflow5k 2018-05-31
nobody cared as long as the nukes stayed in the silos - im sure his family loved it
1 Zyklon_Bae 2018-05-31
Family? They were, and are, all degenerates. Whore-hoppers, bootleggers, Nazi sympathizers, insane-os, drunks, dopers..you name it. Oh, and murderers.
1 evenflow5k 2018-05-31
dopers and insane-os? you are adorable. if i prompt you to tell me more about the kennedy's, do you promise to use weird outdated language, you ol' whore hopper, you
1 Zyklon_Bae 2018-05-31
Do some research, Bubbles. That whole clan is fucked-up.
1 rednrithmetic 2018-05-31
Midas roll,'nother ho(le)
1 ashzel 2018-05-31
Probably a distraction from the Mexico/Canada/EU tariff shitshow.
1 i-Anomaly 2018-05-31
More votes, Duh!
1 Upupabove 2018-05-31
Who gives a shit if it's Kim k or anyone else, at least he's talking about prison reform which is a good thing.
There's literally a post several up from here talking about how we have the largest prison population in the world...and now your all whining bc someone wants to fix it.
Who gives a shit who it is.
1 LurkPro3000 2018-05-31
I would wholeheartedly agree with you if I didn't already know it's all a WE style shitshow.
1 socalfive 2018-05-31
As if Clooney’s humanitarian work is on par with that airhead’s ideas on prison reform. The man has actually worked towards his goals while this dumb bitch just found someone trashy enough to let her in the front door.
1 evenflow5k 2018-05-31
did you miss the stormy daniels thing? it's sorta his thing
1 lroosemusic 2018-05-31
Yes, being selected by Trump to be the nation's national security advisor, then influencing president Trump based on bribes you took from foreign governments has nothing at all to do with the Trump presidency.
Totally logical, what was I thinking?
1 HTownian25 2018-05-31
Isn't Clooney's wife a UN ambassador?
1 evenflow5k 2018-05-31
nobody cared as long as the nukes stayed in the silos - im sure his family loved it
1 rednrithmetic 2018-05-31
Midas roll,'nother ho(le)