The Rothschilds...Just how much influence do they currently have?
31 2012-02-21 by Negro_Napoleon
I heard they lost a lot of money in WWII, but do they still have as much money and influence as we think they do?
Are they really worth trillions?
31 2012-02-21 by Negro_Napoleon
I heard they lost a lot of money in WWII, but do they still have as much money and influence as we think they do?
Are they really worth trillions?
27 comments
27 [deleted] 2012-02-21
[deleted]
5 bumblingmumbling 2012-02-21
Jacob de Rothschild's daughter Hannah recently stated that the family motto is, "The only time a Rothschild should be in the papers is when they are born and when they die."
Look at who gets into Libya post Gadaffi. The Zionist billionaire Bronfman's. http://www.inlifo.eu/content/independent-libya-foundation-ilf-president-basit-igtet-joined-philanthropist-sara-bronfman-t
2 [deleted] 2012-02-21
[deleted]
3 bumblingmumbling 2012-02-21
I was wondering who all would be the beneficiary of the NATO bombing. Now it starting to emerge. http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/20/4277436/us-libya-chamber-of-commerce-announces.html
I am sure it is a tried and true formula. Take over the banking and media ASAP. Then gradually pull all the resources into their businesses, capital funds, ect.
I accidentally found this when someone posted about Adam Hock and the NY bar fight with some European royals. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Hock
This guy is out of Zurich. Sounds like a front man.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basit_Igtet
Social engineering too. http://www.sarabronfman.com/life-and-libya/
Lots of Libyan resources waiting to be gobbled up.
2 AmericanGoyBlog 2012-02-21
Go to the wikipedia page for Sara Bronfman.
Fascinating read.
4 [deleted] 2012-02-21
I heard about Nat Rothschilds recent lost libel case too.
13 [deleted] 2012-02-21
[deleted]
1 [deleted] 2012-02-21
Isn't it better to just start using silver instead of relying on a central bank?
6 krugmanisapuppet 2012-02-21
they have all the silver and gold. better to move beyond a currency exchange society.
1 Aarthar 2012-02-21
I am interested in this. What alternatives to currency would we use? Or are you suggesting we go back to bartering?
Tell me more!
3 krugmanisapuppet 2012-02-21
it is definitely a very interesting topic.
think about it this way - people can produce things at will, and take what they need, subject to overview and consent of the public. nobody ever gets stuck doing something they hate, and nobody goes homeless or hungry, and no businesses go crazy and destroy the world in search of profit.
it works just fine, if you can educate people about how to participate in it.
oh, and the initiation of nonconsensual force is banned. that's a prerequisite.
2 [deleted] 2012-02-21
Someone still has to mine ore, drill oil, pickup garbage, change old people's diapers...
2 krugmanisapuppet 2012-02-21
why do people do that now? compensation - the same principles carry over. are you going to be generous to somebody if they've been working in a coal mine for the last week?
2 [deleted] 2012-02-21
I for one think we should all spend a couple weeks in the mine. For humility's sake. And if you're claustrophobic, there's open pit mining.
2 krugmanisapuppet 2012-02-21
i can see where you're coming from.
2 gethereddout 2012-02-21
http://bitcoin.org/
We can't replace money and ending the Fed is gonna be tough. To me Bitcoin and other means for building our own self regulated economies are the solution, because they can coexist within this corrupted system.
4 S1LENCE 2012-02-21
PROVE TO ME THEY OWN THOSE CENTRAL BANKS.
this isn't impossible, public companies have to report their large shareholders. Show me Rothchilds that control the companies that own the central banks.
Whenever someone talks about the Rothschild conspiracy theories no one can actually cite real facts they just provide links to other conspiracy sites.
If you guys are seriously interested in having a huge circle jerk than grab the nearest dick and go for it, but seriously, I want some facts.
7 wycks 2012-02-21
They are not shareholders, they are lenders (bonds), which is very, very different. They lend banks/governments money, they do not invest in banks/governments or own them. This is their MO ( well besides diamonds/gold/bio-tech/pharmaceutics) and how they become rich. These are private firms with no publicly accountable information, so unless you break into their safes and find the ledgers you're not going to find shit for proof, they are not stupid.
5 krugmanisapuppet 2012-02-21
i'll tell you one thing, they view paper assets only as a medium for control, and precious metals (as well as land rights, properties, etc.) as "real wealth." and guess which one can be easily hidden?
here's are some good places to start:
http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm
http://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=FinalWarning&C=2.1#First
http://www.rense.com/general86/enemy.htm
http://www.theamericandreamfilm.com/the-cast/thomas-jefferson.php
the last two links actually credit Nathan Rothschild (the earlier one) with starting the War of 1812, due to the expiry of the charter of the First Bank of the United States in 1811. remember how there was a second war between the U.S. and Britain, a full 36 years after the revolution started?
i guess that's kind of a smoking gun. i'd definitely like to see a source for this quote:
Rothschild agents who help with the creation of a central bank are usually rewarded with money, or marriage into the family, etc..
2 joseph177 2012-02-21
They aren't public. Use Google finance and look up any fed bank to see.
2 0a0x0e0 2012-02-21
Reminds me of whomever controls the spice on Akrakis, controls everything ;)
1 nello1226 2012-02-21
No..... quadrillions.
10 9000sins 2012-02-21
The Rothschilds don't have influence. They are influence. They are money. All those people who worship money are literally bowing down to the alter of Rothschild. They have trancended beyond the power of royalty and religions. They are the new world order.
-2 bumblingmumbling 2012-02-21
The reality is that the USA was conned into fighting WW II to protect the Rothschild Zionist monetary system. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_system
"We were not foolish enough to try to make a currency coverage of gold of which we had none, but for every mark that was issued we required the equivalent of a mark's worth of work done or goods produced. . . .we laugh at the time our national financiers held the view that the value of a currency is regulated by the gold and securities lying in the vaults of a state bank." -Adolf Hitler, 1937 (CC Veith, Citadels of Chaos, Meador, 1949.)
"And it proved sound. It worked. In less than ten years Germany became easily the most powerful state in Europe. It worked so magically and magnificently that it sounded the death knell of the entire (Zionist) Jewish money system. World Jewry knew that they had to destroy Hitler's system, by whatever means might prove necessary, or their own [system of usury] would necessarily die. And if it died, with it must die their dream and their hope of making themselves masters of the world. The primary issue over which World War II was fought was to determine which money system was to survive. At bottom it was not a war between Germany and the so-called allies. Primarily it was war to the death between Germany and the International Money Power." --William Gayley Simpson, 'Which Way Western Man' (p.642)
-4 S1LENCE 2012-02-21
I have no doubt a group of shadowy figures control much of what happens in this world, however, I doubt it's a family of old money and lean more towards Washington Insiders who were at the healm of major corporations.
Look more towards Goldman Sachs and Haliburton and less towards The Masons, the Rothschilds, etc.
14 TheNewAmericanJedi 2012-02-21
I disagree, as Goldman Sachs and Haliburton are corporations that cannot print their own cash. They are still subject to the ebb and flow of central banking.
11 Slipgrid 2012-02-21
The Rothschilds created and facilitate the bond market. Much bigger than GS.
3 Itookapic_MWJ 2012-02-21
Goldman Sachs and Haliburton are the bishops and knights of the Rothschilds, but more likely the pawns.
2 [deleted] 2012-02-21
I very much doubt it. If it was Washington Insiders, they would not be destroying the US economy. And make no mistake about it, the US economy is currently being thrown to the wolves. All the wealth generated over the last few decades has been transferred outside the country.
1 no1113 2012-02-21
Listen to your user name.
2 [deleted] 2012-02-21
Someone still has to mine ore, drill oil, pickup garbage, change old people's diapers...