QAnon has entered the dumbest timeline
1 2018-08-31 by argalarga
After not much activity, QAnon has made about 100 posts over the last few days, culminating with a torrent of nonsense about shutting down the CIA's computers and satellites. Oh, and making the NSA go away for good.
Obviously, this is idiotic. And not worth discussing. Except people actually believe it. R/greatawakening is full of Qultists declaring that the white hats killed the cabal, and that they'd die for Trump and that Q took out the CIA.
The longer this goes and the more insane it gets, the greater the chances it ends in violence. How does a rational person engage with those who actually believe that some 8chan poster knocked out spy satellites and supercomputers?
134 comments
1 tiberius_regulus 2018-08-31
You sound like a scared editor at the New York Times.
1 BKcam 2018-08-31
๐ค
1 tiberius_regulus 2018-08-31
๐๐ฆ๐โ๐ซ๐ป
1 toxic_piano 2018-08-31
How do you explain him predicting No Names death exactly 1 month prior, down to the exact minute?
1 AltWright 2018-08-31
Are you saying that Q is in the business or fortune telling?
1 toxic_piano 2018-08-31
That isn't what I asked.
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
I think the better question is how do you explain what you are saying? What do you think what you are saying happened means? How did Q supposedly predict McCain's death so accurately and what mechanism allowed for him to be so certain of the timing one month in advance to the minute? What do you think actually happened? Did Q kill McCain?
1 srroguelife 2018-08-31
They know when death is about to occur when someone is dying. The body starts to shut down, symptoms start and a process incurs. Q did not kill nor is psychic. I enjoyed researching evidence but quickly got off the Q train once all critical thinking went out the window.. ๐๐๐
1 GundalfTheCamo 2018-08-31
But it didn't predict death, only that he would be in headlines. There's been several mccain headlines in the past month.
Also it was off by a couple of hours.
So wrong time, and too vague. Several events could've made you day he was right. Conversely nobody on ga did say that it was death prediction until mccain died. Predictions that are apparent only after the fact are cold reading.
1 i-like-glitter-a-lot 2018-08-31
I donโt remember that, source?
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
He didn't. You guys interpreted it that way to satisfy your confirmation bias like everything else in Q world. The fact that he tweeted about someone being in the news a month before they die doesn't prove anything, especially when that person is terminally ill, and is twelve months into an illness whose average timeline for survival is 6-12 months. Anyone who is paying attention knew McCain was nearing the end, and happening to accidentally post on the month to the day of his death, statistically isn't that impressive or proof of anything at all beyond chance or coincidence.
From what I can tell the prevailing idea in the Q community seems to be that McCain was executed or something as part of this deep state coup and that is just fucking insane and based on nothing but the desire to be living in an alternate reality where Trump is the ultimate good guy, despite all visible evidence to the contrary. Use your brain, critically analyze this stuff, because I have yet to see a Q "proof" that can't be debunked through a few moments of critical thinking.
1 nisaaru 2018-08-31
Curious but what evidence is there that Trump is the ultimate bad guy as you claim. Please don't insult us with pissing and Russia stories now.
1 djh315 2018-08-31
Post a Q proof that holds up. Go ahead. It's impossible.
1 nisaaru 2018-08-31
Did you actually read the part of the comment I asked for elaboration or is that too much to ask? It wasnโt about Q.
P.S. sad the down/upvoter seems to suffer the same syndrome.
1 djh315 2018-08-31
He never said Trump is the ultimate bad guy, not sure what you're on about.
1 GamingHermit2k17 2018-08-31
Itโs almost like Q is an AI built to determine things. Seriously.
1 meridianblade 2018-08-31
I suggest you do some reading on Nostradamus and his "predictions". You Q degenerates operate like a religious cult. Your evidence is interpreting a drop by some random internet trolls / russians, then the next person builds upon that larp narrative as the next revolution and brilliance of Mr. Trump. Rinse and repeat.
1 carolus_martellus 2018-08-31
That never happened. Why are you claiming it?
1 ignoremsmedia 2018-08-31
Yeah those antifa, BLM folks are going to kick off again soon in their Q shirts. /S
1 asailorssway 2018-08-31
antifa and q tend to be unrelated... antifa is funded by soros, for one.
1 StefanYellowCurry 2018-08-31
Q is real (Israel)
Q is truth (awakening)
Q is time (patience is a revolution)
Q are coming (the March, March 2019)
strap in, comrades.
Q
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
I love how Q keeps changing the timeline on you guys but you never get suspicious.
1 StefanYellowCurry 2018-08-31
Q are so wrong
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
I also love how you Qs never have a logical or even remotely substantive response for being called out on his inconsistencies and falsehoods but always just double down on the brainwashed double speak.
1 YourHeadWillCollapse 2018-08-31
Maybe my read on u/StefanYellowCurry is off, but I'm pretty sure that he is just fucking with you.
1 StefanYellowCurry 2018-08-31
:-)
​
I thought it was obvious
1 YourHeadWillCollapse 2018-08-31
We have different principles and shit, but I still like your style. Have a good one.
1 carolus_martellus 2018-08-31
Funny how the timelines shift after each predicted date comes and goes without anything happening.
1 asailorssway 2018-08-31
yeah... NOTHING'S happened. clinton foundation is kaput, mccain has gone the way of the dodo... brazile has written an op piece where she acknowledges the LEAKS... all of the rothschild hotspots are undergoing weather events of catastrophic proportion... but yeah, NOTHING has happened.
1 djh315 2018-08-31
CF ended years ago, McCain had fucking cancer, Brazile acknowledged leaks but that doesn't prove Q in any way, and the Rothschilds have spots everywhere lol.
1 asailorssway 2018-08-31
you could research the rothschild holdings and cross reference weather events... but you wont. you could research why the CF flopped like it did.. fuck, even wiki has a couple blurbs about it. you acknowledge they were LEAKS, at least.
his name was Seth Rich.
1 djh315 2018-08-31
Seth Rich has nothing to do with this.
You're proposing that Q's team has weather control devices and have weaponized them against the Rothschilds, ignoring collateral damage?
1 asailorssway 2018-08-31
not q, per se.. but the patents exist.. and if the rockefeller's can fund and catelog byrd's explorations of antartica... i see the rothschilds having no problem constructing a few of these babies a hundred years later... https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/an-extensive-list-of-patents/
note the names on the patents. if you pay for the research.. you own the tech.
seth rich was the leaker... he has everything to do with this.
1 djh315 2018-08-31
I disagree about Seth Rich but that's a whole 'nother can of worms than Q.
So you think the Roths own the weather machines...but I thought you said the weather over their holdings was catastrophic?
1 asailorssway 2018-08-31
i think there are multiple groups fighting for supremacy.. the rothschilds have holdings that are under attack by those other groups. they have used them against people, they may be using them to cover up their own atrocities... but i believe someone else is focusing the energy.
1 djh315 2018-08-31
So the Roth's own weather machines and have patents but it's Q who is attacking them or maybe someone else?
1 asailorssway 2018-08-31
q isn't attacking anyone with weather machines. they may know who is, though. rothschilds own SOME patents on weather mod, other families own others.
1 djh315 2018-08-31
So something is attacking Rothschilds with a weather machine...that you went out of your way to show the Roth's patented...but it's not Q...but it someone proves Q?
1 asailorssway 2018-08-31
what are you talking about? there are weather modification machines. owned by the rothschilds, and some not owned by the rothschilds. if I know about the patents, Q probably does too. wtf?
1 carolus_martellus 2018-08-31
Top kek
1 asailorssway 2018-08-31
kek, the troll god? the babylonian deities? the siren call of reddit's brightest? por que?
1 ignoremsmedia 2018-08-31
"not worth discussing"
Why are you guys paying so much attention to a larp?
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
Because the President and the United States and his allies are knowlingly feeding into and using a baseless conspiracy theory that tells his followers he has a secret plan based on the cryptic ramblings of an anonymous troll on 8chan, and millions of people are not only falling for it but becoming alarmingly incited and indoctrinated to an increasingly insane and violent world view where the only human being they believe is Trump and Q. And even when Trump makes mistakes or does something they don't like they assure themselves that its not real and all part of their secret plan. Its getting borderline religious and we know that that sort of mindset and senseless devotion leads to violence and extremism.
1 nexusnine 2018-08-31
dozens of people....
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
Well 60 million people voted for Trump in 2016. Giving them the benefit of the doubt, lets assume only 1-10% of those people in spite being incredibly stupid, are actually stupid enough to believe in Q. At best that's about 600,000 people, at worst we are looking at 6 million people. Even if only a small fraction of those people decided to go full retard and try to start a revolt over the dethroning of their Cheeto Prince, thats a lot of stupid people who could easily be driven towards fanatical violence. I think if you go check out your local news comments section on fb or instagram, you will realize that insinuations of violence are much more common among Trump supporters/cultists than you would be comfortable with, a lot of these people have been getting pumped up by Fox news and the NRA for decades and have been fantasizing about using their guns in a scenario like this for a long time. Meanwhile the left is sitting there unarmed and too busy arguing about who is more oppressed and micro-aggressions to realize that they are totally unprepared to deal with an open political conflict that has gone past the tipping point of civility. I think there is a good chance things will get very ugly in this country before Donald Trump relinquishes power.
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
60 million people voted for Trump, from his rallies we can see a pretty high concentration of Q followers, but lets assume those people at his rallies are his most devoted followers and that only about a small portion of his supporters actually believe in Q. Even if the % was as low as 1% thats still around 600,000 people. I think from what I can see its probably closer to 5-10% of his supporters as a conservative estimate, so we are talking about millions of people here, and if even just a small fraction of that percentage decided to violently protect their dear leader when he gets booted from office we have a very bad situation on our hands.
1 Katerinavelikia 2018-08-31
your USA numbers are low...but you also do not include the rest of the world.
Germany Netherlands Canada Austrailia Iran Turkey Israel
Read the boards...Q is. World wide phenomena...we are sick of thr 1% controlling and stealing from the 99%.
Next year...you can reassess all the things you said on here.
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
You are being conned by the worlds greatest con man. In a years time you will know you have been taken for a fool. If you actually want change and equality Trump is not your guy, just look at his tax plan, his cabinet, all are for and of the 1%
1 Katerinavelikia 2018-08-31
The only answer to this is time...obviously.
Our respectful disagreement is a step in the right direction.
1 djh315 2018-08-31
Only answer is time because after a thousand+ posts you still don't have a shred of proof that holds up to even mild scrutiny.
1 skindoe 2018-08-31
What if you are wrong? What if there is a group of people who for years have control over the media, the intelligence agencies, many major corporations and there is a group of people who are using Trump to remove this even from power what would that look like?
Look into the family relationship between the people involved in the administrations of Clinton to now. Look into the people who investigated Hillary Clinton we're they truly unbiased? Look into the way that the media treats those who even remotely support Trump as opposed to those who are openly against him?
Is it possible that there is something here? If you aren't willing to accept the possibility now what would it take? "Evidence" or "Facts" only matter if you are willing to accept them.
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
Evidence and facts are real, whether you choose to live in denial of reality is a personal choice. Just ask yourself this question though, if there really was a group like you say there is who controls the most powerful halls of power, the media, the law, the courts, the deep state, everything, and they all really wanted Hillary in power and are out to get Trump, do you really think they would let Trump win the election by a margin of a few thousand votes in Wisconsin on the technicality of the electoral college? No, they wouldn't ever let that happen. So maybe the more rationale thought is that Trump is a liar, and Q is bullshit, since all evidence and logic would indicate so.
1 skindoe 2018-08-31
I didn't say the controlled half of those things. Being in power does not mean omnipotent or will stay in power. From dust to dust.
"Evidence" and "logic" mean what exactly? Groupthink and normality because those are hardly the standards of truth throughout history.
1 _-_-_-_-o49 2018-08-31
If it wasn't Q Anon, it would be B Gone or Z Unknown. These ppls are absolutely ripe for this . . . Quite Anon is just a symptom
Take down Q or whatever and some other mental virus will fill those idiot receptors
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
Too true, willful ignorance is a hell of a thing.
1 morkman100 2018-08-31
CongressAnon was a new one that people were chubbing up for recently.
1 YourHeadWillCollapse 2018-08-31
LMFAO, and where were you for Black Lives Matter?
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
You do realize BLM is a non-violent organization right? The whole thing is anti-violence. Whoever convinced you they were the boogie man sure did you a disservice.
1 skindoe 2018-08-31
The most brutal and violent of wars are fought with the most noble of causes.
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
Cool Thanos got any other lines?
1 skindoe 2018-08-31
Is what I said wrong?
1 sadmep 2018-08-31
Did you get the quote right, sure. Did you use it correctly in context, nope.
1 Gdfi 2018-08-31
Nobody other than random losers online are feeding into this. Especially not the president or any allies.
1 Spartan1117 2018-08-31
Because theres a good chance things will get violent. q "said" he would die for trump. That might make his blind supporters think that this whole thing is worth dying for. Who knows what that might do because of that. One of them already grabbed their guns and help himself up at a damn demanding the "real" IG report to be released based on q's lie that trump had a real one.
1 ignoremsmedia 2018-08-31
Wow that's what the mainstream media is saying ...verbatim.
Dam guy could be psy op (Like Q) and do you have the source where there ever was mention of violence in the Q drops?
1 BeshizzleAGenizzle 2018-08-31
" It won't be safe for them to walk the streets."
Suggestion of violence is obvious.
1 ignoremsmedia 2018-08-31
Once it becomes known what the level of criminality that has been perpetrated on the world at large it probably wont be safe.
George HW Bush said if the public knew what they had done they would be lynched.
I think Daddy Bush is central to a lot of the Intel dropped by the Q team. It's not a statement inciting violence it's merely stating the bleeding obvious.
1 BeshizzleAGenizzle 2018-08-31
Not disagreeing that such people are far from squeaky clean. However, use of an ambiguous collective " Them" is obviously a psychological primer that means "Anyone who doesn't think like you/us."
Composed of suggestive vagueness.
Such are good psyops everywhere!
1 djh315 2018-08-31
Except Q is fake, it's a LARP.
1 YourHeadWillCollapse 2018-08-31
Thanks for illustrating the danger in humoring busy-bodied idiots who think it is their business to police the community's speech.
1 YourHeadWillCollapse 2018-08-31
Maybe try worrying more about your lawn and a little less about everyone else's.
1 wittor 2018-08-31
i don't remember anyone asking you to participate in the debate, why wont you worry "more about your lawn" too sis?
1 YourHeadWillCollapse 2018-08-31
This is a discussion forum. That's how this whole thing works.
Welcome to reddit.
1 wittor 2018-08-31
yes! so why are you here to say things like:
who you think you are? is you who is here trying to say to people where what they should do.
i was just using your own words to questioning you.
1 YourHeadWillCollapse 2018-08-31
I'm sorry. Was that English?
I don't care for fandoms, nor do I bother much with their goings on. If people want to LARP revolutionary, then c'est la fucking vie.
Me, myself and I. No other that I'd rather be.
Why, "who you think you are?"
Broken diction to match your broken logic, nice. You're wrong though.
Maybe you think that. I don't know.
1 skindoe 2018-08-31
First of Q never said anything about Trump haing the "real" IG report it was about the redaction so you are the one lying here. And second of all using a single misinformed person to classify an entire nonviolent, apolitical (This is not a R vs D battle) movement with the catch phrase "We we go one We go ALL" as violent is extremely ignorant and the same type of argument a racist would use? Do you want to be in the same vein as a racist?
1 Spartan1117 2018-08-31
Remember the IG report that q hyped up last march? Not a single bombshell in it so q claimed that it wasn't the real IG report which trump actually had. You guys say its not an R v D battle yet all i ever see is people telling each other to vote for republicans and how republicans need to win the mid terms or its all over. I didn't say the entire movement is violent it was just an example of the violence that has already occurred.
1 skindoe 2018-08-31
Define bombshell. Even if it did would you accept it as one? The information in there certainly questions the credibility of the people at the top of the FBI and the entire existence of the Muller counsil.
You see what you look for in this life. You have to realize that while most of the supporters are Republicans since they grew up in Republican areas (same reason why Democrats are what they are you are a product of your surroundings) Q does not ever suggest that someone is better or worse depending on there party. The bias of the followers does not represent the position of Q and to act as such is a weak means of discrediting what really matters here Qanon.
This argument is similar to saying that Jesus was a sinner and a liar because the Pope's after him have caused thousands of wars in his name.
You are linking one person's violence with the the entire movement as a way to descredit it. Don't deny it it's clear as day. It's the same argument a racist would to call all black people idiots.
1 djh315 2018-08-31
Post a single Q proof that holds up to scrutiny. Go ahead.
1 skindoe 2018-08-31
Define scrutiny. Most of what you call scrutiny is made by people with a set conclusion in mind before they even read it. They haven't attempted to answer any of the questions that Q has asked and therefore there scrutiny is not real scrutiny which involves attempting to understand and question, but rather an attempt to find the first thing on Google that seems to question what Q has said and then use that as a means of saying it is all false.
Here's my favorite
https://mobile.twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/989928248921341952/photo/1
1 djh315 2018-08-31
What in the world is that proof of? That Q said the word gmail (one of the world's most top used mail clients) and then 2 months later Comey was using gmail?
1 morkman100 2018-08-31
Those NK predictions don't fare well nowadays.
1 Spartan1117 2018-08-31
Oh sorry, not a bombshell, there just wasn't anything there at all that was as big a q made it out to be. Just like the Nunes memo, just like the FISA report, just like the entire month of July. All things q hyped up that turned out to be duds but not to worry because like a good cult leader he has an excuse ready to go for why it didn't happen that time. "Trust the plan", "Disinformation is necessary" etc.
1 skindoe 2018-08-31
Think logically let's assume that there is the "bombshell" you are looking for and it were to drop discrediting the Mueller counsil and pointing out the incredible level of corruption involved.
How would it appear to the public? Why was the media mentioning a "violent coup"? Would they accept the truth?
Through what system must the corruption be systematically taken down?
Are there still key players involved in the corruption in office?
Define a cult. Who is the leader of this cult? Historically who has the word cult been used to describe? Does that apply here?
1 meridianblade 2018-08-31
You are not thinking logically, and are arguing semantics over substance. The whole larp of Q has been designed in a way to NEVER allow its qultists to accept anything but their narrative. If Mueller comes out with undeniable proof of trumps treason, qanon will say it's deep state taking down trump, and you're going to see violence.
Stop with the logical fallacies, your replies in this post is literally textbook "argument from ignorance" - shifting the burden of truth.
Think logically.
1 skindoe 2018-08-31
Do you not see the irony here? You are saying Trump's treason like it's a fact but yet you can't define it. If anyone questions it they get labeled all sorts of names. Everything you think the Q followers are doing you are doing yourself. This game is a mirror.
1 meridianblade 2018-08-31
Yes I see the irony here because that was literally my point, that no matter the outcome of the Mueller investigation, if it doesn't fit the Q narrative, then it will be rejected.
I said "if".
There is no mirror here, there is no flipping the senario. This is the argument between using real factual evidence with verifiable sources vs listening to an anonymous user who posts predictions vague enough that they happen by chance 2 months later and then call it some great "proof". Lets not forget they are posted on a Japanese imageboard where the majority of its user base are literally children, who think they are special enough that a "Q" level clearance guy is disrupting X-Box Live and Steam to send a message about the deep state. Do you realize how completely asinine that sounds?
My choice is for you to spare me of your rabbithole bullshit.
1 skindoe 2018-08-31
"Verifiable" sources your putting your faith in something in the same way that people put there faith in Q. More people believing something has no correlation to the truth despite what the media tells you. It only leads to groupthink and conformity a la Brave New World. Remember there was a time when people believed the Earth was the center of the solar system. Is it possible that you could be the one that's putting your faith in the wrong people? Only you can answer this question honestly to yourself. I'm not trying to change your mind just show you where I am coming from.
It's not the facts that sound completely asinine but the lens you choose to view it through. You can paint anything in any light you want you just happened to choose the asinine light.
1 wittor 2018-08-31
1 wittor 2018-08-31
this is a new level of denial.
1 skindoe 2018-08-31
What am I denying?
1 meridianblade 2018-08-31
It's not what you are denying, it's that you're not accepting you've been conned by a larp. Cognitive dissidents can be a real bitch to deal with.
1 skindoe 2018-08-31
What have I been conned to believe?
1 meridianblade 2018-08-31
That literally every argument you've attempted to make isn't a Red Herring.
1 skindoe 2018-08-31
A red herring from what?
1 realityexposed 2018-08-31
Seems to me this will fit the narrative (for the left) of Trump whipping up his base against Journalist and how dangerous that is... Personally I believe Q is complete utter nonsense and Trump (like ALL politicians) is merely a mouthpiece for some faction of TPTB. Honestly it really feels like humanity is splitting while many are "waking up" many others will go to great lengths to NOT confront realities that are pretty clearly laid out before them i.e. your Gov't is not your friend/protector, the MSM is always pushing an angle and lies much much more than they speak truth.
1 wittor 2018-08-31
an anonymous person on the INTERNET have control over a group of active, vocal and centralized people, and they are being radicalized by their leader.
but it is your country not mine... when they start to act there you can come here and ask us why no one was paying attention.
1 patrioticamerican1 2018-08-31
Quit using the word larp a larp wouldn't last this long his either real or a psyop Btw bold lettering doesn't make you argument any better.
1 ignoremsmedia 2018-08-31
Don't worry Patriot ,just trying to point out OP's statement that Q was not even worth discussing. (All this for a Larp?)
This post was just to try and cement the consensus that Q is a violent cult which it isn't.
Q is very worthy of discussion and is far from being a Larp.
1 argalarga 2018-08-31
Because it's turning more and more into a cult, and it's clear that whoever is behind the posts doesn't understand what they've created.
1 meridianblade 2018-08-31
They're starting to act like the Sparrows, the fanatic religious cult in Game of Thrones. They literally have the internet equivalent of prayer circles in the comment section on most posts in their sub.
1 meridianblade 2018-08-31
They're starting to act like the Sparrows, the fanatic religious cult in Game of Thrones. They literally have the internet equivalent of prayer circles in the comment section on most posts in their sub.
1 Sanbob555 2018-08-31
Let's not discuss this ; )
1 d3rr 2018-08-31
Who would want to die for Trump the democrat and Zionist? Poor bastards.
1 SP3KTR 2018-08-31
Whoa....is he grabbing him by the pussy
1 d3rr 2018-08-31
No, he's draining the swamp. Hhahaa
1 SP3KTR 2018-08-31
That is an amazingly olfactory image you created. Bills balls probably smell like cocaine and fat chicks
1 Lord_Eizo 2018-08-31
Someone hates Qcumbers, heh
1 sackajahweeda 2018-08-31
Not trying to get the hate flowing this early but what happened to Anonymous taking down Q? I couldnt care either way I kinda admire the moxie and loyalty of his....uh...fans? Was that just a way for Anon to jump on the qlicks?
1 Bjehsus 2018-08-31
They tried and failed. A few weeks ago somebody cracked Q's trip code and posted a friendly warning about remaining skeptical
1 sackajahweeda 2018-08-31
hummm Was that a solid attempt and fail or was that a type of gurilla marketing for the Qult?
1 Bjehsus 2018-08-31
I dunno, it's not the first time the trip has been compromised. Seemed genuine since it happened so soon after their declaration of war
1 sackajahweeda 2018-08-31
I just never know and cannot help but think hat these two orgs overlap to some degree.
1 Bjehsus 2018-08-31
Both are movements orchestrated by government intelligence, yes
1 Sukkitt 2018-08-31
Is this a deliberate sh*tpost? Or just a troll?
1 Spartan1117 2018-08-31
Nope, they actually believe q took down the cia and nsa today lol
1 srroguelife 2018-08-31
What? Your joking?
1 Spartan1117 2018-08-31
I wish
1 argalarga 2018-08-31
Little from column A, little from column B.
1 ShellOilNigeria 2018-08-31
Removed. Rule 10
1 fuckyouImnotnice 2018-08-31
The bulk of the human race is fed an illusion every single day.
I noticed this particular psy-op has its ideological opponents clamoring about the potential for "violence" when the inevitable let down/betrayal/impatience/boredom manifests.
So many social engineering projects in the USA seem to have violence or the implied threat thereof as their purpose.
If I was going to run a programmed "QAnon" shooter alter into a crowd for a mass transmarginal inhibition inducing event I would seed the notion with repeated predictive programming suggestions on forums and in the Corporate media.
1 argalarga 2018-08-31
Your what hurts?
1 Xaviermgk 2018-08-31
Yeah...you are REAL serious about the "danger".
1 swampdrainr 2018-08-31
Yes, Q is scary for the swamp. Larp or not.
1 TheMadQuixotician 2018-08-31
I love your continued obsession with Q.
1 456com 2018-08-31
Did your boss Soros tell you to post that? WWG1WGA
1 ShellOilNigeria 2018-08-31
Removed. Rule 10
1 WeAreTheResistance 2018-08-31
As someone who's been to GA and tried several times to try and shake awake people in Q-Coma's, this last post is actually pretty terrifying. When people start talking about dying for a cause there's no turning back at that point. The Q-cult is reaching Jonestown level derangement now.
When I saw the total let down of most of the community when Q said he had to bury the dirt on John McCain "for the good of the Republic" I was actually pretty encouraged and hopeful to see people starting to question their own beliefs.
That hope was completely shattered however after reading some of what can only be described as cultish delusions, when Q made his post about the NSA and spy satellites being gone.
1 argalarga 2018-08-31
It's really troubling.
1 meridianblade 2018-08-31
I think they're too far gone at this point, check my recent post history with a guy in this thread who was basically talking in circles on in a truths aren't truths tangent, with that very specific as a matter of fact cultists tone. No matter how you call them out, their response is either a whataboutism, deflection, or throwing the exact same question you just asked them back at you.
1 WeAreTheResistance 2018-08-31
I find it extremely frustrating to see a majority of answers there starting with "Well Q said", it's like they've forgotten how to critically think.
1 xolotl-tlaloc 2018-08-31
i don't think " National Reconnaissance Office" was ever referenced;
...am i wrong?
http://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news/u-s-national-news/3079-breaking-news-urgent-7-cia-mainframe-computers-down-spy-satellites-offline
1 argalarga 2018-08-31
KH-9 was an NRO program. It was nicknamed both "Keyhole" and "Big Bird." This is obviously what Q was talking about. He just didn't bother reading that it hadn't been active in 34 years.
1 claito_nord 2018-08-31
Man that subreddit is fucking losing it. So many posts were โWatch the news on Friday!โ โShit will hit the fan tomorrow!โ
Hmmmm
1 AltWright 2018-08-31
Are you saying that Q is in the business or fortune telling?
1 i-like-glitter-a-lot 2018-08-31
I donโt remember that, source?
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
He didn't. You guys interpreted it that way to satisfy your confirmation bias like everything else in Q world. The fact that he tweeted about someone being in the news a month before they die doesn't prove anything, especially when that person is terminally ill, and is twelve months into an illness whose average timeline for survival is 6-12 months. Anyone who is paying attention knew McCain was nearing the end, and happening to accidentally post on the month to the day of his death, statistically isn't that impressive or proof of anything at all beyond chance or coincidence.
From what I can tell the prevailing idea in the Q community seems to be that McCain was executed or something as part of this deep state coup and that is just fucking insane and based on nothing but the desire to be living in an alternate reality where Trump is the ultimate good guy, despite all visible evidence to the contrary. Use your brain, critically analyze this stuff, because I have yet to see a Q "proof" that can't be debunked through a few moments of critical thinking.
1 meridianblade 2018-08-31
I suggest you do some reading on Nostradamus and his "predictions". You Q degenerates operate like a religious cult. Your evidence is interpreting a drop by some random internet trolls / russians, then the next person builds upon that larp narrative as the next revolution and brilliance of Mr. Trump. Rinse and repeat.
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
Well 60 million people voted for Trump in 2016. Giving them the benefit of the doubt, lets assume only 1-10% of those people in spite being incredibly stupid, are actually stupid enough to believe in Q. At best that's about 600,000 people, at worst we are looking at 6 million people. Even if only a small fraction of those people decided to go full retard and try to start a revolt over the dethroning of their Cheeto Prince, thats a lot of stupid people who could easily be driven towards fanatical violence. I think if you go check out your local news comments section on fb or instagram, you will realize that insinuations of violence are much more common among Trump supporters/cultists than you would be comfortable with, a lot of these people have been getting pumped up by Fox news and the NRA for decades and have been fantasizing about using their guns in a scenario like this for a long time. Meanwhile the left is sitting there unarmed and too busy arguing about who is more oppressed and micro-aggressions to realize that they are totally unprepared to deal with an open political conflict that has gone past the tipping point of civility. I think there is a good chance things will get very ugly in this country before Donald Trump relinquishes power.
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
60 million people voted for Trump, from his rallies we can see a pretty high concentration of Q followers, but lets assume those people at his rallies are his most devoted followers and that only about a small portion of his supporters actually believe in Q. Even if the % was as low as 1% thats still around 600,000 people. I think from what I can see its probably closer to 5-10% of his supporters as a conservative estimate, so we are talking about millions of people here, and if even just a small fraction of that percentage decided to violently protect their dear leader when he gets booted from office we have a very bad situation on our hands.
1 carolus_martellus 2018-08-31
That never happened. Why are you claiming it?
1 YourHeadWillCollapse 2018-08-31
Maybe my read on u/StefanYellowCurry is off, but I'm pretty sure that he is just fucking with you.
1 SP3KTR 2018-08-31
Whoa....is he grabbing him by the pussy
1 FingerPrince69 2018-08-31
Cool Thanos got any other lines?
1 skindoe 2018-08-31
What have I been conned to believe?