You are born with autism. If not, well then is a cure possible. But it isn't.

Maybe some are born with it. But the vast majority develop normally until around 18 months when 'something' happens then they regress.

Regressive autism is still regular autism and still can be detectable from the womb.

Autisim rates across various countries prove the vaccine angle likely bullshit.

Now look into the rates with SSRI and related drug use...

By their mother's?

While not required, you are requested to use the NP (No Participation) domain of reddit when crossposting. This helps to protect both your account, and the accounts of other users, from administrative shadowbans. The NP domain can be accessed by replacing the "www" in your reddit link with "np".

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[removed]

Doesn’t matter what context or where this is posted it is always downvoted instantly.

Great post.

Here is the publication that piqued my interest about this very topic:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273555319_Assessment_of_the_neurotoxic_effects_of_aluminum_hydroxide_vaccine_adjuvant_injections_in_mice

It states:

Until recently, no rigorous animal studies of potential aluminum adjuvant neurotoxicity have been performed, whereas Al is a known neurotoxin, and long-term persistence of Al vaccine adjuvants can lead to cognitive dysfunction and autoimmunity in presumably susceptible adult humans.

I find it hard to believe the claim that "no rigorous animal studies of potential aluminum adjuvant neurotoxicity have been performed." You also seem to believe these studies must have been performed. So I have been asking for your help in finding them. So I ask again, do you know where to find these studies?

Here are some other recent studies that make similar claims:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344667/

Despite their long use as active agents of medicines and fungicides, the safety levels of these substances have never been determined, either for animals or for adult humans—much less for fetuses, newborns, infants, and children.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318414/

The present paper will review these emerging characteristics of alum adjuvant particles that raise concerns about innocuity of this widely used compound.

So have these long used adjuvants ever been tested for neurotoxicity or not? If they have, where are the studies showing which injected doses are safe and which are neurotoxic in animals? It is a simple question. Can you help me answer it?

Because maybe these adjuvants are doing far more harm than good for some people?

https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/758323/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17308763

http://www.jpands.org/vol21no4/miller.pdf

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0162013413001773

The data shows that the more vaccines a state gives, the higher their rate of autism

There are no Benefits without Sacrifices!

When you have 100.000 Kids who survive “something” because they got Treatment (Vaccine) in advance you can (should) tolerate temporary a negative effect in 10.

Maybe 1 of the 100.000 is smart enough to find alternatives Solutions!

autism is 1 in 30 and it's permanent not temporary

You say "1 in 10" yet we don't actually know the number because Vaers is unreliable and we don't do studies like vaxxed vs unvaxxed, saline injection, or long-term health effects. The adverse effect relations is so unknown that in 2011 the Institute of Medicine did a report on over 150 commonly reported adverse events and found no data for over 130 of them, many of these had been reported since 1991.

You act as if you know for a fact that the benefit must far exceed the harm for every single mandated vaccine.

All I want is to see scientifically objective the cost and risk vs. benefit analyses for all specific vaccines. Vaccines are the only medical interventions routinely mandated for perfectly healthy individuals. As such, they must be held to a higher safety standard than all other medical interventions. If just one in one thousand vaccine recipients suffers severe reaction to that vaccine, this completely changes the cost vs. quality-adjusted life-year profile of a vaccine. Vaccine manufacturers are currently allowed to cook the books by designing and funding their own safety studies that use neurotoxic injections as "placebos". How can this be be justified in terms of experimental validity?

As long as you don’t understand the difference between individuals and the World Society as a whole as long this Calculation would be not valid!

A single Person do not have more Rights than a Hive, the Hive must be prioritized.

What's the rundown on the yearly flu jab. I'm close with our doctor and he's told me him nor his family get it. He said they basically guess the flu strain each year but usually its wrong. He says they're incentivised on it as well.

What else are they putting in this and why do they push it so hard?

The yearly flu shot is full of mercury

Sources for this? And what exactly does mercury do a person?

The CDC website admits which vaccines have mercury in, but they hide it under the name thimerosal which is a mercury contaiing compound. Mercury causes many diseases, it is a neurotoxin, increasing the risk of developmental delays and miscarriage.

There's a table here with the flu shots which still contain mercury

"Mercury is a neurotoxin and contained in some flu vaccines. It has been linked to neurodevelopmental disorders and many diseases. The World Mercury Project has pulled together these resources to help you make informed decisions about the flu vaccine in order to protect you and your family from harm." Source - website by the man who has just defeated Monsanton

Under Freedom of Information we see that CDC experts privately admit the dangers of vaccines, they admit that vaccines are causing neurological problems, speech delays and they warn the information must be embargoed.

http://www.aapsonline.org/vaccines/cdcfdaexperts.htm

Key quotes below:-

Dr. Johnston, pg. 14-15 & 19-20: "The data on its toxicity (shows) it can cause neurologic and renal toxicity, including death.”

Dr. Weil, pg. 24: "There are just a host of neurodevelopmental data that would suggest that we’ve got a serious problem." .... "the potential for aluminum and central nervous system toxicity was established by dialysis data. To think there isn’t some possible problem here is unreal.”

Dr. Verstraeten, pg. 31: "we have found statistically significant relationships between the exposure and outcomes for these different exposures and outcomes."

Dr. Verstraeten, pg. 44: "Now for speech delays, which is the largest single disorder in this category of neurologic delays. The results are a suggestion of a trend with a small dip. The overall test for trend is highly statistically significant above one.”

Dr. Bernier, pg. 113: "So we are asking people who have a great job protecting this information up until now, to continue to do that until the time of the ACIP meeting. So to basically consider this embargoed information."

Dr. Johnson, pg. 198: "This association leads me to favor a recommendation that infants up to two years old not be immunized with Thimerosal containing vaccines if suitable alternative preparations are available.” ... "I do not want that grandson to get a Thimerosal containing vaccine until we know better what is going on."

Dr. Weil, pg. 207: "The number of dose related relationships are linear and statistically significant. You can play with this all you want. They are linear. They are statistically significant.

Dr. Brent, pg. 229 "we are in a bad position from the standpoint of defending any lawsuits"

Dr. Clements, pg 247- 249: "that I am very concerned that this has gotten this far, and that having got this far, how you present in a concerted voice the information to the ACIP in a way they will be able to handle it and not get exposed"

Dr. Bernier, pg. 256: "just consider this embargoed information, if I can use that term, and very highly protected information"

It's basically worthless and it is needlessly mercury laden simply to save 11 cents a dose wholesale by using multidose vials rather than single dose injections. Ask any nurse you know about what he or she thinks about being forced to get it if you don't believe me.