RemindMe!

Defaulted to one day.

I will be messaging you on 2018-07-15 00:10:45 UTC to remind you of this link.

CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.

^{Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.}

I may be off on some of the details but there is a theory that a group of scientists aboard the plane shared a patent with the Rothschilds.

I heard about that over the possible cure for hiv but now we have names on two of the passangers And maybe find out if these guys can provide any further information like proffession maybe find a flight log if they where actually suppose to be on the flight or if they are decoys who there affiliated with etc etc

take a look at who Freescale Semiconductor was, and how many patent holders were on the flight, and who consequently got the patent after they all were declared dead

Go ahead, tell us. There's the list of passengers. Find out what patents they hold. Please be specific.

Can you be more specific on the exact info you want us to find for you?

bringsmemes is referring to a story which was posted on the internet not too long after MH370 disappeared, claiming things about Freescale patents that were issued the week MH370 disappeared. In truth, everything about the story is wrong: the importance of the patents, how patent law works, who owned Freescale. But most of all, none of the patent holders were on the flight.

So I was just challenging bringsmemes to find a patent holder on the list of passengers.

I see. I guess a viable question to ask is why did one of the Rothschilds inherit the patent not long after the disaster?

I guess a viable question to ask is why did one of the Rothschilds inherit the patent not long after the disaster?

They didn't. The patent rights for the inventions of Freescale employees belong to the company by virtue of their employment contracts. That's why Freescale is listed as the assignee on all the patents. The inventors assigned the rights to Freescale. Whether the inventors lived or died is completely irrelevant.

There's also no evidence any Rothschild had anything to do with Freescale.

Like I said, everything about this story is wrong.

Bam. My thoughts exactly.

I think its flight controls were hacked.

While back theories were posted/claims made that hackers could potentially hijack flights in mid air remotely. Proceeding to operate planes much like a drone except without being able to precision land without pilot assistance since no system in place to do that. But if you fly it till it's on fumes and go ok pilot here are your options land the plane on this strip or die.

It went north and landed in China/Russia. They hijackers faked the satellite data with a southern flight path to throw investigators off the trail.

Okay, you go with your feels. That's not like "guessing".

That's a pretty hypocritical was of thinking.. You can't confirm what they're saying so you're going to deny it? Yet no one on here can confirm what you're saying, yet we're supposed to follow your info like you're a trustworthy source?

Your information can be confirmed by no one credible which does not fill me with the confidence to just take your word for it. There are many holes in your articles and not enough evidence presented for me to believe your version is the complete story. You have completely disregarded or foolishly overlooked one key story in this puzzle, if have the ability to muster some intelligence to compile your info above I'm sure you'll enjoy looking into MA Flight 17.

Aww, thats a cute way of pronouncing hos butthurt you are simply because of someone not agreeing with your YouTube video.

I met a private jet pilot at a bar one night who flies various executives and celebrities around for a living, and he told me that “someone who would know” told him what actually happened.

Apparently, the pilots were moving something incredibly illegal and/or dangerous on that plane.he said they ended up releasing a gas into the cabin to put everyone to sleep, then they landed to drop off their cargo. After that, they took off again, and then parachuted out, leaving everyone to crash and die in the middle of the ocean.

Yeah I know it sounds crazy. That’s just what someone told me. At the very least, now you know what pilots are saying amongst themselves.

I'm sorry but for some reason the "did they swim home?" cracked me up a bit:)

and then the pilots died cuz it's very difficult to parachute out of a passenger plane

After watching a few docos about mh370, my opinion is UFO encounter. Not that I believe much in aliens and stuff (i have yet to see a convincing video record), but I can't think of any other fully convincing hypothesis.

I like the freescale hypothesis. However, there are too many things around this case that cannot make it a fully believable scenario. Why did all foreign authorities agreed to stay quiet ? Why would they crash a plane full of passengers just to get rid of these 4 chinese guys ? Organizing a plane crash seems overly complicated here. They could have got say, freescale to arrange a team building trip by bus, and have the bus fall over a cliff or something. Or even pay a hitman, or disguise a suicide, or poison the guys. Not a specialist of this, but that seems way easier to do than arranging a plane crash.

If it was about a guy (call him Mr Rothchild or whatever), getting their hands on a very valuable patent, why would authorities from other countries such as China, Malaysia, Thailand etc... cooperate with the official narrative ? What do they gain here ? They don't get a share of the patent rights, do they ?

Why would that British satellite images company (inmarsat) refuse to release satellite images with the plane flight path ? If it was about the pilot who committed a suicide, the blame goes on the now defunct pilot, doesn't it ? Malaysian Airlines gives a formal speech and say they are sorry for the loss, and case closed.

Why would this former French commercial planes pilot, who initiated to conduct his own investigations, say that his mate working at the French secret services "strongly advised him to give up" ? (this comes from a documentary I watched on YT).

To me, these 3 questions alone rule out the freescale patent scenario, however interesting that scenario sounds.

Another interesting scenario is a diplomatic accident. Like, the Americans at diego garcia accidentally shot down the plane. But that doesn't make sense either. Because, commercial planes leave a different radar signature than military planes, so you cannot take a commercial plane for a military plane. And I don't think you can "accidentally" shoot a missile. That must require several levels of approvals in the military hierarchy.

The other most plausible scenario (given the UFO can be called plausible) would be that the plane was shot down to move forward an agenda or to solve some diplomatic tensions between Malaysia and another country. You know, like when they do these false flag attacks in the UK, US or France, and they are meant to send a warning, or to push an authoritarian state agenda (=we need to record everyone's Internet activity to avoid any such attacks repeat in the future)

If it was about a guy (call him Mr Rothchild or whatever), getting their hands on a very valuable patent, why would authorities from other countries such as China, Malaysia, Thailand etc... cooperate with the official narrative ? What do they gain here ? They don't get a share of the patent rights, do they ?

Why would that British satellite images company (inmarsat) refuse to release satellite images with the plane flight path ? If it was about the pilot who committed a suicide, the blame goes on the now defunct pilot, doesn't it ? Malaysian Airlines gives a formal speech and say they are sorry for the loss, and case closed.

Why would this former French commercial planes pilot, who initiated to conduct his own investigations, say that his mate working at the French secret services "strongly advised him to give up" ? (this comes from a documentary I watched on YT).

To me, these 3 questions alone rule out the freescale patent scenario, however interesting that scenario sounds.

Another interesting scenario is a diplomatic accident. Like, the Americans at diego garcia accidentally shot down the plane. But that doesn't make sense either. Because, commercial planes leave a different radar signature than military planes, so you cannot take a commercial plane for a military plane. And I don't think you can "accidentally" shoot a missile. That must require several levels of approvals in the military hierarchy.

The other most plausible scenario (given the UFO can be called plausible) would be that the plane was shot down to move forward an agenda or to solve some diplomatic tensions between Malaysia and another country. You know, like when they do these false flag attacks in the UK, US or France, and they are meant to send a warning, or to push an authoritarian state agenda (=we need to record everyone's Internet activity to avoid any such attacks repeat in the future)